The Freedom of Knowledge, The Power of Thought ©
Letters to The Editor

Bankers Bailout: The Greatest Taxpayer Rip-Off in History

Editor's Note: The American public, by and large, is too stupid, too unthinking, too un-aware, too preoccupied with TV sports, car races, and debauched Hollywood celebrities, too hypnotized, too mesmerized, too mind controlled, and too dumbed-down to understand, or realize, or comprehend what is happening to them right under their nose. They are being ROBBED blind. The robbery is so great that it will cause the impoverishment of the vast majority in this country. This robbery will lead to the Greatest Depression in history and ultimately to the implosion of the United States as a viable economic, military, and political force on the world stage.

Too few realize that wealth is created by workers who produce things - whether those things be automobiles, refrigerators, vegetables, or candles (which will soon become a growth market, by the way). Bankers, Wall Street brokerage firms, "credit markets", or "financial institutions" produce NOTHING. They MANIPULATE the fruits of those who produce real, tangilbe goods to their advantage (and gain) and deny the bulk of the producers their just share (no, I'm not a communist). When banks extend you "credit" with a credit card, they aren't giving you money. They are simply moving digits on a computer screen, but they charge you a great deal of interest -which you pay back with real money-for the privledge of having those digits moved on the computer screen. There was no monetary "debt" created with the bank bacause the bank has to lend tangible money to establish that they are owed a collectible debt.

The Fair Credit Reporting Act and one other law require that certain criteria be met before a bank can establish the fact that you owe them a "debt" from a credit card. When you stop paying on your credit card, the bank will report you to credit reporting agencies as being delinquent and they will demand that you pay the balance in full and with added penalties. You, in turn, send the bank a series of questions to answer which stipulate the nature of the "debt" that they claim you owe them. You will NEVER get an answer to that letter because they will know -at that point- that YOU know the score on credit card "debt". You then send a letter to the credit reporting agencies and confront them with a series of statements and questions which they are required-by law-to submit to the "debtor", i.e., the bank in this case. The bank will not answer the questions from the credit reporting agencies for the same reason that they won't answer your letter. As a result, the bank cannot establish with the credit reporting agencies that you owe them a collectible "debt", therefore you can demand the credit agencies to remove any negative items about you from that bank with reference to that credit card "debt". Since the banks cannot establish the facts of a collectible debt with the credit reporting agencies, they cannot establish that you owe them a debt with the courts either, so they won't be taking you to court any time soon-assuming you have confronted them with the right questions. I know of one man who cancelled about $250,000 in credit card debt and does not have one mark against him with any credit reporting agency, nor has he paid another dime to the bank or any colleciton agency.

Personally, I stopped using credit cards about twenty years ago. If I don't have the money to buy something, then I either don't get it or I wait until I have the money. I never have to worry about having our car repossessed because we always buy older, used cars and pay with cash. If we only have $500, then I buy a $500 used car. If we have $2,000, then I buy a $2,000 used car. I buy whatever I can afford to buy. Intelligent and prudent people live within their means. People who go into debt place a huge millstone around their neck. It isn't worth it. Think about how many small, privately owned farms in this country went belly up becasue the owner was convinced--by bankers--to take out a low interest loan to buy shiny, new, and expensive farm equipment, using his property as collateral. How many people are living out of their cars now because they succumbed to offers of easy credit --from bankers-- during better times and spent beyond their means? We wouldn't be in this pickle today if people used their brains and did not yield to the temptation of using credit-at least not credit from bankers (if you must borrow money, then do it the old fashion way and ask your relatives to loan you money). So why are we-the American taxpayer- bailing out bankers instead of the targets of banker's greed?

I know there is no possibility that the American public will wake up in time because they just bypassed the opportunity to throw out of office the majority of congressional rats who are selling us down the river. I think only seven or eight NWO sell-outs who voted for the Wall Street bailout lost their seats. We can only observe and comment as the nation implodes around us. We are doomed by a pleurality of fools. ..Ken Adachi.
November 26, 2008

Bankers Bailout: The Greatest Taxpayer Rip-Off in History (Nov. 26, 2008)

Hi Ken ,Thought this might shed some light for everybody of what we have in store for sitting on our hands , - Keith

U.S. Pledges Top $7.7 Trillion to Ease Frozen Credit (Update2)
Email | Print | A A A

By Mark Pittman and Bob Ivry
Nov. 24 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. government is prepared to provide more than $7.76 trillion on behalf of American taxpayers after guaranteeing $306 billion of Citigroup Inc. debt yesterday. The pledges, amounting to half the value of everything produced in the nation last year, are intended to rescue the financial system [bankers and Wall Street...Ken] after the credit markets seized up 15 months ago.

