Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours
By Zuerrnnovahh-Starr Livingstone
November 18, 2008
Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours by ZS Livingstone (Nov. 19, 2008)
On November 17 and 18, 2008 nine H-Bombs were exploded below the Arctic Ocean near the North Magnetic Pole. I was unable to transfer this info from the IRIS Seismic Monitor, so I copied this information longhand and typed it back onto my computer.
DATE TIME LATITUDE LONGITUDE MAGNITUDE DEPTH (Kilometers)
17 Nov 2008 12:55:23 UT 79.66 -116.86 5.7 10.0
17 Nov 2008 13:16:51 79.70 -115.78 4.7 10.0
17 Nov 2008 13:40:11 79.70 -115.36 5.1 10.0
17 Nov 2008 17:17:05 79.70 -115.78 4.7 10.0
18 Nov 2008 03:59:49 79.61 -114.76 5.6 10.0
18 Nov 2008 04:10:35 79.76 -115.70 5.1 10.0
18 Nov 2008 04:52:51 79.74 -115.32 5.3 10.0
18 Nov 2008 05:37:27 79.75 -115.33 4.9 10.0
18 Nov 2008 07:05:12 79.78 -114. 69 4.7 10.0
The North Magnetic Pole is about 80 degrees North and 104 degrees West and follows a circular 50 kilometer path each day. This area is north of Banks Island near the edge of the continental shelf and edging into the deeper waters of the Arctic Ocean. It is within Canadian waters.
Checking IRIS WILBER system of seismographic readings I was able to see the distinctive peaks of underground nuclear explosions. No small tremors leading to the major event and few if any aftershocks. The area is seismically stable. None of the blasts appeared to trigger sympathetic tremors. The explosions were concentrated in an area about 16 kilometers by 16 kilometers (10 miles by 10 miles). The explosions were in the 5 to 10 Megaton range. All were 10 kilometers deep (6.2 miles).
Such a concentration of explosions punched a hole in the crust and will allow petroleum from the bottom of the crust to leak into the Arctic Ocean. This could destroy life in large sections of the Arctic Ocean.
The Russians blasted a similar hole in Siberia east of the Urals and soaked hundreds of square kilometers with crude oil. The forests are covered in oil. Also huge volumes of natural gas were vented into the atmosphere. For many years the flaring of the natural gas was the largest source of light on Earth to the astronauts and cosmonauts who flew over night time Siberia. That same field is now the source of natural gas supplied by pipeline to Germany and France. Deep hydrocarbons from this hole contributed to Russia becoming the largest petroleum exporter in the world ahead of Saudi Arabia.
There is a possibility that the Department of Energy working with the oil companies and the Department of Defence, the likely culprits, were attempting to shift the North Magnetic Pole. Checking my compass I have not seen any shifts during the past few days. The flipping of the magnetic poles is happening as the field strength of the Earth is half of what is was centuries ago. There are other disturbances in the Earth's magnetic field indicating change is coming. Were they trying to accelerate the flipping of the poles? Were they trying to cause such calamity that martial law would be imposed? Were they trying to kill five to six billion people?
( I believe there is a way the poles can shift without causing problems.)
Was there a possibility of nine nuke explosions causing the San Andreas fault in California to slip? There was an earthquake drill in California just prior to the explosions. Over the past decade "drills" appear to anticipate forthcoming terrorist events. There was a full moon on November 13 when the drill ended and there has been evidence published of the moon's tidal pull causing earthquakes in areas where crustal pressures are high. Usually the peak time for earthquakes is a few days before to a few days after the full and new moons. The nine explosions were three and four days after the full moon.
(I believe some form of energy has neutralized many earthquakes.)
Maybe Exxon/Mobil has a ship plying the Arctic Sea and accidentally discovers oil sticking to the underside the sea ice and since it is already leaking maybe the Government of Canada will allow exploration in the environmentally sensitive Arctic? Oops! Exxon/Mobil accidentally discovered huge reserves of petroleum, they simply ploughed into the stuff!
Maybe Prime Minister Stephen Harper had no idea someone nuked a big hole in Canada? It would take a lot of effort to drill nine or more holes 10 kilometers deep. It would have taken years. There are large off-shore rigs in the Arctic Ocean. How many knew?
