[Note the date of the 1996 Dunblane Scotland school shooting mentioned below, March 13. All Illumimati staged events are tied to satanic ritual and the numbers 11 and 13 (or their multiples, E.g. 22) are significant to Satanists as they almost always stage a killing event using satanic numerology. They recently tore down the Sandy Hook school using a 55 million fund of U.S. taxpayer dollars to erase every last shred of evidence that would prove that Sandy Hook was a staged event and that no one was actually killed. It's bad enough that federal law enforcement agencies are now obvious collaborators in the NWO undermining and takedown of the American Republic, but to see state law officials, such as the Connecticut State Police and even the Connecticut Chief Medical Examiner's Office participating in wholesale treason and subversion against the People of the United States is beyond the pale. The "crisis" actors who are participating in these hoaxes are as guilty of treason and conspiracy to defraud the public as are the federal and state officials who are orchestrating the staging. Will the day ever come when America will have its own 'Nuremberg' trials to set the record straight and record for posterity the monstrous criminality of these cretins? ...Ken Adachi]
By John Friend
October 28, 2013
Forward from Keith Howe
Note: this article was written and submitted to American Free Press for review, however, it appears it will not be published in the newspaper or on the website. Therefore, I have decided to publish it here. I ask readers to provide feedback in the comments section. -JRF
The alleged shooting at the Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut in December of last year has caused quite a bit of friction and disagreement amongst the staff at American Free Press. Here I will attempt to explain my views on this controversial subject, which stand in stark contrast to the position taken by Michael Collins Piper in his recent article entitled, "Internet Rife with Disinformation: "Cyber Shills" working to misdirect, embarrass legitimate conspiracy researchers," published on page 18 in issue number 43 of AFP’s print edition.
I took a keen interest in the alleged Sandy Hook shooting from the very beginning. The Connecticut State Police and news media reported that on December 14, 2012, a 20-year-old young man named Adam Lanza first shot and killed his mother, Nancy Lanza, in their Newtown, Connecticut home before driving to the Sandy Hook Elementary School and going on a shooting rampage, murdering 20 children and 6 adults at the school – truly an amazing, and highly implausible, feat allegedly accomplished by a young man with no known military training. According to the official narrative of the alleged shooting, Adam Lanza – the “lone gunman” – shot all but two of his victims multiple times, firing 154 total rounds in a matter of minutes. Many have questioned the plausibility of such a scenario.
The alleged Sandy Hook shooting scenario conveniently aligns with the hysterical anti-gun agenda and planned destruction of the 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution long promoted by certain organized political factions.
Coincidentally, the Sandy Hook scenario mirrors the March 13, 1996 Dunblane, Scotland incident where it is alleged that a “lone gunman”, Thomas Hamilton, entered the Dunblane Primary School armed with four handguns, shooting and killing sixteen children and one adult before committing suicide. Even more coincidentally, in the immediate aftermath of the alleged Dunblane Massacre, the controlled media directed public debate on gun control laws, including public petitions using emotionally manipulative appeals calling for a ban on private ownership of handguns - the exact tactics used by the mass media in the United States following the alleged Sandy Hook shooting.
Lawmakers in the United Kingdom responded to the media directed outcry with the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1997 and the Firearms (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1997 which essentially made private ownership of handguns illegal in the United Kingdom.
Both Dunblane and Sandy Hook share similar fact patterns. Both Dunblane and Sandy Hook incidents mirror each other with bizarre - and quite suspicious - legislative acts designed specifically to stop the public from obtaining detailed information about the incidents – except what was released by the controlled media and government officials. Interestingly, the official files concerning Dunblane were originally sealed for 100 years, and numerous legal maneuvers have been employed keeping the public from obtaining information pertaining to the alleged Sandy Hook shooting – ostensibly to “protect the families and their privacy."
My suspicion of the official narrative explaining the alleged shootings at the Sandy Hook Elementary School began almost immediately. In fact, I speculated on my personal website only six days after the alleged shooting took place that the Sandy Hook "shooting" was an elaborate hoax presented to the public as a real event via the controlled mass media in order to advance a number of tyrannical, un-American political agendas using psychological warfare. The government and media offered no legitimate proof or evidence that a young man named Adam Lanza went on a shooting rampage, let alone that he even existed or anyone was in fact killed at the elementary school. Conflicting and extremely improbable reports dominated the mainstream media reporting of the event on the day and in the weeks following. Inconsistencies within the official narrative were particularly troublesome, including the varying accounts of the specific weapon allegedly used in the mass shooting. In fact, the official narrative that emerged was and remains absurd on its face, and should be considered an insult to any thinking individual.
