The Freedom of Knowledge, The Power of Thought ©
Letters to The Editor

Trio of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 'Truth' Assail Dr Judy Wood
Over Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) Used on 911

From Ken Adachi, Editor
May 13, 2011

Trio of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 'Truth' Assail Dr Judy Wood Over Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) Used on 911 (May 13, 2011)

Subject: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth debunk Judy Wood - ???
From: Steve Campbell
Date: Fri, May 13, 2011
To: " Ken Adachi

Note - At this point in time, I have to admit to myself that I am not a scientist enough to know what the truth is about this. Still searching. -



Sunday, May 8, 2011 Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth debunk Judy Wood

Earlier this year, Dr. Judy Wood put out her new book titled "Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11"


Fortunately, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have recently made their position very clear on this matter regarding Directed Energy Weapon theories. A new article written by Jonathan Cole, Richard Gage, and Gregg Roberts shows many of the absurdities of Judy Wood's claims. The article is reproduced here, with some extra links I have added:

AE911Truth FAQ #6: What’s Your Assessment of the Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) Hypothesis?

Written by Jonathan Cole, P.E., Richard Gage, AIA, and Gregg Roberts

Hi Steve,                                                                                                            Artie Wheeler holding up his book

Artie WheelerI saw the steel frame "spire" turn to dust in a DVD video made my Artie Wheeler (Baltimore, MD) and John Maffei in 2005.

Artie and John pointed it out before Judy Wood did, but the reality is that a skeletal remanat of the South Tower of the World Trade Center, an all-steel framed "spire," did completely turn to dust within a few seconds and that steel was HUGE and certainly wasn't dust "from the concrete" (which had already been blown off the steel framework) as this trio falsely assert. That skeletal remant, referred to as the "spire," consisted of several hundred tons of high grade constuction steel. The debunking trio are claiming that the "spire" merely toppled over and collapsed and the "dust" was from concrete. That's not the case at all. It's clear as a bell on Artie's DVD (in which he replays that moment of disintegration of the "spire" over and over): you can see that the steel is disintegrating into dust particles, so naturally, the spire is going to topple over at the sme time that it's disintegrating since the metal is losing all of its molecular cohesion.

Regards, Ken


Subject: Re: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth debunk Judy Wood - ???
From: Steve Campbell
Date: Fri, May 13, 2011
To: Ken dachi

Hi Ken,

Thanks for your input. I saw that also, but I was beginning to wonder if it was some kind of video fakery after all the negative comments about Dr. Wood.. I was hoping you would respond to this, because I think highly of your opinion. Now I will start leaning towards Judy Wood again. I have her book.

Best, Steve


Hi Steve,

I would look at the background and professional associations of the three debunkers: Jonathan Cole, Richard Gage, and Gregg Roberts.

These are the guys who need to be reviewed, not Dr. Judy Wood. Their comments are dripping with officious disdain for Judy with a sort of know-it-all pedantry that proclaims themselves as the only truly serious "authorities" on the subject of the WTC building collapses. Please.

I haven't read Judy's book so I don't know the details, but if she's claiming that an energy weapon ALONE took down the buildings then she would be in error on that front, in my opinion.

However, I'm convinced that BOTH explosives and some sort of molecular disintegration machine was used SIMULTANEOUSLY. The disintegration machine certainly accomplished the vast bulk of the 'dismantling' of the building's steel and concrete. In addition, there were multiple Tomahawk cruise missiles fired into the WTC and surrounding areas. In Artie Wheeler's 2005 DVD, you could clearly see the smoke trails of the individual Tomahawk missiles and parts of the missile. The planes themselves were holograms. Some of the fireball explosions were also likely holograms. There is no doubt about that. There were NO physical planes that entered those buildings.

These three guys are themselves disinformation shills while accusing Judy of "tin foil hat" misinformation. The Illuminated government needs to attack her credibility because we can't have the public realize that the secret government, CIA, etc., have access to advance technology machines that can literally cause molecules of steel to instantaneously unbind and disintegrate into dust--which is what you can plainly see in the so-called "spire" disintegration video clip. I've watched it myself DOZENS of times. The all steel latticework instantly disintegrated into dust. She's 100% correct in that claim.

WTC "spire" before molecular disintegration

Disintegrating "spire" B shot

And Judy is also correct in that some cars located a considerable distance from ground zero also got "toasted", but ONLY THE STEEL parts of the car. The plastic and leather of the interior and exterior of the cars were UNTOUCHED, meaning the energy weapon only affected the disintegration of STEEL and perhaps concrete but not things made out of plastic or wood or natural materials.

