The Fatal Flaw In The 9/11 Coverup
Why can no one name the hijackers or prove they flew the
By John Kaminski <email@example.com>
April 16, 2004
Know how to tell the difference between the truth and lies
of 9/11? If they're talking about hijackers having done the dastardly deed,
you know they're part of the sinister coverup extravaganza, wittingly or
In order for the people of the world to be convinced that
Islamic hijackers were responsible for terrible tragedy of 9/11, we need
to see some evidence. Not hearsay, innuendo, aspersion or promises of evidence,
but real evidence.
Otherwise, the whole subject is rightly regarded as a ruse,
a setup to conceal the identities of the real culprits, the ones who sit
smugly in front of the TV cameras and plot their cynical war on terror -
otherwise known as the war on the peoples of the world.
As President Bush continues to insist that his word be accepted
as truth on numerous questions, time after time his statements have been
revealed as blatant falsehoods. Yet he continues to repeat them, and the
whorish corporate media continues to accept them.
Why hasn't either the Bush administration or some element
of law enforcement in the United States issued a single solid piece of evidence
connecting the hijackers to the hijacked airplanes? Why don't the alleged
hijackers appear on the airport security videos? Why aren't there credit
card records of their ticket purchases?
Why did FBI director Robert Mueller say very publicly to the
Commonwealth Club of San Francisco that nothing on paper connected Arab
terrorists to 9/11? I mean, two and half years have passed. And the feds
produced 19 names within 72 hours of the disaster. Notice a mathematical
inconsistency here? All that has happened since is mere vigilante hysteria,
hypothetical scenarios trumpeted ad nauseum by America's notoriously brainwashed
Seven or eight of the names on that original list have been
found living comfortably in other countries. Why hasn't the FBI made any
attempt to correct the errors made on that original list? See for yourself.
And why, after much hullabaloo about Colin Powell using phony
information in his remarks to the United Nations about the reasons for war,
hasn't the U.S. government produced a single conclusive piece of evidence
to back up its claim that 9/11 was the work Osama bin Laden and other Islamic
terrorists? Not a single piece!
If you disagree, tell me what it is!
There's a simple answer to this, you know. It's because there
isn't any evidence. And why is that? Because those pseudo-Muslims revealed
to be so publicly incompetent at piloting jerkwater training planes had
absolutely zero chance of flying sophisticated jetliners into anything narrower
than the Grand Canyon, never mind executing tricky maneuvers with extraordinarily
The unknown men who played the roles of the so-called Arab
terrorist hijackers were really recruited by either American and/or Israeli
intelligence services in a scheme set up as a diversion to inflame dumb
Westerners against the Islamic world. The purpose was to divert the world's
attention from the Israeli genocide and dispossession of the Palestinians
by blaming the attacks on Muslims.
But that was only half the objective. The other half was to
enable our despicable cabal of neocon gangbangers to fleece the American
public with an endless array of no-bid contracts to enrich the conscienceless
billionaires who are really driving the war machine.
You know how the Bushista American government uses anything
for PR to supposedly authenticate its own evil agenda. If they had any concrete
evidence against the hijackers - if they even possessed all their correct
names - we would have heard about it by now. There would be an avalanche
of TV shows about them, unlike that Jewish claptrap hate crime against Muslims
that appeared on NBC the other night.
After two and half years, with the whole world knowing that
eight of the 19 names on the hijacker list are fraudulent, the FBI has made
no attempt to substitute new names. And why is that? Because the identities
of the hijackers were constructed with mostly stolen papers, for some of
the patsies designed to take the heat. In any case, and whoever they were,
there is no evidence they ever got on the planes.
But nothing. Instead we have one minor player convicted in
Germany, then the conviction was overturned, partly because Americans refused
to help with the prosecution.
We have the so-called 20th hijacker and assorted other preposterous
character actors languishing in jails on trumped up charges. We have security
camera film at the Pentagon, which surely reveal that no jetliner hit that
building, locked away in Ashcroft's vault under the phony aegis of national
security. We have all the rubble of the World Trade Center, which surely
would have revealed the use of nuclear explosives creating shattered beams
in odd places, instantly carted away with no forensic investigation. We
have transcripts - but no recordings - of these phony cellphone calls, some
from people who may not have even existed.
And we have the famous standdown, in which America's air defenses
suddenly evaporated - the only time in our history this has happened.
