I've been a big supporter of David Icke for a very long time. On balance, no one has done more than he to get out the story of the NWO story to a very large global audience. He deserves full credit and recognition for his long time efforts to enlighten humanity. However, he's not infallible and has made errors in judgment and perception, the latest of which I'll address in this article.
David Icke has not always treated other NWO researchers and authors judiciously. Dr. John Coleman, author of many important books on the NWO and its players, and others, have justifiably criticized David for incorporating their original research into Icke's books without acknowledging their pioneering authorship, thus leaving readers and audience members with the impression that he, David Icke, had unearthed their research when he had actually lifted the information from published sources.
Yesterday, I came across a Youtube video posted on May 19, 2014 titled "Fukushima nuclear disaster according to David Icke " (see below) in which David is addressing an interviewer explaining to Croatian viewers that he, David Icke, had come to realize that the Daiichi reactor explosion seen around the world on video tape resembled the mushroom cloud of a small nuclear explosion and that he "concluded" that the large security cameras placed inside the Daiichi containment buildings were large enough to conceal a small nuclear device. Thus, he tells the interviewer, that it is his "strong view" that "Fukushima was blown up on purpose."
That's swell, but the revelation that pre-planted mini nukes caused the explosions at the Daiichi Nuclear Power Station was broken at educate-yourself.org in an exclusive expose posted by myself and ZS Livingstone on March 12, 2011 and March 14, 2011, more than three years ago. And the information about the concealed mini nukes inside the security cameras in the Daiichi reactor buildings, along with the Israeli Dimona connection, was lifted directly from Jim Stone's article posted to the internet on May 28, 2011 titled "Fukushima: Did the Dimona Dozen Murder the Fukushima 50? "
The significance of David Icke, of all people, laying claim to the Fukushima sabotage story in May of 2014 is that the Jim Stone Fukushima sabotage article, the very elements of which David Icke is laying out for the Croatian interviewer, was at the very heart of the battle that erupted between Jeff Rense and Henry Makow in February of 2012 and continued for about a year over the internet. David Icke participated in that battle by joining ranks with Jeff Rense in ridiculing and denigrating the character of Henry Makow and went further by removing Makow's articles from the David Icke web site (see the email he sent to Henry Makow). He wrote that he didn't want Makow's "beyond disgraceful" conduct and "energy" mucking up his Love & Light web site. He characterizes Henry Makow as some sort of insignificant, nobody while elevating Jeff Rense to the status of an Olympian god in the struggle for Truth and Justice. He pontificates that his pal Jeff Rense has "done more to expose the conspiracy over decades than Makow will do if he lives to be a thousand." He then equates Makow's justified editorial response to Rense's summary dismissal over the Jim Stone article, as the tantrums of a two year old.
But why would Jeff Rense break with a heavyweight like Dr. Henry Makow after a 12 year association over one article that broached the subject of sabotage at the Daiichi Nuclear Power Station? After all, Jeff Rense runs a conspiracy web site. Isn't that his bread and butter?
Maybe it had something to do with Jeff Rense's strident and zealous anti-nuclear energy views and the fact that he's been driving the Doom & Gloom Fukushima radiation hysteria psyops from his web site "incessantly" since March of 2011 and doesn't want to hear any suggestion that the nuclear plant itself was safe or that the destruction it suffered may have been the results of intentional sabotage. No, no, no. We can;t have that. That would obviously throw a different light on things and compromise the 'nuclear-energy-is-bad' motif that Jeff (and fossil fuel energy interests) would prefer the public to inculcate. Get rid of nuclear energy and you now gain a huge new market for all that natural gas that they's been fracking globally for the past few years (sounds like a plan to me).
Here's one of the emails Jeff Rense sent to Henry Makow as his emotions take flight:
He [Jeff Rense] wrote hysterically: "ANY story claiming some sabotage or military operation caused the disaster is, OBVIOUSLY, serving the dark side and the nuclear power industry. Nuclear power is destroying the planet. The entire Pacific is gone as a food source.... "
Then in his most patronizing tone: " I have tried to help you see the bigger picture but I am not succeeding. I can't refer people to your site anymore. You are disparaging me and essentially mocking my entire baseline position on this and other areas."
But wait a minute. Isn't David Icke now selling the very Fukushima sabotage story that Jeff Rense chastised was "OBVIOUSLY serving the dark side and the nuclear power industry" ? Isn't this the reason that Rense went off the deep end with Makow?
So why on earth would David Icke embrace the very Jim Stone sabotage story that instigated the rift with Henry Makow?
Because David was never really concerned about the issue that caused the ruckus between Makow and Rense. He was more anxious to demonstrate his loyalty to Jeff Rense who's been helping to promote him on his web site and radio show for 17 or 18 years. And now that David Icke belatedly wakes up to the Daiichi sabotage story himself, he wants to frame it as his own (with a quick, offhand referral to "others information" of course) and undoubtedly incorporate the Japan sabotage theme into his upcoming lectures and his next book. I'm sure his legions of adoring fans will heap ever greater praise upon him for "uncovering" yet another blockbuster conspiracy story that relatively few people in the world yet realize took place in Japan from March 11-15, 2011. However, what about Henry Makow who merely tried to present the Jim Stone sabotage story to Jeff Rense in February of 2012 and got his head handed to him. Doesn't someone owe him an apology?
