The Persecution & Imprisonment of German Lawyer Sylvia Stolz for the Zionist-Created 'Thought Crime' of Holocaust Denial
[Editor's Note: The term "holocaust denier" was invented by the Zionists to castigate anyone who questions any aspect of the World War II Nazi death camp story, other than the official story line promoted by Zionists. There is no question that large numbers of European Jews and others, including Catholic clergy, both nuns and priests, gypsies, and others, were rounded up and delivered to these camps. A very large number of innocent people died, but the total number of Jewish victims appears to be substantially less than the six million usually quoted as the practical matter of disposing of such large number of bodies daily via the purported gas chambers and purported crematoriums at Auschwitz don't match logical and critical analysis of the available evidence. To make it a "crime" for reasonable people to even talk about this topic is an unacceptable outrage to civilized society everywhere and must be repudiated and struck down in every country where it has been installed. I do not concur with racists who blame all Jews for the actions of Zionists. Nor do I give a pass to the Third Reich Nazis who were responsible for rounding up those innocent people and delivering them to those death camps. At the same time, we cannot assign blame to the German people in general, either during the war or after, for the murderous conduct of those dedicated to the Nazi cause, no more than can we properly assign blame to American citizens for the murderous conduct of the Pentagon in the Middle East. Reason must prevail among people of good will who care about justice, and the only way for reason and fair treatment to prevail, is to insure the paramount right to free speech ~ everywhere, without abridgement or censorship or conditionality.]
May 13, 2013 (Forward courtesy of Jerry M)
The Persecution & Imprisonment of German Lawyer Sylvia Stolz for the Zionist-Created Thought "Crime" of Holocaust Denial (May 13, 2013)
Steve F says:
January 17, 2013
Sylvia Stolz, Ernst Zundel's Lawyer, the German Joan of Arc, gave a speech, and then She was charged with Holocaust Denial; and so was the speech organizer. Here is Her speech followed by a standing ovation!AZK - Sylvia Stolz - Lawyer Who Was Jailed for Presenting Evidence in the Zundel Trial (full) [In German with English subtitles]
Published on Jan 18, 2013
(English Subs) Sylvia Stolz, a German Lawyer who was jailed for presenting evidence in the defence of her client in the criminal court trial in Germany of so-called holocaust denier Ernst Zundel, tells her story at the AZK (Anti-Zensor-Koalition) Conference in Switzerland, in November 2012. In 2008, she was banned from speaking during the trial, barred from presenting evidence, and criminally charged with contempt of court, and with inciting contempt, and charged under the same section of the German Criminal Code as her client, and subsequently imprisoned for 3 years. She is also barred from practising law.. After giving this presentation in Switzerland, she is now again facing criminal charges, as is the host and organizer of the AZK, Mr. Ivo Sasek.
NOTE: For a translation of the short interview at the very end, please go here (contains C.C.Engl. Subs)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gJvE_1HQPg [New charges against Sylvia Stolz]
AKZ Website: http://anti-zensur.info/index.php?page=azk8
jetset808 2 days ago
we can't disagree with the Holocaust in Canada by law?
· in reply to 8Asmodai8 (Show the comment)
8Asmodai8 1 week ago
Unfortunately, as I live in Canada, it is a criminal offense to comment on this video. We live under harsh "Thought Crime" legislation. Therefore, to give an opinion of a certain type may lead to persecution by the Royal Corrupt Mounted Police [RCMP], which is Canada's federal police force. They are a corrupt police force engaged in many criminal activities within Canada, and its many members are continuously being charged with various criminal offenses [ie murder, drugs, sexual harassment].
SPEZIO27 2 weeks ago
At 18:50; "THE TRIBUNAL SHALL NOT BE BOUND BY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE."
vushi1000 3 weeks ago
Thank you Sylvia!!! There is more and more of us everyday . We are getting stronger and the truth will out soon.
Chris Duane 3 weeks ago
Wow! Sylvia Stolz, you are a global hero. Parts of your speech were harrowing to listen to though because you came so close to the line of Germany's kangaroo Holocaust laws and may have even stepped over it. As a lawyer, I'm sure you know where that line is better than I do though. Keep speaking out, Sylvia. You, Horst Mahler and others have a growing fan base in the USA.
and here is the article about the charges against her:
http://www.tachles.ch/news/strafanzeige-gegen-stolz-und-sasek [tachles.ch is a Jewish weekly in Switzerland]
[This article has been taekn down and cannot be found on the Wayback Machine, but fortunately, it was saved and re-posted by this blogger. English translation is seen below the German version]
Strafanzeige gegen Stolz und Sasek
17. Januar 2013
Der Auftritt der deutschen Nationalsozialistin und Holocaust-Leugnerin Sylvia Stolz in der Churer Stadthalle fÃ¼hrt zu einem Strafverfahren. Der Berner Anwalt Daniel Kettiger hat nach Medienberichten (vlg. tachles, 11. Januar 2013) Anzeige wegen Widerhandlung gegen die Rassismus-Strafnorm bei der Staatsanwaltschaft GraubÃ¼nden eingereicht.
