Fulgencio Batista, (Cuban President from 1953-59) was the Gaddafi of his day, creating a dangerous example of economic independence from the bankers.
The "revolutionary" Fidel Castro was nothing more than
a banker shill tasked with removing him and reducing Cuba to
penury and servitude, no different from any other US-installed fascist dictator.
Molecule: "The full story of Castro is even worse, but eventually it will come out. I'm actually already pushing the envelope -- the point is that Castro was on "the payroll" of Citibank and the CIA from the beginning."
[Makow Comment: I'm not sure what Molecule's sources are but his account seems plausible. After all the CIA and Communism are both instruments of the central bankers. If Castro was indeed CIA, we will look at modern history in a new light. The Bay of Pigs invasion, for example, was meant to fail, in order to discredit JFK and make Castro look good. A real US invasion of Cuba would have been justified. Now I understand why it didn't happen.]
As his appartchiks, Rockefeller hired the three stooges of the Caribbean, namely Fidel Castro, E. Howard Hunt and George H.W. Bush.
Rockefeller's Citi-Bank provided the financial support that Fidel Castro needed for his ouster of Batista, and that Rockefeller had profited immensely from Castro's fictitious "expropriation" of Moa Bay mining fields.
Castro received his training in the arts of economic terrorism and guerrilla warfare from US Army Special Forces, Col. William A. Morgan of Ohio.
Rockefeller maintained actual physical control of all of "Castro's" oil and mining operations. Meanwhile he collected extravagant profits from endless "Pentagon bailouts" by the U.S. taxpayer.
Castro was a Meyer-Rockefeller-Dulles lackey. With Zapata Oil as cover, he soon became Bush's favorite candyman. Castro was doubtless pre-briefed on the impending April 1961 invasion, by a clutch of clueless Miami Cubanos, who were lead straight to their slaughter in a perfect military gauntlet, a crossfire in a long and narrow bay of water at the "heel" of a unique Cuban landmass, in fact a marine swampland drenched in oil, known as the Zapata.
Air cover would have made no difference at all. The successful humiliation of JFK in the Bay of Pigs operation led straight to rumors of Castro's absolute Invincibility. Castro the Maximum was trained and armed by the Pentagon and financed by the CIA and Citibank.
The person who delivered his paychecks was a Ukrainian country girl, who lived in a small cottage in Greenwich Connecticut. As cover, she sold homemade soaps.
The CIA even put out rumors that hundreds of assassination attempts on Castro had all failed. If they were real at all, they were coordinated through Castro's business partners at Moa Bay Mining and Zapata Oil. With rumors like that, the comic-book status of Castro as "The Invincible One" was assured. The assassination of an American President soon followed.
Castro replaced Gen. Fulgencio Batista,(1901-1973,) left. In Castro's propaganda, Batista was characterized as a "racially impure" Cuban nationalist. Following the collapse in the Cuban economy in the 1930's, Batista crushed Marxist agitators, and established a constitution in 1940 based on the sovereignty of the Cuban people.
Cuba's new constitution was therefore contrary to Teddy Roosevelt's intrusive Platt Amendment of 1901, which attempts to ensconce an army of Zionist know-it-alls and Marine smarty-pants in "Gitmo," with the authority "to take any action necessary to protect Wall Street-Zionist interests in the Caribbean." (See Gen. Smedley Butler.)
Batista's 1940 Constitution asserted Cuban sovereignty over national currency for circulation. Batista chartered a Cuban National Bank, and an Agricultural and Industrial Development Bank, to finance internal economic development, intending to build up a stable middle class of inventors, intellectuals and professionals.
Under Batista, Cuba's natural agricultural productivity and machine tool inventiveness finally had support of a local government. Had Batista's nationalist policies been applied without Marxist-Zionist banker intervention, it would have revived the Cuban economy.
But the Marxist-Zionist pirate-bankers who always work through their monopolistic control of foreign trade. Castro's endless Cuban "trade deficits" were orchestrated to prevent any emergence of internal economic sovereignty, especially for agriculture (for food and health, not sugar and money) and for development of Cuba's immense mineral wealth.