The Connecticut State Police immediately seized all crimes scenes connected to the alleged shooting, including the Lanza home and the Sandy Hook Elementary School. No independently verifiable evidence or proof was offered or presented to the public substantiating the claims that a shooting at the school did indeed take place or that any children or adults were murdered at the school. No crime scene photos, no bodies, no autopsy reports, nothing - just official government press releases uncritically disseminated by the controlled mass media and emotionally manipulative and dubious testimony provided by the alleged family members of the purported victims of the shooting and other “survivors” who escaped the school unharmed.
Already skeptical of the implausible and quite ridiculous official narrative of the alleged shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School, I began investigating the testimony provided by the children and adults said to have been present in the school during the shooting. The more I heard from these “eye witnesses” and “survivors”, the more absurd this alleged shooting sounded. Nothing added up.
Additionally, I began investigating the testimony provided by the alleged family members of the purported victims of the shooting, including the infamous press conference of Robbie Parker, the alleged father of Emilie Parker, a young 6-year-old girl said to have been murdered by Adam Lanza. The press conference in which Robbie Parker spoke for the first time to the media about his daughter's alleged death is available online. I encourage readers to watch it if they have not already.
Does this man appear to be genuine to you?
It should be noted that initially, the Connecticut State Police assigned officers to the 26 families who allegedly lost a loved one during the shooting, and in their efforts to control the flow of information specifically requested that no press interviews be conducted with the family members. However, in the weeks that followed, numerous family members who allegedly lost a loved one in the Sandy Hook shooting came forward and were interviewed by the mainstream mass media.
More red flags appeared as I continued to investigate this alleged shooting. I began watching and reading the interviews of other alleged family members of purported victims of the Sandy Hook shooting broadcast and printed in the mainstream media. What struck me, once again, was their lack of genuineness. These people simply did not strike me as legitimate grieving victims who had just lost a beloved family member. Further raising my suspicion was the fact that many of them seemed to have certain talking points promoting gun-control measures and demonizing gun-ownership in America.
Sandy Hook Families Interviewed All Fake
I don't endorse everything said or alleged in this video, but it is worth watching, especially the first 13 minutes or so. -JRF
I also watched the press conference given by the Connecticut Chief Medical Examiner, Dr. H. Wayne Carver, that was aired by mainstream media outlets including MSNBC, which is also available online. Dr. James Tracy, a professor at Florida Atlantic University specializing in media history and analysis, wrote a provocative essay entitled, The Sandy Hook Massacre: Unanswered Questions and Missing Information in which he transcribed many of the more bizarre and questionable statements made by Dr. H. Wayne Carver during the press conference explaining his investigations into the alleged shooting. Dr. Tracy's analysis of the Connecticut Chief Medical Examiner's testimony argues that, "The multiple gaffes, discrepancies, and hedges in response to reporters' astute questions suggest that he is either under coercion or an imposter." Again, I encourage readers to watch Dr. Carver's press conference if they have not already. Do Dr. Carver's statements, actions, and behavior appear credible to you?
Sandy Hook School shootings- Dr. H. Wayne Carver, Chief Medical Examiner- Full Press Conference
We already know that we cannot trust the government or media as a source of unbiased, truthful, or even credible information. We also know that there are elite political forces striving to realize their tyrannical agendas using whatever means available to them. In the intelligence world, analysts wanting to separate fact from fiction in this and other countries do not simply turn on the TV or read the paper to find out what to think. And we should not either considering the volume of repeated misinformation and disinformation coming from media sources and government officials and spokespersons.
Professional analysts do not simply believe the news or what a government spokesperson says. They collect and evaluate the credibility of evidence, and choose from among several alternative hypotheses in order to arrive upon the most plausible as likely explanations for the evidence being analyzed. This is also the function of a court of law - to settle disputes and find facts. One way of doing this is to evaluate all reasonable hypotheses and reach conclusions about their relative likelihood, based on all available evidence – not merely cherry-picked evidence that supports a preconceived or favored point of view.
