The Freedom of Knowledge, The Power of Thought ©

The World Conquerors
Chapter 10, New Purim and Nuremberg

Google Translator (60 Languages)

By Louis Marschalko (1903 - 1968)
Published 1958

The World Conquerors: Chapter Ten, New Purim and Nuremberg (1958)

The entire book in html format (including links and addendum notes) with Table of Contents (easier to read than the pdf version)

Complete original book in pdf (40 MB) / First Half in pdf (20 MB / Second Half in pdf (20 MB)

Chapter Ten (pages 129 - 146):

New Purim and Nuremberg

WHO knows about those ancient teachings on which the Jewish doctrine of revenge is based? Who knows the real meaning of the Feast of Purim? Who has seen this feast? Who has seen the Jews getting drunk in their synagogues? For, although they are at other times often teetotalers, on this day their religious duly is to get inebriated. Who, among all the "Bible-reading" Gentiles knows that Purim is celebrated by Jewry to this very day as a feast of rejoicing to commemorate one of the greatest mass-murders in the history of the world?

Nearly 2,500 years have passed since the first Purim, but the descendants of Mordecai and Esther still bake their cakes decorated with the lion of Judah. The male members of the Jewish community still become drunk on the fourteenth day of the month Adar, remaining in an ecstasy promoted by a sense of revenge. And when in the synagogues the book of Queen Esther is read, Haman-sticks are taken out of caftan pockets; for orthodox Jews must symbolically strike them on the synagogue bench whenever the name of King Ahasuerus's chief minister is read out in the text. In the synagogues of the East also, drunken Jews who have consumed unlimited quantities of wines and spirits are seen reeling about on this day. In Belz and Sadagora, Palestinian dancing girls perform their lustful eastern dances. This feast is to be enjoyed; it is to celebrate a mass murder and a great revenge.

Let us see what the Jews are taught in the Book of Esther. What happened at the first Purim?

The Book tells us that *Ahasuerus, the Persian King, fell out with his wife, who was also a lady of Persian descent, and decided to find himself another. The new Queen whom he chose happened to belong to the Jewish community which had been carried into captivity by Nebuchadnezzar. But Esther did not disclose either her origin or her nationality to the King and the royal household. (129) Mordecai, her uncle, forbade this. Thus Mordecai laid the foundation stone of a new political school. He marked out for future generations the policy of having Jewish women selected for the royal chamber and thus influencing kings, emperors, presidents and other statesmen, in order to achieve at a high level the aspirations of Jewish nationalism. Though these Jewish women repudiated the Mosaic commandment, nevertheless they furthered the cause of their nation.

At this time Haman, son of Hammedatha the Agagite, was advanced by King Ahasuerus to the highest office, to the post of prime minister of the Empire. The reason is not recorded in the Bible, but Haman was the "enemy of the Jews" and accused them before the king as follows: "…There is a certain people scattered abroad and dispersed among the people in all the provinces of thy kingdom: and their laws are diverse from all people; neither keep they the king's laws..." (Esther iii. 8.)

According to the Book of Esther, the King ordered in his edict that on the thirteenth day of the month Adar the Jews must be killed. But old Mordecai learned of the king's plan and sent a message to his niece to go to the king and "make supplication unto him, and make request before him for her people". Thereupon the queen invited the king and Haman to a banquet.

"And the king said again unto Esther on the second day at the banquet of wine, 'What is thy petition, Queen Esther? and it shall be granted thee: and what is thy request? and it shall be performed, even to the half of the kingdom.'" (Esther vii. 2.)

It is clear from the Book of Esther that by the time the queen began to accuse Haman, the "hater", the king was under the influence of wine. Ahasuerus in a rage left the banquet and went out into the palace gardens to cool himself; meanwhile Haman began to beg the queen for his life. The application of the Nuremberg methods can here be clearly recognised; lies and slander! When Ahasuerus returned, the queen accused Haman of attempting to rape her while the king was out. Thereupon the king ordered that Haman be immediately hanged.

The taking over of power was achieved before the prime minister's body was cold. (130)

* One of several Mede and Persian kings mentioned in The Old Testament, specifically in the Book of Esther, generally identified with Xerxes. Xerxes (circa 519-465 B.C.) king of Persia was the son of the first Darius.

