"The traits that The Operators all share and demonstrate
are commitment, humor, unconditional love, selfless service, wisdom, artful
synchronicity, harmony, timeless knowledge and understanding, compassion,
generosity, intelligence and resourcefulness and we're gradually learning
to be more like them and less like our fragmented, unhappy and rudderless
old selves" ...Don Croft
By Don Croft <email@example.com>
August 8, 2005
I imagine that something or other in this essay will tread
on every single gouty toe but I sense that humanity, even materialistic,
jaded and pigheaded Westerners, are ready to start talking openly or at
least hearing about God again without resorting to sycophancy, ostracism
or tiresome cultish mummery.
Pekka Martinen, a young gifter in the Arctic Circle who loves
and appreciates God very much, as I do, challenged me to write something
about my personal beliefs (I've skirted around this subject since the beginning,
four years ago, of this network) and I figure that it won't do any harm
to express them, since my basic belief is that no institution or ideology
is capable of standing in between our Creator and ourselves.
I've referred now and then to 'The Operators,' because I've
felt that mentioning God much would drive away the more faint hearted but
well meaning. After this, I'll probably go back to being circumspect about
God and religion but, in fact, I believe that there are many hierarchies
in the unseen realms who more directly serve God than we do and who have
sometimes a vested interest and sometimes a selfless interest in helping
us succeed in driving the occult/corporate world order into prison cells
and potters' fields in the near future, thereby paving the way for the long-promised
Golden Age of dynamic human unity, freedom and prosperity. By volunteering
for this work we become cogs in a machine, granted, but what a glorious
machine it is! ;-)
I'm certainly convinced by now that if we don't choose to
be part of God's machine we'll just end up playing an unwitting part in
the sickening machinations of the occult/corporate dung beetles, the part
likely being either cannon fodder, couch potatoes or livestock.
No tyrant has ever given up power willingly, of course, so
we'd be pretty neurotic to hold out for that massive, mostly unseen body
of tyrants who make up the occult/corporate world order to hand us their
sabers any time soon. At least we know by now that we can bring them to
account without shooting physical bullets at them, or at least perhaps not
many bullets ;-).
The traits that The Operators all share and demonstrate are
commitment, humor, unconditional love, selfless service, wisdom, artful
synchronicity, harmony, timeless knowledge and understanding, compassion,
generosity, intelligence and resourcefulness and we're gradually learning
to be more like them and less like our fragmented, unhappy and rudderless
old selves. Coincidentally, these are among the characteristics that all
of the Manifestations of God have demonstrated and taught us, throughout
the ages, how to achieve, so I think Their missions are all reaching fruition
Read this as just one fellow's considered opinions and take
what you like, then leave the rest in the 'wait and see' bin, okay? It feels
to me like I can write about God without alienating you or 'preaching to
the choir.' For one who pays attention all of the revealed religions are
rich mines and anyone can come away with priceless gems after approaching
any of them without prejudice.
The hatred of religion and even of God in recent generations
is a pretty weird phenomenon, I think, and it's obvious to me that most
of that happened by design. There seems to be some wiggle room, though,
despite the finality with which so many people have condemned religion and
the worship of God.
Have you noticed that everyone who parrots these formulaic
condemnations of religion and/or God seems to honestly believe that he/she
came to those convictions independently? It's the lockstep, herding nature
of this system of belief that shows that its army of proponents were artificially
inseminated with it. Clearly, the intended goal was for these unwitting
pseudo intellectuals to effectively silence all rational, open, candid public
and even private discussions of religions and God.
Thanks to the internet, though, one can casually display one's
considered thoughts and views without interruption. It will be fun to see
if there's any backlash to this essay by the inebriated but well-targetted
cruise missiles of the world order, those clamoring, deeply programmed and
sociopathic Monarch saboteurs who are present on every single board where
they haven't yet been expelled on account of bad behavior, because I'm not
arguing in favor of any particular ideology; I'm only stating my subjective
view of reality.
The rebellious occult/corporate world order has taken its
best shot at the Godhead and widely missed the target in recent years, hence
the near-universal rejection of Maitreya, their Wizard of Oz styled, Theosophical/Masonic
false prophet, along with the rest of their stable of charismatic fakers.
This, to me, is another clear evidence that the occult/corporate order is
not only hopelessly behind schedule and ultimately can't understand humanity
but have gotten entirely off track, in spite of perhaps millennia of careful
plotting and exploitation, during which time they at least got almost complete
control of the clergy of every major religion. This world order and its
institutions are hopelessly centralized, so of course they needed to offer
a monolithic ideological framework in order to get the rest of us to swallow
their ill-prescribed medicine.
What will Christianity, Islam, Buddhism and Hinduism look
like, perhaps very soon, after people have finally decided that the role
of clergy must be no more intrusive than the role of the unassuming people
who keep the internet up and running? My sense is that everyone will then
recognize the common Source of all these and other revealed religions and
one's religious preference will be no more or less significant than one's
nationality or ethnic origin in terms of relating to the rest of the world.
It's time to stop letting religion be rather a source of division and paranoia,
serving only the clergy and their corporate sponsors by keeping us artificially
divided along ideological lines.