Batista also made provisions to dissolve the extreme concentration of economic power in the hands of a few Zionist-owned sugar companies -- who by use of fancy lawyers, including Fidel Castro, and by compromised judges, had accumulated ownership of 70% of Cuba's arable land, thereby unleashing unstable (i.e. "Marxist-ready") populations of wandering tenant farmers, penniless wage-workers and peasants living by subsistence.
To prevent a Marxist-Zionist takeover of Cuba, by an internal insurgency using a "liquefied" and "Marxist-ready" population, Batista proposed educational reforms for the formation of a creative middle class, and for redistribution of the vast barren and unused lands of the "U.S.-owned" sugar plantations to Cuban family farmers.
In short, if the Batista model of Cuba were to succeed, it would have set a dangerous example for the economic potential of constitutional sovereignty, in Cuba, in the United States, and throughout the Caribbean and South and Central America. Batista's concept of Cuban national sovereignty had to be destroyed.
Quoting from the above mentioned CIA training manual, by Norm La Charite, "Castro was a rebel by and in reality long before Batista's second period of power. As president of the Law School student body, he became involved in campus politics, which many times reached violent proportions at the University of Havana. He was also one of the founders of Unión Insurreccional Revolucionaria (UIR), a terroristic organization [later to emerge as model for Al Qieda], which allegedly dealt in political assassination. Castro was arrested several times in connection with murder, but was never convicted. In 1947 he took part in an abortive plot to overthrow Rafael Trujillo, then dictator of the Dominican Republic. The Cayo Confites expedition, as it is called, was stopped before it got underway.
Many researchers propose that Castro was involved in the 1948 assassination of a popular Columbian politician, Jorge Eliécer Gaitán (1903 - 1948). It is widely speculated that Gaitán would likely have been elected President had he not been assassinated on April 9, 1948. Castro had attempted to recruit Gaitán earlier to his cause, but Gaitán had repeatedly declined and was assassinated because he was too politically influential and would have countered the Cold War objectives of the USSR in the Caribbean.
Gaitán was a Bogatá attorney who gained national popularity by successfully defending striking workers at the United Fruit Company. UFC was represented by Sullivan & Cromwell, a N.Y. City law firm of which John Foster Dulles was partner. (Dulles was also Sec. of State; his brother Allen was Director of the CIA; and John Moors Cabot, past president of UFC, was Asst. Sec. of State for Inter-American Affairs.) In his speeches, Gaitán distinguished between the "political country," which was controlled by an oligarchy through use of fictitious internal struggles, orchestrated between "Liberal" and "Conservative" factions, and the "national country," which responds to the real political and economic needs of a nation of people.
------------ Postscript from Molecule:
I did this research 20 and 30 years ago, so memory fails. It was before Wikipedia became a Mossad operation. A google search on Batista and smear job does however produce a book by a Humberto Fontova, titled "Fidel: Hollywood's Favorite Tyrant." Admittedly, the history of Caribbean piracy has been one of history's more complex hairballs ... shrouded in secrecy, starting with Geo. Washington's pre-revolutionary "holiday" in the Caribbean, as special guest of the future Wall St banker, the pirate Henry Morgan. It was on this trip that Geo. was introduced to the young boy Alexander Hamilton, perhaps as a catamyte, or travel companion. For Cuba in the 1940s and 50s, we jump ahead to Ramon Grau (pres. 1944-48) and Carlos Socarras (pres. 1948-52). Both had a few too many Rockefeller-Citibank and Bush-Texas mafia connections to pass my sniff test. Under Grau and Socarras, the NY bankers and their "mafias" were given free reign, and Havana developed into a degenerate hangout. Batista came forward to put an end to it.
