To post this article on Facebook, link to the TinyUrl seen below. Facebook will remove any article identified as coming from educate-yourself.org http://tinyurl.com/z3mqzyt
On 2/11/2016, Al Thompson wrote:
I would rather try to mitigate anything in a courtroom rather than work with the cops on the scene. They are extremely violent and a man can get killed or seriously injured to confront the cop on his own. He also could have his car stolen.
I got a ticket for "driving" without lights; I forgot to put them on pulling out of a local restaurant. I went in about sixty days later and when they called my name, I simply asked this question: "What facts do you have that the vehicle code applies to me?" The judge then entered a plea of not guilty and had me come back in 30 days trial. When I was in the courtroom the second time, the judge told me that she called the cop and told him not to show up. She said something like"It's your lucky day." It was more like it was her lucky day as I would have made a mess of their case in the courtroom. The "charge" was withdrawn. The reason is that they have no facts that show that the vehicle code applied to me. Rather than argue, I just asked the question. It's simple but the stress level in a courtroom is overbearing. Some judges scream at the people like an undisciplined toddler in order to get their way with the victim. If a person can get past that then the rest is easy.
What most people don't realize is that these laws do not apply to anyone and they have no facts to support their position. This exposes the violence of the government and that's exactly how they operate. The same question cannot be answered by the government people. In addition, when dealing with the government, it is very important not to answer any questions especially the one: "Do you understand?" An affirmative answer will start the evil process and a person will lose their case.
By shifting the burden of proof to the accusers will usually result in some effective damage control. My time was still wasted showing up to court, but it would be a waste of time to be arrested and have to go through the process from a jail cell. I've done it both ways and it's easier being able to go home afterward.
The most important and most effective defense in any court is to refuse the oath. Swearing oaths are like pouring gas on yourself and setting it on fire. I've written a lot about oath-taking on my blog and it is an effective defense. Without the oath, the court has no jurisdiction. Oath-taking is an essential part of the feudal-communist system.
(follow up email)
Here are the links about the oath that I have on my blog. If there was any one thing that I see that is of utmost importance is to avoid oath taking or signing any documents under the penalties of perjury. Oath taking is the conduit to the evil legal system. The Swear Not at All has a recording of a deposition I did in Feb, 2014 and I refused to swear an oath and completely messed up their deposition. I was threatened with jail if I refused to testify. I didn't refuse to testify; I refused to testify under oath. They cannot use unsworn testimony. Remember, oath taking violates the commandment forbidding the taking of the Lord's name in vain. It also violates the natural law as God is the only one with the power to swear oaths.
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.