On the order of the beautiful Jewess the king promoted Mordecai to the post of prime minister and simultaneously bloody massacres broke loose from India to Ethiopia, perpetrated by Jews who had actually suffered no harm whatever. After all, Haman's plan remained a plan only, never being carried out, and Haman, the person responsible, was hanged. Then, as always, whenever power fell into Jewish hands, they celebrated their victory by bloody massacres. The husband of the Jewish queen, the ancient symbol of the puppet statesman, graciously permitted the Jews "to take revenge on their enemies".

Since the first Purim, Mosaic nationalism has consistently bathed in the blood of victims slain in achieving perpetual revenge. "The Jews had light, and gladness, and joy and honour!" (Esther viii. 16), says The Old Testament.

The Book of Esther gives a detailed account of the victims of this mass slaughter who were executed with exceptional savagery. It recounts that all the ten sons of Haman were killed, whose only sin was that their father was an "anti-Semite". In the city of Shushan the Jews first killedmen, then slaughtered another 300 and finally in the provinces "... slew of their foes seventy and five thousand..." (Esther ix. 16) without any plausible reason.

To be able to assess the magnitude of these massacres correctly, we must not consider these figures in relation to the present-day population of the earth. The armies of Alexander the Great which conquered India consisted only of 47,000 men. The total strength of the Persian army at Marathon was 5,000, and Hannibal fought the Battle of Cannae with 20,000 soldiers. Therefore the figure of 75,000 massacred Persians was statistically an exceedingly high number.

All this happened "on the thirteenth day of the month Adar; and on the fourteenth day of the same rested they; and made it a day of feasting and gladness." (Esther ix. 17.)

"Because Haman, the son of Hammedatha the Agagite, the enemy of all the Jews, had devised against the Jews to destroy them and had cast Pur, that is, the lot, to consume them, and to destroy them." (Esther ix. 24.)

"But when Esther came before the king he commanded by letters that his wicked device, which he devised against the Jews, (131) should return upon his own head, and that he and his sons should be hanged on the gallows." (Esther ix. 25.)

"Wherefore they called these days Purim after the name of Pur. Therefore for all the words of this letter, and of that which they had seen concerning this matter, and which had come unto them." (Esther ix. 26.)

"The Jews ordained, and look upon them, and upon their seed and upon all such as joined themselves unto them, so as it should not fail, that they would keep these two days according to their writing, and according to their appointed time every year." (Esther ix. 27.)

"And that these days should be remembered and kept throughout every generation, every family, every province and every city; and that these days of Purim should not fail from among the Jews, nor the memorial of them perish from their seed." (Esther ix. 28.)

No nation has ever kept a pledge better than the Jews have kept the Feast of Purim for more than twenty-four centuries. Year after year they have celebrated the anniversary of the revenge and massacres. The frenzy induced by blood and wine and the triumphal exultation of satisfied revenge soared from city to city and from village to village. In the small thatched village synagogue, as well as in the impressive domed metropolitan temple, Purim became both a religious and national feast day.

The writer of these pages, when in a provincial town in Hungary, happened to witness the caftan-clad troops reeling out of the synagogue in fours. It was the Feast of Purim. Passers-by commented casually: "Hello, the Jews are having their holidays."

This same eternal hatred burns behind the teachings of Marx and of the Illuminati. It has turned Marxist Socialism into a creed of hatred. The apostles of this hatred have stood in the background of revolutions and Communist uprisings; they came to power with Bolshevism. Perhaps one day the history of the modern Hamans will be published ~ the story of those politicians, clergymen, statesmen, writers and journalists who were bold enough to see in the hatred demonstrated during Purim, a threat to the Christian world ~ and an account written of how they were persecuted, how their families were (132) ruined and how their children were plunged into destitution, and lastly, how "the haters" were hanged.

Jewry's greatest holiday is Purim: the feast of hatred. The greatest holiday of Christianity is the birth of Christ ~ the birth of love. At Nuremberg, Purim was dressed in the robes of legality. Revenge was wrapped up in legal paragraphs. A brand new "legal title" was created for the purpose of carrying out mass slaughters, whilst the real aim behind it was far more ambitious and sinister. Christian and Roman law and, generally speaking, Law itself, was to be nullified. The aim was to humiliate the vanquished nations, to intimidate the minds of the people, and through the "new law" to secure the political possibility of attaining total and complete world rule.

