Forward courtesy of Steve Campbell
From Douglas Reed's Somewhere
South of Suez,
1951, pages 179-181:
I must for clarity
recapitulate this fascinating story as far as it now goes. Early in his
twelve years of might I began to suspect that Hitler was not what he professed to be: merely an arch anti-Communist and anti-Jew. His actions, I thought, would clearly help Communism and Political Zionism
(and the outcome of the second
war proved this.) I was at first puzzled
that he did not see so plain a consequence. Later I thought he did perceive it and
was the accomplice of these two powerful forces. Twenty years ago the theory might have been beyond credence.
Today, in this century of masks and secret allegiances, it is
reasonable. The man of one sworn loyalty, and a different, hidden one,
is now a familiar figure in all countries; he has appeared in the
trials of Dr. Alan Nunn May and Dr. Fuchs in England, of an M.P., officers and officials in Canada, and of certain persons in America.
thought Hitler a man of this type, but risen to the highest place
instead of just to a high one. It seemed to me that, for great
successes, which they could not otherwise achieve, Soviet Communism and
Political Zionism needed an apparent antithesis, as a heavyweight
champion needs a sparring partner. I believed Hitler played this part, and think the results of the last war uphold this reading of his part in our affairs.
For one thing, his appearance was as mysterious as
his disappearance. Although the British and Americans, when they
reached Berlin and Vienna, were able to
put their hands on a mass of documents one would have expected to be
destroyed, the Viennese police dossier of Hitler's formative years before 1914 has never been published. Chancellor Dollfuss is supposed to have been killed, in 1934, because he knew of it. His successor,
Chancellor Schuschnigg, may also know of it; he was present at the
Nuremberg Trial but
was not put in the witness-box, although the
invasion of Austria and his own treatment were matters in the
indictment. At every turn a blank wall opposes those who try to find
out what manner of man Hitler was, what he did and with whom he
consorted in those significant years. Who enabled him, then, an obscure
nobody apparently without a past, to spring into the central limelight
of affairs in 1919, like the demon king in pantomime? I never learned
an answer to these questions, but by 1938 I thought the Rabbi of Prague
(see Disgrace Abounding, 1939)
might be proved correct, who said: 'Hitler is the Jewish Messiah.' Not all rabbis agree that Political Zionism is Messianic, but this one thought so and by that standard could today claim to be right.
Therefore I conjectured that this man-from-nowhere might in truth be the accomplice of Communism and Political Zionism, two forces which have
always supported each other. His 'Fascism' thus seemed to me to be merely the third prong of one trident, with which the cauldron of our
century is kept stirred.
Discussion of "The Final
Solution to Adolph Hitler" DVD
Christopher Jon Bjerknes, author and
interviews Jim Condit Jr. on the
Hitler-Nazi-Zionist-Founding-of-Israel-Connection. Mr. Bjerknes has many
interesting insights to add to the mix. Interview conducted May 23,
is a three hour interview.
Talk about spinning and speculating. I have great reservations about
They may be useful in terms of Zionist history, but
as far as National
Socialism and Adolf
Hitler are concerned, Reed displays a
which originated in his own British supremacist background.
Of course there is nothing much worth mentioning to be found in Austrian
police records about AH's FORMATIVE YEARS, i.e. age 1 to, lets say,
10, because he had a perfectly normal childhood. No reason whatsoever to
start a police record on him. He makes it appear as highly suspicious
that a nondescript citizen has no extensive files of him with the
police. Didn't he know that this is the reality for all citizens of less
than prominent status?
If Reed means by
formative years the time after WW I and the beginnings of the Nazi
movement, I can only marvel at his willful lack objectivity. Hitler, in
Reed's fevered mind, has to be, come hell or high water, what Jewish
hate mongers and the British elite insist to this day he was: namely, a
conspiratorial tool of evil forces with satanic proclivities.
That Hitler was campaigning in a heartfelt manner, with huge odds against
him (not being of the elite and of very modest background), earning the
trust of the German people by powerfully appealing to their hearts and
minds, NEVER LYING TO THEM, and proving his unflagging commitment to
redress the criminal injustices that had been committed on Germany and
Germans, and because ONLY THAT being the secret of his successful rise
to power; it leaves Reed at a complete loss. It
an speculate in all kinds of shady ways to make Hitler match the way
Reed is used to seeing politics practiced everywhere else.
As far as Reed is concerned, Hitler had to be evil. Period. A virtual
nobody can't possibly become the leader of a nation otherwise.
Reed doesn't provide any credible evidence for that. Merely a lot of
compelling sounding conjecture and speculation.
As great and well-researched a writer as Douglas
Reed was (and I
have read many of his books) I believe he attributes nefarious intents
to a man who has been demonized by all and sundry since well before I
That consistent denigration of Hitler by our centuries-old enemies
should be an excellent starting point for those seeking the truth to
determine exactly what is the "scoop" on his character and objectives.
Although it is not always correct to infer that "the enemy of my enemy
is a friend", in this case, as we can assess from so many instances in
history, our enemy continuously calumniates those whom they wish to
destroy...not those who are deserving of it! Therefore,we are far more
likely to derive truth from commencing from the other side of what our
enemies want us to believe about Hitler...or any other person or event
Concomitantly, the argument put forth by Reed is similar to the
tripe that emanates from seriously flawed treatises like "A Course In
Miracles" and "The
wherein we are told that "What you resist, persists...don't you know!"
For Reed to have taken such a stand tells me that he (as well as us) was
subject to propaganda from sources that appear to want you to feel
For Hitler to have wanted to oppose Communism and the plans of our
millenia-old enemies was a good thing. For, as Burke stated so well,"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do
nothing". Our enemies use every trick in their book to ensure that their
enemy is marginalized...including the ruse that fighting against evil
brings you more of it! (So patently false with a hundred examples to
defeat such a premise that it boggles the mind that ostensibly
intelligent minds fall for it!)
The fact that Hitler "lost the war" (which he never started; never
offered the casus belli of which he has been accused; and had none of
the ultimate intentions attributed to him in that conflict) is more an
indictment of the peoples of the "western world" who easily succumbed to
the programming launched against us for centuries previous.
Would it not have benefited us more in WWII
to side with our ally against our
common enemy.....instead of the other way around, as we continue to do?
Thanks for these responses. I would have to say that I concur with them as
well even though I hold Douglas
Reed in the highest regard in terms of his otherwise astute
coverage of the origins of political Zionism. I also think that had he
been alive today and was privy to the kind of information that's
recently come out that he too would likely have changed his tune in
regards to Hitler.
It was tough enough for me
to overcome the massive brainwashing regarding the Nazis and that took a
number of years once I began investigating the whole issue of Zionism
and its connections with the German nation. On top of that there are
still some unanswered questions that I have regarding certain aspects of
Hitler's history such as the Reichstag
Fire (Reed's first book was on
this and is very difficult to find today. I have a copy though) and his
alleged arrest during the Bavarian period when the Communists
momentarily took over and were driven out. Reed states that Adolf was
arrested for being part of the Communist guards surrounding the person
(forget his name) in charge of that coup but that Adolf consented to
testify against the commies and escaped as a result.
today, in light of what the Zionists have been exposed to be doing over
the last century, it's practically inconceivable to see Hitler in the
light in which he's portrayed by their media and publishing houses. I
think that in some future time JFK's words will finally ring true and
Hitler will be eventually exonerated and he will be seen as one of the
major historic heroes of all history and possibly even a saint in the
eyes of future Germans.
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.