By Richard A. Serrano, Times Staff Writer
September 25, 2005
Capt. Ian Fishback repeatedly voiced his
concern about prisoner abuse in Iraq to his superiors, but felt he was being
WASHINGTON — When Army Capt. Ian Fishback told his company
and battalion commanders that soldiers were abusing Iraqi prisoners in violation
of the Geneva Convention, he says, they told him those rules were easily
skirted.When he wrote a memo saying Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld
was wrong in telling Congress that the Army follows the Geneva dictates,
his lieutenant colonel responded only: "I am aware of Fishback's concerns."
And when Fishback found himself in the same room as Secretary
of the Army Francis J. Harvey at Ft. Benning, Ga., he again complained about
prisoner abuse. He said Harvey told him that "corrective action was
At every turn, it seemed, the decorated young West Point graduate,
the son of a Vietnam War veteran from Michigan's Upper Peninsula, whose
wife is serving with the Army in Iraq, felt that the military had shut him
So he turned to those he knows best. He sought guidance from
fellow infantry commanders and his West Point classmates, and learned that
they agreed with him that abuse of prisoners was widespread and that officers
weren't adequately trained in how to handle them.
Then, in a lengthy chronology obtained Saturday by The Times,
recounting what he saw in Iraq and his numerous efforts to get the Army's
attention, he wrote that "Harvey is wrong." He wrote that Army
guidance was "too vague for officers to enforce American values."
He concluded that violations of the Geneva Convention were "systematic,
and the Army is misleading America."
This summer, after weighing the possible effects on his career,
he stepped outside the Army's chain of command and telephoned the Human
Rights Watch advocacy group. He later met with aides on the Senate Armed
Services Committee. On Friday, he authorized them to make public his allegations,
along with those of two sergeants, of widespread prisoner abuse they had
witnessed when they served in Iraq in 2003 and 2004 as members of the Army's
82nd Airborne Division.
Within hours, the Army announced it had opened a criminal
The review is the first major investigation by the military
of widespread prisoner abuse outside the Abu Ghraib prison scandal, and
the first time such a review has targeted soldiers in the regular Army rather
than the National Guardsmen and reservists in the Abu Ghraib case.
But for Fishback, whom friends describe as a deeply religious
Christian and patriot who prays before each meal and can quote from the
Constitution, the ordeal may be just beginning.
Army officials have temporarily furloughed him from Special
Operations training school at Ft. Bragg, N.C., to make him available to
the Criminal Investigation Command as it sorts through his allegations.
And sources close to the case said investigators are pressing
him to identify the two sergeants who have backed up his accusations —
something he does not want to do for the sake of all their careers.
"He's a very decent, fine young man," said Col.
Dan Zupan, who teaches the rules of war at West Point and was one of Fishback's
mentors. "He doesn't have an ax to grind. He's just in search of the
At Human Rights Watch, Tom Malinowski, the group's Washington
director, recalled escorting Fishback, his uniform adorned with two bronze
stars, to meet with staff aides on the Senate Armed Services Committee two
For an hour they chatted behind closed doors in the committee's
hearing room in the Russell building. Malinowski said Fishback answered
all their questions unflinchingly.
"He answered them just as you would imagine an officer
would — very factual, very unemotional," Malinowski said.
A former soldier close to Fishback, who asked not to be identified
out of respect for Fishback's own decision not to talk to the media, said
Fishback "really doesn't care what happens to him."
"He wants to stay in the Army. But he also says, 'This
is bigger than me. I've got to do the right thing here.' "
Fishback maintains that he witnessed detainees being stripped,
deprived of sleep and exposed to the elements at the behest of Army intelligence
officers, who wanted the prisoners softened up for interrogation.
To back up his claims, two as-yet-unnamed sergeants came forward,
telling Human Rights Watch they saw soldiers break a prisoner's leg, kick
and punch others and force others to hold large water jugs for long periods
of time or stack themselves into human pyramids.
They said the practice involved numerous soldiers and lasted
six months, from the fall of 2003 to spring of 2004 in the vicinity of Fallouja,
a hotbed of opposition to U.S. troops.
Human Rights Watch officials said one of the sergeants had
left the military and the other had been reassigned. One said he had never
been trained in handling prisoners.
"We never should have been allowed to guard people who
tried to kill us," the infantry sergeant said.
Human Rights Watch said it had spoken with a third sergeant
and two Army physician's assistants who can back up the claims of brutality.
But they said those individuals had not given permission to release their
For now, Fishback has been instructed to remain at Ft. Bragg,
where he must obtain a pass for any trips off the base farther than 50 miles.
When he came to Washington to meet with the committee two
weeks ago, he came with a pass. But according to Human Rights Watch, the
Army learned of that session and denied his request for a pass to return
The Army would not discuss those matters. But Paul Boyce,
a spokesman, said, "The Army does not tolerate detainee abuse."
He added that it had conducted more than 400 investigations
and 2,800 interviews on possible abuse since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist
attacks. He said 230 members of the Army had been punished.
Central to Fishback's reasoning in pursuing the abuse matter
is the "Cadet Honor Code" he studied before graduating from West
Point in 2001. It says, "A cadet shall not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate
those who do."
In his personal chronology, he wrote, "Bottom line: I
am concerned that the Army is deliberately misleading the American people
about detainee treatment within our custody."
When the prison abuse scandals at the Abu Ghraib prison erupted
in April 2004, he noted that he had heard of instances around Fallouja that
were "even more intense."
By June of this year, his concern had grown because it had
become clear that the military was holding few soldiers accountable for
Abu Ghraib beyond the half-dozen guards arrested, and that none of their
superiors had been court-martialed. He asked the Army's inspector general
at Ft. Bragg for an analysis of the Geneva Convention on treatment of prisoners.
"He listens to me and agrees to give me an IG investigation
summary," Fishback wrote. "It is very incomplete and provides
no information that I need."
He called the International Committee of the Red Cross for
an interpretation of the Geneva Convention, and found it "much closer
to my West Point education."
Then he learned of two new incidents of abuse: Someone had
"interrogated" a detainee to death in Iraq and "fed a prisoner
water by saturating the sand bag over the prisoner's head."
That was enough for him, he wrote. He began "obtaining
documents and additional points of view from fellow officers and determining
possible courses of action."
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.