As a general rule, deception in a Political Warfare context is goal driven. Deception is used to further an agenda. In the case of Sandy Hook, it is undeniable that the Connecticut State Legislature enacted draconian anti-gun laws that would have been unable to be enacted if it were not for the alleged Sandy Hook shooting. It is also undeniable that in the wake of public questioning of the official Sandy Hook narrative, Senators Feinstein and Durban have sought to pass legislation seeking to define who a journalist is. Should this succeed, we can expect that journalists will then have to be licensed by the government. Perhaps a “Ministry of Truth” will be created to compliment and support DHS.
If we know that the official narrative of what transpired at the Sandy Hook Elementary School is simply untenable, and that no legitimate proof or evidence exists to support the contention Adam Lanza went on a shooting rampage murdering 20 children and 6 adults that fateful day, what exactly happened? Was the alleged Sandy Hook shooting a massive hoax presented to the public as a real event via the mass media with the intent of advancing and conditioning the public into accepting a number of political agendas, including gun-control? Was the alleged shooting in fact a “mass shooting” drill organized by the Department of Homeland Security working in conjunction with officials with the State of Connecticut, Connecticut State Police, elements of the mass media, and others, and presented as a real event to a gullible – and traumatized – public? Consider the following facts:
A workshop organized by FEMA and the Connecticut Department of Emergency Services entitled Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters was taking place in Bridgeport, Connecticut – roughly 18 miles from Newtown - the same day as the alleged Sandy Hook shooting;
Virtually all standard operating procedures pertaining to medical and police personnel responding to a genuine mass shooting were not followed that day, including the fact medical personnel responding to the alleged shooting were forced to operate at the fire station several hundred feet from the school rather than at the school itself;
No Emergency Medical Technicians entered the school to examine and remove the alleged shooting victims to a hospital for emergency medical care, or for a certified Medical Doctor to pronounce them dead;
The parents of the alleged victims were not allowed or even asked to identify their children’s bodies;
Department of Homeland Security vehicles and personnel were in the vicinity of the school before the alleged shooting even took place;
The State of Connecticut’s Emergency Communications System was taken over on the morning of the alleged shooting;
In the age of digital media, no digital photographs or video of the victims or crime scene has been presented, and the photos of the alleged victims presented in the media are all extremely suspicious, showing signs of alteration and/or Photo shopping;
The Newtown City Clerk’s Office initially refused to release the death certificates of the alleged victims – which are normally public records – but was eventually forced to release them only after a Freedom of Information Act request was filed;
The Sandy Hook Elementary School is currently being demolished, and those involved in the demolition have been sworn to silence and cannot discuss anything relating to the school;
Military strategists and experts specializing in psychological and information warfare have stressed the importance of utilizing victims – either real or fabricated – in obtaining specific political objectives. For example, the infamous Operation Northwoods document, prepared by the Join Chiefs of Staff and presented to President Kennedy in the 1960s, specifically called for creating “casualty lists” which would be placed in U.S. newspapers to facilitate “national indignation” and swing public opinion in a desired direction;
Professor George J. Stein’s 1995 essay Information Warfare describes sophisticated psychological warfare techniques in which “fictive or fictional operational environments” can be “generated, transmitted, distributed, or broadcast by governments” or other actors “through increasingly diversified networks” - mass media, social media, television, radio, etc. - in order to obtain public policy objectives or to “shape the political context” in which public policy is made;
On December 14, 2012, America changed. America changed in ways reminiscent of the aftermath of 9/11.
On that fateful day last December, America changed from a decreasingly open society suffering under draconian legislation, such as the Patriot Act and NDAA, into a Soviet-style totalitarian society employing deceit and psychological manipulation, not only on its external enemies, but also upon its own citizens in an increasingly blatant manner.
On that day, Americans and the world public were fed a story-line, a script written to psychologically and emotionally terrorize an already traumatized and vulnerable audience into accepting a preconceived political agenda relating primarily to gun-control and mental health services. The Sandy Hook deception was designed to attack and ultimately destroy the uniquely American tradition of private gun-ownership, independence, and self-reliance.
As we sit idly by watching our Constitution being shredded before our eyes, it’s time that we take a closer look at Sandy Hook. This time, using the same kinds of Structured Methods of Intelligence Analysis that the CIA employs – such as the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses, Hypothesis Mapping, Argument Mapping and Logic – techniques which this reporter utilized to investigate the official narrative of the alleged Sandy Hook shooting.
