[Editor's Note: Reviewing the absurdities of the 911 cover
story is getting to be old. If, after four long years of independent investigation,
thousands of web sites and articles, dozens of books, videos, and taped
interviews, you still think the "terrorists did it", then you
have the intelligence quotient of a moron and nothing can be done to save
you, for your lack of brains and perceptive acumen will bury you.
If, on the other hand, you know very well that the entire
'terrorist' ruse and the events of 9-11 were a put-up job, then you know
that the media propagandists and mealy mouth promoters of the terrorist
ruse are themselves put-up jobs. You can accuse them of being agents or
paid disinfo spinners, etc., but I have the feeling that the bulk of high
profile radio personalities (and cover story defenders) like Art Bell or
Rush Limbaugh are more brainwashed than their brainwashed listeners who
buy into their spin. It's seems much more likely to me that these guys have
been mind controlled and programmed
to think and feel the way they do.
That makes more sense to me when you consider their apparent
emotional commitment to the naked stupidities and blatant contradictions
in the 9-11 cover story. Art Bell, in particular, has all the 'background
markers' shall we say, of the typical mind control candidate for government
programming: a self-admitted 33 degree mason, his parents were career military
(Marine Corps); Art himself spent ten years in the military (Air Force);
he has a fascination with a movie (Somewhere in Time) that has
a time warp theme to it and was thrilled to spend a week
at Mackinaw Island (set location for the movie) a few years ago and told
his listeners that he watched that movie over and over again. He just loves
watching that movie and can't get enough of it. Art even spent an entire
program interviewing Jane Seymour, co-star of the movie with Christopher
Why is that significant? Well, if you read Fritz Springmeier's
and Cisco Wheeler's book, The
Illuminati Formula to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Control Slave
, you know that movies with a time warp theme-such as The
Wizard of Oz or Alice in Wonderland, are used to program
mind control victims. While under mind control, hypnosis, or drug conditioning,
victims are required to memorize long sections of dialog and action
in these movies, for they act as cues and triggers in order for handlers
to call up certain alter personaities or behavioral traits that are being
inculcated. While in their normal, 'front' personality state, the mind control
victim doesn't know that the movie was used to program him, of course, but
he will tend to be fascinated by that movie and feel a compulsion to
watch it over and over again. I recently heard Howard Stern say the
same thing on the air. Stern told his audience that he watches a particular
movie over and over again, and he doesn't know why! He says it's
a dumb movie. He says that he's seen it a thousand times, and yet -for some
unexplainable reason- he feels compelled to watch it.
Finally, Cathy O'Brien mentioned in her book, Trance Formation
of America, that Mackinaw Island includes a secret government mind
control programming center where she was subjected to mind control programming
on numerous occasions. Just coincidence? Maybe, but let's just say that
it's something to consider as a possibility...Ken]
by Lisa Guliani
Posted E-Y August 11, 2005
Forward courtesy of Dr Kanya<DRKANYA@aol.com>
On Saturday, March 5th, 2005 I called Art Bell’s Coast to Coast AM
late-night radio talk-radio program - at least 50 times. I got through to
Art once, at approximately 1:45 am. God must have intervened because it’s
very difficult to get Art on the phone nowadays, especially when the theme
of his show is going to be debunking 9-11 conspiracies.
In addition to calling Art on the telephone, I also fast-blasted
him numerous times and sent him several regular emails with questions for
Ben Chertoff, research editor of Popular Mechanics. I had quite a few talking
points I wanted Art’s guest to address - like this one:
Explain the pools of molten steel burning 70 feet below street
level for 100 days after 9-11. Since we know the jet fuel burnt off within
a couple of minutes and jet fuel fires cannot even come close to the temperatures
it takes to create a molten or liquid state in steel, then how do you explain
This is addressed at length in 9-11 on Trial by Victor
Thorn. FEMA’s report even stated that the WTC fires burned at, or
below temperatures in a typical office fire.