Fukushima nuclear disaster according to David Icke
The statements David Icke makes in this video about Arnie Gundersen, one of the most outrageous prevaricators to ever come down the pike, and the non existent radiation supposedly spewing out of Fukushima shows you just how uninformed and duped even David Icke can become when deluged by the sort of unremitting alarmist radiation bilge posted at rense.com and enenews.com. Anyone who cares to thoroughly check online data resources will quickly discover that there is no real radiation threat emanating from Fukushima Japan, and there never was one. The articles posted on this index page should help convince you that the great Fukushima radiation peril is a contrived fiction:
David refers to Tesla's 1895 hand held reciprocating earthquake device and HAARP in an attempt to account for the technology used to create the earthquakes that rocked Japan on 3/11. While HAARP can pump up hurricanes, create killer tornadoes, and cause prolonged droughts, it can't create large earthquakes. For 3/11, they used space based, pulsed beam weapon platforms and planted, subterranean nuclear devices (also used on Haiti in 2009).
As explained by ZS Livingstone on March 14, 2011 and in my March 12, 2011 Japan attack expose, the saboteurs detonated undersea nuclear bombs to create the so-called tsunami that inundated the northeastern coast of Japan. The 3/11 Hokaido seismogram clearly reveals the tell tale signature of a nuclear detonation and not that of a natural earthquake.
Notice how a natural earthquake gradually intensifies to maximum displacment while a nuclaer detonation instantly spikes to maximum displacement.
David Icke has convinced himself that the people of Japan are doomed to a future of misery and death from radiation poisoning from Fukushima when there is zero evidence to support such a dire and hysterical conclusion. Quoting him verbatim from the video:
"Japan is over. It's over! The amount of radiation that has been released into the earth's atmosphere is potentially catastrophic. The amount that has been released in the immediate area around Japan and the wider Japan is unthinkably catastrophic. I mean people are already starting to go down from the effects of it and we've seen nothing yet!" [end quote]
These statements are absurd.
This is what happens when you accept the exaggerations and fabrications of radiation fear promoters and anti-nuclear energy propagandists masquerading as nuclear experts, instead of doing your own homework and verifying whether the statements (and data) of Fukushima alarmists are true or not. You become brain washed and convinced by the shear volume of The_Sky-is-Falling radiation scare stories that have flooded the internet, internet radio talk shows, AM and FM talk radio, crusading anti-nuclear Leftists like Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez of Democracy Now or Thom Hartman, and countless Nervous Nellie bloggers who are ready to jump out of their skin at the mention of the word "Fukushima."
I wrote a number of articles in 2011, 2012 and 2013 critiquing the Fukushima related statements of Leuren Moret, Arnie Gundersen, Christopher Busby, Turner Radio Network, and others. Without fail, alarmists reveal themselves to be shameless prevaricators who will utter one falsehood after another with an air of confidence and certitude that would put Laurence Olivier to shame.
The Fukushima radiation psyops is intended to frighten people around the globe into rejecting nuclear power plants and replace them with natural gas, thus further enriching the Fossil Fuel Boys and permanently eliminating the competition from nuclear energy. That's why the focus of all news outlets around the world quickly centered on pumping the Daiichi radiation hysteria story. Ordinary Japanese people are mystified why media outlets outside of Japan only focus on the Daiichi radiation story (where no one has died) while ignoring the devastation and death of so many who were victimized by the flooding. but it's no mystery to me. It was planned that way.
As usuual your article is spot on.......It has always been apparent to me that Rense was an anti nuclear proponent. Icke follows the popular theme,even though he may have thought all along that Henry, and folks like him (you/ZS) were right all along. I too believe that 3/11 was man made, my question is: Why?? what was their real intent?? These folks are obviously nuts,evil or both.
I think it was two things:
1. Japan was pulling way ahead with free energy development on many fronts, including cars that ran without using gasoline, and that's always a no no with the Rockefellers. They were also building car factories in Thailand and other Asian countries and the Rockefellers don't want Japan to proper too much in areas that might cut into their energy domains, so they had to slap them down. The manufactured quake and tsunami was a message to back off...or else. The Japanese Illuminati know that the 1995 Kobe quake was caused by an undersea nuke. It was a payback note from Bush Sr.
2. They want to get rid of nuclear energy as a competitor to fossil fuels and replace nuclear energy with natural gas, using turbines made by Seimens (long time insider and big time connection to the Nazi International according to Otto Skorzeny) so they engineered the tsunami and detonated pre-planted mini nukes at Daiichi. Then they launched their radiation hysteria campaign to create public opinion against nuclear energy using anti-nuclear shills like Arnie Gundersen
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.