The unprecedented pledge of funds includes $3.18 trillion already tapped by financial institutions [bankers and Wall Street...Ken] in the biggest response to an economic emergency since the New Deal of the 1930s, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The commitment dwarfs the plan approved by lawmakers, the Treasury Department’s $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. Federal Reserve lending last week was 1,900 times the weekly average for the three years before the crisis.

When Congress approved the TARP on Oct. 3, Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson acknowledged the need for transparency and oversight. Now, as regulators commit far more money while refusing to disclose loan recipients or reveal the collateral they are taking in return, some Congress members are calling for the Fed to be reined in.

“Whether it’s lending or spending, it’s tax dollars that are going out the window and we end up holding collateral we don’t know anything about,” said Congressman Scott Garrett, a New Jersey Republican who serves on the House Financial Services Committee. “The time has come that we consider what sort of limitations we should be placing on the Fed so that authority returns to elected officials as opposed to appointed ones.”

Too Big to Fail
Bloomberg News tabulated data from the Fed, Treasury and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and interviewed regulatory officials, economists and academic researchers to gauge the full extent of the government’s rescue effort.

The bailout includes a Fed program to buy as much as $2.4 trillion in short-term notes, called commercial paper, that companies use to pay bills, begun Oct. 27, and $1.4 trillion from the FDIC to guarantee bank-to-bank loans, started Oct. 14.

William Poole, former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, said the two programs are unlikely to lose money. The bigger risk comes from rescuing companies perceived as “too big to fail,” he said.

‘Credit Risk’
The government committed $29 billion to help engineer the takeover in March of Bear Stearns Cos. by New York-based JPMorgan Chase & Co. and $122.8 billion in addition to TARP allocations to bail out New York-based American International Group Inc., once the world’s largest insurer.

Citigroup received $306 billion of government guarantees for troubled mortgages and toxic assets. The Treasury Department also will inject $20 billion into the bank after its stock fell 60 percent last week.

“No question there is some credit risk there,” Poole said.

Congressman Darrell Issa, a California Republican on the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said risk is lurking in the programs that Poole thinks are safe.

“The thing that people don’t understand is it’s not how likely that the exposure becomes a reality, but what if it does?” Issa said. “There’s no transparency to it so who’s to say they’re right?”

The worst financial crisis in two generations has erased $23 trillion, or 38 percent, of the value of the world’s companies and brought down three of the biggest Wall Street firms.

Markets Down
The Dow Jones Industrial Average through Friday is down 38 percent since the beginning of the year and 43 percent from its peak on Oct. 9, 2007. The S&P 500 fell 45 percent from the beginning of the year through Friday and 49 percent from its peak on Oct. 9, 2007. The Nikkei 225 Index has fallen 46 percent from the beginning of the year through Friday and 57 percent from its most recent peak of 18,261.98 on July 9, 2007. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. is down 78 percent, to $53.31, on Friday from its peak of $247.92 on Oct. 31, 2007, and 75 percent this year.

Regulators hope the rescue will contain the damage and keep banks providing the credit that is the lifeblood of the U.S. economy.
Most of the spending programs are run out of the New York Fed, whose president, Timothy Geithner, is said to be President- elect Barack Obama’s choice to be Treasury Secretary.

‘They Got Snookered’
The money that’s been pledged is equivalent to $24,000 for every man, woman and child in the country. It’s nine times what the U.S. has spent so far on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to Congressional Budget Office figures. It could pay off more than half the country’s mortgages.

“It’s unprecedented,” said Bob Eisenbeis, chief monetary economist at Vineland, New Jersey-based Cumberland Advisors Inc. and an economist for the Atlanta Fed for 10 years until January. “The backlash has begun already. Congress is taking a lot of hits from their constituents because they got snookered on the TARP big time. There’s a lot of supposedly smart people who look to be totally incompetent and it’s all going to fall on the taxpayer.”


President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal of the 1930s, when almost 10,000 banks failed and there was no mechanism to bolster them with cash, is the only rival to the government’s current response. The savings and loan bailout of the 1990s cost $209.5 billion in inflation-adjusted numbers, of which $173 billion came from taxpayers, according to a July 1996 report by the U.S. General Accounting Office, now called the Government Accountability Office.


