By Dr. Stephen C. L'Hommedieu, D.C.
February 27, 2007
Forward courtesy of Jean and ZS Livingstone
Here is a update on that aricle from Discovery Channel on the chemtrails that I got
from this doctor, in a personal email. What has your weather been like? We start out
some mornings with blue skys, and within a short time after the flights start
overhead, we are socked in. I was trying to film the steady flow of them this
morning, and some look like fighter planes, certainly not passenger planes, like the
newpapers try to mislead us, to believe. They fly right over our area as they take
off from the airport.
Have a great evening, . Jean
Discovery Channel "Best Evidence" Chemtrail Coverage: Revealing or Concealing?
By Dr. Stephen C. L'Hommedieu, D.C.
February 27, 2007
Saturday evening I was able to sit back and watch the Discovery Channel Chemtrail
coverage originally presented on Thursday evening, February 22. Previously aware of
the upcoming broadcast, I considered the possibility that this presentation may
intentionally avoid critical facts of the subject to quench public scrutiny. Sure
enough, I wasn't surprised.
The majority of the information for this 'investigation' presented by the 'Not to
Discover' channel was just as you would expect from a controlled media production.
They presented carefully selected material arranged into a purposely-crafted design.
They started with an easily dismantled, implausible and ridiculous hypothesis
selected out of a collection of amateur opinions about chemtrails. The investigation
then set the stage for discarding the validity of chemtrails from this bogus
hypothesis. It was the kind of bad 'science' commonly implemented to dismantle any
investigation that begins to get too close to the truth. It's called discrediting.
Immediately the deception began by directing the emphasis of the presentation to a
faulty concept of an aluminum component present in commercial jet fuel. This
'scientific investigation' appeared very impressive on the surface. It seemed as if
they were actually determined to go all-out to solve this chemtrail 'mystery'. Armed with $1M in research equipment to 'sniff' out the chemical culprits thought to be
secretly hidden in commercial jet fuel; predictably, they found nothing. I suspect
even the researchers knew they wouldn't find anything in the commercial jet fuel
because even I knew they wouldn't.
I found it interesting that the military refused to provide a sample of their jet
fuel for testing. The coverage noted that civil contrail plumes were observed to
last from seconds to minutes as opposed to military contrail plumes that would
persist up to 4 to 8 hours. Do you suspect they may have tested the wrong jet fuel?
That was one of many examples suggestive that something is obviously going on.
Patrick Minnis, the senior researcher at the NASA Langley Research Center, provided
the typical disparaging analysis that you would expect from insiders involved with a
cover-up. For instance, Rosalind Peterson, the founder of www.californiaskywatch,
sent her carefully documented findings and descriptions of these chemtrails to
Minnis for review. Upon opening and reviewing the extensive collection he stated
that "these are some very imaginative names and very, very interesting". Was Minnis
simply being polite? Obviously, Peterson's documentation required some original
thought to describe these blatantly altered anomalies. But with his initial
statement he followed with the comment that "those who believe in chemtrails simply
ignore the obvious reasons." May I suggest that "very, very interesting" contrail
anomalies do not routinely occur in concise formations on a massive scale for
obvious or ordinary reasons?
The announcer eventually went on to emphasize, "Where Minnis sees clouds and
contrails, Peterson sees these chemtrails." Then to solidify the uncertainty
necessary to obscure the truth, Minnis stated that "it appears no one seems to agree
on what these are other than they're not contrails," and followed with "the notion
of chemtrails is ludicrous." Well then, what are they? Would Minnis actually provide
a thorough and scientific explanation to the question presented?
Unfortunately, the only answer extracted out of Minnis, an authority on the subject,
was "there must be an explanation for each of Peterson's photographs." Thank you
sir; yes, we already realized that. But again, the question is what exactly are
they? Not surprisingly, he didn't bother to indulge us any further on this
important topic to set all of us straight. His only comment was that "there could be
infinite reasons". Really!
Frankly, I am surprised that Minnis believes all of us have the stomach to swallow
this garbage. I'm a highly skilled at my profession and can usually provide
on-target possibilities into the cause of complex health disorders. What is his
problem in his area of expertise? Could there possibly be a conflict of interest?
But then we get some bits of the truth mixed with a measure of inconsistency.
Journalist, William Thomas acknowledges these are not normal contrails and provides
good examples of many detrimental health related incidents associated with the
presence of chemtrails. However, he mistakenly believes these are being used to
slow down global warming when in fact it is probably a major contributing factor to
the cause of our 'global warming' altered weather patterns. This altering of the
weather plays other valuable roles within the secret agenda that he may or may not
be aware of.
I can certainly verify the detrimental health affects from chemtrails within my own
clinical practice. During the spring and summer of 2006 I had seen many patients,
especially children, suffering symptoms of irritability, extended periods of unusual
uncontrolled behavior, allergies, cough, asthma, and sinus infection. It was then I
found many of these symptoms to be a direct result of exposure to the subtle heavy
metal poisoningfrom aggressive chemtrail activity. This ALWAYS occurred when
chemtrail aerosoling was at high levels. I would give their children what they
required for the toxic elements indicated and then, to the amazement of the parents,
the symptoms magically disappeared. Now they have begun to notice when their
children spend more time outside in the presence of heavy chemtrail overcast they
begin to develop symptoms the same day or the next.