Was thefarcical procedure to furnish "war criminals" at Nuremberg an example of democracy in action? Was there really an unbiased court under theUnited States of America, Great Britain, France and SovietRussia, or was the procedure nothing but the sword of Jehovah smiting a defeated people? Were the "new laws", i.e. the basis for theverdicts, Christian in character? Did justice or revenge prevail?

The Nuremberg verdicts were pronounced to punish crimes committed against humanity. But on the bench sat the mass murderers of Katyn together with those responsible for the bombing of Dresden. The war propaganda of the allies always protested with extreme vigour against the principle of collective guilt. Nevertheless this principle of collective guilt was sanctioned by the Nuremberg tribunals when the ignominious theory of "guilty organisations" was invented. The radio networks everywhere lectured frequently at this time about "the law", yet at Nuremberg one of the most important legal principles was thrown aside, i.e. that no one can sit in judgment on his own case. American and Soviet flags were displayed together on the tribunal, but the most basic legal principle of the American constitution and judicature was ignored, i.e. Nulla Poena Sine Lege, which means that no one can be convicted for acts which were not punishable by law when committed. In the courtroom sentences were pronounced against barbarism, while concurrently in the basements of the court buildings the Prison Guards of Robert Kempner, the Public Prosecutor, brutally tortured prisoners. The principle of fair play was observed formally only, as the sentences (133) were based on incriminating or forged documents. Any crimes committed against humanity in the concentration camps should have been brought under the jurisdiction of an international court consisting of judges delegated by neutrals, and under conditions in which the court could judge not only the barbaric acts committed by the defeated parties but also those committed by the victorious states. Had this happened, the real criminals could never have obliterated the black stigma branded on them. But by adopting Jewish revenge methods, martyrs were made of certain guilty persons who in any case would never have been acquitted by an impartial court.

In the tribunal at Nuremberg, American, Russian, French and British judges sat, but a single victorious power prosecuted and judged: Judah!

Now we know what actually took place behind the scenes. Robert M. Kempner, a Jew of course, and formerly an "oberregierungsrat" in Germany, had been working behind General Taylor, the Chief Public Prosecutor. Morris Amchan assisted Kempner. In the court buildings of Nuremberg, excepting the judges and the accused, there were hardly any other people but Jews. The staff of the Ljudljanka and the M.V.D. was not any different from the personnel of the Courts of Nuremberg, Dachauand other places dealing with "war criminals". It consisted of Jews almost exclusively. The majority of witnesses were Jews as well, and of these Maurice Bardeche writes that their only concern was not to show their hatred too openly and, at least during the hearing of the witnesses, to try to give an impression of objectivity. It is characteristic of this kind of "administration of justice" that the number of witnesses called to give evidence in court was 240 only, yet 300,000 written affidavits were accepted supporting charges without this evidence being heard under oath. It is needless to say that the majority of these depositions were not true.

The accused prisoners were subjected to exactly the same kind of tortures as in Soviet prisons. Julius Streicher was flogged until he was covered with blood and was forced to drink water from the W.C. Then the Jews wearing U.S. Army uniform spat into his mouth in turn and forced him to kiss the feet of a Negro. In the prison of the Schwabisch Hall the young officers of the Adolf Hitler guards were flogged until they were soaked in blood, then they were forced (134) to lie prostrate on the ground while their torturers trampled on their sexual organs. As in the Malmedy Trials the prisoners were strung up in turn and then released until they signed the confessions demanded of them. On the grounds of such "confessions" extorted from Sepp Dietrich and Joachim Peiper, the Leibstandard Garde was convicted as a "guilty organisation".