We have Marvin Bush sitting suspiciously on the board of directors
of the security company that had the contract for the Twin Towers.
We have Larry Silverstein, who conveniently leased and insured
the towers shortly before the big hits, telling officials to "pull"
a relatively intact tower, which then fell identically to the two structures
that were struck by airplanes, creating the impression that that's the way
all three came down.
We have billions of dollars of windfall profits made by savvy
investors in the days before 9/11, and an FBI investigation that insists
nothing was amiss with these spectacular deals. Of course, we don't get
the details. Only "assurances" that the trades were not suspicious,
despite patterns and results that were unprecedented in the entire history
of financial trading.
We have reports from firemen of explosions at the base of
the Twin Towers BEFORE they fell, and the seismographic evidence to back
up these assertions.
We have leader after leader saying they didn't know such a
thing could happen when the government had been studying the problem for
ten years. It had held at least two major drills simulating such a possibility.
And we have a president sitting in a ghetto classroom in Florida,
at possibily the most pivotal moment in American history, pretending to
read a book that he was holding upside down.
Perhaps most tellingly of all, we have the tragic tale of
John O'Neill, rabidly honest FBI investigator, prevented from following
his leads about Osama bin Laden because of the danger he would have discovered
the links from Afghanistan back to CIA headquarters. Just review the way
he was prevented from conducting his probe of the Cole bombing, and prevented
by digging into other leads by the same guys - namely insiders Louis Freeh
and Thomas Picard - who prevented significant reports from other FBI agents
from seeing the light of day.
So, how does all that make you regard the supposedly impartial
government panel investigating these matters? When they talk about Presidential
Daily Briefings months before the event, or chitchat with presidential flunkies
who leak out these pseudorevelations about this and that tidbit of essentially
trivial information. And especially when they talk about the dastardly hijackers
(without being able to name them) as if there is no question of their guilt.
Talk about your misleading urban legends! This one is the champ.
Well, no sense feigning surprise. We knew this commission
was a set-up from the get-go. Recycled Watergate investigators, even. Part
of the same bunch that has run the country and covered up everything for
the past 30 years or more.
Surely you didn't expect a real investigation. Thomas Kean
declared at the outset of his hearings that Osama bin Laden was guilty.
End of discussion. As soon as he made that statement, there was no way the
hearings could be legitimate.
Asserting that genuine Arab hijackers did not carry out the
attacks of 9/11 requires analysis of two concomitant categories: the history
of American (and Israeli) involvement (and subterfuge) with Arab terrorists,
and methods of remote control of aircraft, or other means of piloting the
The remote control aspect continues to be a bone of contention
among legitimate pilots, with some asserting only real pilots could have
made such extemporaneous maneuvers and others insisting only remote control
could have accomplished such a feat. An interesting new perspective on this
debate can be found here: http://joevialls.altermedia.info/wtc/radiocontrol.html
A third natural area of study in this regard would be the
intimate histories of those whom officials claim to be the hijackers, including
putting the microscope on their behavior in the days and weeks before the
Many researchers claim the name al-Qaeda was made up in middle
'90s by a variety of American functionaries (one of them being none other
than Richard Clarke) as an all-purpose villain the U.S. could blame as a
convenient reason for its military adventurism. And a group of Israeli provocateurs
was recently discovered trying to create their own faux version of al-Qaeda.
How many more hints do you need? The absence of any relevant
arrests or discovery of any clues to the hierarchy of this supposedly worldwide
terror group should tell you a lot.
Al-Qaeda doesn't exist except for when they want it to, to
blame for any sort of strategic terror they have created themselves for
some political reason, like influencing the elections in Spain. Hah, that
one really backfired.
Why haven't American intelligence operatives gone to these
foreign countries to interview these named hijackers who turned out to be
alive? Simple. Because they knew the list was fiction in the first place,
and the Arab-types who have been named as terror gurus are mostly their
own employees, or people who have been set up by them.
It is a celebrated fact that Mohammed Atta and some of his
friends were seen in nightclubs in the hours before 9/11, certainly a fact
that argues against them being able to carry out their supposed missions
because they were motivated by Islamic religious zeal. So their appearance
in strip clubs blows the whole story that they were devout Muslims giving
their lives to Allah. Devout Muslims don't drink, never mind cavort with
If we knew who the hijackers were, we'd know their names,
wouldn't we? Or is it now worth bombing other nations and murdering thousands
of innocent people because we say we know who the hijackers were, even though
we don't know their names? It is the great shame of the American people
that they have approved of the murders of thousands of people because of
that blatant lie.