So, if we know that hydrocarbon fires can only reach a
maximum temperature of 1517 degrees Fahrenheit, how could they
possibly have melted this steel, when the melting point of steel
is 2,795 degrees and the boiling point of steel (when it becomes
a molten liquid) is 5,182 degrees Fahrenheit?
The existence of these burning pools of molten steel were
- Mark Lorieux of Controlled Demolition, Inc
- Peter Tully, President of Tully Construction
- and the American Free Press newspaper
Please explain where these molten pools of steel came from,
because hydrocarbon fires are not going to burn in an oxygen-starved environment
as these underground fires did?
Art actually answered the phone when I called in during that
first hour. I was calling too early, he said. His guest had not yet been
introduced. I still laid out the above issue, and also mentioned that the
official version of the WTC collapses defy both Galileo’s Law of Falling
Bodies, and also Isaac Newton’s First Law of Motion.
He suggested I fast blast him with the information to help
him remember it. So I did. In fact, I emailed him many times, with different
talking points and pertinent scientific questions about 9-11. I made a concerted
effort to be concise, succinct, to stay on-point, and use no “conspiracy
I kept my finger on the speed-dial for four hours, alternating
between the three phone numbers he provides for listeners to call in to
his show. A few times, I heard the phone ringing, but Art never picked up.
Instead, after MANY rings, a recorded voice terminated the call. The rest
of my call-in attempts for the duration of the show were unsuccessful.
I made a point of depriving myself of sleep not merely to
listen to Art Bell’s program tonight, but to actively participate
and engage in some serious, scientific dialogue with both he and Ben Chertoff.
I waited and waited for him to broach the subject matter I had laid on the
table in the first hour.
Bell conveniently failed to do so, even though my numerous
emails and fast-blasts must have constituted a nice chunk of his inbox.
He never touched the points I made to him earlier in the show - but instead
allowed his listeners to be subjected to some of the most ludicrous, imbecilic,
incomplete disinformation I’ve heard since the “hologram theory”
first made its debut.
Chertoff and Bell had a helluva time disparaging and marginalizing
9/11 “conspiracy researchers,” and he made no bones about telling
everyone how “angry” he was to be labeled a traitor by a number
of people in his audience. Art himself gives legs to conspiracies such as
crop circles, extra terrestrials and shadow people, and appears to embrace
such “entertaining” conspiracies with a level of attention and
seriousness that is apparently more ‘worthy” of serious thought
than those of us who pose intelligent questions about the government’s
official version of what happened on 9-11.
In fact, Bell has allowed many of his past callers to ramble
on incessantly about ghostly experiences or stories about seeing dead people
- but tonight, he cut me off about 9-11 after just a very few minutes and
never followed up on my questions with his guest. Despite the impression
he gave (that he would address my points with Ben Chertoff), Art never bothered
to utter a word once his guest was in the hotbox.
The more Chertoff spoke, the more I realized that the team
of Popular Mechanics “experts” had absolutely failed to research
the most salient issues regarding not only the WTC tower collapses, but
also the anomalies surrounding the Pentagon strike and what happened to
Flight 93. I found myself asking aloud how Chertoff could possibly have
consulted with so many so-called “experts,” and then subsequently
present such lopsided unconvincing explanations to the public.
When the matter of WTC steel was raised, Chertoff said that
the steel was “weakened” by the heat of the fires in the towers,
which we were told burned at approximately 1800 degrees F. Absolute rubbish!
The maximum temperature that hydrocarbon fires will burn is 1517 degrees,
but the WTC fires never burned hot enough nor long enough in order to attain
this temp on 9/11. Chertoff was talking about the plasticity of steel. So
my fast blast to Art said the following:
“At 1022 degrees, steel reaches a point of elasticity,
and at 1320 degrees it attains plasticity. Elasticity means that when the
steel is bent, it returns to its original shape and will spring back. Plasticity
means that the steel is permanently deformed and does not return to its
original shape. The steel would have had to be heated to 1320 degrees to
be weakened to 20% of its original strength.
