http://educate-yourself.org/lte/littleguddhatosuzyward24jun04.shtml
June 24, 2004

Subject: Fw: Explanation.
From: "Little Buddha" <littlebuddha@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Thu, June 24, 2004 4:15 pm
To: editor@educate-yourself.org

Dear Ken, sorry that I took so long to reply to you. I have just sent this email off to Suzy and I felt that you should have the same access as to my explaining myself however briefly.

Regards, Lionel Dass.

----- Original Message -----
From: Little Buddha
To: suzy@matthewbooks.com
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 12:12 AM
Subject: Explanation.

Hello Suzy, I have just e-mailed Ken and he has defended you magnanimously, good for Ken.

I did check what I said in my first e-mail to you and it wasn't that bad, but I was only reacting to what I considered to be just another channelled work very similar to the 'Lady Kajina' material from the Spectrum website.

Thank you for taking the time to reply to my emails, I am not a crank or someone who has a beef with you because the material doesn't fit my reality or Truth or whatever the label may be. It is a case of taking responsibility for what you are inviting the world to accept as bona fide information, otherwise why have it posted and why publish books on the subject? You can't simply say that it is 'just information' and escape any serious attempt to take responsibility for the impact that this kind of information has on the psyche of Joe average out there, who are simply reaching for something, anything that fits their assumptions or expectations in this lunatic asylum? You are giving the impression that this is some kind of new gospel to the world, well if it is, one must provide proof.

I have been to your website in the past and looked at it very carefully and nothing registered for me that would show that what you are producing is any different from other channelled works. I sympathise at the loss of your son and I know how that feels, but the information supplied appears to be general information added with a touch of ufology. I have been involved with a victim of mind control and the dark ones (Nato, GCHQ, Menwith Hill sites) here in the U.K for about 2 years as a counsellor to this guy Tony Topping (www.etlife.co.uk) and his experiences involved ufo contact, of which I am dubious about. He broke off contact with me because he was unwilling to provide the proof that I was asking for so that I could have been more able to assist him but he obviously feels that I am unwilling to accept everything that he states as truth seeing as how I would not play his victim game of which his experiences could have been subjective and attention seeking. I do not know for sure and probably never will.

I always seek to be honest, sincere and absolutely truthful, and I am here to help others who seek it, just for the sheer joy of doing so. So you can understand my anger when the material that you have posted in my honest opinion makes no sense to anyone who has a background in religion, of which the search for Truth above all else is sacred. Today the Truth can be anything and is subjective to ones' opinion. That is not what Truth is about... and well you know it coming from a church background.

The whole mind, body, spirit circus here in the U.K. as well as the number of 'spiritual people' involved to some extent in holistic medicine is quite frankly amateurish. All the talk on DNA, indigo children and all the rest of which I can tell you I have listened to from those in the know is all U.S. imported New Age useless information.

As for the homosexual comment by the Religous lady who emailed you, well check out Henry Makow's May 22 2004 article amongst others on this subject, of which Ken has Mr Makow's site posted on his website. Being Gay is a decision made by those who are manifestly misguided and good luck to them, but they have no place in the Kingdom of Heaven, I don't remember Our Lord Jesus Christ alluding to Gays as acceptable in Our Heavenly Fathers Kingdom, do you?

I recommend and make colloidal silver, have advised people on real folk medicine with a scientific approach of natural law. I am a professional healer and use this God given gift sparingly.

I have respect for good psychics - who are few and far between - and had the privilege to have met one here some years ago in the U.K. My first out of body experience was as a child in my native country. So you see I am not some cynical, western educated read all the books that you can, opinion forming pundit, without having sound judgement, common sense and a very good intuition for what may not be entirely what appears to be at first glance Truthful. Above all else I despise those who sell information as Truth, and cannot discern little truth from something of real use to the human race.

When it is called for I accuse those of hypocrisy if they wear the mantle, how can I do that you may ask yourself without appearing arrogant and conceited? well I was schooled in the teachings of the Vedanta of which very few people can understand muchless apply in the real world. I take Christ's Gospel as well as what tool I may require to get the job done, but only with the Truth and not the mantle of the lower self. It is quite a skilful thing to balance with humility in service and not to be taken for a fool. This work is rare and The Lord fashions his tools with immense Love and suffering as it should be. And above all else I am a truly religious person and Truth is my shield and my sword. Thank you for the attachment, I have read it and can only conclude without appearing elitist as I know it is an easy label to stick on to me because my conduct is unbecoming of a gentleman, in as much as your son's material may have a platform but it certainly does not belong on any serious forum.

I know that you do not accept tests, but for my peace of mind for your sake, ask your son who I am and email me the answer if it is possible. If you consent to do so I will keep the information to myself and will not divulge it nor try to use it to embarrass you in your efforts.

I know that you may not trust me in what I am asking you to do, but this is a question from my higher self asking your higher self. What have you to lose? This test is for you not for me. I have a good knowledge of what I am doing because I can operate at the higher self, when it may appear that I am on the lower.

I hope that you may benefit from this engagement and thank you for your professional courtesy.

With the kindest of regards, Lionel Dass.