Many of the men who were fingered as 9/11 hijackers received
preferential treatment from American immigration officials when it came
to entering and leaving the U.S. on numerous occasions. Many of these same
names reportedly trained at various U.S. military installations.
What has resulted after two and a half years of work by America's
crack intelligence agencies, besides the persecution of Muslims throughout
Well, hundreds of innocent people have been unjustly imprisoned
and tortured at Guantanamo. All of them innocent, hapless dupes rounded
up in a Rumsfeld-ordered dragnet in Pakistan after U.S. planes had (inadvertently
or otherwise) allowed the Taliban fighters to escape with the Pakistani
army from Afghanistan.
Two pathetic flunkies have been arrested and held without
due process. One of them, the notoriously pathetic shoe bomber who was obviously
a deranged personality and not a member of any terror network, was ceremoniously
sentenced to life in prison.
Other than that, no al-Qaeda kingpins have been even named,
never mind apprehended. No clue about how the 9/11 attacks were engineered
has ever emerged. This is simply not consistent with being able to name
all 19 hijackers the day after the attacks. It is a case of pretending you
have all of the information instantly, and then pretending you no information
for the next two years. What a smell!
This means two things: that the list of 19 names was a total
fabrication, and that the worldwide terror network called al-Qaeda is also
a total fabrication, the wet dream brainchild of the CIA and the Mossad
to be trotted out as an excuse for a whole string of terror attacks - Madrid,
Bali, Riyadh, Istanbul, etc. - that were really carried out by the CIA and
the Mossad themselves, cleverly involving designated patsies to give the
operations a suitably foreign flavor.
Al-Qaeda does not exist except as a bogeyman invented by Western
powers to justify their evil agenda. There were no hijackers flying those
planes on 9/11. And honest FBI agents have been prevented from publicizing
If you disagree, prove it! The world knows you can't, though
the high-tech mass murder by the United States and Israel spreads around
the world because of this falsified version of events.
History will show - and the public will soon realize - that
those who are telling these lies not only allowed 9/11 to happen, but planned
it for their own personal advantage.
The only question that remains is will the American public
awaken to this murderous, treasonous scam before the perpetrators achieve
their objective and bury the whole planet in the flames of their insane
Just remember. If they're talking about the hijackers, they're
part of the coverup, whether they know it or not.
Much more productive would be analyzing the tiny hole in the
Pentagon, how the ejected material in the WTC photos prove there were unexplained
explosions, or how those emotional cellphone calls could not possibly have
been made as government flunkies have presented them.
But you won't hear the official 9/11 commissioners talking
about any of that, because they are definitely part of the coverup. You
can obviously tell, because they keep talking about the hijackers.. . .
Other than a general alert to citizens of the world about
the basic lies that continue to underlie all political debate in the United
States at this time, there is another, more pressing reason to discuss and
contemplate all these matters at this time.
On Tuesday, April 20, and Wednesday, April 28, the U.S. Supreme
Court will hear arguments on the power claimed by the President to designate
people as "enemy combatants" and have them incarcerated by the
military - indefinitely, without charges, and without access to the court
system--solely on his say-so.
As my friend Alvin notes, "This is a critical moment
in United States history."
"How the court rules on these cases will determine the
type of country we will be living in. We urge those of you who can to be
present outside the Supreme Court on these dates," said Alvin. For
more information please see http://www.nlg.org/eccases/
It is one thing to realize all law enforcement and defense
strategies in America in 2004 have become lies.
It is quite another to incorporate those lies into the law
itself, and that is about to happen next week.
The decision expected will make a time of darkness grow even
darker, and practically guarantee that freedom and justice for all is now
an outmoded phrase that has been conveniently discarded by the evil robots
who now control the lives of every person on earth.
John Kaminski is the author of "America's Autopsy Report,"
a collection of his Internet essays seen on hundreds of websites around
the world, and also "The Day America Died: Why You Shouldn't Believe
the Official Story of What Happened on September 11, 2001," a 48-page
booklet written for those who insist on believing the government's version
of events. For more information about both, go to http://www.johnkaminski
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.