Since the fires did not reach any of the critical temperatures
needed to melt the steel - and didn't even come close to these temps, how
could the buildings collapse due to plasticity? The towers were rated to
bear five times their rated strength. Even if the steel was reduced to 60%
of its rated strength, it would still be able to support three-times its
rated strength and would not have been weakened sufficiently to cause the
The core columns were robust structures of steel and concrete.
If the towers collapsed due to plane impacts and subsequent fires, then
the 47 steel/concrete core columns should have been left standing. Remember,
the damage to the towers was NOT uniform and the fires did not burn uniformly."
I would have LOVED to get Ben Chertoff to answer the many
questions I had waiting for him, but regrettably, every single email and
fast blast was in vain. Art and Ben were apparently having more fun diminishing
the work of independent 9-11 researchers and mischaracterizing the whole
lot as “off their nut”.
Rather than selecting the most intelligent talking points
and laying them on the table, Bell chose instead to accept his guest’s
explanations as accurately “etched-in-stone,” when in fact,
they are not. A number of callers did manage to get through, and almost
none of them were buying Chertoff’s asinine assertions. He was pressed
about the annoying little fact that several of the 9/11 hijackers have been
found to be alive when they’re allegedly dead (at least according
to the government).
In response, he replied that this is an unsubstantiated rumor
which started with a BBC report, yet failed to mention the meticulous research
of David Ray Griffin, which presents credible evidence that many of the
so-called “dead” suicide hijackers are indeed, still alive in
other countries. Chertoff tells the audience that his team didn’t
really get into investigating that part of the story. Why not?
Another caller broached the subject of government foreknowledge
of 9-11 and how certain officials were warned not to fly. We must add this
to the “gray area” because Popular Mechanics failed to look
into this as well, and Chertoff could not even remotely answer the question.
Callers continued to back him into a corner as the night wore on, despite
Bell’s official 9-11 government ass-kissing and his ongoing snide
commentary, repeatedly referring to conspiracy theorists as “wing-nuts”.
The topic of the Pentagon strike was also presented, and here
we all got to witness some really blatant lying on the part of Chertoff.
My fingers were burning into my keyboard and phone pad as I listened to
him spout off that Flight 77 actually hit the Pentagon, and the subsequent
shinola about damage to the Pentagon lawn.
Excuse me, Mr. Chertoff - what damage might this be? Are we
looking at the same photos? Where exactly are the scorch-and-burn marks
you’re talking about? Whose lawn is he looking at? Chertoff’s
Pentagon non-explanations were so outlandish, it’s no wonder people
have an easier time believing in shadow people.
The Popular Mechanics editor casually cited evidence of plane
wreckage and bodies of victims at the crash scene. Hello? Bodies? What bodies?
Are we examining the same crime scene? Mr. Chertoff, could you please point
out to me even ONE dead body found at the Pentagon on 9/11? Who’s
“off their nut” here?
Still another caller pointed to the five frames of video footage
which have been the subject of intense scrutiny over the last few years
- you know, the doctored frames with the incorrect date stamp that do not
show any jetliner? Again, we were told by Chertoff that this is terrain
that the “experts” of Popular Mechanics have yet to traverse.
What are they waiting for - a formal invitation? Furthermore,
he sidestepped around the FBI’s utter failure to release the videotapes
seized from surrounding entities like the Citgo gas station, Sheraton Hotel,
Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles, and the Pentagon’s own videos.
According to the sputtering Chertoff, this is understandable because the
Pentagon strike is still under official investigation. No kidding –
an “official” investigation, huh?
Wow, who could tell? I really wanted to ask him what his ‘team”
had discovered regarding the Pentagon jetliner in light of the fact that
the FBI first said the entire plane had vaporized, and then did a complete
180 and later said that they have reconstructed nearly all of the aircraft
and are storing it in an FBI hangar.
Has Chertoff, or any of his crack investigative team, examined
this alleged evidence? The only time I ever hear this subject brought up
is among independent investigators and researchers. Not surprisingly, it
wasn’t discussed on Art Bell’s show.
Chertoff must be privy to some inside scoops the rest of us
aren’t worthy to know, although he seemed rather clueless about his
own family tree. Perhaps the most laughable claim made by Chertoff during
this broadcast was his unconvincing dismissal when questioned about his
familial tie to Michael Chertoff, the new homeland security czar.
