The Freedom of Knowledge, The Power of Thought ©

Crucifying a Quack: Jim Humble, MMS, and the Cassiopaean Channel, Laura Knight-Jadczyk
August 31, 2011

Crucifying a Quack: Jim Humble, MMS, and the Cassiopaean Channel, Laura Knight-Jadczyk (Aug. 31, 2011)

Subject: Jim Humble and MMS
From: Mark Miller
Date: Wed, August 31, 2011
To: Ken Adachi

Hello Mr. Adachi.

My name is Mark Miller. For what it's worth, I truly love your web site, and I thank you for your hard work in pulling all of this information
together for the betterment of all. To get to my point -- there seems to be a WIDE chasm between your views of Jim Humble/MMS and other reputable and sincere truth-loving sites such as Upon researching the claims further, I must say that the good people at have compiled quite a case against using MMS (in general) and the personal integrity of Jim Humble (in particular). In case you are not aware of this information, here's a good link to use as a starting point:

I'm a holistic health counselor, electrical engineer, software developer, and long-time truth-seeker, and I must say that the case against Jim Humble is daunting (overwhelming?). I have neither met Mr. Humble personally nor ever used MMS.

I'd be curious to know how this information changes/alters your view on this situation, if at all.

Thanks in advance,
Kind regards,
Mark Miller


Hello Mark,

I read the article by Dr. Gabriela Segura MD and the comments by Laura Knight-Jadczyk, of and after calming down, I was glad to see that there were at least 4 or 5 readers who could see through the bias, the inaccuracies, the misrepresentations, and pseudo science - to say nothing of the faulty conclusions - so evident in Segura's slam piece. I'll have to write my own lengthy rebuttal to Segura's garbage.

Laura's small mindedness is immediately apparent when she reprints the e-mail response sent by Jim Humble to Dr Segura's article by emphasizing two innocuous and slight mispellings Jim made in his letter by inserting the flashing neon sign of "(sic)" after each mispelled word, just to be sure that the reader can fully appreciate what an uneducated dummy the 78 year old "quack' must be.

I had a higher opinion of Laura Knight-Jadczyk before reading the swill that she got the famous heart surgeon, Dr Gabriela Segura, to pen about MMS (and by inference Jim Humble), but I have a lower one now. I could see that Laura is on a mission to discredit Jim Humble and MMS.

The question to ask yourself is - why?

With a little reading, it wasn't hard to discover that Laura Knight-Jadczyk got huffy and decided to cancel her invitation to speak at the Nexus conference in Amsterdam apparently because Jim Humble was invited to be a speaker at the last minute by Nexus editor Duncan Roads .

Laura got a guy named "A. Branson" to write the most appalling and OUTRAGEOUS guilt-by-association, guilt-by-innuendo, and guilt-by-use-of-the-title-"Bishop" hit piece that I've ever read in my entire life! It's titled "Down the Rabbit Hole - The Assassination of JFK, Bishop Jim Humble And The Nexus Conference"

Holy Cow! This guy could make Mickey Mouse look like the Prince of Darkness by guilt-association. According to Branson, Jim Humble is part of a long succession of anointed "apostolic Bishops" which includes early 20th century pedophiles, Satanists, con artists, Crowley disciples, criminals, and many dark dudes involved in the JFK assassination who were ALL connected by use of the title of "Bishop" in front of their names (how's that for dogged sleuthing!)

Branson spends the entire length and breath of his essay character-assassinating Jim Humble on the basis of the word 'Bishop' in front of his name, while here and there throwing the reader a bon mot about his neutrality with comments like: "we can only speculate".

If anybody wants to see a text book example of what YELLOW JOURNALISM is, you've got to read Branson's hit piece on Jim Humble (bought to you courtesy of Laura Knight-Jadczyk via, of course)

The heart surgeon Gabriela Segura and Laura are obviously working in league with each other as Laura is the owner of Signs of The Times (SOTT) and also now controls the. web site (and magazine) where Gabriela's slam article 'first' appeared.

And how about the Fellowship of the Cosmic Mind that Gabriela's says she "works" for? Even though the "About Us" link at the Fellowship or "Church of PaleoChristianity" keeps alluding to "who we are', the link NEVER actually identifies who they are, but rather keeps referring to PHILOSOPHIES to which they aspire without giving us a name. However, I have the feeling that the site is another one (of many) owned by Laura Knight-Jadczyk. The web site is registered to a proxy in England, and last I knew, Laura was living in France, but she may have moved to Great Britain by now.

I'll have much more to say about this. The calculated denigration of MMS and the demonization of Jim Humble by Laura Knight-Jadczyk and minions will not go unchallenged.

Sincerely, Ken Adachi


----- Original Message -----
From: Drew
To: Ken Adachi
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011
Subject: Re: Jim Humble

Hi Ken,

Regarding Jim Humble and MMS, I had a number of email conversations with Jim years back before the government and others started their whole defamation campaign against him and all I can say is Jim is one of the most honest and straight forward humanitarians on the planet right now.

