By ROBYN E. BLUMNER, St Petersburg Times Perspective Columnist
Oct. 26, 2003
No pause in Patriot Act pounding
When pressed over whether Lakers star Kobe Bryant should continue
playing basketball while the issue of his alleged sexual assault is under
consideration by the courts, NBA Commissioner David Stern told the Los Angeles
Times: "Absolutely. We don't have a Patriot Act in the NBA."
It appears the repressive nature of the USA Patriot Act, which
is 2 years old today, has penetrated the American consciousness to such
an extent that it now stands as shorthand parlance for any type of unfairness.
Despite Attorney General John Ashcroft's barnstorming tour of the country,
selling the act to friendly audiences of law enforcement, nearly 200 communities,
including three states, have passed resolutions objecting to its excesses.
You would think this general unease would cause President
Bush to pause before proposing additional entrenchments. But no, it seems
to only have spurred him on. In a speech given on the eve of the second
anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, our tin-eared president decided the time
was ripe to propose Patriot Act expansions.
The proposed changes, which the president called the closing
of "loopholes," may seem technical, but within those details lie
our character as a nation. Are we a model of liberty, even in the face of
threats to our national security? Or has al-Qaida's ragtag band impelled
us to unravel a 200-year commitment to due process? Which is what Bush and
Ashcroft are pushing.
Bush wants three additional powers from Congress.
First, he wants to give the Justice Department the authority
to confiscate records and compel testimony without review by a court or
The Patriot Act had substantially changed the law in this
area by removing the requirement that federal agents tie the records they
are seeking - be they library, medical, financial, educational or other
records - to an investigation of a foreign agent or terrorist. Now, all
the government has to do is certify to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Court - a court that operates in secret and is only open to government lawyers
- that the records are "sought for" an investigation into terrorism
Where once the FBI could only demand that bookstores turn
over records on a particular customer who was under suspicion, now the FBI
can seize the entire customer database as long as it somehow figures in
an ongoing investigation. The Patriot Act made the courts little more than
a rubber stamp for the FBI.
But even this is apparently too much of a paean to the separation
of powers for Bush. He wants passage of the "Antiterrorism Tools Enhancement
Act of 2003" that would give the FBI "administrative subpoena"
authority to confiscate any records and compel any testimony on its say-so
alone. The bill would eliminate entirely court oversight, or as Bush would
call it "interference."
Second, Bush wants to chip away at the right to bail. Current
law allows a judge to deny bond for anyone shown to be dangerous or a flight
risk. And, for anyone accused of international terrorism, there is a presumption
against granting bond.
Not good enough, according to the president. He wants passage
of the "Pretrial Detention and Lifetime Supervision of Terrorists Act
of 2003," a bill that would keep people accused of a whole range of
new crimes behind bars pending trial by making those crimes presumptively
"no bond" offenses.
This is an attempt to lock people up first and investigate
later. In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, more than 750 immigrants were
jailed for months while the Justice Department looked into potential ties
to terrorism. In the end not, one was charged. Now Bush wants the power
to do the same thing to Americans and immigrants here legally.
And third, Bush wants to expand the reach of the federal death
penalty by making it applicable to "domestic terrorism."
Under the Patriot Act, the crime of "domestic terrorism"
couldn't be more broadly written. Any criminal act intended to influence
the government through "intimidation or coercion" involving "dangerous
acts" qualifies. Aggressive protesters of all stripes from Greenpeace
activists to abortion foes could easily fall within this definition, opening
the door for politically motivated executions.
Bush also wants the death penalty for those convicted of providing
"material support for terrorism," a law that can be violated even
when people think they are giving money to a charity and don't know the
group is a designated terrorist organization.
While Bush is working to undo more of our liberty, there are
bipartisan efforts in Congress pushing back. Perhaps the most promising
is the "Safety and Freedom Ensured (SAFE) Act" that would rollback
some of the worst excesses of the Patriot Act. If even NBA commissioners
know the Patriot Act is a bad thing, what is Congress waiting for?
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.