It's a simple fact that all human cultures are fashioned around
the framework of one or another genuine, revealed religion so religion's
not something that will go away just because we click our heels three times
and wish. So, why not look at it with new eyes, instead?
It's typical of the world weird order's dialectic approach
to both undermine humanity's religious institutions and, when possible,
to pollute the Scriptures; and then put on another face and advise intellectuals
that religion (and by extension, God) are essentially horrific and exploitive.
This criminal class created Theosophy, atheism and the other popular cults
in the last century and a half in order to sponge up the less discerning
intellectuals among the people who had become disenchanted with the world's
revealed religions. Trapping people in these looped ideologies which explain
everything but answer nothing essentially guarantees that they won't pursue
the higher path of intellectual integrity, of course, and by getting them
to parrot these limiting formulae they are able to reinforce their old,
meticulously built house of cards that's based on Luciferic rebellion. To
the untrained or lazy intellect reality is determined by what 'the majority'
of their particular demographic believe and think, after all, and how many
people, by now, have rejected clergy-canned religion along with its 'alternatives:'
cults or canned intellectual cynicism? Not very many, which is one reason
I'm writing this little essay.
In simpler, more graphic terms, the world order are like someone
who silently stinks up a crowded elevator, then, drawing attention to himself
first with histrionics, stage-turns to glare at the innocent person next
When I was twelve I was advised that I needed to choose between
the Biblical presentation in Genesis and Darwin's theory, strange to tell,
and at the time I believed that this was a valid choice-boy, was I depressed
and it turned me into a little atheist! That was in 1961, before genetic
science had disproven Darwin's basic thesis and pointed toward a purposeful
organization of flora and fauna, though of course Darwinism is still being
presented as the 'correct' paradigm in funded schools and universities because
his theories are just as spiritually enervating as Marx's dribble is. Because
I was brought up under fascism/materialism and religious hypocrisy it took
several more years before I finally figured out that the truth in this issue
is to be found somewhere else.
Note that fundamentalist Christian 'scientists' are presenting
'Creationism' as a viable alternative to Darwinism and the strange part
of that is that some folks who ought to know better have bought into that.
Honestly, though, mainstream scientists are just as superstitious because
they aggressively ignore the etheric aspects of reality in favor of infantile
materialism. I think it's long past time to knock that plagiaraist, Newton,
off his pedestal and pay more
attention to Tesla and Reich, genuine scientists, than to Einstein, the
I think that devotion to priestly fakers is just evidence
of the schizoid nature of western civilization in its receding paradigm,
though, and no matter how intricately they might explain away the obvious,
such as the fact that the earth is billions of years old and that matter
and energy are manifestations of hyperdimensional ether/orgone, the vast
body of good scientific evidence that supports these simple truths will
not go away.
According to IN QUEST OF EDEN, which is a speculative but
well-documented book about the origins of the Bible, the version of GENESIS
that's used in Jewish theological seminaries in Israel, at least, is a huge
volume carried over into Judaism (eventually) by Abraham, Himself, from
the Chaldeans. His father was a high priest in that older religion, of course,
and it was on account of the older religion having been corrupted that Abram
was initially inspired to
destroy the idols in the main temple, for which he was cast into the desert-a
fate worse than death in those days, we're told.
Muhammad later did that in a shrine in Arabia which Abraham
had established, by the way.
GENESIS was whittled down to the slim, hard-to-swallow bit
of the Bible that we've all seen. In the unedited version, Adam was apparently
a great scientist; a Prophet who survived a global cataclysm and re-established
civilization in the world. Also, in that book the author (I can't remember
her name) quoted evidence in the Bible that Israel was trading with Eden
in the days of Solomon and that Eden was by then called, 'Dilmun,' and was
located at the headwaters of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, near or including
Mount Ararat. Also, a favored import from Dilmun at the time was apparently
Another wonderful book which I no longer have and which name
I've forgotten argues that each time Religion is renewed by a new Prophet
institutional usury is destroyed and that the (at least temporary) destruction
of usury as a formal, legally supported practice is largely responsible
for the periodic advance of human civilization. It's said that the ultimately
parasitic City of London still enforces old Babylonian land rent policies
on the rest of the planet, by the way.
No matter how much the programmed cynics carp about the nature
of civilization, by the way, it's a fact that one can now travel freely
throughout most of the world without risking being murdered by bandits,
plundered by pirates, starving, dying of exposure or being tossed into a
dungeon by tyrants and that's real human progress, nor are we anywhere near
the fulfillment of that depressing Orwellian paradigm that's been force
fed to us in our schools and media since America became a fascist country
in the 30s, despite the presence of the new but (for now) impotent Homeland
Security Abominations, many of whom are Russians, by the way. I think we're
now witnessing the demise of the current usurious world order, in fact.
I feel kind of like the guy on the mountain top who can see
the dawn a little bit sooner than the folks in the valley can. You might
think I'm crazy for saying that this old world order is collapsing around
us but I see the evidence and I've been trying to convey that for a few
Many of us in the informal, global orgonite network have been
witnessing genuine miracles, sometimes caused by our own efforts, and it's
been a window on another realm that religionists have mostly been afraid
to explore due to the interference of self-serving clergy: genuine self-empowerment.