The reason Jim started the church is because it was essentially the only way he could safe guard his rights and those of other genuine health conscious people who wish to heal themselves without pharmaceutical drugs.

Religious organizations have a bubble of protection around them that the government is weary of going up against. He is playing the game the way it needs to be played so to speak. Jim has a website called

that I dont think too many people know of.

[Here are direct links to Jim Humble's free books available on line:

Book One is really an introductory essay leading to the 23 chapters that comprise Book Two.
Book One: A New , More Practical God
Book Two Index to Books and Chapters
Chapter Zero, Introduction to Book Two ]

It's Jim's take on non faith based enlightenment. For any willing to read it, it will open anyone's eyes to the type of person Jim Humble is. It's a brilliant expose of the situation humanity faces at the hand of oppressors and how to take ownership of one's life through truth and stepping up to the plate. Anyone with a pendulum can put it over a bottle of MMS and ask if it is good for the body.

My experiences with a pendulum in this regard were REMARKABLE!!!! My pendulum swings in the full maximum arc without my influence over a bottle of MMS. The only other substances I have come across that does this is food after praying to God to cleanse and purify my food and bring it back the full and maximum life force energy the food can hold.

If anyone reads Laura's hate postings on her cassiopean web boards, from what I can tell she is against anything that brings health back to the human organism. She has postings on there that say such things as 'Vegetarian and Vegan diets are bad for people and lead to disease and illness'...... ummm what?!?

She must be reading some different science than I am and judging by the way she looks. She is not the person I would go to for health advice.

God Bless,

Andrew G


Subject: Jim Humble attack
From: John (Netherlands)
Date: Thu, September 1, 2011
To: Ken Adachi

Hello Ken,

The Latin saying ' Nomen est omen' comes in to play with what to believe. When you have read the book of Jim Humble you are very well informed on practical results with his MMS formula.

JIM HUMBLE - I have a formula to help you get better = good
BERNIE MAD-OFF - I can triple your money in no time! = bad

It is always a combination of Sir name, Given name that triggers feelings in the right direction. DICK CHENEY = ???

The Netherlands


Subject: Your insightful comments regarding Jim Humble and Laura Knight Jadczyk
From: Craig
Date: Thu, September 1, 2011
To: Ken Adachi


Your response to a reader who asked for your opinion regarding Jim Humble and Laura Knight Jadczyk was quite revealing. You have shown yourself after all of these years to be what you have often professed to despise. The choice to use subjective phrases better used by a psychopath instead of the prevailer of truth you've made yourself out to be has done us all a great favor. Why you chose to out yourself like this is interesting. You attacked an article that brought forth much evidence while your own reply was juvenile and full of vile and vitriolic off the cuff dismissiveness.

While evidence is not the same as proof, in that article on it is well pieced together and draws the reader in to pursue their own research. You however have done just the opposite and displayed a violent and juvenile triteness, the likes of which is seen only in the most agressive of propaganda. Now you make better sense and you have brought about a solution as to why your opinions seem to have of touch of the self loving martyr to them. Your absence from the internet due to being attacked by an electronic force and the occassional appeal for help due to intermittent but constant pressure from the PTB now make more sense.

Goodbye Ken.

Yours truly,
Craig T


Dear Craig,

Why do you come to my web site if you hold my opinions in such low esteem? That doesn't make sense. It seems to me that you're on a little revenge kick of your own. Did I criticize something that you posted to the internet a long time ago and now it's payback time or are you just part of Laura's 'Jim Humble character assassin' team?

I guess you're so preoccupied with putting me down that you failed to notice that I said I was going to write a much longer critique of Segura's article. What I put into that reply was my INITIAL response to an outrageous, wildly inaccurate, and scientifically untenable slam piece written by a woman who doesn't even understand the basic chemistry of oxidative reactions, while claiming to be an authority on the subject.

The Segura piece didn't read like someone trying to offer another opinion or to "draw the reader in to pursue their own research." She wrote a classic SCARE screed, which pharmaceuticals SHILLS have been doing for as long as I can remember, in order to frighten people away from trying something as fabulous as MMS because, according to her, MMS is a "poison"; it's "toxic"; and it "causes cancer"; and other ridiculous statements.

I think I can arrange to block your access to my web site so you'll no longer have to endure my "violent and juvenile triteness", but I'll post your e-mail address so others can keep in touch with you and continue to share in your erudite observations.

Goodbye Craig.

Yours truly, Ken Adachi


Subject: Re: Your insightful comments regarding Jim Humble and Laura Knight Jadczyk
From: Craig
Date: Thu, September 1, 2011
To: Ken Adachi

I look forward to your article Ken. No, you never made me angry, you've always educated me. I apologize for my over the top email. Sometimes I'm a little over zealous and yes, I even agree with you about Laura. I just don't trust her. Once again, my apologies. I hate it when I'm an ass.


Hello Criag,

Okay, apology accepted. We'll start again.

Sincerely, Ken.

Copyright 2011  All Rights Reserved.

Free Newsletter

Email Address:

Join the Educate-Yourself Discussion Forum

All information posted on this web site is the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only. It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer of your choice for medical care and advice.