Don Croft Daily Reports

---

Powerwand Succor Punch (SP) Holy Handgrenade (HHG) Tower Buster (TB) Chembuster (CB) Earth Pipe (EP)
Harmonic Protector (HP) Terminator II U.S. Cell Phone Tower Locator Croft Daily Reports Index

Good Researchers Always Honor Empirical Standards

By Don Croft <terminator3@turbonet.com>
http://educate-yourself.org/dc/empericalstandards29oct04.shtml
October 29, 2004

Come on Don,

Don't be an empirical testing party pooper. I think galeros g5 are on the up and up and opening up a major can of happy, its not like the Sally Water shaninigans..... ; )

Chris, Bay area..

********************************

From Don Croft:

Thanks for your assessment, Chris. Your views are always appreciated and I'm not being facetious now.

It's easier to assess somethign that's used in the home environment or on the body than it is to assess a field device like the G5 Earth Pipe of the field items, of course, because we can directly experience and assess the effects, especially those who are energy sensitive.

The reason I want others to field test Galaero's invention in varying circumstances is that,

1) we need to determine whether just any orgonite tossed out in the Phoenix area mght have gotten the same results,

2) Galaero's making specific claims which need to be backed up, soon, in order for this board to keep it's well-earned reputation, and

3) if the device can be shown to be viable and worthy of promotion it will need to have more than one reputable person's confirmation and assessment.

Otherwise, perhaps, we actually do risk discrediting ourselves when we blindly promote something which we don't understand on a practical level. This has been a personal complaint of mine since this network started.

Empirical testing, just like brushing our teeth, might be uncomfortable and inconvenient sometimes but it's an overall healthy approach. So far, I doubt that I've crossed the line in terms of being overbearing. I'm just not a confrontational or jealous person. If I were, I doubt that this board would have survived.

We're all breaking new ground right now, in many ways. Unless we find and adhere to some practical standards, though, genuine progress is impossible.As anyone can see, I'm supporting Galaero's effort by asking people to field test his invention. He seems to be quite adamant about the viability of his device and that's his right but the other inventors who post on this board are less adamant about our own creations out of respect for each other and, frankly, because of the dictates of intellectual honesty. I appeal to every inventor to adopt this approach, in fact.

If our personal lives aren't satisfying or fulfilling, we're not going to make up for that by overemphasizing our accomplishments, after all.

It may be that Galaero has discovered an entirely new area of research with these devices. We're not going to know that simply because he repeats it, over and over again. The only way we're going to know that is by personally experimenting and/or gathering the results of several reputable testers' efforts in the field.

In another thread, I asked for volunteers who will apply the devices according to Galaero's suggested parameters and their own inspired hunches. Research like this always turns up information that nobody's even considered before. It's a synergistic process and the real stuff can be sifted from the extraneous this way, depending on the experimentor's diligence and personal integrity.

In that vein, are we to take Galaero's word for it that his configuration is teh only one that works? People have tried dozens of permutations with any of the basic gifting devices and, so far, the simplest ones still work just fine. I turned all that loose in the beginning with the open challenge to simplify them even further. The earthpipe was invented by someone else, in fact, as was the etheric pipe bomb. I promote those two just as vigorously as my little offerings.

The rational mind wants to know how variations of these features might change the dynamics, after all. Any inventor needs to feel good about other experimentors 'taking it out and chopping it up,' in fact.

The rest of us here, Galaero, who invent and market new devices hold ourselves to high standards like these before we'll make any claims and anyone who posts on this board and makes claims will eventually be held accountable by me.

You've made some premature claims, simply stated, and that has to be made right, either by extending the research or by refraining from posting unsupported claims until you get more objective data.

I can't let this board turn into a private playground, my friend. I hate having to say this publicly but I feel a little bit cornered and I think that mentioning this will turn out to be the right approach. If I promoted my own inventions here this way I could at least be accused of hypocrisy but in fact I haven't made any claims which can't be backed up by plenty of empirical research.

