The Freedom of Knowledge, The Power of Thought ©

More on Jim Stone re. Aurora Shooting Hypothesis and NSA Counter Intelligence
September 23, 2012

More on Jim Stone re. Aurora Shooting Hypothesis and NSA Counter Intelligence (Sep. 23, 2012)

Original thread: Jim Stone & James Farganne (Sep. 19, 2012)'

Subject: Re: James Stone
From: Mike
Date: Thu, September 20, 2012
To: Ken Adachi

Hi Ken,

Thanks for a thoughtful reply. Here's my two cents for what it's worth.

I think you might be being just a tad charitable with Stone. So he spent a couple of months and 500 hours verifying for himself that what you said in the first place was true and then maybe added a couple of pictures and a point or two in addition. The basic work was yours and claiming that he was the instigator of it without attributing any of it to you is still plagiarism in my book. By the way, based upon my experience with him, you should be wary of any "additions" he makes.

Stone first came to my attention when I saw the original article on Makow's site. I had no idea that the theory was anything but Stone's and it seemed plausible. Since I have absolutely no expertise whatever with nuclear power plants, someone could say something completely wrong about them and I would have no way of detecting it. All I can do with something like this is put it in the category of interesting possibility.

Still, it was intriguing, so I followed the link to Stone's site. This was back in April and there wasn't much on his site yet. I did notice a comment he made in regard to 9-11 about the planes being remote controlled. They were, but not the way he thought. Still, it was a better understanding than most people seemed to have, especially Makow who had fallen for the no planes theory.

So, I wrote him a note briefly explaining what had happened from my perspective as a retired airline captain. He got all excited and asked me to write up a more comprehensive article on the subject which he would post as a guest writer. (It's still there, by the way)

Along the way, as I sent him drafts, he said he wanted to verify all the details, but consistently drifted off the path. I could tell he didn't know squat about airplanes, but patiently corrected his errors until we got to the final one about it being an -800 model, which was nearly impossible at the time. Being such a small point (and he was so proud of the picture he found) I told him he could say whatever he wanted in his part if he would just post my article as is, which he did.

Now, here's what I think is going on with him: Back in the 19th century, they used to have cattle drives where they would take a herd of cattle from Texas all the way to Missouri where the slaughterhouses were. To get a herd of cattle all that way is no simple proposition, but requires much work.

To assist in the task they had dogs which helped. Some dogs would run along the left side of the herd and chase and bark at any cow who tried to drift off from that side. Other dogs performed the same function on the right side. Thus the herd was kept moving in the desired direction.

It works the same way in political affairs. The main stream media controls the general direction of the herd while "dogs" like Rachel Maddow of MSNBC guard the left and "dogs" like Rush Limbaugh guard the right. In order to do this, they first have to gain credibility by establishing themselves as right or left.

Of course, with the alternative media, there are more than just two ways of drifting away from the herd and I believe James Stone is one example of someone being placed to be a control in the alternative media.

I happened to run across him when he was in the establishing credibility phase of his operation. That's why he was so eager to have me write a piece for him. It was credible, but only covered a minor aspect of 9-11 and wouldn't interfere with anything he might want to do later. That would also be the reason he stole your Fukushima material. It also is most likely true and was the major boost to his credibility. I wish I knew enough about nuclear power to be sure, but your hypothesis still seems pretty likely.

After that, not much of real interest took place on his site until he started with the Aurora nonsense. I started by sending him private e-mails (which he got and responded to while at the same time claiming his e-mail was being blocked).

When that didn't work, one Saturday I answered a thread on his forum with all the reasons why his Aurora theory didn't work. At first he claimed that none of the dead people appeared on the Social Security Death Index and therefore they weren't real people. I pointed out that SS waits until they are notified of a death before updating their index and that since the victims were young and not collecting Social Security, there was little incentive to rush and notify them. This process usually takes a month or more and it had only been a few days.

Since he claimed they were not real people, I did an Intelius search and found names, addresses and ages for all the reported dead. He then tried to claim they hacked the Intelius data base and faked the names.

Someone else replied, "What about phonebook of America?" So I did a search of that data base and found most of the same names and addresses and posted it. Phonebook of America white pages only covers land lines, so those with only cell phones would not be found. I called one phone number (Cowden) and got an announcement that his answering machine was full and couldn't accept more messages. I guess he wasn't taking good care of that being shot dead and all.

So then I pointed out the extreme unlikelihood of both data bases being faked and also that he was not addressing the 58 people shot and wounded who were taken to local hospitals and that the local paper, the Aurora Sentinel, had been devoting a special section to the subject ever since it happened (hard to do in a small town with so many returning victims if nothing really happened).

All this took place within a period of about 6 hours that afternoon. Then I guess the accumulation of facts was too much for him for suddenly the entire thread was deleted and I was banned from his forum, which ban is still current to this day.

