By Rick Stanley <firstname.lastname@example.org>
July 9, 2003
Subject: If only I Was Black; The Media Would
Cover the Injustice
Rick Stanley, Constitutional Activist and
former 2002 US SENATE Candidate, gave the following written release to the
"I couldn't help but wonder aloud, that if I was black, then the media
would cover the injustice." Rick Stanley, who was reading about the
FEDERAL PROBE SOUGHT as the headline in the Rocky Mountain News,
openly ponders this question. Why is a story about a rogue judge in Denver,
specifically Judge Robert Patterson, who has issued a bench
warrant for Rick Stanley, illegally and unlawfully, not being investigated
by the media? He is black.
The Police Department has issued an Armed and Dangerous report
and the FBI has admitted they are investigating Stanley as well. What is
this all about?
Stanley has been demonstrating in front of the Colorado Supreme
Court and around the Denver area with a sign that says, "COWARDS COMMITTING
TREASON: DENVER & COLORADO JUDGES ARE VIOLATING THEIR OATH OF OFFICE:
RICK STANLEY DEMANDS HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS BE UPHELD". Stanley
has been accused by a Colorado Supreme Court employee of brandishing a weapon,
and when it is discovered after 2 hours of being arrested, this is not the
case, Stanley is released, no charges, no apology, no investigation of the
woman at the Colorado Supreme Court for her lie and unlawful action resulting
in Stanley being arrested with eight police officers pointing guns at Stanley.
Based upon the history of the Denver Police Department and their horrendous
record of killing suspects by "accident" or just on purpose and
then covering up with excuses, with no charges ever being filed, is it any
wonder that Stanley does not trust the judicial branch of government and
the Denver Police Department that is harrassing him and now hunting for
Stanley to make an arrest.
Stanley has a case that was originally in Denver Judge Robert Patterson's
courtroom in 2002, and he was convicted of exercising his State and National
Constitutional right to openly carry anywhere in the state of Colorado including
Denver. The courts in Denver did not, and still do not recognize that right,
even though the legislature and Governor of Colorado affirmed that right
with SB-25 on March 18, 2003, and with that legislation made a state law
banning the cities of Colorado from violating the State Constitution right
of open carry of a weapon on your person.
The new SB-25 just affirmed what the State Constitution already
said. Now it is being observed by the police in Colorado and Denver, but
the courts are still ignoring this fact. Stanley's case is now appealed
lawfully, with all fees paid, to the Colorado Court of Appeals, which means
by the courts own rules that Stanley can not be brought back to the original
jurisdiction of Judge Patterson's court during the appeal process for any
reason regarding this case. A stay of execution is in effect from Judge
Patterson at the sentencing hearing which was secured by Stanley's paid
$2,500.00 appeal bond.
Judge Patterson has tried to bring Stanley back to hiscourt
twice now to revoke the Stay of Execution for his 6 month jail sentence,
fines, probation, community service, etc. He brought Stanley back in March,
and threatened to revoke the Stay of Execution and told Stanley he must
get a Stay from the Colorado Supreme Court, who was considering hearing
the case, and when the Colorado Supreme Court issued a Stay of Execution,
Judge Patterson did not lift his Stay of Execution, but made Stanley think
he was going to.
Stanley filed for his appeal bond bond money of $2,500.00
with Judge Patterson on May 29th, 2003, with an IN REM BOND CLAIM ON LAND
VERIFIED CLAIM TO BOND and was turned down because the bond was supposedly
securing the Stay of Execution Judge Patterson had originally agreed to.
The Stay of Execution from Judge Patterson had never been lifted and Stanley
did not need a Stay of Exectuion from the Colorado Supreme Court while on
Appeal. When the Colorado Supreme Court refused to hear Stanley's Writ of
Certorari, and ended their Stay of exectuion, Stanley filed an appeal to
the Colorado Court of Appeals, because the Colorado Supreme Court refused
to hear the case. Stanley filed the new appeal within 30 days of the Colorado
Supreme Courts refusal, keeping his appeal efforts alive.
Judge Patterson issued an order for Stanley to appear in
his courtroom in Denver on June 26th, 2003, which Stanley answered with
a Petition and Motion to Dismiss because Judge Patterson does not have jurisdiction
over Stanley regarding this case until the appeal process is exhausted.
Stanley has already said he will take the case to the Supreme Court of the
Land if all his other appeals are exhausted. Stanley is awaiting decision
on the Colorado Court of Appeals now. The Federal Court of Appeals would
be his next step if this appeal is denied in Colorado... All of this time
the Stay of Execution is bonded by the $2,500.00 paid in full bond by Stanley.