Specifically, since there are scores of CBs in your area and perhaps thousands of disabled towers, not to mention the proactive gifting that was done in Mexico and California during the past three years, it actually is impossible to offer a fairly objective declaration that the recent deployment of your new devices has achieved these results. During the past three years we've tracked a gradual increase in rainfall and certainly an end to the very long drought in the region. Lots of people are responsible for this trend, Galaero.

You disabled most of the death and HAARP towers in the Phoenix area, so you've certainly earned a good reputation as far as I'm concerned. You're probably just not aware that making unsubstantiated claims in a public forum is out of line, though I've tried to gently impress you with this fact over the past few months.

I thought long and hard before offering this criticism in a post, by the way. A year and a half ago I was much more reticent about challenging similar questionable claims and I suffered quite a lot from that later on, so I'm being a little more forthcoming in your case. I know your intentions are good, unlike in the previous case, but I'm still just going to go with my intuition and insist on more testing before you continue making claims.

Dr Reich was much stricter than I am, by the way, as were the rest of the genuine pioneers. I'm not much more than a hacker, really. There are half a dozen folks on this board who are better scientists and inventors than I am and I'm actually happy about that.

I can't in good conscience do less than I'm doing in terms of insisting on rational standards for investigation, though. Nor is it appropriate to regulate or codify this process because the subjective element is a powerful one when it comes to etheric tech. I just think we're all mature enough to recognize when one has done the proper homework before making claims and when one hasn't.

I know I'm skating on thin ice here because this thread has generated more traffic than any other, so a lot of readers are supporting your effort, at least this far. Pppularity has never been a proper gauge of value, though. When the overt slander started on a previous board, a year and a half ago, the site traffic numbers went through the roof, for instance.

What I'm hoping for is that enough reputable experimenters will apply your methods so that we'll get some longer lasting value from what you're claiming. I don't want to hear from the same folks who endlessly promoted the discredited offerings of previous promoters. In fact, none of them are posting on this board, so at least I won't hear from them here. I wonder if these benighted folks are boosting the numbers on this thread, in fact.

So, let's see who will step forward and help you out, okay? The weather here is fine and the G5 you generously sent to us didn't find a proper testing spot. I don't think it operates on the same principles as the basic earthpipes, at any rate, since there's no resonant cavity. What I'm looking forward to finding out is what principles it does work by, though.

~Don

October 30

I felt uneasy while writing the previous post and had turbodowsed it many times along the way to make sure I wasn't stepping over the line without realizing it. Carol says I need to be more careful about how I talk to people. I still feel uneasy because I haven't criticised anyone, here, in a post since the beginning of this board effort in August.

Having slept on this, Galaero, I have something else to add, though, which is the consideration that claims carry inherrent guarantees with them, which is yet another reason they mustn't be made casually in a public forum.

For instance, if a well meaning person takes your advice and deploys your G5 pipes in a desert or drought area and gets little or no results, he may feel inclined to say that your invention's no good. If two or three people do that and the news gets around, your reputation's just been destroyed.

Since you're using my board to promote your claims, that justifiably poor report would reflect on my own character. By posting this caveat, I'm helping you to recognize that claims based on insufficient data are counterproductive and, frankly, I'm covering my own butt, too.

I know there's enough interest in your invention so that, even though you can't afford to travel to appropriate test areas, others may extend the research with your cooperation and advice. I'm putting the onus on folks who wish to promote your devices without first ascertaining their true value, too, by the way. This is just like being pregnant, in that one either holds to intellectual honesty or one doesn't. There's no 'sort of pregnant' nor 'sort of honest' in research and developmnet.

Institutionalized scientists often specialize in faking integrity. MDs all specialize in faking integrity. That's an obsolete pursuit and won't find a home here.

Georg Ritschl volunteered to help you extend your research and he's done more than anyone else on the planet to generate rain in deserts and he did it all with the intelligent application of orgonite. By now, he's also connected with some committed and resourceful desert dwellers in the Namib, which is the driest region on earth. They all have a vested interest in generating rainfall, of course. I hope you'll pursue this!