The less disciplined and rebellious among us become kind of egotistical
when these things happen and the ones among us who have more integrity are
rather humbled by it and even driven to explore the true source of these
I think it's convenient and appropriate to refer to the few
rebellious, vociferous, self-seeking and omnipresent folks on our planet
as 'Luciferic,' though I have never seen any indication that 'pure evil'
exists or has an archetypical representative. If we are willing to consider
that allegory, parables and allusions are more effective spiritual teachers
than literal description can be we're not put off by the presentations in
religious Scriptures that would be an affront to
our rational minds if we were expected to believe them literally, any more
than a painted picture would put us off by being two dimensional.
In real terms, the only way to convey spiritual truths is
through allegory. James Clerk Maxwell, for instance, who used mathematics
and poetry to describe the etheric realm's parameters, apparently knew that
his mathematical equations would later be corrupted beyond recognition by
the dung beetles of academia, so he also published his findings as poetry,
which the dung beetles simply lack the intelligence to corrupt.
I think that rational people have always realized that these
descriptive elements in old Scriptures were not to be accepted as literal
truths but clergy have corrupted that simple process--and ostracized &
silenced (murdered in many cases) rational folks--and, whenever possible,
have even changed religious Scriptures in order to diminish the light of
the creative nature of the Works. The older the religion, the more chicanery
has been accomplished by clergy, I think, but the priesthood have always
been aware that to completely obscure the life-giving principle of Scriptures
would ensure their own downfall because people are essentially spiritual
enough to be fundamentally attracted to whatever remains of the Creative
principle. If that were gone from religions people would stop subscribing
and I think the fear of losing a following is more horrific than the fear
of death for most clergymen.
Clergy are kind of like medical doctors. Many folks who regularly
visit MDs say, 'My doctor is SOOO nice!' but they're obviously being murdered
by expensive installments, even so. In other words, charisma is more important
to these fools than discernment.
Let's face it, if these characters weren't charismatic how
could they get so much money and devotion from the incredulous Pajama People
who will probably always be the majority? Sure, it's relative; the PJ man
of today probably knows more and is more socially advanced and less prejudiced
than the savvy man of ancient Rome.
In other words, clergy mostly behave as any other kind of
parasites do: they will delay the death of the host (in this case, the creative
Core of the religion) for as long as possible because the host's survival
ensures the parasite's vitality.
Hinduism is a special case because it wasn't a homogenous
religion before the British set up 'Hindu Theological Seminaries' in Calcutta
in the late 1700s in their insidious effort to subvert, then bleed the subcontinent
dry. That mass mind control effort was the root of Theosophy, by the way,
which is the pseudo-Hindu/Buddhist religion through which this occult/corporate
world order tried to subvert the entire planet.
A friend of mine took a tour in India of a vast cave in which
hundreds of intricate statues were carved from the rock. The Hindu guide
was explaining the significance of the art and one of the tourists asked,
'Why do Hindus worship so many gods?' The guide said, 'There's only one
God, of course-we just like to call God by many Names. For instance, Shiva
the Destroyer, alone, is capable of destroying our bad qualities.'
I think the artificial 'world religion' effort was doomed
to fail from the beginning because the light of creativity is entirely absent
from Theosophy and the other occult/corporate artifices. I think that Marjorie
White, who publishes under Franklin Press, has done the most to uncover
and document British neo-aristocracy's role in undermining the world's religions
for the past two centuries. By the way, Lord Thomas Huxley, who was the
head of Britain's spy network at the time, directly employed Marx and Darwin
to write their ideas down and it's been reported that he paid so little
that one of Marx's kids starved to death. I guess 'the dialectic of materialism'
dictated that only the strongest in Karl Marx's family (i.e., Karl) should
eat in that situation ;-)
The logical outcome of Huxley's Marxism was Pol Pot's regime,
I think, which preyed on children on a massive scale in its depopulation
Karl Marx, who had been a Lutheran Seminarian as a young man,
later stated, 'I will strike the face of God in his high heaven!' Aren't
commies supposed to be atheists?
Along with these two, some of the founders of the Western
cults, including Christian Science, Jehovah's Witnesses, Seventh Day Adventists,
Scientology, Church Universal and Triumphant (!) and Mormonism were also
directed and financed by British Intelligence and/or their Masonic (later,
CIA/NSA) American subgroups. The newage movement (regurgitated Theosophy)
is another one, of course, as is the latest form of Christian fundamentalism,
which is a thinly disguised cargo cult.
A fellow once told me he wanted to make up this bumper sticker:
What Would John Frumm Do? I don't think most folks would get it, though.
If you examine the cargo cult of the New Hebrides Islands (I once shared
a home with some of those Melanesian vine jumpers from Tanna when I worked
in Western Samoa) during and after WWII you will find some interesting parallels
to what's happening in your local, massively attended, ostentatious, usually
'non denominational' fundamentalist church, though.
Televangelism, the ultimate cargo cult, is set up that way,
generously financed by mostly nice folks who just can't tell the difference
'between knealing down and bending over.' Here's a case where a little bit
of intellectual self development might have saved these devotees from penury
and having to sit on an inflated donut cushion.