We also need to call out those who have been intentionally misrepresenting our concerns by setting up fallacious straw-man arguments, ignoring or distorting our views and points of contention with the official narrative of Sandy Hook, appealing to authority and emotion, and generally engaging in intellectually dishonest tactics.
Bottom line: there is simply no reason for any objective, rational observer to conclude the Sandy Hook shooting did indeed take place. In fact, the weight of the evidence disproves the official narrative of the Sandy Hook shooting.
Until legitimate evidence and proof is offered demonstrating a shooting did take place in which 20 children and 6 adults were murdered by Adam Lanza (and there should be lots of verifiable proof if this shooting did happen), the official narrative and propaganda associated with the Sandy Hook shooting should be rejected. Rather than demonstrating a mass shooting perpetrated by a crazed “lone gunman” named Adam Lanza took place by presenting legitimate evidence and offering proof, the government and media presented a carefully crafted script playing on our emotions, appealing to authority, and generally exploiting our psychological weaknesses. The public was – and remains – expected to simply believe what the government and media have told us about the alleged Sandy Hook shooting.
Was the Sandy Hook shooting an elaborate hoax presented as a real event via the mass media, designed to advance a particular political agenda, or set of agendas, including destroying the Second Amendment and the uniquely American tradition of private gun ownership? Based on the known facts, this appears to be a much more plausible explanation than accepting the official narrative promoted by the government and media – no matter how revolutionary or controversial such an idea may be to certain individuals.
Indeed, accepting the official narrative of the alleged Sandy Hook shooting is as irresponsible and dangerous as accepting the official narrative that Osama bin Laden and 19 Muslim fanatics attacked America on 9/11, or that Hitler gassed 6 million Jews during WWII. American Free Press correctly states that the media is the enemy, and we would be wise to remember that when analyzing major events that have drastic consequences for public policy, particularly as it relates to our cherished Second Amendment.
What puts Adam Lanza at the scene of the so-called crime? The car that was suppose to be his mother's car is not his mother's car. The licence plate registry is for a man who has been in and out of prison all his life. I can't remember his name but it would be easy to trace.
The above actors supposed daughter killed at Sandy Hook, was in the same clothes as her picture playing on Obama's lap after he arrived. I think the whole thing was a Hoax! Sandy hook like the Boston Bombing were Fema drill hoaxes. There is a video of the SH Fire department from above. People are coming out of the FD, going around the corner & back into the FD. Examine the Boston Bombing, the 'explosions' didn't even damage the flags. When a serious injury like the missing leg actor, they are covered up immediately, not photo opted down the street. Thanks!
Adam Lanza turns out to be his brother who is now working as an accountant in NYC, apparently. They split them out of one person conveniently to dispose of the culprit and this is evidenced clearly by photo analysis with experts as well as records and interviews of apparent family members.
I have asked from the first day how a skinny 130 lb. kid could have carried in so much artillery and all of those shells without falling over? Did the kid have the muscle to lug it all? Of course not. This snowjob is part of the Cold Civil War, as I call it on the American People.
The American Free Press is I believe the same source that I stopped listening to when I found they defended aspects of 9/11 that were clearly false. There's a gatekeeper at every watering hole, it seems? After being blocked out of my Gmail account that was being used to argue with Anthony Lawson on Youtube about 'no plane theory' (which Lawson censored me on badly, removing my questions and commentary totally then sending me private messages declaring how righteous he was), I was forced to stop making headway as a citizen reporting on basic, bare bones facts. Lawson was not able to hold water on the subject and so Google just blocked my whole account causing quite a bit of damage and loss to my professional and personal life on that scale.
I don't think we have much of a chance at this point to restore our republic after 100 years of murderous deception and control. The same source that took over Russia has taken hold here and the echoes throughout Europe show little difference.
It's still encouraging to read journalism which displays the truth and has honor to it rather than fearful scripted anti-American bogus narratives. The Pentagon must be confusing Hollywood movies with the news these days because both play the same-
I have a lot of respect for AFP and Mike Piper, I just totally disagree when it comes to Sandy Hook and the Boston "bombing". I was hoping we could have a live discussion/debate on these topics, but I don't think that is going to happen... we had one scheduled but it never panned out.