Oswald Pohl, a general of the S.S., was manhandled with savagery during the trials of the personnel of the S.S. Paymaster's Office. His face was smeared with feces, and he was beaten until he signed the desired confession submitting to false accusations. These Jews, clad in the uniform of the American forces, had similarly tortured Weiss, S.S. Obergruppenfuehrer, at Frankfurt-am-Mein and in Dachau. In the Malmedy Trials Jewish torturers in American uniform likewise extorted confessions from private soldiers. McCarthy, the American Senator, when dealing with these cases, gave the following statement to the American Press on May 20th, 1949; "I think the world expected us to, give proof of American legal principles and judicial practice by using them when dealing with our defeated enemies. Instead of this, Gestapo and M.V.D. methods were used. I have heard evidence and read documentary proofs to the effect that the accused persons were beaten up, maltreated and physically tortured by methods, which could only be conceived in sick brains. They were subjected to mock trials and pretended executions; they were told that their families would be deprived of their ration cards. All these things were carried out with the approval of the Public Prosecutor in order to secure the psychological atmosphere necessary for the extortion of the required confessions. If the United States lets such acts committed by a few people go unpunished, then the whole world can rightly criticise us severely and for ever doubt the correctness of our motives and our moral integrity."

In addition to the tortures, forged documents were also produced to convict the accused persons. Mitigating circumstances were not allowed to be considered against incriminating proofs. This in itself is a falsification of truth and justice. A periodical called Madrid reported the hearings of the Nuremberg Trials, that some American business Jews had converted some of the concentration camps into museums and in return for cash were conducting tours to these camps to show American tourists, journalists and other invited people the (135) horror spots. With the help of wax figures, the entrance to the camp "gas-chamber" was reconstructed. Wax figures representing horribly distorted human forms were used to demonstrate the alleged tortures in these camps. If a camp had no "gas-chamber" ~ and in most of the camps there were none ~ then they built an improvised one with expert studio methods as we will see later.

Not only did the propaganda of the World Jewish Congress and of similar other Jewish organisations utilise film trick photography, but the Public Prosecutor's Office, headed by Robert M. Kempner, former German-Jewish emigrant, operated with "proofs" of a similar value. In a film about Funk, Minister of Economy, great piles of gold teeth, spectacle frames and Pince-nez [pinched nose glasses] were to be seen, which were supposed to prove that they came from Jews exterminated in these camps. It is generally known today that American Jews brought these films with them when they arrived at Frankfurt, a few days after the city was occupied, in the wake of the American troops. The notorious film called "Todesmuhle" (The Mill of Death) which was shown in the courtroom during the Nuremberg Trials with the purpose of turning public opinion against the accused prisoners, is also a forgery.

The Jews stuck to their old tactics of remaining in the background, with the "Gentiles" in the forefront. Though the judges were presumably Christians, they entirely lacked the spirit of Christ. The most incriminating evidence-forged films, documents, affidavits and extracted confessions ~ was produced by the Jewish prosecutors, C.I.C. agents, false witnesses and others, working in the background. The judges were afraid of the Public Prosecutors. General Taylor, the acting head of the Public Prosecutor's Office, together with Robert M. Kempner, organised and ran a sort of "intelligence service for spying out and controlling opinions expressed by judges, which had leaked out from their private discussions. Sixty percent of the staff of the Public Prosecutor's Office consisted of persons who had to leave Germany when the Hitlerian racial laws came into force. Earl Carrol, an American lawyer, stated that, according to his observations, not ten percent of the Americans employed at the Nuremberg courts were actually American by birth.

It was an American judge, Justice Wenersturm, who exposed the real background of the Nuremberg revenge campaign. He was (136) President of one of the tribunals, which tried the cases of certain German generals who had held commands in the South East and were charged with "war crimes". Wenersturm gave up his appointment at the Nuremberg Court and took the risk of returning to America. Half an hour before his departure he gave a statement to the reporter of the Chicago Tribune (a paper in Gentile hands), under the strict condition that it should not be published before his plane grounded in America. His statement contained the following points:

