An unnamed Western intelligence source in the Middle
East was quoted in the British Sunday Express yesterday: "Saddam
was not captured as a result of any American or British intelligence.
We knew that someone would eventually take their revenge, it was just
a matter of time."
By Paul McGeough
Correspondent in Baghdad, Sydney Morning Herald
Dec. 22, 2003
Washington's claims that brilliant US intelligence work led
to the capture of Saddam Hussein are being challenged by reports sourced
in Iraq's Kurdish media claiming that its militia set the circumstances
in which the US merely had to go to a farm identified by the Kurds to bag
the fugitive former president.
The first media account of the December 13 arrest was aired by a Tehran-based
American forces took Saddam into custody around 8.30pm local time, but sat
on the news until 3pm the next day.
However, in the early hours of Sunday, a Kurdish language wire service reported
explicitly: "Saddam Hussein was captured by the Patriotic Union of
Kurdistan. A special intelligence unit led by Qusrat Rasul Ali, a high-ranking
member of the PUK, found Saddam Hussein in the city of Tikrit, his birthplace.
"Qusrat's team was accompanied by a group of US soldiers.
Further details of the capture will emerge during the day; but the global
Kurdish party is about to begin!"
The head of the PUK, Jalal Talabani, was in the Iranian capital
en route to Europe.
The Western media in Baghdad were electrified by the Iranian agency's revelation,
but as reports of the arrest built, they relied almost exclusively on accounts
from US military and intelligence organisations, starting with the words
of the US-appointed administrator of Iraq, Paul Bremer: "Ladies and
gentlemen: we got 'im".
US officials said that they had extracted the vital piece of information
on Saddam's whereabouts from one of the 20 suspects around 5.30pm on December
13 and had immediately assembled a 600-strong force to surround the farm
on which he was captured at al-Dwar, south of Tikrit.
Little attention was paid to a line in Pentagon briefings that some of the
Kurdish militia might have been in on what was described as a "joint
operation"; or to a statement by Ahmed Chalabi, head of the Iraq National
Congress, which said that Qusrat and his PUK forces had provided vital information
A Scottish newspaper, the Sunday Herald, quoted from an interview
aired on the PUK's al-Hurriyah radio station last Wednesday, in which Adil
Murad, a member of the PUK's political bureau, said that the day before
Saddam's capture he was tipped off by a PUK general - Thamir al-Sultan -
that Saddam would be arrested within the next 72 hours.
An unnamed Western intelligence source in the Middle East was quoted in
the British Sunday Express yesterday: "Saddam was not captured
as a result of any American or British intelligence. We knew that someone
would eventually take their revenge, it was just a matter of time."
There has been no American response to the Kurdish claims.
An intriguing question is why Kurdish forces were allowed to join what the
US desperately needed to present as an American intelligence success - unless
the Kurds had something vital to contribute to the operation so far south
of their usual area of activity.
A report from the PUK's northern stronghold, Suliymaniah, early last week
claimed a vital intelligence breakthrough after a telephone conversation
between Qusrat and Saddam's second wife, Samirah.
Web posted at: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/12/21/1071941612613.html
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.