Most of what's called Chritianity is actually just regurgitated
Mithraism (the bloody, Roman soldiers' cult) and much of Tibetan Buddhism
is obviously just a refurbished version of whatever was being practiced
in Tibet before Buddhism came along. That's not to say that Mithraism and
the other were not originally, at least partially, derived from revealed
religions, of course, and there's plenty of genuine wisdom in Asia that's
not particularly religion-derived.
Lao Tsu, for instance, had written down some very ancient
and accessible teachings about the empowering nature of humility that I'd
never found so explicitly explained in religious scriptures. I think this
just points up the fact that we need to diversify our investigation of reality
and not just try to get all of our information from one Source.
It's worth mentioning that a group of Tibetan Buddhists have
been aggressively blasting the Bush Administration cadre on a regular basis,
as some of the network's intel/blasting cells also have been doing here
and abroad. A fellow who visits them sent us a lovely orgonite casting of
an icon of one of the fierce 'deities' whom these fellows subscribe to.
I think that entity (thoughtform; elemental?) was around a very long time
before Buddha was but we sense that these Tibetans are our close, cordial
allies in making this world better now and we look forward to meeting them
one day and learning more, first hand, about their beliefs and practices.
Lao Tsu also notes that , 'When the foolish man hears about
the Tao, he laughs out loud,' and how many people do you know who turn into
obtuse village idiots whenever anything important or timely is mentioned
in their presence?
Muhammad said of the rebellious that, 'Whenever they hear
the truth, they thrust their fingers in their ears,' and 'They perceive
the straight to be crooked and the crooked to be straight.'
Most of Mithraism came from Persia. Zoroaster was a Persian
Prophet descended from Abraham through his third wife, Khatura, who was
an Aryan by the way. The Magi who showed up in Palestine to be present when
their Messiah was born were Zoroastrian priests, as everyone knows. I have
a theory that Buddha, a Brahmin (Aryan, so not characteristic of the population
of Ceylon in those days) also descended from Abraham through Khatura but
I haven't come across any evidence that this is so. Abram was not Semitic,
of course, though some of his descendants, including Jesus Christ, the Prophet
Muhammad and the Jewish Prophets, perhaps mostly were. Most western Jews,
for that matter, are much more Aryan than Semitic so an 'anti-Semite' would
apply more to one who hates Muslims rather than Jews ;-) since so many Muslims
All of humanity are like the varied flowers of a garden, though,
so it's impossible to support racial prejudice.
There are more Satanists, per capita, in America's Bible Belt
than anywhere else in the world, apparently. Since there are also quite
a few documented cases in which Christian ministers in some prominent churches
in that region double as satanic priests, using the same altars, it's not
hard to see how the overlaid blood cult of the Romans just sort of blended
into the more overt satanic organizations in the West later on. If one were
to take the 'red letter' quotes (Jesus' recorded statements) out of the
New Testament and compare that to the larger body of writing by a few of
the Apostles the schizoid nature of fundamentalism is more obvious. That's
even more evident when you read the alleged writings of some of the more
honest Apostles who didn't get published, by the way. If you compare Jesus'
own sayings with the recorded sayings and writings of the other Prophets,
on the other hand, you'll easily see that all of this is from the same authoritative
I grew up in the South and a lot of gifters are Southerners
and genuine Christians. I don't mean to disparage anyone's faith and the
satanic/fundamentalist churches in that region are surely the exception.
Religious prejudice, though, is still as rife in that area as racial prejudice
had been and I think I'm performing a public service by pointing that out.
When people argue about religion, they're mainly focused on
the artificial trappings and conditional social teachings. It was conditional
for Moses and Muhammad to be particularly decisive with punishments for
crimes, for instance, because the world in those days was pretty vile, socially,
and the early Jews and Muslims needed to overcome that social tendency just
to survive as besieged communities. Both cultures went on to spread peace,
education, hygiene and prosperity in their part of the world and beyond,
of course. Others who are better writers than me have written extensively
about this. As history progressed, religious laws got more lenient and progressive.
Muhammad was the first to support the right of women to own and inherit
property, for instance, and He also made it harder for men to divorce women.
He also forbade forced conversions and protected the Christians and Jews,
whom He called, 'the people of the Book.' The majority of Muslims (Sunni)
are eagerly expecting for 'the Return of Christ,' by the way, as are many
We've been led to believe that 'rebellion' is to go against
the established order but, in fact, the established order is founded in
rebellion and by opposing it we're solidly on the side of the rule of law.
To rebel against universal law is ultimately like rebelling against gravity
by leaping from the top of a tall building. The old order apparently confuses
falling with flying.
One who is rebellious against the notion of an All-Powerful,
All-Loving but essentially Incomprehensible Creator doesn't like to consider
terms, like 'The Creative Word,' because that doesn't fit in his essentially
Luciferic paradigm but in fact it's the creative principle that ties all
of the genuine religions together and marks them as being in a higher category
than mere human philosophy, institutionalized self-aggrandizement or cultism.
There are common features in genuine religions and in luciferic cults that
are amazingly consistent for each, in fact.