  1. 1.     The high ideals prescribed for the Military Court of Nuremberg had never materialised in the practice of the Nuremberg Courts.
  2. 2.     The fact that the victors alone were trying the losers did not promote true justice.
  3. 3.     The members of the department of the Public Prosecutor, instead of trying to formulate and reach a new guiding legal principle, were moved only by personal ambition and revenge.
  4. 4.     The prosecution did its utmost in every way possible to prevent the defence preparing its case and to make it impossible for it to furnish evidence.
  5. 5.     The prosecution, led by General Taylor, did everything in its power to prevent the unanimous decision of the Military Court being carried out, i.e. to ask Washington to furnish and make available to the court further documentary evidence in the possession of the American Government.
  6. 6.     Ninety percent of the Nuremberg Court consisted of biased persons who, either on political or racial grounds, furthered the prosecution's case.
  7. 7.     The prosecution obviously knew how to fill all the administrative posts of the Military Court with "Americans" whose nationalisation certificates were very new indeed, and who, whether in the administrative service or by their translations, etc., created an atmosphere hostile to the accused persons.
  8. 8.     The real aim of the Nuremberg Trials was to show the Germans the crimes of their Fuhrer, and this aim was at the same time the pretext on which the trials were ordered. But the only fact the Germans were shown was that they had fallen into the hands of rather brutal and hardened conquerors. Had I known seven months earlier what was happening at Nuremberg, I would never have gone there. (Das Letzte Wort über Nurnberg ~ The Last Word About Nuremberg - Der Weg's edition, page 57.) (137)

When someone posed the question: "Why did Justice Wenersturm not have his statement published until after his personal arrival in America?" an English press observer remarked shrewdly: "Justice Wenersturm was well aware of the fact that air crashes are not uncommon in American civil aviation."

Thus it can be seen that even American lives are not safe from the revenge of Jehovah. It is enough for us to conclude that Nuremberg was not the work of either American or British mentality, but that of typical Jewish tribal "Nazism". It is a clear demonstration of the fact that once administration of justice falls into the hands of Jews there will be no justice since, according to Jewry's double morality, against Gentiles everything is permitted.

So, for the public prosecutors of the Nuremberg Trials, procedure was governed by no code except that of the Protocols only.

That the revenge of Jehovah took its course at Nuremberg is not only demonstrated by the mentality displayed there, but also by statistics. Out of 3,000 people employed on the staff at Nuremberg Court, 2,400 were Jews. This figure speaks for itself! But, in the background of the Nuremberg tragedy there is another far-reaching aim discernible; the terrorisation of the whole world through the Nuremberg sentences. It was to silence all opposition, to brand as "war criminal" anybody daring to criticise Jewry, and on the Soviet pattern, to punish with death all those who might become embarrassing witnesses.

Besides the above-mentioned aims, a further and even greater one was completely achieved: the prevention of any reconciliation between the Gentile nations. The aim was to arouse the hatred of the Germanic people against America. World Jewry reckoned that a time would yet come when America might sorely need the aid of German divisions against Bolshevism. As most of the sentences were announced in the name of America, they had therefore to be worded in such a manner that no European nation would ever be prepared to take up arms to support America. (138)

Jewry's aim was achieved, and this was reflected by German public opinion which, between 1945 and 1951, placed America on the same level as the Soviet Union.

It was not Washington's America nor England of Magna Carta fame nor the France of Descartes which carried out this revenge. It was the spirit of Purim that sat in judgment at Nuremberg, "... and slew of their foes seventy and five thousand…" says the Book of Esther, Haman's false accuser, Queen Esther's ghost, had returned to hire false witnesses in Christian Europe, to manufacture forged affidavits, to produce faked films, to torture innocent people in prison dungeons and to falsify history itself.

The glorification of treason and the rewarding of traitors was one of the horrible consequences which will afflict the world today. Nuremberg acquitted everybody who had betrayed his country and convicted all those who had kept their oath of allegiance. Thus the gulf between patriotism and treachery disappeared. Which country is to be betrayed? Hitler's of course, but probably Washington's country as well. The verdicts acquitting people such as Julius Rosenberg and the atom spies all had their precedents at Nuremberg. When, in spite of everything, traitors were occasionally Jewish, anti-American demonstrations showed that, from Jewry's point of view, treason committed against other nations was wholly justified. The British Military Code demanded unconditional loyalty from the British soldier, while at the same time German soldiers were sentenced to death for obeying orders. The traitors were rewarded. By doing these things all those traditions of loyalty that upheld states were demolished.

The Nuremberg Court became not only the symbol of revenge but an emblem of moral depravity as well. The Nuremberg Court building itself was the centre of black market activities in a starving Europe devastated by war. Mark Lautern draws a shocking picture of this sink of iniquity engulfing the Court of Nuremberg. "They have all arrived: the Solomons, the Schlossbergers and the Rabinoviches, who, as members of the Public Prosecutor's staff, in the intervals between two death sentences or between two executions, deal busily in American cigarettes, valuable chinaware, silver, gold, furs and works of art."