Hold on now. Here comes Denver Judge Patterson, saying that Stanley's appeal
is over because, Judge Patterson says it is. Judge Patterson says the Stay
of Execution is over from the Colorado Supreme Court, because they won't
hear the case. Judge Patterson says come back to my court so I can intiate
One problem: Stanleys case is on paid appeal at the Colorado
Court of Appeals now. Doesn't matter to Judge Patterson, he will order the
hearing knowing he doesn't have jurisdiction while on appeal, and he will
ignore the fact that his original Stay of Execution is still in effect,
bonded by the original bond of $2,500.00 paid by Stanley, and Judge Patterson
also refused to release that same bond because it was securing the Stay
of Execution he granted in the first place. Stanley doesn't go because he
doesn't have to by the law, (their rules not Stanley's rules) and Judge
Patterson ignores his own Colorado Rules of Law and enters a Bench Warrant
Is this terrific or what? Stanley can't demonstrate with his sign anymore
because he has a Bench Warrant out for his arrest, so no more embarrassing
phone calls to the judiciary about Stanley's sign. Stanley can't wear his
weapon everywhere around Denver as he has since March 18, 2003, demonstrating
that it is not a danger to the public and in fact secures Stanley's rights
and security, and if need be, could be used to defend Stanley's life or
the life of another from a REAL criminal. Solves two dilemnas for the City
of Denver and the judiciary being used to pummel the citizenry of Denver,
not to mention Stanley. Judicial abuse? One other thing: Stanley refuses
to be arrested for a bogus warrant and any other bogus charges. Whoopee!!!
Now the City of Denver can start harassing Stanley and his employess on
their way to work with illegal stops, called investigations, even though
the driver has done nothing to warrant being pulled over except be an employee
of Stanley's Stanley Fastener and Shop Supply. Now we can plan
a swat team arrest or killing of Stanley and it is all the fault of that
wild eyed crazy gun toting militia guy, Rick Stanley. Stanley has never
harmed anyone before. Never even pointed any of his weapons at anyone. Having
a weapon has defused situations regarding Stanley being threatened before
in his life with criminals carrying guns and knives and threatening Stanley
with bodily harm. Just the fact that Stanley was armed in the past has defused
many potentially life threatening situations against Stanley and his property.
That is what a legal defensive weapon is for. ]
The Colorado Court of Appeals has a Petiton and Motion to
Vacate Lower Court Bench Warrant and Hearing since June 27, 2003, and yet,
strangely, there is only silence from the Colorado Court of Appeals on the
matter. They have 30 days to answer this matter and each day is a life threatening
situation to Stanley from the Denver Police Department. Yesterday in Michigan,
a police officer was killed while trying to illegally enter a man's home
and serve a warrant for SUSPICIoN of SEXUAL ASSAULT, a felony warrant placed
by a 16 year old girl. The man's home was burned down and they thought the
man was in the fire caused by the police Helicopter and Tank which was assaulting
the home along with the swat team. One officer was killed and yet the man
who owned the home was not there at the time. He now has an APB out for
his arrest. This is commen police tactics. So is the drugging of an activist
in San Diego yesterday by the police there. None of this gets covered by
the media. Stanley's case has been totally ignored. They are just waiting
for the coup de grace of the swat team entering Stanley's property which
will set off a chain of events. The cities chain of events goes like this:
Police swat team breaks down Stanley's door in the middle of the night and
swat team enters armed to the teeth. Stanley defends himself from this illegal
entry and defends himself from attack. Shots are fired, Stanley is killed.
Another psycho gun toting crazy man is dead. Hooray for the police. Media
writes that story and that is the way it is.
Only problem with this is: It is all done fraudulently to
begin with. What started all this? Stanley exercising, peacefully his right
to openly keep and bear arms on the 210th Birthday of the Bill of Rights
on December 15, 2002, and is arrested by 18 police officers and swat team
members of the Denver Police Department. A man who actually has the audacity
to exercise his Constitutional rights is arrested, and thus starts the road
to destruction at the hands of thugs with guns in government.
The second scenario is the same except one thing: Stanley repels the invadors
of his property because he is skilled with the use of weaponry and has the
firepower to withstand the assault. Stanley calls out the Mutual Defense
Pact Militia of the 2d American Revolution at this time and holds the aggressors
at bay until hundreds of armed militia citizens of America arrive each day
to defend their brother militia member. The stand off gets larger. More
and more militia members and Patriots from across America heed the call.
Hundreds turn into thousands. The city and the Governor get involved and
the situation escalates. Thousands of angry armed Americans will know of
the transgressions against Stanley. Colorado becomes a battleground.
All because a Colorado citizen by the name of Rick Stanley decided to exercise
his God given, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed right to openly
carry a gun on his hip in celebration of the 210th birthday of the Bill
of Rights on December 15, 2002. What is going to happen? The Governor has
been contacted with phone calls, e-mails and letters trying to get a pardon
to end this entire fiasco that the jduicial branch of the government refuses
to address because it is politically charged and Denver is not happy. What
is going to happen?
The judiciary is ignoring this so they can be rid of Stanley and his accusations.
We will see.
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.