Subject: Re: From Ken Adachi concerning Ted Gunderson and Stew Webb
From: "james cairns" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Fri, October 6, 2006 8:53 am
if facts are untrue then the courts is the place
to examine them thoroughly,
you imply that nothing should be published , even by
whistleblowers, about anyone, which is controversial.
The very fact that you put forward this thinly veiled
threat makes me feel that you and Ted Gunderson have
something to hide and you are only trying to censor
free speech and the courts are your last resort.
Im not based in the USA and Im not privy to up to date
info on this, so I cant give a judgement but I believe
in free speech and whistlle blowing.
I answered you in the way I did because of the stupidity you expressed in your response to me, after I took the time to carefully and patiently explain to you what Webb was doing and why he was doing it. I have more important things to do with my time than spend all of it contacting web sites, such as yours, that are posting defamatory statements about Ted Gunderson which were obtained from slanderers like Webb and accepting it without challenge-and then re posting it like it was the unvarnished truth from the Oracle of Delphi.
Sure, we're all for free speech. What a monumental statement! I bet your also opposed to the use of drugs as well! Bravo, what a champion of liberty you must be. But there are degrees of 'FREE SPEECH' which are not protected by law, and SLANDER is one of them.
Your lack of discernment and perceptive acumen was already made clear in the readiness in which you embraced Webb's allegations against Ted without requiring anything that even borders on corroborating evidence. Webb says it, so it MUST be so, right? Exactly what were your words? On yea, something like "I always suspected something wasn't right about him anyway" or close to that. Wow, you're really on the ball aren't you?
Here too, in this e-mail, your statements reflect the mind of a person who's adept at spouting shibboleths and jingoism, without requiring any real logic to support it.
I love this line:
"The very fact that you put forward this thinly veiled
> threat makes me feel that you and Ted Gunderson have
> something to hide and you are only trying to censor
> free speech and the courts are your last resort"
Apparently, even suggesting to you that Ted is a victim of character assassination is in itself cause for greater suspicion on your part!
The threat about including you and your web host server as defendants in a slander and libel lawsuit was not veiled at all. It was clearly stated. If you allow yourself to be used as a vehicle for slander than you are as guilty as the party who initiated the slander.
I realize that you're an unwitting dupe in this case. But once someone, like me, brings it to your attention that you're being duped, then you have an obligation to INVESTIGATE and RE-EVALUATE before mouthing slogans about free speech and "whistle blowing".
I'll send a few links in this e-mail of articles that I've posted which establish beyond ALL DOUBT that Webb is a LIAR and a THIEF. If you're unwilling to take the time to read them and carefully consider what's being presented, then you've gone beyond functioning as a dupe; at that point, you've graduated to a DOPE.
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.