‘Worst Crisis’
The 1979 U.S. government bailout of Chrysler consisted of bond guarantees, adjusted for inflation, of $4.2 billion, according to a Heritage Foundation report.
The commitment of public money is appropriate to the peril, said Ethan Harris, co-head of U.S. economic research at Barclays Capital Inc. and a former economist at the New York Fed. U.S. financial firms have taken writedowns and losses of $666.1 billion since the beginning of 2007, according to Bloomberg data.
“This is the worst capital markets crisis in modern history,” Harris said. “So you have the biggest intervention in modern history.”
Bloomberg has requested details of Fed lending under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act and filed a federal lawsuit against the central bank Nov. 7 seeking to force disclosure of borrower banks and their collateral.

Collateral is an asset pledged to a lender in the event a loan payment isn’t made.


‘That’s Counterproductive’
“Some have asked us to reveal the names of the banks that are borrowing, how much they are borrowing, what collateral they are posting,” Bernanke said Nov. 18 to the House Financial Services Committee. “We think that’s counterproductive.”
The Fed should account for the collateral it takes in exchange for loans to banks, said Paul Kasriel, chief economist at Chicago-based Northern Trust Corp. and a former research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
“There is a lack of transparency here and, given that the Fed is taking on a huge amount of credit risk now, it would seem to me as a taxpayer there should be more transparency,” Kasriel said.
Bernanke’s Fed is responsible for $4.74 trillion of pledges, or 61 percent of the total commitment of $7.76 trillion, based on data compiled by Bloomberg concerning U.S. bailout steps started a year ago.

“Too often the public is focused on the wrong piece of that number, the $700 billion that Congress approved,” said J.D. Foster, a former staff member of the Council of Economic Advisers who is now a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation in Washington. “The other areas are quite a bit larger.”


Fed Rescue Efforts
The Fed’s rescue attempts began last December with the creation of the Term Auction Facility to allow lending to dealers for collateral. After Bear Stearns’s collapse in March, the central bank started making direct loans to securities firms at the same discount rate it charges commercial banks, which take customer deposits.
In the three years before the crisis, such average weekly borrowing by banks was $48 million, according to the central bank. Last week it was $91.5 billion.
The failure of a second securities firm, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., in September, led to the creation of the Commercial Paper Funding Facility and the Money Market Investor Funding Facility, or MMIFF. The two programs, which have pledged $2.3 trillion, are designed to restore calm in the money markets, which deal in certificates of deposit, commercial paper and Treasury bills.
Lehman Failure
“Money markets seized up after Lehman failed,” said Neal Soss, chief economist at Credit Suisse Group in New York and a former aide to Fed chief Paul Volcker. “Lehman failing made a lot of subsequent actions necessary.”
The FDIC, chaired by Sheila Bair, is contributing 20 percent of total rescue commitments. The FDIC’s $1.4 trillion in guarantees will amount to a bank subsidy of as much as $54 billion over three years, or $18 billion a year, because borrowers will pay a lower interest rate than they would on the open market, according to Raghu Sundurum and Viral Acharya of New York University and the London Business School.
Congress and the Treasury have ponied up $892 billion in TARP and other funding, or 11.5 percent.

The Federal Housing Administration, overseen by Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Steven Preston, was given the authority to guarantee $300 billion of mortgages, or about 4 percent of the total commitment, with its Hope for Homeowners program, designed to keep distressed borrowers from foreclosure.


Federal Guarantees
Most of the federal guarantees reduce interest rates on loans to banks and securities firms, which would create a subsidy of at least $6.6 billion annually for the financial industry, according to data compiled by Bloomberg comparing rates charged by the Fed against market interest currently paid by banks.
Not included in the calculation of pledged funds is an FDIC proposal to prevent foreclosures by guaranteeing modifications on $444 billion in mortgages at an expected cost of $24.4 billion to be paid from the TARP, according to FDIC spokesman David Barr. The Treasury Department hasn’t approved the program.

Bernanke and Paulson, former chief executive officer of Goldman Sachs, have also promised as much as $200 billion to shore up nationalized mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, a pledge that hasn’t been allocated to any agency. The FDIC arranged for $139 billion in loan guarantees for General Electric Co.’s finance unit.