Mr. Salamonson specialised in watches; Mr. Sterling smuggled (139) paintings; Mr. Cohen ordered coffee by the wagonload, or American cigarettes.

"But it was not the black market only," writes Mark Lautern, "that converted the surroundings of the Nuremberg Court into the very sink of Europe. Even more horrible was the moral degradation originating here. The orgies of the foreign employees carried on in private flats and hotels often caused indignation in the whole district. The number of young women employed at the Court grew steadily. Amongst them were Germans and allies alike, drawn into the whirl of depravity and corruption. Sexual incontinence and the most revelling perversion prevailed in these circles, and unlimited scandals supported by ample evidence, provided certain papers and magazines with material for years. (Das Letzte Wort über Nurnberg, p.68.)

Sentenced to death or life imprisonment stood the new Hamans before Queen Esther's people; they were privileged to hear their haters, the black marketeers, the perverts and torturers, singing in chorus an improvised Nuremberg march twisted from Lehar's Merry Widow:  Da geh ich in PX, Dort bin ich bis halb sechs!

At midnight on October 16th, 1946, eleven European "war criminals" set out for the gallows at Nuremberg. And then a miracle happened. At the very portal of death the vanquished scored a victory over their conquerors. It did not seem to be a scaffold they mounted but the pedestal of a morality, which might save Europe yet. Joachim von Ribbentrop died first in silence. General Wilhelm Keitel stepped after him under the gallows, his uniform smart, his boots shining. Before dying, he said: "Two million German soldiers died for their country. I am going now to follow my boys!"

It was then the turn of Dr. Ernst Kaltenbrunner: "I loved my country and my German people with all my heart! Good luck, Germany!"

Silently, with set face and an immense contempt, Dr. Alfred Rosenberg confronted the hangman, being followed to the grave by Dr. Hans Frank, Governor-General of the Polish territories. These (140) two men were held responsible for Jews said to have perished in the East.

Dr. Wilhelm Frick, Minister of the Reich, was the next victim: "Germany for ever!" he shouted, before the trapdoor opened. Julius Streicher succeeded him on the gallows. He belonged to that small circle possessing the power of vision. He bad been captured by a New York Jew named Blitt, who, with the rank of major, specialised in exterminating "anti-Semites". Perhaps Streicher had foreseen the gallows awaiting those leaders who dared defend themselves and their nation. Regarding the spectators with contempt he sarcastically announced the whole truth about Nuremberg: "It is the Feast of Purim of 1946!"

Dr. Fritz Sauckel came next with the words:  "I die guiltless. I respect American soldiers and their officers but not American justice!"

With head erect, General Alfred Jodl stepped under the gallows. Arthur Seyss-Inquart followed:  "I believe that this execution will be the last act in the tragedy of the Second World War!" he said.

It was perhaps a symbolic fact that even the military executioner, John C. Woods, was a Jew. He took 143 minutes to hang the "war criminals".

"This smart job," he said proudly, "deserved a good long drink!" Meanwhile, the reporters of Life took his picture, rope in hand, so that this well-known magazine could, in the most doubtful taste, reproduce the photograph on its front page. All this may indeed deserve a good long drink. But a prophecy of Julius Streicher loomed ominously over the heads of judges and hangmen alike. They had heard him pronounce from the gallows:  "Remember! Your turn will come next! You will be hanged by the Bolsheviks!"

Hermann Göring, having taken potassium cyanide smuggled into his cell half an hour before the time of execution, was dead. British, American and Russian agents were looking feverishly for Hitler's body in the ruins of the Fuhrer's shelter. Goebbels perished, together with his family; he first killed his six children and then committed suicide. Bormann disappeared. Himmler committed suicide with (141) cyanide when he fell into the hands of British-Jewish interrogators. Robert Ley committed suicide in Nuremberg prison.

In Milan, Mussolini, who had already been shot dead, was hanged by his feet, upside down. The last scene at Nuremberg depicted aeroplanes taking off to scatter over Germany the ashes of the "war criminals". This deed symbolised the fear induced by a guilty conscience on the part of both judges and participants awakening from the drunken frenzy of Purim.