Skeptics and disinformation experts will no doubt reduce this, as well as most
information that falls in opposition of accepted views spoon-fed to the masses by
the media and government agencies, to the power of suggestion or an active
imagination. Unfortunately, most will continue on heavy doses of ignorance to
maintain their inability to grasp reality.
Dr. Wayne Evens, an atmospheric scientist, actually hit the nail on the head when he
claimed "chemtrails are acting as cirrus cloud formations that radiate more heat
energy to the earth rather than reflecting solar energy back into space as do normal
clouds." Did any one happen to notice how warm it was last spring when temperatures
were only in the 80's, never mind the entire summer? The following disappointment,
intended to reinforce 'controversy', was that his land-based spectrometer did not
reveal the suspect elements thought to be used.
Of course, the coverage made sure to include comments by Dr. Tom Wigley, a senior
scientist for the National Center for Atmospheric Research, one of which stating
that, "we're certainly not going to do anything to endanger the climate system."
Considering the extreme weather events and climate fluctuations associated with the
radical increase of chemtrail activity his words hit as a hard smack in the face of
An important question in my mind throughout the entire coverage was how did they go
from demonstrating aircraft used in cloud seeding with fuselage mounted
canister-like applicators and cartridges that release chemicals into the atmosphere
to the spin on aluminum particles in commercial jet fuel? My guess is to insure you
would be convinced chemtrails are purely a contrail con job.
There may or may not be something added to the military's fuel supply. If true that
could be a relevant issue. However, there is a massive atmospheric aerosoling
occurring separately from the fuel system. Dave Dicky, a professional landscaper
investigating these unusual 'contrails', revealed a telling example of this in the
coverage. During a visit to a flight control tower at a commercial airport he
witnessed two identified KC-135s, noted by their call signs, making their big 'X'
chemtrail in the sky. The chemtrails were so immensely large he could not even see
the aircraft. These aircraft have the ability to discharge huge quantities of
chemical solution over any designated area to create massive designer clouds. I have
personally observed how these aircraft can literally turn these chemical aerosols on
and off like Morse code. These are not contrails.
Dave Dicky performed another experiment of collecting rain water from his area for
testing. Lab reports indicated aluminum levels approximately 20 times higher than
normal. Naturally, the source of this aluminum toxicity was not identified.
A key element of proof these are not contrails, curiously omitted from the coverage,
was the actual photographs of these plumes developing from multiple areas on the
wings of these aircraft, even those with only two engines. Just visit
www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm and see some pictures for yourself. Why was such
incriminating evidence so conveniently left out?
Not surprisingly, there was very little coverage about the barium. It is certainly
the major health and environmental concern that was almost totally sidestepped.
What about strontium associated with the barium? Strontium is very difficult to
separate from barium. There was no mention of the use of titanium in the atmosphere,
as well. There was no mention of how these positively charged ionized barium
particles can bond to negatively charged particles of fluoride and chloride in the
upper atmosphere; those responsible for destroying the ozone layer. These bonded
particles descend to the ground to be inhaled by the public and pollute our
environment. These are typical elements easily detected on all patients during the
spring and summer months when these chemtrails elements ionize more readily.
If you don't think there is a problem with inhaling these toxic elements into your
lungs, think about this. Barium and strontium fall in the same periodic table column
as calcium and magnesium. That means these heavy metals can and do substitute for
these extremely important macronutrients in your body then quickly move into the
skeletal system and soft tissues. These heavy metals will not work effectively in
the body but will be substituted in place of them as determined by availability
relative to the body's supply of the proper nutrients. If you seem to notice more
cardiac arrest, stroke and high blood pressure, and respiratory issues this summer
and you think it is only the heat, think again.
Nanoparticles of titanium, used to absorb UV radiation, can damage the nervous
system. That is the big reason to even avoid all sunscreen that incorporate
titanium, as well. The damaging effects of fluoride and chloride are well documented
so I will not mention their destructive health effects.
I thought the timing for this coverage was especially important in order to prepare
us for the up and coming spring and summer flood of chemtrails that will work so
effectively to dismantle your immune system. But by then the majority of the public
will be programmed and desensitized enough into acceptance and the educated others
will be labeled conspiracy theorists. Make no mistake; chemtrails are no theory.
Dr. Stephen C. L'Hommedieu, D.C
Copyright 2007 All Rights Reserved Dr. Stephen C. L'Hommedieu, D.C.
Dr. Stephen C. L'Hommedieu, D.C. has a private practice located in Wichita, KS
called Advanced Alternatives for Health. Dr. L'Hommedieu is an expert in the
detection and treatment of toxic metals and chemicals. He specializes in internal
disorders with a unique ability for identifying underlying causes to complex and
chronic health disorders and their effective treatments. With more than 30 years of
study in natural healing and alternative medicine his professional experience draws
from an extensive range of alternative healing approaches that help to restore
normal balance and function to the individual. 316-652-9191
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.