http://educate-yourself.org/lte/nwoincorrectness22apr04.shtml
April 22, 2004

----- Original Message -----
From: Henry Brown <browha@rugbyschool.net>
To: Editor@educate-yourself.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 1:22 PM
Subject: RE: New World Order incorrectness

Dear Sir,

I couldnt help but be appalled by your article on the New World Order, specifically the bit discussing the Illuminati and money-hoarding. Factually, and proved by scholars, the Illuminati were only founded in the 16th century when Gallileo Gallile was persecuted by the Church for his views, the Illuminati were his way of meeting with other scientists. The joined the Free Masons, as such, during the late 18th Century, where they are supposed to exist to this day.

The Priory of Sion and the Order of the Templar Knights are completed un-related things.

The Illuminati are an anti-Christian group, determined to remove the oppressive church from suppressing scientific evidence. The other groups are completely unrelated.

I suggest you research your facts more before involving yourself in these discussions.

Regards.

----- Original Message -----
From: Editor
To: Henry Brown <browha@rugbyschool.net>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 2:42 AM
Subject: Re: New World Order incorrectness

Hello Henry Brown,

Appalled? Well, aren't we the chiding authority who's going to set the record straight and put me in my place!

OK, I'll play.

I'm certainly prepared to give you full credit for braggadocio and brass, but unfortunately you're lacking somewhat in the accuracy of your historical "facts".

I have to assume that you are referring to my article titled "The New World Order, An Overview"
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/

Shall we review Professor Brown?

1. I wrote about the Illuminati in the essay you refer to, but I can't find the term "money-hoarding" anywhere in that essay. So what are you talking about here?

2. You said: "Factually, and proved by scholars, the Illuminati were only founded in the 16th century when Galileo was persecuted by the Church for his views"

Not really, Professor.

The growth of those secret society groups who came to call themselves the "Illuminati" took place principally in the Hesse state of Germany somewhere around the later half of the 11th century as Martin Luther was likely a Rosicrucian and used Illuminati symbols for his personal seal. In one of my articles, I mentioned the role of the Bavarian monk Adam Weishaupt who set up a faction group which he called the"illuminati" in the 18th century, but the larger and more powerful German Illuminati was already in existence in Europe for over 600 years.

I suppose you could argue that the hierarchy of the Catholic church during Galileo's time was under Illuminati influence, but to say that the Illuminati started in Italy in the 16th century has no historical or 'factual' basis whatsoever. If you are thinking about the 'enlightenment' that accompanied the Renaissance, then you are confusing your 'light' sources.

3. Gilded Masons and the later Free Masons, The Priory of Sion, Knights Templar, Knights Hospitaler, Teutonic Knights, and similar secret ritual groups were/are not completely unrelated entities as you state. They are all part of a larger controlling collective that is more properly referred to as Brotherhood societies. The "Brotherhood" , in turn, has been under the domination and influence of negative alien groups going back to the ancient world. There was a time in human history when some of these domineering aliens lived on the earth and they were called 'gods' by ancient Egyptians, Sumerians, etc. While these different Brotherhood groups are always fighting among themselves and jockeying for advantage and greater power, they are all committed to the SATANIC agenda of domination, abuse, and control of all of mankind.

4. I'll agree that the Illuminati is anti-Christian, but not for the purpose of bringing scientific enlightenment to humanity. Good Lord! Please, give me a break! What an absurd statement to make. The Iluminati has been the principle force SUPPRESSING advancements in science (keeping the knowledge for themselves) which could have greatly benefited mankind, especially in the last 100 years. You don't "get it" Professor. The 'light' is not intended for YOUR benefit, it's for THEIR benefit and advantage. By the way, the "light" they are referring to is light of the 'lightbearer'-- Lucifer.

You know, Professor, for a guy who tries to come across as an authority on this topic, you have a lot more midnight oil to burn before you can wear the mantle of academia. Maybe you should heed your own council.

(And you a Rugsby School man to boot! Shame, shame, shame. )

Sincerely, Ken