----- Original Message -----
From: "Educate-Yourself" <email@example.com>
To: "Ville Sarell" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: Mono atomic gold
I'm not concerned about whether my web site is part of your
'approved' list. You do not pay me one dime for coming to my web site and
accessing all of the information available there. All of the time, effort
and cost involved with making that information available was borne by me,
not by you. Therefore, I do not OWE you anything. It's fairly ironic that
you should accuse me of arrogance when you yourself drape that mantel about
your shoulders by assuming the role of critic and 'rebuker'. What right
do you have to send me a chiding e-mail? You act as if you're a paying customer
who got ripped off and now has the RIGHT to complain.
I agree that I was somewhat harsh (perhaps 'strong' is the
better word) in my response to Joe Prosek, as I'm now being somewhat harsh
in my response to you. However, Joe DESERVED a strong response because of
his arrogance and lack of diplomacy in characterizing my writing as "drivel".
YOU also deserve a strong response for your self righteous, unsolicited,
and un-entitled condemnation.
People who approach me in a non-judgmental way and make a
sincere inquiry with tact and diplomacy are NEVER treated harshly. I treat
people with the SAME level of courtesy and civility that they present themselves
to me. It's a 'you reap as you sow' world with me. You might be surprised
to know that Joe Prosek sent me a long reply to my published response in
which he tempered his remarks greatly and added a great deal of USEFUL information
to the mix- the second time around. I haven't answered him yet, but when
I do, I'll appraise him of my revised (and cordial) view of his commentary.
I see that you still list my home page and my New World Order
overview as url links below your name at the bottom of your e-mail. Wow,
you're a real piece of work, aren't you!
Beyond acquiring information obtained FREELY from my website
for YOUR benefit, you also send out MY information to everyone you send
an e-mail to for THEIR benefit, and YET, you have the arrogance and temerity
to rebuke me for defending myself from a self-appointed critic!
How impudent of you to refer to me as "immature"
when you demonstrate this demeanor yourself. What is more child-like than
assailing me with your scolding comments and then follow with "...
so I'm now dropping your research altogether..";
How "Nah, nah, --na, nah, nah, I'm not playing with you
anymore!" can you get?
It's OK with me if you are now "sticking" with Jeff
Rense, etc., as I have dozens of articles posted there anyway.
Did it ever occur to you that one of the reasons you might
hold Jeff Rense in such high esteem is that he NEVER PUBLISHES HIS RESPONSE
to e-mails sent to him? He may publish the contents of an e-mail, but without
comment from him. And even then, he will only publish an e-mail from someone
who is sending material that is CONTRIBUTORY and beneficial to a larger
audience. He would never publish (or even respond) to a letter such as yours
-or even Joe Prosek. Would you prefer to have your letter ignored? Have
you everlooked in a mirror and asked yourself what REAL contributions have
YOU made to humanity with your opinions?
The fact that I DO respond to letters from readers and offer
my opinions is one of the things that makes my website different and UNIQUE
from Jeff Rense. Some people, whose vision is more acute than yours, might
find that both interesting and desirable.
I'll guess I should end my little discourse with you, as I've
already invested too much time in responding to a clueless fop whose a-mail
should have met with my Delete button upon initial perusal.
This, by the way, is the ONE and only time you will receive
a reply from me, so cherish this one-time communication as my Swan Song
to you- Ville Sarell, eminent critic, "tripper", and Moral High
Grounder from beautiful (and safe) Finlandia.
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.