1) All religious Scriptures indicate that divine grace and
forgiveness can overturn one's self-inflicted limitations and that spiritual
attainment is asked for and freely given by God to a genuinely humble person;
luciferic doctrine states that spiritual advancement comes only through
one's own efforts and that 'karmic law' can't be overturned . They also
put no premium at all on genuine humility, though some fakers give it lip
service ad nauseum in order to rope in the unwitting. The story of Cain
and Abel illustrates the distinction between salvation by grace and attempted
salvation by 'works.' I favor the second definition in my dictionary of
'salvation:' The saving from danger, difficulty or evil. That's a practical
consideration, not an ideological one per se.
2) Religions indicate that the Godhead is easily accessible
through the human heart (by sincere asking) but is otherwise unapproachable
and incomprehensible; rebellious doctrine states that we're all at least
part of God and that we are potentially able to encompass 'God' through
effort and knowledge. The principle of 'selfless asking' is contrary to
their paradigm, though of course they talk this up, too, as though they
3) A genuinely spiritual person who embraces religion considers
virtue to be its own reward and is easily capable of showing selfless love
and self sacrifice; luciferic folks won't give you the sweat off their privates
unless there's something to be personally gained from it, and although they
talk endlessly about love and service in order to gain your trust they're
not capable of demonstrating much or any of that.
4) The spiritual adept who gets inspiration from religious
Scriptures considers the ego to be something that has to be reined in. That
one is well informed of principles like personal sovereignty, the worth
of one's character, and accountability. People who seek integrity vie with
each other to be the most genuinely humble. The most apparent feature of
one who has embraced a luciferic attitude is the prominent ego and in any
group of them all you're likely to see is a parade of egoists and sycophants,
all of whom avoid personal accountability and integrity like genital warts.
Each is either constantly looking for an advantage over the rest or seeks
to find charismatic others who will take responsibility for their own lives.
5) Religionists know that right and wrong are real principles
and that one's own heart and instincts are designed to guide us through
life; cultists are not genuinely empowered, so they are incapable of embracing
simple truths like these. Instead, they subscribe to a lot of 'conditional'
paradigms and so are easily capable of rationalizing and justifying even
the most heinous acts and practices.
6) I don't rightly know what specifically happens to the human
soul after the death of the body, perhaps because the finite mind is incapable
of grasping it, but I'm quite sure that the stilted, linear view of reincarnation
is just as inaccurate as the literal belief in heaven and hell. For some
reason I can't figure out rebellious folks are passionately devoted to the
notion of linear reincarnation and all of them, of course, were someone
very important or notorious in their past lives. I haven't yet met any who
had been Chinese peasants or African hucksters. I remember that in the hippie
days any time I openly questioned linear reincarnation or the belief that
we are God I was instantly shunned by individual hippes and groups of them.
I think hippies were prototypical newagers. In re: faux-Biblical immortality
paradigms, LaRouche states that 'Christians have traded eternity for a bad
Are you getting the picture? I'm sure that I could come up
with other clear examples but the point is that I encourage you to think
critically. Nothing that's irrational is worthy of the human mind or heart
and whatever we can know can be explained in our own terms or at least described
The best that the old world order and their clergy have ever
been able to recommend is blind acceptance of irrational principles. Did
you know that the early Theosophists called their belief system, 'Irrationalism?'
I think they eventually were forced through embarrassment to drop that silly
label, just as they were later eager to change the name of their book company
from 'Lucifer Trust' to "Lucis Trust' in the 1940s when they were featured
as the United Nations' official publishing house.
You might marvel that something as ingtellectually and spiritually
bankrupt as Theosophy could ever have gained so much prominence in the West
but bear in mind that the people who created this fake religion also own
most of the media, gold mines, diamond mines, oil fields, universities,
hospitals, seminaries, corporations, armies, navies and air forces on the
planet. I'm telling it openly but they're at least prudent enough, by now,
not to stick the outmoded name, 'Theosophy' on any of their many banners.
Mark Twain wrote, toward the end of his life, a speculative
work in which he questioned the paradigm of a Biblical heaven. He noted
that most people in this life have no musical talent to speak of, so giving
them all musical instruments in the next life would create a cacophony in
heaven. Also, he wondered how heavenly the next life might really be without
sex. He wasn't able to publish that book; it wasn't published until fifty
years after he died.
I've heard that astral sex is awfully good. The fellow I heard
it from was unable to maintain an earthly love relationship, in fact, because
3D females couldn't measure up to his expectations. He wasn't happy, by
I bet you know people who fit in both of these categories
(spiritual and rebellious) and if you're fairly objective you can assess
your own orientation, assuming that you consider these and similar observations
accurate or valid.
Since the occult/corporate dung beetles have essentially destroyed
the vitality of just about all religious institutions in the past few generations
the external constraints on human behavior that these represented have been
removed. The downside of this is that human degradation has reached an all
time low, sometimes on a massive scale, as happened in previously Buddhist
and peaceful Cambodia; the upside is that what's left, which is internal
restraint and decisive, informed action based on conscience, sort of gets
highlighted and this, by contrast with how the world has become, takes on
a renewed force of example. That's the form of empowerment to which I'm
hoping the gifting and predator blasting effort will help lead humanity.