Given the obvious false flag events such as the Oklahoma City Bombing of 1995 and 9/11 and the Jew Supremacist intense anti-gun campaign, your analysis sounds
quite probable. The Jew media and the US government work hand in hand now.
No investigation, just 24/7 non-stop propaganda.
John, yesterday (Mon 10/28) MCP posted a podcast where he again plays self-appointed watchdog against shills/agents/etc in the TM. TUT describes it,
"Tonight’s program–Agents within the movement, literally under every bed, some of them knowing who they are and what they are doing, others who simply do the enemy’s dirty work while believeing they are doing something good. "
I had a bit to say about it, including MCP's (potentially...) describing himself at 1:09:00 into the podcast. I also discuss some more background leading up to your having to self-publish your "...Where's the Proof?" essay, including the "cancelled at the last minute" appearance of MCP on your show to discuss Sandy Hoax, back on Sept 26. Easier to link to it:
Separately, re the anti-gun "Demand a Plan" propaganda bit you included above; one good thing to come out of Rabbi AJ's camp was their response piece, "Demand A Real Plan ~ Disarmament Leads To Democide" 5.5 mins:
Somewhere, there's another great 'response' clip mocking how half the celebs in the "Demand a Plan" bit, themselves starred in some of Bagelwood's most graphic gun-violence ridden movies. It would take some digging to find that clip again...
Who orchestrated this hoax? Janet Napolitano? Obama himself? Surely there is some staff somewhere in some level of government that planned, organized, recruited, coordinated and controlled this psy-op. Probably the same staff that pulled off the Aurora and Tucson shootings, and the subsequent cover-ups. Could be a CIA project. Our politicians know. They should be hung by their fingernails until they talk.
Evidence points to the Sandy Hook operation being primarily an Israeli operation. The community surround Sandy Hook Elementary School is very, very heavily populated by jews. Entire streets are jew. They even have jew street names. Most of the so-called "victims" were jew. Yet - for some strange reason the headlines didn't screech "Holocaust at Sandy Hook!!" Nope. Why though? Too obvious? lol
This is all part of the disarmament plan they have in store for us. What do you think is going to happen after that? Huh?
As the county gets "darker".....is it getting "safer"? Nope.
Think of it this way: The jews want to de-horn the cattle. Cattle with horns are dangerous.
John, you are most correct about the Sandy Hoax. Piper is just plain wrong on the topic. I do want to note that posting about the hoax six days after the psyop doesn't really mean that you had some extraordinary insight into the event. Those that were truly clued in to the hoax were posting discrepancies the very next day and you were able to sift through their original material and the anomalies regarding the official lie for an additional five days.
I don't mean to disparage you in any way, I'm just making an observation and tip my hat to those that laid the foundation for all of us with their keen research.
And 13 months later Lanza allegedly shot the children at the Sandy Hook elementary school.
Should the parents be allowed to protect their deceased children from public scrutiny? Of course...unless they are trying to use their children's demise in a public forum ( http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/bus-tour-commemorating-sandy-hook-takes-gun-control-164753700.html ) to alter a fundamental, Constitutional Right to keep and bear arms!!
Take it on the road? Ok. But before you do, PROVE it really happened! And not via photo-shopped "death certificates"! Complete and AUTHENTIC autopsy reports...ok? Fair enough?
Break the fed by declaring all "money" the property of the nation (meaning the people), thus ending usury and the "National debt".
I read something recently about harmless dry ice "bombs". I'd imagine one of those going off would look exactly like the "bomb" shown in Boston. Plenty of white "smoke" (actually carbon dioxide) and no damage.
The video of the London "beheading" was no more convincing. It looked as if it was made in a studio using "green screen" technology, and the "body" in the road appeared to be made of rubber. No blood anywhere except (sometimes) on the hands of the supposed killer. Did Lee Rigby even exist? The one image (the ONLY one) of him looks Photoshopped to me, with a tiny head on an oversized body.
I read somewhere that the images of the Syrian "gassing victims" were released a day before the supposed event, though I don't have the means to verify this.
Why haven't you gone to Sandy Hook, and interviewed the victims family themselves? It should be pretty easy to prove or disprove the victims simply by interviewing the townsfolk. If they were actors, I'm sure they aren't still living there. You can sit there and speculate all you want, and it makes for a good story, but this really shouldn't be that hard to prove one way or the other.
