Educate-Yourself
The Freedom of Knowledge, The Power of Thought ©

Writer Corroborates OJ Simpson's Frame Up in Original Trial


http://educate-yourself.org/cn/fogutOJframeup18dec08.shtml
December 18, 2008

Writer Corroborates OJ Simpson's Frame Up in Original Trial (Dec. 18, 2008)

----- Original Message -----
From: Dick Fojut <r.fojut@worldnet.att.net>
To: paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 4:52 AM
Subject: OJ PUNISHED FOR PAST MURDERS HE DID NOT COMMIT!

Paul Craig Roberts < paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com>
From Dick Fojut in Tucson, Arizona <r.fojut@worldnet.att.net>

-----------------------
Dear Paul,

Just read your timely essay about the innocent - as well as the guilty - being FRAMED by our present "Justice System" -
The United States: A Country Without Mercy
- By Paul Craig Roberts Dec. 16, 1008
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21482.htm

Paul, I believe ANOTHER possible injustice just occurred in Las Vegas with the 9+ year conviction of OJ Simpson, (supposedly) for "robbery" and "kidnapping."

There are many thousands of Google listings written by sincere people convinced OJ Simpson WAS guilty, yet escaped punishment for the murders of his ex-wife Nicole and Ron the waiter. They also applaud the conviction of OJ by the Las Vegas Judge and Jury as delayed, but "justified" partial REVENGE - FOR those murders (NOT for the so-called "robbery" and "kidnapping")!

I may be one of a very few who think (no matter how the Judge tried to "justify" her harsh sentence as having nothing to do with the past murders) that: OJ WAS JUST PUNISHED IN 2008 - FOR PAST MURDERS HE DID NOT COMMIT!

I remain astounded that (apparently) none of those who are convinced OJ committed the murders (especially the Las Vegas Jury and clearly vengeful Judge) heard the EARLY testimony of the lead detectives in the OJ murder trial! The murder trial Jurors DID, and that early testimony persuaded them that OJ was innocent (not because they were an all black jury)!

First recall the Prosecution's scenario: After slaughtering Nicole and Ron, O.J. drove back to his home, dashed upstairs, changed out of his bloody clothes, showered off the blood, changed into clean clothes, then hurried down with his luggage to the special chauffeur waiting to drive O.J. to the airport.

Now read the following about the early testimony the trial Jury HEARD AND REMEMBERED in deciding O.J. was innocent, which some of them repeated again as the key to their acquittal, on a network TV interview - apparently heard by few - some days after the trial...
The lead detectives testified they had TORN APART the plumbing of OJ's bathroom - and found NOT A TRACE of blood in the pipes! And not a trace of blood leading up the light colored stairs and walls leading upstairs, nor in OJ's light carpeted bedroom!

I detailed the above and more in the following article Jeff Rense kindly posted on his website last year...

Was OJ Correctly Found Innocent? Some Believe So

http://www.rense.com/general78/oj.htm

From Dick Fojut <r.fojut@worldnet.att.net> September 23, 2007

WHY THE MURDER TRIAL JURY CORRECTLY FOUND O.J. SIMPSON INNOCENT
-------------------
PLUS DETAILS OF SHERMAN SKOLNICK'S IGNORED, BUT NEVER CHALLENGED, CLAIM THAT LA POLICE FRAMED O.J. SIMPSON - WHILE THEY KNEW THE COMPETING YAKUZA OR MEXICAN HERRERA NARCOTICS MOBS HAD ACTUALLY SLAUGHTERED NICOLE & RON.
---------------------------------
Excerpts only from article...

In early questioning of the 2 main detectives, F. Lee Bailey got them to admit some incredible things! Following is the testimony the jurors remembered that led them to find O.J. innocent....

* Detective Lange admitted to F. Lee Bailey, they could not find a trace of blood OR dirt on the white (or light covered), stairs or on the walls leading to O.J.'s upstairs bedroom.... OR on the white bedroom carpet OR in the bathroom. (The single dark sock with his blood spot went strangely "unnoticed" until days later.)
* The same detective then testified that they took apart ALL the plumbing in the bathroom but could not find one drop or flake of blood in the pipes! The media people present heard this but never later repeated that testimony!

---------------------------
ADDITIONAL EXCERPTS...

Chicago private investigator Sherman Skolnick publicly contended that members of the narcotics-distributing Japanese Mafia, the YAKUZA - or - competing Mexican Herrera mob, slaughtered drug-dealing Nicole and Ron... Skolnick further claimed the murder was filmed by the DEA - and also watched by O.J.'s own detectives. None attempted to stop the murders. According to Skolnick, to cover up the role of the narcotics gangs, the crooked L.A. police framed Simpson...

According to investigator Skolnick, Nicole and Ron were distributing drugs through a chain of stores she got from O.J. as divorce settlement. And Skolnick also claimed the mob(s), after the trial, told O.J. that if he talks about them they will kill EVERY last member of his extended family. (Unfortunately, Skolnick died a few years back. But you may find more of his articles about the trial through a Google search.)

Both the narcs and O.J.'s detectives reportedly witnessed Nicole and Ron cut up, Samurai-style, by a dope hit team. The video reportedly shows them as 3 or 4 hispanics or orientals. If the trial evidence is true, was that O.J.'s shoe-print at the murder scene, *after-the-fact*, alerted by his detectives reportedly having witnessed the bloodbath?

Naive people ask: Why didn't the narcs and/or the detectives stop the murders? For one thing, the narcs know their top dogs at the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration are highly corrupt, and have given the Herreras and other major dope traffickers a pass. (See the book, "The Underground Empire," by James Mills.)

Also, both teams knew better than to interfere with the bloody turf wars between the Herreras and the Yakuza in California.

Insofar as the L.A. police later planted "evidence" implicating O.J., was this a type of police "logic" : "Well, O.J. is in with criminals anyway, so let's sink him one way or another."

THE ROLE OF THE TRIAL JUDGE AND HIS WIFE: SHUT YOUR MOUTH! --

O.J. trial Judge Lance Ito was reportedly in a position to know what the double murders were really all about. His wife, L.A. Police Captain Margaret York, has been in charge of investigating police department corruption. Captain York reportedly knew of the other police brass as the corrupt secret owners/operators of the fast food sites, formerly O.J.'s businesses (Did O.J. still retain an interest?).
-------------------------------
Open the article URL to read more from Sherman Skolnick and "the rest of the story."
http://www.rense.com/general78/oj.htm


Related

OJ Simpson "Finally" Sentenced to 18 Years: Just Desserts? (Dec. 5, 2008)
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/simpsonsentence05dec08.shtml

© Copyright 2008 Educate-Yourself.org  All Rights Reserved.



Free Newsletter

Email Address:


Join the Educate-Yourself Discussion Forum

All information posted on this web site is the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only. It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer of your choice for medical care and advice.