Spirituality was never an institutional prerogative. It may
be that humanity's growth and development required the role of clergy for
a period of time and it may be that when this time was over and humanity
reached the next stage of development clergy itself became more aggressive,
insidious and corrupt in an attempt to retain the power it was losing. Popes
were not considered infallible, for instance, until Pope Pius IX had lost
his political/economic influence in Europe by the 1860s and became known
as 'The Prisoner of the Vatican.' He's the one who then issued the Papal
Bull, declaring himself infallible. One of the genuine miracles of Catholicism,
perhaps, is that Catholics swallowed that ;-)
Padre Pio was just made a saint. Carol tells me that he had
stigmata on his wrists rather than on his palms and this was one evidence
that he was a genuinely saintly man. She says that the main evidence is
that he boldly advised Catholics not to accept the idea that the Church
somehow represents Jesus Christ ;-) and for that reason he was apparently
shunted around to the more remote areas of Christendom. We plan to visit
the place in Barto, Pennsylvania, where this Italian was a pastor for a
little while. I absolutely honor people of integrity in any religion and
of no particular religion..
It's been said that the universe is holographic and that everything
that's outside of us is also inside of us. Lately, some gifted scientists
have been telling us that but the Prophets have always told us that, of
course, none more eloquently than Muhammad: Dost thou reckon thyself a puny
form whilst within thee the universe is enfolded? (Rodwell's exquisite translation).
I think that was more explicit than Jesus' statement: In my
Father's house are many mansions. A mansion is bigger than a house, of course,
but the Creative Word has many, many meanings and synergistic levels of
It's perhaps because humanity's in a period of dynamic transition
that I've noticed that some of our network's more selfless and powerful
contributors who are not particularly religious are exhibiting traits that
I had always assumed only came through one's love for and knowledge of God.
Mostly, anyone who drops God's Name much without demonstrating that unmistakable,
selfless love creeps me out and I avoid them. In their case I think the
world would be a better place if they didn't have religion. Those are the
ones who smack you on the head with their ideologies when your back is turned
Any religionist acknowledges that one's acts are more significant
than one's words or even beliefs and I think we're witnessing the rise of
a new, vital demographic: genuinely spiritual, self-empowered, discerning
and humble people who are not religious. I'm actually not writing this for
their sake because they're already on the right track. I'm rather writing
this to encourage people to stop allowing religious prejudice to be a spiritual
handicap and social menace.
If you think your own religion is better than someone else's
or if you assume religion is worthless or vile, you're suffering from religious
prejudice, in my opinion.
Consider this: If Muhammad, Jesus, Buddah, Krishna, Zoroaster
and Moses are in a room and there's only one chair, which One will sit in
the chair? Answer: None of Them, because They are all the Essence of humility.
You can bet that if any of the London dung beetles' infantile gurus were
let into that room they'd knock Anyone down Who stood in his path to the
Arrogance always cost something, as in the following old joke:
An African pagan died and went to heaven, where he was met
by the African pagan equivalent of St Peter, who told him, 'Welcome to paradise!
You lived a life of personal integrity, selfless service, and of benefit
to others and paradise is your reward. Come on, I'll give you a guided tour!
They floated along through a verdant, fruitful and flowering
valley under a brilliant blue sky and along the way were beautiful villages
and towns full of strange and wonderful things. The guide introduced him
to some Hindus, some Buddhists, some Taoists, some Muslims, Sabeans, Sikhs
and Zoroastrians, all of whom lovingly greeted the new arrival, visited
and traded with each other and appreciated the diversity of their rich,
progressive, vital and peaceful community in paradise. All this time, though,
the African kept glancing at a grey fortress on a ridge of one of the mountains.
He finally asked the guide, 'Who's in that fortress? It looks like it doesn't
The guide, after some hesitation, said, 'Okay, come on and
I'll show you, but be very quiet when we get there, okay?
The African agreed, so they floated up to the fortress and
peeked over one of the parapets to see a group of unhappy people huddled
around a fire in the courtyard, muttering to each other and glancing furtively
over their shoulders now and then.
The guide said, 'These are the Christians; they like to believe
that they're the only ones in paradise.'
I've mainly focused on Christian subjects because the Christians,
generally, are the most prejudiced and their clergy have done the most to
give religion a bad reputation in the world.
Jesus had said, when He was asked whether He were the promised
Prince of Peace, 'I bring not peace but a sword,' and He made it very clear
that He sanctioned no formal religious organizations so we mustn't ever
blame Him for what has been done in His Name. It seems obvious to me that
His main Message, which revolutionized the fortunes of humanity, was about
individual salvation, accountability, and empowerment through faith and
in spite of what clergy have done over the millennia to obscure His simple,
powerful message with hideous trappings anyone can still go to the Gospel
and 'get it.'
Observing the transformation taking place in so many gifters'
hearts has proven to me that faith itself has very little to do with rational
thought and has almost entirely to do with the heart, which is 'an organ
of fire,' by the way, and can easily burn away the mental dross of dogma
and enervating ideologies. Faith, which is only ever a gift from God, is
something that nobody can steal or fake. The only way one will lose faith
is to allow fakers into one's confidence (heart). God seems pretty particular
about that and if we allow any ringers in there, He exits. Wouldn't you?
I can barely stand to be in the same parlor with a manipulative, saccharine
newage nazi or a religious fanatic, for instance.
