May 14, 2007
Subject: Laura Knight Jadczyk/Cassiopaea.org
From: Craig Thomas
Date: Mon, May 14, 2007
I read your article on Laura Knight Jadcyzk and the Cassiopaean site with
much interest. I have read the transcripts of the channeled sessions with the
Cassiopaeans and most of the material on the web site. Her meticulous details in the
articles concerning history and Christianity are refreshing and thought provoking.
No where does she say to believe what she says but to find out for yourself those
things that are rarely answered or even discussed in today's "society".
criticisms leveled against her are obvious in their use of disinformation and the
subjective use of language. Anonymous sources and emotional verbage have no place in
serious discussion. Instead they tend to inflame and justify the thoughts of those
who have already reached their conclusions and close what open-mindedness they may
still possess. Those who are offended by the Cassiopaean's use of objectivity in
describing possible futures and present day events are seemingly not averse to using
subjective descriptions of their own opinions without the use of any facts what so
ever. That's called propaganda and it has no bearing in meaningful discussion of any
Your sideways condoning of such an "opinion" is disheartening in it's
revelation of ...well, I'll leave that one to you. I have no intent to insult and I
do not know you personally. The mixing of the excellent information on your site
with disinformation such as this article is prevalent on the internet today. But it
does make it fun and interesting in the pursuit of knowledge. Please do continue
with your site. It does have much useful infomation in more ways than one.
Take care, Craig Thomas
I did not write the piece about Laura, another woman was the author. I have reservartions about Laura, but that doesn't mean I can't find value in her info. I like much of what Montalk has to say and he's a big fan of her stuff. However, Montalk isn't infallible either and I've noticed that he can drift off the mark too.
Laura is a mixed bag as far as I'm concerned and intelligent people can come to their own conclusions.
Subject: Re: Laura Knight Jadczyk/Cassiopaea.org
From: Craig Thomas
Date: Tue, May 15, 2007
Thanks for the quick reply. I'm glad you took my letter in stride. I love
to write and internet sites are a handy venue.
I agree with you about Laura. I often observe their forum and the long term
members are quick to pounce on new members
who don't agree whole heartedly with her. Ark has become cold and lacks a
natural easiness in his comments and is instead too
stern and lofty. Laura's criticism of other authors is often impatient and
lazy. She seems like another person compared to her early dialogues with
the Cassiopaeans and as far as I know there are no further releases of the
channeling except for books which are a bit
pricey. I also wonder about the ongoing request for donations to keep the
Laura replied on their forum to the person who wrote the
article on your site and did it quite well but fell into the emotional well
of anger by doing so. She also comments on politics
regularly and often vehemently while the Cassiopaeans had advised her to not
get involved as nothing happens in politics that has not been planned. I
seem to have written a critique of that which I had earlier defended. I
feel more rounded already.
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.