Thousands of seismologists know nukes were detonated and have been very quiet.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008
Subject: 9 seismic events in the Artic
Zuerrnnovahh-Starr Livingstone said that "nine H-Bombs were exploded"... the H-Bomb is the largest nuclear bomb developed by the Russians. I think it could be some other kind of lesser bomb.
Yes, it is confirmed that those nine readings were recorded on seismographs. USGS has them here. http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/qed/http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/qed/
I have posted some notes on the Project Avelon forum and the Above Top Secret forum to confirm the sequence of nine blasts.
I am very interested in trying to find out how he thinks they are H-Bombs. I don't have anything to be published at your website, I'm just following through on my own research, and have posted verifications of those seismic events on the other forums so that people would know they did occur.
From: Zuerrnnovahh-Starr Livingstone
I do not have hard evidence regarding the size of the bombs. I remember reports of the Russian, American and French tests when seismologists were not under gag orders from The Department of Homeland Security.
The Amchitka test was a MX type H-Bomb and in November 1971 caused a 5 Richter scale tremor at a mile depth.
The French tests in the Marquesas Islands were H-Bombs of some sort and likewise caused 5 Richter Scale earthquakes.
During the Cold War reports of underground Soviet test came out of Sweden and the guessed yield often was often in the 2 to 10 megaton of TnT range for 4 to 6 Richter scale blasts.
The Sweden's also reported on the Nevada tests and reported that some of the tests in the late 1960s were over the 2 megaton yield cap on tests at that location as the test zone was 100 miles north of Las Vegas. All the pre 1970 casinos were damaged by large shocks.
A Hiroshima 60,000 ton fission bomb underground would be in the 3 to 4 Richter range.
The two tactical nukes used to take out the Twin Tower elevator shafts at the second floor underground caused 2 Richter scale shocks. These two blasts were simultaneous to the aircraft striking the towers. They were probably in the 5 to 10 tons of TnT range.
The largest bomb was detonated in the air over Novaya Zemlya Siberia in 1962 its yield was guessed at 40 megatons. If that blast had occurred underground it would have been in the 7 to 8 Richter range.
The Richter scale is logarithmic and a 6 Richter earthquake is 30 times greater than a 5 Richter scale quake.
Definitely the nukes used in the Arctic were not the old style H-Bombs where the triggering smaller fission blast could be seen a split second before the larger fusion detonation on seismograph charts. The Wilber seismic reports showed just one large spike and few aftershocks. The bombs may not be of the old H-Bomb type but some sort of newer technology. The quakes were between 4.7 and 5.7 Richter a thirty-fold difference in yield. Nukes are fickle as identical devices explode with different yields. The nine nukes may have been identical but the yields were not.
The Bikini H-Bomb test was supposed to been equivalent to 8 megatons but resulted in a 14 megaton explosion sinking ships surrounding the atoll and toppling over a concrete observation bunker on the far side of the island. Predicting nuke yields is not an exact science. The scientists said, "The blast got away from them." The theory taught in school is not what the scientists experience when setting nukes off.
There appear to have been nukes detonated under the Gulf of Mexico during the past few years. Last year in Cuban waters there was a single 5 Richter quake 10 kilometers deep at roughly 84 degrees West 24 degrees North. A few months ago the Cubans announced the discovery of a large oil field in the same area. That quake may have been a Russian nuke. There were four other quakes in USA and Mexican waters during the past few years at 93W 22N, 95W 24N, 90W 27N and 86W 26N. The Gulf is not a seismically active zone.
Exploding nukes below the ocean floor is extremely dangerous as the ocean floor crust is thin. There could be huge amounts of natural gas and petroleum released causing all manner of problems including tsunamis.
In James Churchwards 1931 "Lost Continent of Mu" he reports that Lemuria sank due to the release of large volumes of "gas" from volcanic islands dotting the South Pacific. Could the release of petroleum and natural gas in the Gulf of Mexico sink the Mississippi Valley?
© Copyright 2008 Educate-Yourself.org All Rights Reserved.
|All information posted on this web site is the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only. It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer of your choice for medical care and advice.|