Rechtsanwalt Kettiger richtet seine Strafanzeige sowohl gegen die Rednerin Stolz wie auch gegen Ivo Sasek, Organisator der Konferenz der Anti-Zensur-Koalition. Dies weil dieser â€žals verantwortlicher Moderatorâ€œ es unterlassen habe, â€žFrau Stolz das Wort zu entziehenâ€œ, als diese Ã¼ber lÃ¤ngere Dauer â€žoffensichtlich Leugnung des Holocaustâ€œ betrieben habe.
In seiner Anzeige verweist Kettiger auf jene Vortragspassage, in der Stolz kritisiert, der Holocaust sei noch nie vor Gericht bewiesen worden. Was wegen der Offensichtlichkeit auch nicht notwendig ist. Stolz fÃ¤hrt dann fort: es wÃ¼rden â€ždie Feststellungen Ã¼ber die Tatorte, TÃ¶tungsmethoden, Anzahl der Toten, TatzeitrÃ¤ume, TÃ¤ter, Leichen oder Spuren eines Mordesâ€œ fehlen. Weiter auch Ã¼berâ€žZeugenaussagen, Dokumente oder sonstige Beweismittelâ€œ. Und es gÃ¤be auch keine Beweise fÃ¼r eine nationalsozialistische â€žAbsicht, die Judenheit ganz oder teilweise zu zerstÃ¶renâ€œ, ebenso fÃ¼r â€žBeweise, PlÃ¤ne und Befehleâ€œ. Es ist schwer vorstellbar, dass der Holocaust noch umfassender geleugnet werden kann. [TA]
English TRANSLATION: (http://www.tachles.ch/news/strafanzeige-gegen-stolz-und-sasek)
Lawsuit against Stolz and Sasek
17th January 2013
The appearance of the German National Socialist and Holocaust denier Sylvia Stolz in Chur City Hall leads to a criminal prosecution.
The Bernese lawyer Daniel Kettiger filed after media reports difficulty (see tachles, January 11, 2013) complaint for a criminal offense liable to racism criminal provision to the prosecutor Graubnden. Lawyer Kettiger directs his lawsuit against both, the speaker Stolz and Ivo Sasek, conference organizer of anti-censorship coalition founder. This is because he has failed, as a responsible moderator, to cut off the speech of Stolz, as they have lingered for a longer period of time in obviously a Holocaust denial mode.
In his ad, Kettiger refers to those lecture passage criticized by Stolz “ that the Holocaust was never proven in court, which because of the obviousness of the HC is also really not necessary. Stolz continues: there is much lack of evidence, for instance: the findings of the crime scenes, killing methods, number of deaths, crimes committed spaces perpetrators corpses or traces of a murder (raise questions). Next also testimony, documents or other evidence are missing. And there is lack of evidence of a Nazi intention to destroy Jews in whole or in part, in evidence, plans and orders. It is hard to believe that the Holocaust can not be denied even more comprehensive. [TA]offline
She doesn't mind being called a Nazi, as a matter of fact, She considers it an honor:
[Stolz expalins in this video that being called a "Nazi" in modern Germany is a Zionist tool of censorship and intimidation, much as the words "anti-semite" are used by Zionists in North America to shut down debate and criticism of Zionist machinations and subterfuge.
German lawyer may face prosecution for denying Holocaust
(Sylvia Stolz (R) and Ivo Sasek address a conference of the Anti-Censorship Coalition in November 2012).
A German lawyer may face prosecution for questioning the Holocaust and making an argument that there is ‘no evidence’ to prove the event.Sylvia Stolz [misspelled Schultz in original article, corrected here] denied the Holocaust during a conference of the Anti-Censorship Coalition held in the canton of Graubunden, Switzerland, in November 2012.
According to reports, Daniel Kettiger, a Bernese lawyer, has filed a criminal complaint against Stolz at the Graubunden Prosecutors Office.
The German lawyer had said during the conference that the Holocaust had never been proven in court as it would have lacked the findings of the crime scenes and killing methods and the number of deaths, perpetrators, corpses or traces of a murder.
Stolz had also argued that there was also no “testimony, documents or other evidence.”
Stolz is not the only person for whom a criminal complaint has been filed. Ivo Sasek, the organizer of the Anti-Censorship Coalition conference also faces similar prosecution.
Sylvia Stolz may face prosecution again
Published by carolyn on Sun, 2013-01-20
Slyvia Stolz only a little over a year ago completed serving a 3 and 1/2 year prison term in Germany for "holocaust denial." Her "crime" took place while, as his lawyer, she was defending another "holocaust denier" (Ernst Zundel) in court. Now 'the Jews' (yes, it's them for sure) are after her for daring to speak up once again. Her voice is too legally accurate, too reasonable, and too persuasive for their comfort. You can see and read Stolz' speech here. Please do so to educate yourself on the legal questions involved.
|All information posted on this web site is the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only. It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer of your choice for medical care and advice.|