[Editor's Note: I wrote an article in 2006 titled "Undocumented Immigrants" to emphasize the Tavistock-created label used by Zion's media machinery to brainwash gullible Americans into believing that millions of illegals pouring in from Mexico and Central America who have taken away millions of jobs from Americans in landscaping, construction, hotel work, clothing manufacture, factory jobs, farm work, etc.; have burdened American taxpayers with the costs of paying for their schooling, health care, social services; and filled our prisons with their criminals, is somehow to be viewed as "good" for America, because we "are a nation of immigrants." However, illegal aliens who sneak into America are not immigrants. They are committing a criminal act and therefore can only be properly described as a criminal. I wouldn't mind Zion's media using undocumented, as long as it's 'undocumented criminals.' At least it's honest.]
By Henry Makow, Ph.D
May 14, 2015
dis·in·gen·u·ous: not candid or sincere, typically by pretending that one knows less about something than one really does.
Why is there no middle way between amnesty
and deportation? Why not give many of the 11 million
"illegals" in the US "guest worker" status?
The immigration debate is disingenuous because America has been subverted by the Illuminati, a Masonic Jewish satanic cult. Its goal is to use immigration to dilute and destroy the European Christian heritage of the US and the West in general.
Who ever heard of a nation that flouts its own immigration laws? One that terms people who jump the queue and enter illegally "undocumented immigrants." That grants these law-breakers "amnesty" and calls it "immigration reform."
These policies are normally associated with the Obama Administration; but aside from the Tea Party, the GOP endorses them as well. On Monday, Jeb Bush told Fox News' Megan Kelly that we need to show respect for illegal immigrants. We need to "fix the system so that legal immigration is easier than illegal immigration and show some respect for people."
THE ILLUMINATI AGENDA
Both parties are following the Masonic One World Race agenda. In his book Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism), Illuminati insider and EU founder Richard Nikolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi laid out this vision of the future:
" The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals. "
" Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit. This happened at the moment when Europe's feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to Jewish emancipation."
This agenda is playing out both in the United States and Europe. The Illuminati undermine the nations of Latin America, North Africa and the Middle East. They set off a tidal wave of northward migration as millions of desperate people seek a stable and prosperous homeland.
The Zionists conquered Palestine the same way, by migration. In the US and Europe, the object is to make Europeans a minority, and to create another political constituency like women and gays dependent on the Illuminati. It's called the "Cloward-Piven Strategy."
Were it not for Illuminati subversion, there is no reason these migrants would be consider "immigrants" and granted citizenship, the vote and social benefits. They could either be deported or registered under a guest worker program.
THE EXAMPLE OF CANADA
There are about 400,000 official temporary foreign workers in Canada.
"Our policy is that Canadians should come first for Canadian jobs," Employment Minister Pierre Poilievre said. "The April 1st deadline has been known for a very long time, and the purpose of the program is for it to be temporary. That's why they're called temporary foreign workers."
Businesses should increase their wage rates and hire Canadians if they're struggling to fill positions, he added.
THE US EXPERIENCE
Why is there no middle way between amnesty and deportation? Why not give "illegals" status as "guest workers?" I put this question to my Senior Correspondent Richard Evans who works with illegals in Texas:
"They do deport them, and it does take a decade or more for them to get citizenship. It's just that there are so many of them, so many loopholes, and so many NGO's such as the Catholics to harbor them, that most can go for years without getting caught.
It could all be solved - I personally think if they asked them just fill out a form to get a very EZ 'guest worker' visa, and provided them free bus transportation to and from the border, under the supervision of Mexican border agents, that would deal with the matter the way it actually IS. They're here. I see them working here every day putting up the new houses that going up like mushrooms around here. They are ubiquitous, part of the scenery.
The Media always glamorizes things and makes things black and white. Media portrays "the Immigrants" as if they were Rousseau's 'Noble Savage'. In reality they're like any mass of humanity; they range from nice people to criminals.
But I must say something that nobody ever says, but it's bloody obvious. These are the kind of people who would have never left their ancestral villages had their way of life not become unsustainable by corporate development and exploitation of labor by the dictatorships of the elites that own those countries.
Our government cut deals to get what they wanted from Mexico's patrons and Central America's elites to provide a steam valve for public pressure. Millions of Mexicans spend part of the year taking our money into the Mexican economy. If they couldn't do that, there would have been several revolutions in Mexico since 1980. "
Comments for "The Disingenuous Debate Over Illegal Aliens"
CR said (May 14, 2015):
One aspect of the immigration debate that seems to be largely overlooked is the effect on the countries that people are leaving. What happens when all the middle class and/or educated people leave? Sure, they might send some money home to relatives or friends but the end result is not good.
In Jamaica, 80% of university graduates leave the country. In Haiti, almost anyone with any money left after the earthquake. How do you think things are there now? The vast majority of people are functionally illiterate and have no formal training in anything. Crime is rampant. Things that these countries used to produce are now imported. The end result: more people trying to make money to leave the country, IMF loans, and NGO's controlling everything (in Haiti).
I work with a Haitian woman who left after the earthquake. She and her husband sold their house and had to pay the Canadian government basically all their money (around $13,000 Canadian) to be given permanent resident status. She says she would have been happy to stay in Haiti but life had become unbearable at that time, partly due to a massive crime wave involving constant robberies, kidnappings, and murders after all the prisoners were let go.
Rather than helping a few people who make it to our "rich countries", wouldn't it make more sense to try and help people in their own countries so that they don't have to come here and beg for help while things get even worse back home?
George said (May 14, 2015):
The immigration article is obviously correct as far as it goes. But there is another dimension. The populations of industrialized countries are aging. That means more people on pensions, some of them, such as bureaucratic government pensions, very lavish. The tax base to support those pensions is crashing, largely due to the falling earnings expectations of the young because of the shifting of the world's economic center to Asia, coupled with free trade, outsourcing, and the collapse of on-site retailing, among other factors. The solution is simple. Get rid of the useless eaters and demanding American youth though the slow-acting poisons of vaccinations, bring in a new stock of foreign cheap labor as the bottom layer of the Ponzi scheme, and profits soar as wages and pensions plunge. The problem is that while the destructive part of this agenda is working fine, the illegals are running up massive expenses of their own, refusing to pay taxes or shoulder any of the burdens of citizenship, and are shipping a large part of their earnings back home.
Al Thompson said (May 14, 2015):
I'm not sure this immigration issue is that complicated. I have a theory about it that I haven't seen expressed anywhere else. There has been approximately 40-50 million abortions in the United States since the late sixties and early seventies. This is enough abortions to cause a problem in with low population levels.
Aborted babies don't pay any taxes so then the intake of the government has to be grossly affected. However, immigrants will pay into the system when they find work. This could help to bolster Social Security and give the govtards even more money in income tax.
Some people say that peoople are "monetized". That each person has a cash value when they enter the system. Aborted babies never enter the system. By government supporting the idea of abortions, it inadvertently destroyed a part of its own cash cow. Aborted babies don't pay income tax; immigrants will.
My guess, and it is only a guess, is that the immigration is simply making up for the loss of population by reason of abortions. I don't think the "globalists" thought this one through. A small population will reap a small return in finances.
Can I prove it? No. But the reason they may be doing this is to benefit their own pocket book, and it has nothing to do with altruism. The old saying holds true to this day: "Follow the money."
I suppose I'm getting cynical in my old age. Governments are artificial entities with the power to steal. If you or I did this on our own, we'd be in prison. Yet, if the govtards do it, then it's okay. Government is a very destructive force and causes most of the problems for mankind.
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at firstname.lastname@example.org
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.