I would rather try to mitigate anything in a courtroom rather than work with the cops on the scene. They are extremely violent and a man can get killed or seriously injured to confront the cop on his own. He also could have his car stolen.
I got a ticket for "driving" without lights; I forgot to put them on pulling out of a local restaurant. I went in about sixty days later and when they called my name, I simply asked this question: "What facts do you have that the vehicle code applies to me?" The judge then entered a plea of not guilty and had me come back in 30 days trial. When I was in the courtroom the second time, the judge told me that she called the cop and told him not to show up. She said something like"It's your lucky day." It was more like it was her lucky day as I would have made a mess of their case in the courtroom. The "charge" was withdrawn. The reason is that they have no facts that show that the vehicle code applied to me. Rather than argue, I just asked the question. It's simple but the stress level in a courtroom is overbearing. Some judges scream at the people like an undisciplined toddler in order to get their way with the victim. If a person can get past that then the rest is easy.
What most people don't realize is that these laws do not apply to anyone and they have no facts to support their position. This exposes the violence of the government and that's exactly how they operate. The same question cannot be answered by the government people. In addition, when dealing with the government, it is very important not to answer any questions especially the one: "Do you understand?" An affirmative answer will start the evil process and a person will lose their case.
By shifting the burden of proof to the accusers will usually result in some effective damage control. My time was still wasted showing up to court, but it would be a waste of time to be arrested and have to go through the process from a jail cell. I've done it both ways and it's easier being able to go home afterward.
The most important and most effective defense in any court is to refuse the oath. Swearing oaths are like pouring gas on yourself and setting it on fire. I've written a lot about oath-taking on my blog and it is an effective defense. Without the oath, the court has no jurisdiction. Oath-taking is an essential part of the feudal-communist system.
[Ken Adachi note: I'm reposting below an edited version of an audio recording that Al Thompson made at his depostion meeting with the US Attorney on February 11, 2014. I removed the gaps in the recording where no one is speaking and I increased the volume of the other participants (who are farther away from the mic) so you can hear their comments more distinctly. Al Thompson did a remarkable job here of holding his ground and not allowing the US Attorney to pull him into the UCC jurisdictional net where they have you at their mercy ( and trust me, these parasites have little interest in mercy, but much interest in profiteering at your expense). If Al was not as prepared as well as he was to rebuff the coersions and threats the US Attorney was making to him, then he would have crumbled and caved in as most UNIFORMED American citizens would do since most Americans do NOT understand the game being played in the federal, state, and municipal court sustems. The court systems are not really there to serve truth, honor and justice. That's the cover story that may have applied at one time in America's history, but it no longer applies today. They are there to fleece you of as much money and assets as they possibly can or throw you into their for-profit prison complex which makes money for all parties in the feeding chain, including the judge. You are there merely as the sucker/chump who is expected to pay the price for this profiteering in human misery. Here is the edited audio of Al's deposition:
You will hear that the US Attorney tries numerous times to get me to swear an oath and then tries to get me to accept the word perjury as just lying. You can hear me correcting him or letting him know that I know the difference between perjury and lying. Again, perjury is lying under oath. You will also notice how the attorney threatens me with jail time if I don't swear an oath. I could make the case that he was attempting to use extortion to compel me to swear an oath by threatening me with jail.
The Ultimate Evil
This is oath taking nonsense is the satanic way of evil men attempting to be gods. Only God himself has the power to swear oaths. My recommendation is to never, ever, sign anything "under the penalties of perjury" or swear any oaths. It will save you a lot of trouble."
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.