If you don't want to end up like a couple of folks whom you and I personally know who landed right in the middle of a pile of self-generated excrementa due to their denial of the realities of proper, rational research and development you'll consider my advice.

This thread more appropriately belongs in the Research and Development section of the board, I think. Would you please start a fresh thread there when you're ready? I'd like that thread to feature a more analytical approach for the sake of integrity.

Something I get a lot in email from readers of this board is that they're able to go to just about any thread here and get usable information. Repitition drives 'customers' away from a board almost as thoroughly as subterfuge and diatribes do, please consider. We all want this board to succeed, I think.

I know that several posters who are more tentative are now scared to post anything becuase they feel I'll jump down their throats and this is the 'thin ice' factor I have to deal with at the moment.

I think this particular issue is a good training exercise for all of us, though. It's the readership who will decide whether our effort is viable, not any 'popularity contest' considerations, of course. All I'm after is a user-friendly, exemplary, inspiring and very informative internet board effort. I don't care about fashion, charisma or personal paradigms very much.

You busted over a thousand towers, as far as I know. The reason you stuck with that effort is that you found that my claims for this humble little 3 ounce device had merit. The only reason anyone takes that giant leap of faith and tests my own claim for this invention, which I have absolutely no vested interest in promoting, is because I emphatically state that this will disable a death tower. Most folks simply can't believe that until they see it happen, over and over again. Why should they believe it? All I ask is that they hang onto their skepticism until the confirmations show up.

I did that right, in other words. If your invention is genuine, you'll find that people will get consistent results but this isn't likely to happen until you do enough genuine research to find some parameters and understand the process, at least in a pragmatic way.

After we do that and KNOW what we're talking about we can make suitably outrageous claims with a good conscience.

I have an advantage over most of the weird science inventors, perhaps, becuase I cut my teeth on the Zapper trade. Zappers, I found out during the middle of 96--anyone's zappers--cure most cancer, AIDS, arthritis, hearrt disease, and all the other killer illnesses cheaply and fast. That's an outrageous claim but I know that it's so because I've spent 8 1/2 years watching it happen to my customers consistently.

I made another outrageous claim for Dr von Peters' ChemBuster, based on seeing it consistely heal a variety of chronic illnesses that were apparently caused by the chemtrails since 1999.

Even so, I still can't promise that anyone will cure their sickness with a zapper or heal their chemtrail-generated chronic condition with ChemBuster.

I absolutely can claim that a 3oz towerbuster will turn the average death tower into a life force generator, though, because there's no subjective element involved in that process. A dog or accident could cause a TB to land within a quarter mile of a tower and that tower would be busted, I genuinely believe and claim.

There's power behind that claim, in other words. This is the first time I've posted that claim on this board, by the way.

If your invention, too, can get specific, consistent results I'll help you promote the claims for it, as I've helped several other inventors promote their proven inventions. Even if I see that the trend of the research is promising I'll advise people to try them out and give us feedback from their own experiments. That's why I'm specifically asking the readers of this thread to get actively involved in the research with you, my friend.

Business, science, healing, education and a whole lot of other social pursuits are rudely aloof from our personal feelings, hopes and dreams, Galaero. We either have to submit to their immutable parameters or fail. anyone can look in the wake of the viable portion of this global network and see teh flotsam of discredited promotional efforts. It's up to each of us who wish to advance claims to choose the more ordered life on the vessel over treading water in a raging sea.

Carol and I weren't even looking to have a network when we started publishing my journal reports by Ken Adachi's gracious invitation, 3 1/2 years ago. Most of the folks on this board, including me, have always been loners, in fact. We left all of the sycophants behind this time.

It's usually a group like this one which is called on to do uncharacteristic social things. I can tell you that when the chatblasts first started here I was just about tearing my hair out becuase four to ten talented loners were finding it nearly impossible to pull in the same direction at the same time.