The awakening came for me when I encountered, quite by accident, the above mentioned CIA training manual. (I take it that in their training programs, the CIA knows that their field agents need to know both the usual fictional history, fed to us by the mainstream media, and the real history, as known to insiders by the family names and connections, and by tensions and competitions between families and friends, of banker appointed leaders.) From page 27, we read in a CIA training manual, about Batista and the banks ...
"There were times when the government, prompted by protectionist-nationalist elements, encouraged diversification of agriculture and industry and attempted to solve the basic economic problems resulting from over-dependence on sugar production [i.e. on United Fruit]. But these efforts were ill-timed. During times of prosperity when the government had at its disposal the means and opportunity to diversify and expand its economic base, it failed to do so. Only during times of economic crises did it adopt remedial measures, which provided the motive but not the means for change. Attracted by greater and faster returns, private investors, both domestic and foreign, plowed their capital into sugar production [on their sugar plantations] and showed little or no interest in promoting and developing non-sugar export industries and home- market consumer goods for the home market.
"In an effort to expand Cuba's economic base the [Batista] government took on greater economic responsibility in the 1950s and established a number of credit institutions and a grand scale development plan.The National Bank, legally authorized in 1948, became fully operative in mid-1950. The Agricultural and Industrial Development Bank was established in 1950 to promote rural credit and industrial development. Many new autonomous government credit institutions flourished during the period up to 1959 [which is when Castro replaced Batista]. Batista's new Economic and Social Development Plan which included tax incentives and easier credit was put into effect in 1954 to reduce unemployment and increase production. This ambitious plan called for the expenditure of 350 million Cuban pesos (1 peso=1 dollar) over a 4-year period."
Batista was taking control away from the bankers. He wanted parity between the Cuban peso and the US dollar. He was using his Agricultural and Industrial Development Bank for "rural development." I'm not so sure that the mafia volunteers, or the CIA, told us the truth about Mr. Batista.
Batista's political enemies were Grau and Socarras, both of whom we now find out were "best friend" of the mafia. It's only logical the mafia suddenly volunteer themselves, to claim that Batista was their best friend. The smear job was on! It was also a means of creating a distraction around Castro, who like Grau and Socarras, Citibank and the CIA also kept on the payroll.
On the still unsolved assassination of Gaitán, there are some parallels between the assassination of JFK and the political trauma that it caused in the US, and the assassination of Gaitán and political trauma that it caused in Columbia, and South America. Basically, with their assassinations the bankers and the drug dealers rolled in and took over "da joints."
Like Henry, "I'm not sure what Molecule's sources are". But I´m sure communism is a very useful tool to big money and Fidel is one of those tools.
One example. Angola etc.
In 1974, the Portuguese authoritarian regime was deposed by a military coup. As a consequence, the Communist Party - infiltrated in the military - started a campaign to abandon Portugal's colonies in Africa: Angola, Mozambique and Guinea-Bissau.
With the independence, almost 1 million of white Portuguese that lived there had to abandon their houses, cars, businesses, farms, etc..
Marxist governments (MPLA in Angola, FRELIMO in Mozambique, PAIGC in Guinea) were imposed to the african populations, devastating their countries.
But ... surprise! The American oil interests in Cabinda (Angola) didn´t suffer at all!!
Gulf Oil Corporation (now Chevron) maintained its oil exploration in Cabinda with the Marxist government.
Try to guess who had thousand of soldiers fighting next to the communists during the ensuing angolan civil war, at the same time the marxist government protected Chevron?
Yes... Fidel Castro's Cuba!
About this, I recommend the late Prof. Antony Sutton work "THE BEST ENEMY MONEY CAN BUY". I quote him: « As succinctly stated by Congressman William L. Dickinson (July 1985), "These Cuban troops are protecting American oil interests and they are preventing UNITA from overrunning the MPLA."»
- one million of Portuguese citizens is deprived of everything by communists;
- Chevron is protected by the same communists;
- Fidel Castro's troops help the communists that help Chevron.
I can´t think about a better example to illustrate Molecule's arguments.
