Did Google Kill Julian Assange?

[Editor's Note: Do not assume Assange is dead based on the allegations expressed in this story. I do not know this author, but he's too eager to accept rumors and insignificant Twitter misspellings as proof of something. British police took 2 hours on October 15 to respond to a call from the Ecuadorian embassy of a man trying to climb into the building in the early morning hours. It was not an "invasion" by British police. British security is not going to go into the Ecuador embassy and just kill Assange. That's ridiculous. WikiLeaks data will continue to be released whether Assange is alive or dead, so killing him would serve no purpose other than to ensure a greater landslide victory for Trump on Nov. 8. While we are all captivated by intrigue and murder mysteries, we can't throw common sense out the window. I think the author is allowing his imagination to take a high altitude flight. It's more likely that we will soon see evidence that Assange is alive and well. Google's censoring and low ranking of anti-Clinton articles is already well known. As more people switch to bing.com or Yahoo.com, for searches, Google's popularity as a search engine will inevitably drop as their dishonesty and collusion with the JWO becomes more widely known. The links at the bottom of the aritcle contain a good index of referrence articles on Google duplicity. ...Ken Adachi]

by Buddy Schwartz (henrymakow.com) 
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/Did-Google-Kill-Julian-Assange24oct16.shtml#top
October 24, 2016

@KenAdachi1

Did Google Kill Julian Assange? (Oct. 24, 2016)

Facebook Censorship
To post this article on Facebook, link to the TinyUrl seen below. Facebook will remove any article identified as coming from educate-yourself.org
http://tinyurl.com/z6aopfp

http://henrymakow.com/2016/10/did-google-kill-julian-assange.html

Julian Assange was about to drop 

the hammer on Google.

Did Google get to him first? 

(Disclaimer- The statement by Wikileaks below this article attempts to dispel these worries but thousands of people still are demanding proof Assange is alive. Wikileaks is tweeting a poll asking if appearance at window. So far, video has a slight lead over window.)

<

Rumors abound that Julian Assange, CEO of Wikileaks, is dead.

People familiar with Mr. Assange and his daily habits point to strange anomalies right after the police invasion of the Ecuadorian Embassy October 15, 2016, in the wee hours of the night. Soon after, Julian Assange's internet access and tweets were shut down.

They point out that: 

(1) Wikileaks DNS Server was suddenly pointed elsewhere;

(2) Mr Assange's subsequent tweets were noticeably more hostile and attacked his most loyal supporters; 

(3) Mr Assange's tweets regularly misspelled the names of some of his closest friends whom he has known for decades (Gavin McFadyen became McFayden for example). McFadyen,76, a mentor of Assange's, was found dead.

(4) Streams of disinformation were spewed; 

(5) Themes supported by Mr Assange for years were now being knocked down/discredited by his subsequent tweets and communications;

(6) "Body double" rumors have been circulated and documented; 

(7) New strange hitherto unknown moderators of Wikileaks have suddenly been installed; 

(8) and his "deadman switch" has been activated, wherein much of his stored data and secret website PINS were to be released in the event of his untimely death.

So all signs and evidence point to his death.

DID GOOGLE KILL HIM? 

Who has the power, wherewithal, connections,  money, influence, and above all the motivation to bypass all norms of international law, the Geneva Convention, sovereign immunity of nation-states, and common human decency to get this done?

The keyword is "motive," which as any criminal investigator will tell you is a main focus of any murder investigation.

On October 5, 2016, Julian Assange tweeted that he was about to do a huge data dump proving that Google routinely collaborates with various nefarious elements of the US Deep State and Military Industrial Complex. 

They would prove his contention that "Google has grown big and bad. Schmidt's tenure as CEO saw Google integrate with the shadiest of U.S. power structures as it expanded into a geographically invasive megacorporation.' 

Assange became concerned about former Google CEO Eric Schmidt's ties with the State Department in 2009 when Hillary Clinton was serving as Secretary of State.

He has claimed that Schmidt, who is a chairman at the company, has worked with the Clintons for years, as Donald Trump accused Google of political bias saying that it suppresses negative news about Clinton. 

 

But now that Julian Assange of Wikileaks is apparently dead, these documents and evidence will most probably never see the light of day.

These allegations of the unitary relationship by and between Google and the US Deep State will forever be just allegations, as this evidence has no doubt been destroyed, and lost forever.

----