People who genuinely, selflessly love, though, seem to share
one big heart and that's very pleasant and refreshing companionship which
pleases God, too. Contrast that with how you feel dragged down, uncertain
and discouraged whenever you're associating with the rebellious, okay? We
learn best from personal experience.
Something about tossing orgonite out into the environment
intelligently and regularly seems to generate genuine faith in some people.
Maybe the heartfelt desire to heal the world and help humanity was their
request to God for personal faith. I never get tired of hearing that gifting
has given an individual a sense of purpose, better discernment, a bigger
sense of accountability and a feeling that this activity even has come to
represent something which we were born to do. It's the complete absence
of ideology from this process that shows how little the finite mind needs
to be involved in genuine spirituality.
As my good energy teacher, James Hughes, is fond of saying,
'The embalmers in Egypt couldn't figure out what the brain was for, so they
threw it away and preserved the other organs, instead.'
I guess that in a similar way we all meet on the internet
but we don't consider our computers to be the stars of the show; they're
fine tools and necessary but only a means, not an end.
Cultists consider 'the mind' all important; spiritual knowers
consider the heart to be the main focus. One of the Persian poets wrote,
'Heart to heart speaks the language of the mystic knowers; no missive can
contain it and no pen can bear it,' and the more one loves, the less one
is able to relate to the world. In a balanced, worldly person the mind and
heart are best friends and help each other out of jams daily. If we want
to keep and grow our faith we need to develop our intellects, too, of course,
and not least because the dung beetles are sleepless in their efforts to
destroy everyone's personal faith.
Hafiz felt that one's love for God, ( the 'barroom love' version
in this case ;-) should be just like 'grabbing the sore balls of an elephant
and hanging on even though one is deprived of the sweet relief of death'
;-) The metaphors used by poets are good signposts, I think. Love is never
rational but to live without it is pointless, I think-spiritual starvation.
This kind of love is not at all susceptible to intellectual sniping, of
course, so it's best to lay this foundation before erecting our personal
I love my wife, Carol, with white-knuckle devotion and blind
commitment and vice versa. We've imagined, during times of trial, that there
are many reasons why we should have broken up (none of them come to mind
at the moment ;-) but you can say that of any other happily married couple,
of course. Fortunately, we also have a good working relationship and our
senses of humor are similar. We had both been married to conscience-free
mates before, too. The occult/corporate dung beetles have made sure that
there are more obstacles in the Crofts' married path than usual due to our
activities, of course, but this has only made us love and appreciate each
other more, ultimately.
I forgot to mention that rebellious folks don't comprehend
commitment, by the way. They consider commitment to be a sort of mental
illness. Poor, sick bastards-notice that they generally move in and out
of love relationships almost as regularly as they change their socks and
that they consider it a lifestyle. Notice, also, how empty their lives actually
are in spite of having all the answers ;-)
How much love can you stand? The ocean of God's love is boundless
and only a heartbeat away. We all have our inborn capacities for experiencing
love and knowledge and yours might be a bucket and mine a thimble but that's
all in order and is part of the marvelous way the universe is made and monitored.
According to the deluded, luciferic self seeker capacity is
not a valid consideration but in real terms everyone who wanders into a
concert hall is not a Beethoven; Gomer Pyle won't be given any honorary
doctorates at Harvard and Elephant Man won't ever be cast in a role that's
more suitable for Brad Pitt. That's not to say that the guy who cleans toilets
in the opera house, Pa Kettle and Quasimoto aren't reflecting (in their
capacity) the light of God, of course, or that they don't have unique, peerless
personal gifts to develop and then offer to the world. They could all be
crackerjack gifters right now, at least ;-)
When Reverend Jesse Jackson tells assembled gangster crack
addicts that they 'ARE. SOMEBODY!' it seems disingenuous to me but I've
noticed that even the most degraded human being is capable, in any moment,
of demonstrating personal integrity and thus being an example to others.
Carol and I have gone gifting with a few active Monarch assets who made
the grade while we were with them, for instance, and contributed significantly
to some viable gifting campaigns. When I think of these folks it's their
good acts that come to mind, not the crap they threw at us later on when
the programming kicked in again.
We're not responsible for others' spiritual progress but we
are accountable for how often we've taken the opportunity to encourage and
empower others along the way. It's a practical approach, too, because when
we're willing to ignore ten bad traits and complement that one good quality
in someone we help that person to identify more with his good trait. How
different and more effective is that than the old-paradigm approach of drawing
attention to the bad traits in an effort to correct them? The old way was
just another habit of taking responsibility for others' development, of
course, and that's a trap for both parties. It reminds me of the way fundamentalists
constantly talk about the devil. I sometimes tell them that they're devil
worshippers but I do that in jest and only when I don't think I'll catch
a beating on all four of my cheeks.
I personally believe that only a few people have consciences
and the rest rely on peer pressure, fashion or external constraint to regulate
their behavior. Having a conscience is more a burden than a distinction,
of course, and I've known folks who have consciences and wish they didn't.
If one doesn't have a conscience, why would we feel a need to judge that
person as though he/she did? Why not just stay out of crosshairs, instead?
That's to say, why would you ever allow a conscience-free person into your
confidence? It's a fact that people who have embraced rebellious doctrines
have done so mainly because they lack a conscience and personal integrity,
which is another way of saying that they have little or no genuine discernment.