In France, the old grey-haired General Pétain, already on the edge of the grave, was sentenced to life-imprisonment in a fort, out of gratitude for defending another fortress, Verdun, against the Germans. Then Pierre Laval, the French Premier, boldly faced the firing squad.

He too had taken cyanide, but for two hours doctors fought desperately to save him ~ for death. And, in the end, he stood there confronting the guns, while the judges appointed to be present at the execution took cover behind the prison van, unable to look at the scene which was the consequence of their judgment. Laval, though wrecked physically by the horrible effects of the poison, refused the offer to be executed sitting in a chair. Though staggering, he braced himself to say:  "A French Premier dies erect!" He himself gave the order to fire, but the bullets missed their target. Finally, the French Premier had to be killed by a revolver shot through the back of his head.

In Norway, Prime Minister Quisling was executed in the prison yard of Akershus, and the members of the firing platoon were deeply impressed by the courageous and dignified manner with which one of the oldest enemies of Bolshevism faced the guns.

The Hungarian leader Ferenc Szálasi was executed together with his ministers. Miklos Horthy, the previous Head of State, only escaped Nuremberg by becoming one of the chief witnesses for the prosecution and by denying he had anything to do with the so-called "Jewish Laws" which he himself had sanctioned. Ferenc Szalasi gave a military salute to his fellows, the members of his Cabinet, who had already been executed on the gallows, when he was passing by to take his turn, and he died with such bravery that the Soviet-made film of his execution had soon to be banned from all cinemas, to such a degree did his heroic conduct command the respect and (142) admiration of the whole nation. Laszlo Bardossy, Bela lmredy, Dome Sztojay and Jeno Szollosi, the four ex-Prime Ministers of Hungary, died with similar bravery on the gallows or tied to the stake. Those who made retrospective laws against them or sat in judgment over them belonged almost without exception to the world conquerors. It could not even be said against Laszlo Bardossy that he was an "anti-Semite". His only crime was that he had declared war on Bolshevism. When he looked down at the dense mob released from the ghettos and saw the revengeful spectators crowding the place of execution, he cried out as his last prayer: "Oh God! Deliver Hungary from these bandits!"

In Rumania, Marshal Antonescu, one of the greatest Rumanian heroes, was executed. In Yugoslavia, the leader of the patriotic partisans, Drazsa Mihajlovich, was handed over to the butchers of Mojse Pijade. Dr. Jozef Tiso, both priest and Prime Minister of independent Slovakia, also died on the gallows on April 18th, 1947. The revenge did not stop at the persons of church leaders. Even the Pope himself could not rescue Christ's priest from the hands of Edvard Beneš, the great freemason who grimly said:  "Tiso must hang!"

In eight or nine countries the heads of state, prime ministers and leaders, were executed during the new Purim. But they are not war criminals in the eyes of their peoples, but symbols of their nation's martyrdom. They were followed by anonymous martyrs, by soldiers loyal to their oaths, by intellectuals, journalists, farmers and churchmen. Thus, not only the "anti-Semitic Nazis" and "Fascists" were murdered, but also anybody representing quality who might be unpleasant witness against perpetrators of outrages. For example, Ferenc Orsos, the Hungarian university professor and European authority on forensic medicine, was a "war criminal" because he signed the report on Katyn confirming that it was not the Germans but the Bolsheviks who massacred the officers of the Polish army.

Possibly the Americans are already beginning to feel that the time is approaching when Streicher's prophecy may be fulfilled:  "Remember! Your turn will come next! You will be hanged by the Bolsheviks!"