These guys were obviously assigned the task of discrediting Judy and making her look foolish PRECISELY because she has the scientific credentials-which always concerns the CIA, and she published a book-which also bothers the CIA.

It couldn't be plainer what these three sharks are trying to do: sully Dr. Judy Wood's reputation

Regards, Ken


Subject: Dr. Eric T. Karlstrom Agrees With Dr. Judy Wood's Analysis
From: Steve Campbell
Date: Sat, May 14, 2011
To: Ken Adachi

Here is someone who has done an enormous amount of research on 9/11 who thinks highly of Dr. Judy Wood's work. Not to be dismissed so easily.



Subject: Trio of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 'Truth' Assail Dr Judy Wood
From: Randall T
Date: Mon, May 30, 2011
To: Ken Adachi

I'm puzzled by your response to Steve Campbell, where you state: "I haven't read Judy's book so I don't know the details, but if she's claiming that an energy weapon ALONE took down the buildings then she would be in error on that front, in my opinion." First, how can you dispute Dr. Wood's evidence without having first read her book? I've read it twice and you don't need a PhD in one of the sciences to understand her evidence. This book is written so that a prosecutor could utilize it for a prosecution case, and any juror could understand it. And having an "opinion" is not scientific. Evidence is scientific and is the first requirement for presentation to a judge and jury. Dr. Wood's book is over 500 pages of real, factual, indisputable evidence, not an opinion.

Secondly, since it is clear that the video evidence of the spires dissolving in mid-air obviously happened, and this had to be some form of invisible, directed energy force that did it, WHY would any other weapon of destruction be necessary? If something can turn steel into dust in mid-air, a much less dense material like concrete would easily be dissolved. The "explosions" people heard, or we were told they heard in that famous disinformation film, were likely all sorts of tanks exploding in the building: oxygen, fire extinguishers in hallways and in offices, and in the Windows on the World restaurant, etc. As they dissolved and their tank walls got thinner and weaker, they exploded. Not hard to figure, and the evidence was right on the ground. Firemen were saying that in one case, all the Scot packs, the breathing apparatus they use, were spontaneously exploding on the trucks. They wouldn't have parked the truck in a place that was so hot that the tanks exploded from heat, so something else, something invisible, was causing this.

The controlled opposition got their story out early and with enough force to hoodwink the most people. I would suggest getting a copy of Dr. Wood's book and reading it. Like Jesse Ventura, you won't be swayed any longer by the likes of Alex Jones, who kept trying to argue with Ventura that"...well, at least building seven was a classic controlled demolition." Ventura didn't budge. He's not buying the disinformation any longer, and Alex Jones and all the rest of these "truthers" don't know what to do about it.

Randall T
Deer, Arkansas


Hello Randall,

The specifics on how the WTC buildings came down isn't the most important thing to talk about. The fact that it was an inside job committed by the Zionist contractors, Mossad, CIA, and traitors in the US military is what is important to focus on.

1. I was writing about 911 being an inside job and those buildings coming down due to controlled oppostion starting on Sept 12, 2001 via e-mail exchanges with Jeff Rense, long before anyone ever heard the name of Dr Judy Wood, so don't talk to me like I'm new to the subject or that Dr Judy Wood is the End all, Be all authority on the topic.

2. It's obvious from the physical evidence of the diagonal cut beams and both the sound and visual evidence of explosions, that explosives were part of the demolition. A number of cruise missiles were also fired into the WTC and into the surrounding area, one probably hit the Woolworth building. It is also likely that a nuclear device was planted under the WTC as Dimitri Khalzekov has adroitly explained. I happen to agree with Artie Wheeler that some sort of molecular disintegration machine was used to turn that spire beam into dust, after the building came down, in a matter of seconds. And it obvioulsy played a big role in those buildings coming down so fast, which explosions alone could not have done. I also agree that the cement and metal within the WTC were largely pulverized into a fine dust by that machine, posibly in combination with a nuke under the buildings. That info was brought out in Artie Wheeler's 2005 DVD and book, long before Judy Wood wrote her book, so I don't give Judy credit for uncovering that story; that goes to Artie Wheeler.

If she's says that it was the machine alone,. then I would not agree with that.

I don't have the time to read her book. If I had the time, I would spend it reading the books I already have.

Nor do I need permission from Judy Wood or you to think for myself and form my own opinions.

Having academic credentials before or after your name doesn't mean squat in my book, although it apparently impresses you to no end.

Regards, Ken

Copyright 2011  All Rights Reserved.

Free Newsletter

Email Address:

Join the Educate-Yourself Discussion Forum

All information posted on this web site is the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only. It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer of your choice for medical care and advice.