By now, when a chatblast is scheduled, we pretty much get right to business, thanks mainly to the women's diligence and commitment. That took some effort and, more to the point, we're each required to suppress our individuality just a bit in order to make the group thing work.

I know that you're frustrated by your present outside limitations and could do ten times more good work if you had the cash and time available. What I'd like you to consider, though, is that there just aren't any shortcuts sometimes.

I want to make a lot of money someday, I'm not ashamed to say, and I want to make it by writing books that sell millions of copies so that I can spend all of my time, not writing on Carol's and my avocations. The way I'm hoping to arrive at that happy circumstance is by simply doing all my email in a timely way and paying sufficient attention to this board while sending whatever I feel is relevant to Ken Adachi, who still sends us most of the people who are interested in orgonite.

I figure that after some more time has passed (years?) there will simply be so many people healing the planet and themselves this way that I'll find that I have a readership big enough to sell books to. That will free us to travel enough to extend our own research. I'd like to reverse the Gobi and Sahara, for instance, if nobody does it first. I'd like to pay for it, too.

I want to stop hurricanes at sea in a sailboat with sufficient CBs on it, too. I even want to go to jail for driving without a license. That's actually an ambition of mine. I'll only do that as a calculated risk, of course, and if/when it feels timely as a way to speed up the destruction of the US Federal Government without using my body as a battering ram ;-)

If I end up a lobotomized veggie in the American psycho gulag in the process, on account of that experiment, I'll still probably feel content because at least I followed my instinct faithfully.

Meanwhile, I work every waking minute when I'm not taking necessary trips to disable the occult/corporate sewer rats' infrastructure and I'm enjoying the holy hell out of every minute of this, even when I"m dealing with personal attacks from other quarters.

If my plan doesn't pan out, I'm content that something even better will happen. Maybe I'll die at the hands of some enthusiastic prison guard but even that will be okay as long as I'm sure that I'm where I"m supposed to be at the moment. As I've said, personal faith is something we need right now, not something we figure we'll get when we retire, like a pension. Are you as annoyed as I am by the hordes of middle aged folks who wasted their youths and sit around in churches with beatific smiles and bob their heads in rythm to the preacher's diatribes?

If I didn't feel fairly content now, I know that I wouldn't feel content by having more money. I know it becuase I've had money when I felt discontented and it wasn't that great. In fact, I spent it fast so that I could be worry free again ;-).

My own hard life lessons have taught me that contentment is what it's about, not recognition. Sure, it may take some achievement and a sense of self worth to feel content but recognition is just the gravy. PJ People are so fickle and popularity is always a two edged sword at any rate.

The proper route to recognition is through friendship and solid alliances with others who wish to be awake. I've got a lot of friends and allies around the world now because they like the way my suggestions panned out for them and now they're pulling in the same direction that I am. Nothing and nobody can take away their own achievements that were based on my suggestions and they're genuinely empowered from them.

The Christians among them don't care that I'm not a Christian; the newagers who actually do the work don't care that I think that everything that ever came from the Great White Brotherhood and their lapdog, Theosophy, is just a pseudospiritual pile of diseased, hideously stinky, loathsome crap. They're solid allies and often genuine friends, too.

In short, Galaero, you could write all of what you've written on this board in private emails and that would be appropriate. By posting it, you've made some formal claims in a public format and that's an entirely different thing that involves accountability.

The other dropped shoe that we're all waiting for now is legitimate confirmation. I didn't make these rules; I'm only the messenger. Arbitrary rules can and maybe should be broken, but the market sanctions without mercy or appeal, so it's wise for us to learn this lesson without paying a whole lot of tuition in the process. This network isn't like the PJ ones, where a televangelist, for instance, can bugger children and 'be forgiven' by the sheared flock.

When we've ruined our good reputations by denying the rule of empirical science, they're deader than disco.

~Don

© Copyright 2002-2004 Educate-Yourself.org  All Rights Reserved.