Allegedly, the Lanza home was located at 36 Yogananda Street, in Newtown, Connecticut. Allegedly, the Lanzas lived there. When you get a chance search the term Yogananda and see what you come up with.
The Lanza home was located right in the heart of an ethno-religious enclave. To get there from Route 34, you turn off onto Zoar Road. You’ll see it there if you look at a map.
Zoar, meaning "small" or "insignificance" in Hebrew, (a "little one" as Lot called it,) was a city east of Jordan in the valley of Siddim, which later became the Dead Sea. Along with Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, and Zeboim, Zoar was one of the 5 cities slated for destruction by God; but Zoar was spared at Lot's plea as his place of refuge. (Genesis 19:20-23)
So, Zoar is a Hebrew word. Most of the residents there are quite familiar with Hebrew – and most of the operatives in this case are also quite familiar with Hebrew.
1. The civilian disarmament agenda can benefit greatly from Denial and Deception campaigns involving school shooting scenarios with child victims.
• Political operatives had motive
• Political operatives had means
• Political operatives had opportunity
• Political operatives had required expertise
• Political operatives had required personnel security
2. Government was willing to use Denial and Deception measures against its own citizens to further political objectives.
3. Furthermore, the government has hidden the operation well:
• They passed laws stopping public access to information hiding information and evidence of a drill presented as a live event to further the civilian disarmament agenda,
• They passed laws charging money for any information request to any State Agency especially relative to the Sandy Hook situation – whether the information requestor received a response or not to hide information and evidence of a drill presented to the public as a real event to further the civilian disarmament agenda.
• They subjecting all CT State Troopers to an internal gag order complete with sanction for violation if they talk about anything pertaining to Sandy Hook, or any person in the Department at all to hide information and evidence of a drill presented to the public as a real event to further the civilian disarmament agenda.
• They forced all members of the demolition crew who took part in the demolition of the Sandy Hook Elementary School to submit to a binding gag order to hide information and evidence of a drill presented to the public as a real event to further the civilian disarmament agenda.
4. Furthermore, the government is confident they can continue to hide the operation well:
• They can continue to hide the operation though their control of the compliant foreign controlled media and though their control of key government posts and through their disbursement of monetary funds coming directly from well-meaning donations.
5. Furthermore, the government has silenced any leaks:
• They have ensured that no former or current operatives have accused them,
• They have ensured that no other people associated with the operation (doctors, providers, police, workers) have accused them
One note on evidence of the donations being used as hush-money. Would it surprise you to know that a guy by the name of John Trentacosta just happens to own the property adjacent to that allegedly occupied by the Lanza’s at 34 Yogananda Street in Newtown. He just happens to live not only in the same community, in the same town – but on the exact same street.
John Trentacosta is the CEO of Newtown Savings Bank and is also on the Federal Reserve Advisory Council. As you know, the Federal Reserve is directly connected to the Ruling Class – and their agenda.
Coincidentally, Mr. Trentacosta has also been heavily involved in the fundraising for Sandy Hook. What a coincidence.
I sure would like to read that article by Mike Piper about his suspicions of shills in "the movement." (I detest that phrase in all its intereations.) Guess I won't be able to find the article online for free.
I am also very curious about MCP's ideas about 9-11. I ordered AFP's special paper edition on 9-11 and all in all it seemed decent, and I am a tough evaluator when it comes to 9-11. 9-11 is kind of my litmus test event through which lens I evaluate alternative media people's coverage of other false flag type events.
Would mention that the city clerk of Newtown refused to issue death certificates and there were even two bills floated in the Ct. state legislature to try to prevent the release of those death certificates but the bills failed to pass and the death certificates were released.
Thing is death certificates do not mean much. They can be faked too.
I think it would be an interesting article or show to discuss just exactly how one would go about proving beyond the shadow of a doubt that a victim was a real person who really did die at the stated time and place and in the manner as the "official narrative" declares. I just do not know WHAT would constitute solid proof.
Annother big area of research seems to be for someone to go to Newtown and try to see if anybody knew those children or those adults, that is, like neighbors or church members or friends of the family. It seems incredible to me that the whole town is operating in effect under a gag order. I just wonder if any researcher has prowled around and talked around and tried at least to find out that the victims were real people.
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.