The Freedom of Knowledge, The Power of Thought ©
Letters to The Editor

"I thought you were more mature type"
September 9, 2005

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ville Sarell" <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 6:59 AM
Subject: Mono atomic gold


Just read some stuff and a critical email from Joe Prosek

And I really was disappointed of your very harsh and arrogant reply. I'm into people who don't attack others that way... so I'm now dropping your research alltogether..sticking with Rense and others.

I thought you were more mature type.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Educate-Yourself" <>
To: "Ville Sarell" <>
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: Mono atomic gold

Hello Ville,

I'm not concerned about whether my web site is part of your 'approved' list. You do not pay me one dime for coming to my web site and accessing all of the information available there. All of the time, effort and cost involved with making that information available was borne by me, not by you. Therefore, I do not OWE you anything. It's fairly ironic that you should accuse me of arrogance when you yourself drape that mantel about your shoulders by assuming the role of critic and 'rebuker'. What right do you have to send me a chiding e-mail? You act as if you're a paying customer who got ripped off and now has the RIGHT to complain.

I agree that I was somewhat harsh (perhaps 'strong' is the better word) in my response to Joe Prosek, as I'm now being somewhat harsh in my response to you. However, Joe DESERVED a strong response because of his arrogance and lack of diplomacy in characterizing my writing as "drivel". YOU also deserve a strong response for your self righteous, unsolicited, and un-entitled condemnation.

People who approach me in a non-judgmental way and make a sincere inquiry with tact and diplomacy are NEVER treated harshly. I treat people with the SAME level of courtesy and civility that they present themselves to me. It's a 'you reap as you sow' world with me. You might be surprised to know that Joe Prosek sent me a long reply to my published response in which he tempered his remarks greatly and added a great deal of USEFUL information to the mix- the second time around. I haven't answered him yet, but when I do, I'll appraise him of my revised (and cordial) view of his commentary.

I see that you still list my home page and my New World Order overview as url links below your name at the bottom of your e-mail. Wow, you're a real piece of work, aren't you!

Beyond acquiring information obtained FREELY from my website for YOUR benefit, you also send out MY information to everyone you send an e-mail to for THEIR benefit, and YET, you have the arrogance and temerity to rebuke me for defending myself from a self-appointed critic!

How impudent of you to refer to me as "immature" when you demonstrate this demeanor yourself. What is more child-like than assailing me with your scolding comments and then follow with "... so I'm now dropping your research altogether..";

How "Nah, nah, --na, nah, nah, I'm not playing with you anymore!" can you get?

It's OK with me if you are now "sticking" with Jeff Rense, etc., as I have dozens of articles posted there anyway.

Did it ever occur to you that one of the reasons you might hold Jeff Rense in such high esteem is that he NEVER PUBLISHES HIS RESPONSE to e-mails sent to him? He may publish the contents of an e-mail, but without comment from him. And even then, he will only publish an e-mail from someone who is sending material that is CONTRIBUTORY and beneficial to a larger audience. He would never publish (or even respond) to a letter such as yours -or even Joe Prosek. Would you prefer to have your letter ignored? Have you everlooked in a mirror and asked yourself what REAL contributions have YOU made to humanity with your opinions?

The fact that I DO respond to letters from readers and offer my opinions is one of the things that makes my website different and UNIQUE from Jeff Rense. Some people, whose vision is more acute than yours, might find that both interesting and desirable.

I'll guess I should end my little discourse with you, as I've already invested too much time in responding to a clueless fop whose a-mail should have met with my Delete button upon initial perusal.

This, by the way, is the ONE and only time you will receive a reply from me, so cherish this one-time communication as my Swan Song to you- Ville Sarell, eminent critic, "tripper", and Moral High Grounder from beautiful (and safe) Finlandia.

Saionara, Ken Adachi

© Copyright 2005  All Rights Reserved.


Free Newsletter

Email Address:

Join the Educate-Yourself Discussion Forum

All information posted on this web site is the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only. It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer of your choice for medical care and advice.