March 8, 2005
From: Humberto Nunez <email@example.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 9:23 PM
Subject: Terrorism, Treason and Sedition-- Child Support Enforcement laws
are anti-American and an act of Terrorism against Americans
Terrorism, Treason and Sedition-- Child Support Enforcement laws are anti-American
and an act of Terrorism against Americans
written by: Bruce Eden, Constitutional Rights Director, Fathers
Rights Association of New Jersey & Mid-Atlantic Region
Communism is alive and well and it runs the United States
of Amerika. I have been involved in the research of child support and welfare
reform for years and have researched a number of very astute scientists,
economists, psychologists, legal professionals, politicians and many others.
Irwin Garfinkle's paper, "Sweden's Child Support System"
(1982) is the current model for the state of Wisconsin which has been emulated
by a large number of states in the U.S. However, economics experts studying
this field of child support have found that is indeed not from Sweden, but
in actuality from the former Soviet Union. Though we can learn from other
systems, the transplantation of any foreign social program into the U.S.
is fraught with danger. We have our own Constitution and a different relationship
between government and private economy. It is nonsensical to transplant
social programs outside the political and economic context in which they
develop because this inevitably leads to treason and sedition and the overthrow
of our government by internal forces.
U.S. child support reforms are based on the Soviet model,
Article 81 of the The Russian Family Code, adopted in 1995. Its use was
and is promoted in the United States by Irwin Garfinkel as part of a suite
of Communist policy which became known to us as "The Wisconsin Model"
because it involves the income shares approach--how much each parent makes
determines how much child support is paid; rather than the true cost of
raising children. As the Communist Manifesto says: "Each according
to ability; each according to his needs". Our child support system
was conceived and implemented as part of the former Communist way of doing
We can start by recognizing that the "percentage of income"
formula comes directly from the Russian lawbooks. The Russians used 25%
for one child, 30% for two, and 35% for 3 or more. Sound familiar? This
must have made sense in a country where most everyone was poor, prices were
controlled by the government, and the transfer of "wealth" was
the most important fundamental ideal of the oppressive regime's entire economic
system. The Income shares model developed by Robert Williams, of Policy
Institute, Inc. fame, mimics the "percentage of income" formula
to a significant extent.
Russian fathers pay the amount prescribed by the formula.
That's it. There are no deviations; there are no exceptions; there is no
consideration of individual circumstances (i.e., involuntary loss of employment
due to economic downturn, downsizing, outsizing, ageism, etc., disability,
illness, underemployment and unemployment, and even death); and there is
no excuse for non-payment. Most payments in the Russian system are taken
directly by the government. They are all processed by the central bureaucracy.
The bureaucracy doesn't care about "special circumstances". There
was no "individual" in Soviet society--only compliance. Those
who found, or even look for, a way to avoid compliance in the Russian child
support system could get jail, credit problems, exclusion from work, loss
of rights (to the extent they had any), and loss of government benefits.
Sound strikingly familiar? Debtor's prison for CIVIL child support debt
in violation of Fourth Amendment since there's no probable cause a crime
was committed to arrest and jail someone in a CIVIL matter; prohibitions
against imprisonment for debt; ruination of credit; suspension of driver's
licenses, professional licenses, hunting and fishing licenses; seizure of
Social Security Disability benefits and retirement benefits (I know firsthand
since I am disabled and they left me below the regional poverty line after
garnishing my Social Security Disability benefits without a trial); denial
of visitation rights without any enforcement of court orders for same; jailed
for extended periods of time causing loss of employment due to no fault
of self because of inability to comply with excessively high support orders
leaving people unable to fend for themselves.
How did the Russian Communists react to the fact that not
everyone in their society matched the model of a good communist citizen?
With public humiliation and condemnation and even ostracizing from groups;
calling groups of people "deadbeats" and putting up posters with
names and pictures of people who interfered with communist efficiency. The
child support enforcement tyranny does the same identical tactics in this
Those who say we won the Cold War are sadly mistaken. Former
Soviet Union Premier Nikita Kruschev was right. He stated that the United
States would be defeated by communism from within its own borders. The Communist
system existed for 80 years in Russia before its collapse. We fought communism
all over the World--Korea, Vietnam. NATO was a result of Communist hegemony.
Why then, are the biggest, most important U.S. social policy
changes of the last 15-20 years based on the Soviet-Communist model? Why
also, are the centralized computer systems purchased for the child support
system powerful enough to keep track of intimate details of every person
on the planet? Why are we opening up the IRS database for use by other agencies?
Why have there been so many court decisions undermining the guarantees spelled
out clearly in the Bill of Rights? Doesn't this all involve a completely
foreign vision of the basic fundamental relationship between individuals
and the state; something that is indeed, in the most concrete way possible,
We are headed in the wrong direction for this country. The
time to stop it is now before it is too late. Government is passing more
and more draconian child support enforcement laws every day. Government
oppression is at its highest pinnacle since the British ruled this country
over 225 years ago. Where does it stop? We are on the slippery slope. And,
for what? Because some bureaucracy wants to remain employed by violating
and depriving the people of their fundamentally secured rights? It has become
big government/big business. Just like in the Soviet Union.
Bruce Eden, Constitutional Rights Director, Fathers Rights
Association of New Jersey & Mid-Atlantic Region
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.