You see, it’s now known that Ben is Michael Chertoff’s
cousin (surprise, surprise!) according to Christopher Bollyn of the American
Free Press newspaper. Bollyn’s letter was sarcastically read aloud
by Bell during the broadcast, during which time Bell also took a jab at
Jeff Rense, labeling Rense’s website as “anti-Semitic.”
I guess Art had the time to fire off pot shots at independent
researchers like Victor Thorn, but didn’t have time to address important
inconsistencies in the official government version of 9/11. What a sad,
unnecessary waste of valuable time, Art. Chertoff’s response to this
newly “discovered” family link? He didn’t even know (until
now) that Michael Chertoff just happens to be his cousin. Sure, Ben. We
believe that one.
Apparently, his “team” also didn’t bother
to investigate the mysterious stock put-options that took place just prior
to September 11, 2001, or the fact that the government scenario regarding
the WTC collapses defies the laws of nature, even though we “conspiracy
theorists” have been focusing on this material for more than three
years now and drawing increasing public attention to these matters.
Why would Popular Mechanics fail to examine the most credible
arguments and glaring inconsistencies with the official story and choose,
instead, to shine a spotlight on selective and often less relevant, weaker
conspiracies surrounding 9/11? After all, the experts at Popular Mechanics
have Victor Thorn’s book, 9-11 On Trial.
Again, do they need a formal written invitation? Well, we
sent them one via the U.S. Postal Service. Will they decide to do a follow-up
addressing the conclusions in this work, or will they refuse to “go
This show proved one thing to me last night, and hopefully
it proved something to many of you listeners out there: Art Bell is not
about TRUTH. He’s about chasing tails, spinning yarns, and creative
storytelling. His abject willingness (not to mention ability) to ignore
facts that are right in his FACE never ceases to amaze me.
How disillusioning it must be for all his groupies, because
all Bell is doing with respect to 9-11 is simply taking everybody for yet
another ride. This is evidenced by his propensity to peddle sloppy half-baked
research, poorly investigated claims, and absolute garbage as truth rather
than deal with the topic honestly. I’m also not buying into his phony
self-righteous indignation, either.
It’s no wonder the public has barraged him with scathing
criticisms and angry accusations over his failure to confront the status
quo and rise above it. For all intents and purposes, Bell has effectively
shown his hand as a government shill once and for all, which hardly surprises
me. Last night, he had the chance to show millions of listeners around the
world what he’s made of - and he most certainly did, without question.
His repetitive mantra of “I don’t believe for
ONE SECOND that the government had anything to do with this,” simply
amplifies the obvious: Bell refuses to play hardball with the government
while he continues lobbing softballs at his audience.
Art seems to have an aversion to taking a serious look at
all the real scientific facts and serious inconsistencies with many aspects
of 9/11, for whatever reason. I hope the payoff is well worth the choice
Likewise, Ben Chertoff (Art’s guest) is either largely
uninformed, incompetent to take on the task of speaking to these issues,
or he too is akin to the paid pundits we see on our nightly television news
networks. This would hardly be a revelation to me, considering that the
Hearst Corporation doesn’t exactly have a reputation for dealing in
honest journalism. Moreover, the Hearst Corporation is better known for
its outright lies of the past more than anything else.
I’m kind of surprised that one of these gentlemen didn’t
bother to throw in an alien sighting for good measure, just for kicks. That
certainly would have had more plausibility than the propaganda-tripe Chertoff
regurgitated (at Bell’s invitation) to a rather huge late-night global
Finally, I was inundated with emails from people I know who
also listened in during this show, and they forwarded to me copies of fast
blasts they sent to Art during the program, which he obviously never bothered
to take the time to address.
Shame on you, Art. You ARE a coward. Maybe Amy Goodman and
Mike Gallagher will move over and give you a seat in the SHILL VIP box.
I have just one more question for the King of “Coast to Coast”:
When do we get our turn, Art?
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.