The greatest service that can be rendered to America would be for somebody to have the courage to explain that all these outrages (143) were not the acts of Americans but of world Jewry, and that Nuremberg represented no new law but the terror of Purim. After all, not only the vanquished and the collaborators were murdered at Nuremberg. One of the first martyrs of Jew Finance was America's epic hero, General Patton, Commander of the U.S. Army invading Germany, the "knight of the armoured divisions". A descendant of the American pioneers, he thought of Nazism as a satanic evil. The propagandists, journalists and statesmen said so, anyway, so far as he was aware. He arrived in Germany hating it. He believed that the Nazis must be punished. Then, a German dairymaid living in the neighbourhood of his H.Q. happened to come his way, and during a casual conversation she told him about the things happening behind the "villa of the commandant", i.e. his house. She described how the milk intended for the cities was dumped in the roads by the military police on the order of the Morgenthau Boys; how, no longer Nazis but ordinary German soldiers were detained in crowded internment camps just because they did their duty; how the workers had been expelled from their homes out of revenge by the former inmates of the concentration camps, and how Jewish doctors in the hospitals recommended that every fourth newborn baby should be killed with an injection because there was not enough milk.

And General Patton set forth like the medieval knight-errant to see with his own eyes whether the German peasant woman's account was true or not. Without displaying his rank, in the uniform of a private, he toured all parts of this earthly hell; the prisons, the internment camps and the prison camps where he saw for himself that those torturing Germans teaching the theory of collective guilt and meting out collective punishment were not American boys but sons of Jehovah. From that moment the officers of the U.S. Army received strict orders to give sufficient food to the prisoners of war, already half dead with starvation, and the Military Police was forbidden to dump the babies' milk on the roads any more. General Patton was not prepared to put the Morgenthau Plan into effect, although he had fought for America ~ and, alas, also for Judah. But another general was only too willing to serve the Morgenthau Plan. His name was Dwight Eisenhower.

It was not possible to convict the "knight of the armoured (144) divisions" at Nuremberg. Patton was therefore convicted and sentenced to death behind the scenes. But the people who sat in judgment upon him were the same as those who had convicted the German leaders at Nuremberg. In spite of having been hushed up, it is well known today that on the order of C.I.C. agents, an "American" car drove into Patton's. Asa result of this "accident" General Patton was injured. He was promptly transferred to an ambulance, but on its way to hospital the ambulance collided with a large American heavy lorry and this time he was killed. At the same moment something disappeared from his pocket which the world conquerors had every reason to fear.

"I have a little black book!" the General had said earlier, "and when I get back to the U.S.A. I am going to blow hell out of everything." But before closing his eyes for the last time, his eyes surely saw the same enemy as did Keitel, Jodi and Streicher when they stood under the gallows of Nuremberg.

Nevertheless, certain people were never brought to trial at Nuremberg. The members of the Frankfurt Research Institute for the Investigation of the Jewish Question, and the representatives and staff of Welt Dienst (World Service) were never touched although they were the first to be captured by Jewish members of the American C.I.C. They were the first to be brought to Nuremberg and to be threatened by the hangman before he despatched the ministers of the Reich. But these people simply retorted to their interrogators: "Very well then! We are ready to stand trial at the Court of Nuremberg, but with the help of our hidden documents we will prove that world Jewry is the real perpetrator of the war crimes. At the same time we will be compelled to disclose that 'World Service' was not a Nazi organisation at all. The members of twenty-three nations contributed to its columns. Amongst them was an American ex-President, officers of the Swedish General Staff, several of the worthiest members of the English aristocracy and a Cabinet Minister of the Union of South Africa."

The leaders of these German organisations, although detested by the world conquerors, were never even indicted. They were freed in a hurry and anyone reading the Nuremberg sentences will see (145) that neither the Frankfurt Research Institute nor "World Service" are to be found mentioned among "Guilty Organisations".

It would have been most unpleasant for the world conquerors had the leaders of these groups submitted their "defence" in court. Union, an English paper, in its issue of January 19th, 1952, writes that it had just received news from Germany which seemed to show rather bad taste on the part of the authorities of the American Occupation Zone. The first Jewish synagogue had been dedicated in the Court Palace of Nuremberg in the very place where Goering and the other National Socialist leaders were sentenced to death. Were any more proof needed to convince German public opinion that their leaders were murdered by the schemes of world Jewry, this synagogue dedication would be sufficient.

And so the Nuremberg courtroom will ever remain a symbol of the new Purim, for here, in 1952, a new synagogue was established to the glory of Jehovah and as a token of the fact that Judah and not the allies, sat in judgment at Nuremberg. (146)

Note: C.I.C. stands for Counter Intelligence Corps.

Chapter Eleven What Has Become of Six Million Jews

Table of Contents