Notice how many of these claim to be able to fix all your problems, by the
way, and to know all the answers you're seeking. They're often charismatic,
lovely, witty, fun to be with, perhaps psychic and even informative, sometimes,
but when we trust them we get betrayed sooner or later and that hurts in
a way that one won't ever experience by confiding in God or in people who
If any of us evaluate our own lives objectively we'll see
plenty of gaping holes in our own personal integrity at times. It's helpful
to look at these holes and think about how we can avoid creating them in
the present and future, which is partly what's meant by the tradition, 'An
hour's reflection is better than seventy years of pious worship.'
When we respectfully draw attention to flaws in a spiritual
person's character that person thanks us and takes steps to correct it;
when we respectfully and even lovingly draw attention to a person's rebellion,
that one attacks our character, usually as publicly as possible.
The simple fact that none of us know what our own end in this
life will be is one reason I shy away from labeling folks as 'agents,' or
'reptoids.' I know an awful lot of people and I"ve only known a few
folks who seem to be intractable, in fact. I can't honestly say that they
won't figure it out at some point and start working for the good side. These
usually seem to be enthusiastically locked in an infantile behavior pattern
based on dissociative programming and that programming only ever takes hold
in people who have weak characters, which means it works on most people,
of course ;-)
But most people, even most of those many millions of active
Monarch assets, don't actually wish to harm others, so what will the world
(at least the West) be like when millions of Monarch handlers are exposed
and held accountable (punished)? Only a few people wish to harm others and
they're that way by choice, alone. Ultimately, this is the only real choice
we ever have.
By now, the Monarch Program is so vast in the West that I'd
be surprised to encounter an imbalanced or parasitic person who doesn't
have this personal history. The kids who have consciences are spit out of
these various mind control programs (if they survive) by the time they reach
adolescence, apparently. I guess these few are considered at Langley and
Tavistock Institute to be 'intractable.' ;-) and I run into an awful lot
of these in personal correspondence who are finding ways up out of the overwhelming
self-sabotage programming and dead-end, destructive love relationships with
active Monarch assets which is the invariable parting gift of their handlers.
I'm constantly amazed at this world order's ability to so intimately and
thoroughly screw so many individuals' lives up and use them to pollute society
further. It's not hard to see how the intellectually lazy so readily assume
that a devil's doing all of that.
A Hindu acquaintance in Tonga once said to me, 'The only devils
are flesh and blood.''
Waking up to personal accountability is painful these days,
though maybe it was always like that. I feel sorry for anyone who becomes
aware, as I did, of how comprehensive and insidious the occult/corporate
world order is without first becoming aware of how one may easily empower
him/herself with orgonite and the timely art of predator blasting. I'm also
pained to know folks who are coming to this awareness without having had
any personal experience of God (conscious or otherwise). They seem to suffer
the most. The best shortcut to reaching some certitude in those circumstances
that I can advise is firewalking.
I did some firewalks while I was in the middle of a long period
of personal torment relating to the loss of my children. That happened on
account of having been married to an active Monarch asset for 22 years and
then being betrayed and cast out of my home under the auspices of the City
of London's control of the American courts and police.. That grief experience
made me a little crazy and nearly suicidal and I was unable to settle down
for about ten years. If you've lost your beloved children to an unbalanced,
unfaithful and abusive mate who was backed up by an unlawful government,
you realize that it perhaps feels worse than if your children had died,
instead. The hardest part for me to bear was seeing that my children were
the main targets of this horrid global system and there wasn't a damn thing
I could do at the time except impotently witness it.
Walking on fire showed me that the 'insurmountable obstacles'
of the contingent world, like my family situation, are only conditional
and just a matter of one's point of view. You should try it! Find a proper
teacher, though ;-)
It wasn't very long after firewalking that I decided that
destroying this occult/corporate world order was the only practical way
to begin to fix the problems in the world. For another year and a half I
didn't have a clue how this might be accomplished, then Carol and I started
experimenting with orgonite on a large scale ;-)
Since then, too, the American government has become so openly
treasonous, murderous and otherwise menacing that it feels to me like they're
inviting all of humanity to hold them accountable. This fake, London-appointed
government in Washington is the keystone of the entire world order, of course.
The downfall of the City of London and their other subsidiary regimes in
Russia and China will surely soon follow the demise of this lawless American
government and its unspeakably vast but hidden swarm of Monarch handlers.
The curious thing is that I came to love and appreciate God
more during that decade, even though I recognized that these tests were
from Him as preparation for what would perhaps come later on. That torment
was my sacrifice, in other words, and His gifts/rewards to me for passing
those tests were to finally have a loving, committed and very interesting
wife (like most folks, I hate being lonely), the creation of this astounding,
vital and diverse but informal global network and finally meeting a few
people of conscience, certitude and faith who are truly trustworthy.
This essay is a teaser, of course-one guy's story. The only
valuable information is whatever you can gain from your own inspired experience
and unprejudiced examination of reality. If I were to lay out my feelings
about God and spirituality without offering some dislaimers, please understand,
the sleepless Monarch vultures would be able to pick this essay clean and
make me look like a mouth-breathing simpleton, inebriated by the opiate
of religion ;-)
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.