I pretty much expected this and wasn't surprised, but I did send him an e-mail suggesting that while he was at it, he should also delete my 9-11 post under guest writers. He has never done that, which if he was so upset with me, you would think he would have done. To me, this just reinforces my belief that he needs every little bit of credibility he can get for his web-site. I'm just sorry I'm helping give it to him.

Within less than a month, six of the victims appeared on the Social Security list, so now he's changed his tune again and says they appeared too soon.

So, why is he blowing his credibility on this nonsense. Since you've seen Grace Power's report, which is pretty much on track except for the motives, then there were two people responsible for the actual shooting who have gotten away. I believe Stone's job here is to protect the shooters, who I would bet anything are Israeli Mossad.

I can't be sure of this, but in my correspondence with Stone and all the clues I have seen on his site, I strongly suspect he is a crypto-Jew and that his real name is Goldberg or something. I believe his anti-Israel statements are just designed to gain him credibility in the Alternative media and are carefully aimed to cause no real harm to Israel. Time will tell on this. If this is true, it will be harder and harder for him to hide this as events proceed.

I also believe he is current NSA, not ex-NSA. In the beginning of his tale of escape, he mentioned being sideswiped at an intersection in Salt Lake. What is his connection with Utah except that the NSA is building its largest data collection center here? Also, for a guy who is supposed to be on the run and operating with a laptop out of internet cafes in Mexico, he seems to get an awful lot of hard-to-obtain pictures and data that would be easily available to a current NSA employee.

Also, I believe his web-site has some purpose beyond its current one of diverting attention from the Aurora shooters. I have only suspicions at this point, but this should become more apparent if it is eventually used for its ultimate purpose. That's assuming his whole site hasn't self destructed with Aurora. I predict his next endeavor will be to do as much as he can to reestablish his credibility, so I expect mostly true things from him until we come to his next project.

That's my take, for what it's worth. Caveat Emptor. Thanks for taking your time to write me. Hope I haven't rambled on too much. Since I've now been banned from Stone's site and Makow's site, I'll probably disappear.

Best Wishes,



[I asked Mike if he had a list of any of the Aurora shooting victims, whether killed or wounded, to send it to me so I can add the names to the story. ]

Subject: Re: James Stone
From: Mike
Date: Sun, September 23, 2012
To: Ken Adachi


This is one of the postings I made to Stone's forum which he deleted. I didn't save the rest.



The Social Security Death Index takes a long time (often months or more) to be updated. Someone has to report the death, which they usually do quickly only to stop payments from being sent which will just have to be returned. In the case of young people not collecting benefits, there is no incentive for anyone to do this promptly.

Here is a quote from the Social Security website:

Record Description

The index is an online searchable database. It only includes the names of deceased individuals whose deaths were reported to Social Security.

Below are the results of a search of for the people identified as victims of Aurora. You can duplicate this seach yourself, if you wish. As you can see, these were all real people living in Aurora or the local area. The idea that these deaths were faked is ridiculous as is the idea that they could also claim that 58 people were wounded but somehow did not show up in the local hospitals with gunshot wounds. You can easily find a list of the several hospital to which the victims were taken.

The people living in the area know this was real, even if they don't know that it was staged.

Rebecca Ann Wingo, Age: 32
3479 S Uravan Way #5-204 Aurora, CO 80013

Alex Matthew Sullivan, Age: 27
4433 S Hannibal Way #494 Aurora, CO 80015

Micayla Carolyn Medek, Age: 23
111 S Joliet Cir #13-308 Aurora, CO 80012

Jessica Nicole Ghawi, Age: 25
2678 N Syracuse Ct #207 Denver, CO 80238

Gordon Ware Cowden, Age: 51
1250 S Blackhawk Way Aurora, CO 80012

Jesse Evan Childress
12744 Elm St Thornton, CO 80241

Alexander Boik
836 E 17th Ave Denver, CO 80218

Jonathan T Blunk , Age: 26
11548 E Highline Pl Aurora, CO 80010


I forgot. I didn't do the Intellius search on the other four. I recall now I figured eight was enough to make the point. He was claiming at the time that these weren't real people. The other victims were:

John T, Larimer, Age 27

Matt McQuinn, Age 27

Veronica Moser Sullivan, Age 6

Alexander Teves,. Age 24


Jim Stone: The 'Groundbreaking' Fukushima Whistleblower is Now "The Fugitive," Running for His Life by Ken Adachi (March 3, 2012)

Letter Sent to Henry Makow from Ken Adachi, posted on Jan. 28, 2012, re. Jim Stone's Fukushima Article & Commentary on Jim Stone's Career as a "Freelance Journalist" (Feb. 22, 2012)

Jim Stone & James Farganne (Sep. 19, 2012)'


© Copyright 2012  All Rights Reserved.



Free Newsletter

Email Address:

Join the Educate-Yourself Discussion Forum

All information posted on this web site is the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only. It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer of your choice for medical care and advice.