Automakers Struggle
The tally doesn’t include money to General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler LLC. Obama has said he favors financial assistance to keep them from collapse.
Paulson told the House Financial Services Committee Nov. 18 that the $250 billion already allocated to banks through the TARP is an investment, not an expenditure.
“I think it would be extraordinarily unusual if the government did not get that money back and more,” Paulson said.
In his Nov. 18 testimony, Bernanke told the House Financial Services Committee that the central bank wouldn’t lose money.
“We take collateral, we haircut it, it is a short-term loan, it is very safe, we have never lost a penny in these various lending programs,” he said.
A haircut refers to the practice of lending less money than the collateral’s current market value.

Requiring the Fed to disclose loan recipients might set off panic, said David Tobin, principal of New York-based loan-sale consultants and investment bank Mission Capital Advisors LLC. '

‘Mark to Market’
“If you mark to market today, the banking system is bankrupt,” Tobin said. “So what do you do? You try to keep it going as best you can.”
“Mark to market” means adjusting the value of an asset, such as a mortgage-backed security, to reflect current prices.
Some of the bailout assistance could come from tax breaks in the future. The Treasury Department changed the tax code on Sept. 30 to allow banks to expand the deductions on the losses banks they were buying, according to Robert Willens, a former Lehman Brothers tax and accounting analyst who teaches at Columbia University Business School in New York.
Wells Fargo & Co., which is buying Charlotte, North Carolina-based Wachovia Corp., will be able to deduct $22 billion, Willens said. Adding in other banks, the code change will cost $29 billion, he said.
“The rule is now popularly known among tax lawyers as the ‘Wells Fargo Notice,’” Willens said.
The regulation was changed to make it easier for healthy banks to buy troubled ones, said Treasury Department spokesman Andrew DeSouza.
House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank said he was angry that banks used the money for acquisitions.

“The only purpose for this money is to lend,” said Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat. “It’s not for dividends, it’s not for purchases of new banks, it’s not for bonuses. There better be a showing of increased lending roughly in the amount of the capital infusions” or Congress may not approve the second half of the TARP money.

To contact the reporters on this story: Mark Pittman in New York at; Bob Ivry in New York at
Last Updated: November 24, 2008 13:26 EST


Nov. 24 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. government is prepared to provide more than $7.76 trillion on behalf of American taxpayers after guaranteeing $306 billion of Citigroup Inc. debt yesterday. The pledges, amounting to half the value of everything produced in the nation last year, are intended to rescue the financial system after the credit markets seized up 15 months ago.

The unprecedented pledge of funds includes $3.18 trillion already tapped by financial institutions in the biggest response to an economic emergency since the New Deal of the 1930s, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The commitment dwarfs the plan approved by lawmakers, the Treasury Department�s $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. Federal Reserve lending last week was 1,900 times the weekly average for the three years before the crisis.

Is the FRAUD clear enough? If it isn't clear to you yet, the foxes are in charge of the hen house. These guys have one goal and one goal only, they will take absolutely everything from American citizens to keep the banks and the bankers alive. The banks will have all the money and all the assets if the American People do not band together, rise up and stop them. $24,000 has just been stolen from every, woman and child! One half of the entire country's REAL production wiped off the face of the Earth and PAID TO THE BANKERS!

The banks are NOT lending money! They are NOT going to lend money! The real economy is meaningless to the banks and those that run them. It is also meaningless to our elected government officials that get the BANKERS!

The winners and losers have already been chosen - long ago. Three more small banks failed Friday night. Citi was rescued. JPMorgan is backstopped. Bank of America is backstopped. Merrill Lynch was rescued/merged. Morgan Stanley is temporarily propped up. Goldman Sachs was rescued/merged. Lehman was left to die. Why? They didn't 'play nice' during the LTCM debacle 10 years ago. Paybacks are a bitch when you're no longer in the 'Club'.

GM isn't in the 'Club'. Neither are any of the other American automakers, or any of the companies in the real economy. The American taxpayer is most definitely NOT in the 'Club'. Absolutely everything and everyone is expendable to save those that ARE in the 'Club'. You can take THAT to the bank.

YOU are a slave to this 'Club', as are your children and their children. When the US Government can no longer sustain the sucking black hole that are the banks, the US Sovereign AAA credit rating will be downgraded, instantly doubling or trippling (or worse) the rate at which our government borrows money (which is what your taxes represent) and if they can no longer wring it out of YOU, then the United States of America will default on its debt and cease to exist.

Fed up yet?


Free Newsletter

Email Address:

Join the Educate-Yourself Discussion Forum

All information posted on this web site is the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only. It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer of your choice for medical care and advice.