"Note the absurdity: the U.S. spent billions and sent 500,000 troops around the world to Vietnam to "fight communism," yet it wouldn't lift one finger to fight communism in its own backyard." See James Perloff in Comments section.
Comments for "Fidel Castro Was a CIA Agent"
James Perloff said (May 13, 2015):
The U.S. media and State Department worked overtime to put Castro in power. A series of articles by New York Times reporter Herbert L. Matthews (CFR) persuaded Americans that Castro was the George Washington of Cuba. Castro was featured on the Ed Sullivan Show https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjpnfDwWd7Y and Jack Paar. The best alternative-media book I read on Cuba was DAGGER IN THE HEART: AMERICAN POLICY FAILURES IN CUBA (1968) by Cuban exile Mario Lazo. He revealed why Cubans accepted the Castro takeover: the U.S. media blitz of adulation had convinced them that the best way to maintain friendship with America would be to accept Castro!
Earle E. T. Smith, who was U.S. Ambassador to Cuba then, candidly said: “To the contrary, Castro could not have seized power in Cuba without the aid of the United States. American Government agencies and the United States press played a major role in bringing Castro to power….As the U.S. Ambassador to Cuba during the Castro-Communist revolution of 1957–1959, I had first-hand knowledge of the facts which brought about the rise of Fidel Castro….The State Department consistently intervened—positively, negatively, and by innuendo—to bring about the downfall of President Fulgencio Batista, thereby making it possible for Fidel Castro to take over the Government of Cuba.” (letter to New York Times, 9/26/1979).
I also agree with Molecule about the Bay of Pigs and the failed “assassination attempts.” The U.S. military could have easily deposed Castro; the Cuban people would have fully supported it.
Note the absurdity: the U.S. spent billions and sent 500,000 troops around the world to Vietnam to “fight communism,” yet it wouldn’t lift one finger to fight communism in its own backyard (Castro’s island is only 90 miles from our shores). The CIA could also have easily had Castro assassinated; I have always believed the “attempts” myth was standard company PR disseminated as a “leak.”
I would be interested in hearing Molecule’s take on the 1962 missile crisis.
CO said (May 12, 2015):
I've always been extremely sceptical of the cult of Castro as a sworn enemy of US capitalism. If he was such a bête noire, how did he survive for so long right on America's doorstep? The New World Order expended huge resources in violently removing leaders they perceived as enemies of their interests in faraway countries, e.g., Mossadegh, Saddam, Ghaddafi, the Taliban, and many many more. Yet the logistically far simpler task of removing a ramshackle Marxist regime right next door has always been beyond them? I don't think so. The 1974 World Book encyclopaedia entry for Castro portrays him as an impossibly glamorous, macho character - and the World Book was always a reliable conduit for Masonic/CIA propaganda. And if American big business hated and feared Cuban Marxism why have they, over the last 45 odd years, promoted Castro's deceased sidekick, Che Guevara, as a western pop culture icon to rival Elvis, James Dean and Marilyn Monroe? Hollywood and the MSM have always peddled the notion of Batista as the corrupt buddy of American mafioso, but neglect to mention that many more mobsters aided the Castroites - including, incidentally, Jack Ruby.
McLeod said (May 12, 2015):
Molecule's" portrayal of Fulgencio Batista as some sort of saint certainly collides with the historical evidence of the mobbed up company he kept: Meyer Lansky, Lucky Luciano, Santo Traficante et al. -- all of whom had well documented postwar connections with the CIA. Forced to make a choice, I would say that Batista was far more likely to have been a CIA asset than was/is Fidel Castro. At the risk of insulting an anonymous contributor, "Molecule" exudes the scent of a troll, a "mole" in CIA argot being a deep cover agent whose job is to penetrate and confound the opposition
Peter said (May 12, 2015):
The strange book, The Carnivals of Life and Death, by James Shelby Downard, Feral House, 2006, has some interesting Castro background. Not indexed, 286pp. We are all conned on almost everything. My touchstone is.’The more bullshit there is, The more it is bullshit.’
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.