To post this article on Facebook, link to the TinyUrl seen below. Facebook will remove any article identified as coming from educate-yourself.org
Satanists reward Bob Dylan with Nobel Prize in "Literature"
for his role in the debasement of modern culture.
When Bob Dylan said he "sold his soul to the devil" what did he mean? Miles Mathis suggests Dylan betrayed his artistic integrity & audience
in return for fame and fortune.
The Illuminati can make anyone famous. It's called hype. They choose people who will advance their satanic agenda, i.e. "social change."
Bob Dylan: Change Agent (1-4-2015)
(henrymakow.com) In a recent article, Miles Mathis presents a compelling argument that Bob Dylan is a phoney.
He believes Dylan did not write his own songs and while Dylan's stage performances were not devoid of talent, he is not whom we believe him to be.
Dylan, whose real name is Robert Zimmermann, was born into a wealthy Jewish family in Duluth, Minnesota who owned a chain of movie theatres in the small town of Hibbing, MN. They were already in the 'deception' business.
According to Mathis, Hibbing has produced a number of dubious characters that include Vincent Bugliosi, Bruce Carlson and Gus Hall to name three. Gus Hall is the former leader of the US Communist Party and probably an Intelligence Services asset. Bruce Carlson is Director of theNational Reconnaissance Office (an intelligence agency) and a leader of the Mormon Church, believed part of the Elite. Vincent Bugliosi was the attorney who 'prosecuted' Charles Manson, allegedly another one of the long list of 'Laurel Canyon' assets.
In 1961, Dylan, 20, was "made" by a favorable New York Times review of his short set before 10 people at 'Gerde's Folk City.' He had been performing for only six months, and had no original material.
The review was written by another Jew, Robert Shelton, (Robert Shapiro.) Charlie Rothschild was the booking agent for 'Gerde's' at the time.
MK-ULTRA: "The Times they are a Changin'"
Intelligence was running many black ops and using the music industry as cover in the 1960s. Some of them have since been partially declassified, such as Operation Mockingbird, MK-ULTRA and others.
Mathis believes that there was an even larger operation called, 'Operation Rolling Stone' designed to promote extreme change in all forms.
Because humans are naturally resistant to change, Mathis contends, change had to be manufactured and constantly sold. Mathis points to the constant use of the 'Rolling Stone' title such as Dylan's famous song, the band 'The Rolling Stones,' and also the magazine 'Rolling Stone.'
Mathis believes that the 'Rolling Stone' meme was a creation of Intelligence agencies as part of their social engineering. In the " Protocols of the Elders of Zion," the author says three times, Our Countersign is "Force and Make-believe."(Protocol 1)
"Make-believe" is the Illuminati's "Magick." Magick is simply deceit or lying which is easy when you own the mass media and educators. The evil magician Aleister Crowley defined Magick as "the science and act of causing change to occur in conformity with will... any willed change in ourselves or in our environment is Magick."
The CIA had taken over all media by 1961. This may explain why Columbia was so keen to sign the 20-year-old Dylan based on virtually nothing. So arguably, Dylan's entire career was pre-planned.
Columbia had not heard him playing any of his original songs, because he had none at this time. He had only two original compositions on his first album, and that was not released until 1962.
In 1963, Newsweek accused Dylan of plagiarism, suggesting that 'Blowin' in the Wind' had been 'acquired' from a high school student. As Mathis points out, if Dylan had written the song, Columbia would have sued Newsweek as soon as the story appeared. If Dylan had not written what is his most famous song, what does this say about him as a songwriter?
In 1965 Dylan was booed off the stage at the Newport Folk Festival allegedly for going 'electric guitar.' Mathis believes that 'real' folk fans knew that he was a fake, but by 1969, the infiltration and co-option of anti-war movement was complete so Dylan was no longer needed. He was therefore abandoned.
Mathis also posits that after Watergate, Dylan was brought back to Columbia in 1974 as part of the grand misdirection so that the American public would not notice that the CIA had just finalized a takeover of the government.
Mathis thinks fellow Jewish agent Leonard Cohen was Dylan's ghost writer. Cohen's record label was also Columbia. Furthermore it would also explain what Joni Mitchell said in 2010, referring to Dylan: "He's a plagiarist, and his name and voice are fake. Everything about Bob is a deception. We are like night and day, he and I."
And as Mathis points out, why did Dylan or his record label not sue Mitchell for defamation? A claim of plagiarism is the most serious accusation that could be directed at a performer.
As a 'former' fan of Dylan, Mathis concludes, "...this is no easier for me than for you... It hurts. Talent and real art have been rare enough without losing what little we had to these government disinfo programs... Even more recently, Dylan has been doing Chrysler commercials... It is like watching Gandhi as the spokesman for Monsanto, or Martin Luther King schlepping pharmaceuticals for Pfizer."
UK-based author John Hamer has written numerous short articles and several books including the best-seller, 'The Falsification of History' and 'RMS Olympic' and 'Titanic's Last Secret'. ------------------ Note: Bob Dylan's eldest son, Jesse (left) is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. (Thanks Deanna)
Miles Mathis is one of those people who is not even an author by trade, but is somehow able to put two and two together to come up with four. The source for all his information is to be found on public information web sites, and he documents all of his work. His talent, along with people like the late, great Dave McGowan is ability to see the small details that most of us miss, even professional investigators and authors, and then weave those details into a complete tapestry. Some of Miles's other "investigations" include the "Tate Murders", the "Spirit of St. Louis", and a related investigation into the Lindberg's (Sr. and Jr.) themselves. Whether you chose to believe him or not, you will never look at the subjects he choses to dissect in quite the same way. Here is a link to his work if anyone is interested.
Dylan was exactly what he purported to be: a subversive. If his naive white bread followers never figured out he was subverting their heritage - not his, more's the pity.
Dylan created a persona which is simulacrum of stereotypes of the white Western Americana that he saw in the movies growing up. His baby boomer fans to this day haven't realized that his act has been mockery all the while.
But that's not because didn't give them plenty of blatant clues.
Henry, Good god I hated Dylan when I was a teenager.My father loved him.That whiney nasally voice was just unbearable.Then again my dad couldn't understand Slayer, Metallica, or Megadeth either.With a voice like that, he HAD to have had some Illuminati handlers.
Martin said (April 7, 2015):
I know when Dylan did his deed.
(BTW, I think he was deeply threatened into it.)
I didn't buy the "Desire" album right away. It was a couple of yrs later that I bought it, so figure 1981 or so.
I held the record in both hands, looking at the front of it, and felt some sort of juju, some sort of contamination.
I'm sure it was during the post production of the record that Bob sold out. He gave "conscious permission" for the darksters to use him to mesmerize the masses.
"I'm sure" about that because I now dowse and remote view some of my curiosities.
Dark energy piggy-backing is done anyway, such as David Crosby mentioning in 1974 that finished recordings spend a couple of days in the "temple room" before it goes into manufacture.
The dark stuff is many times more powerful if the artist gives permission for that dark transmission.
Also, just before the "Desire" album was his Christian record "Slow Train Coming". That record, and the one immediately before that were great, and still are. If any artist of any form gets close to getting folks to think outside of the matrix, those artists get whacked.
Joni Mitchell and, especially, Van Morrison have tons of stories of the darkness of the industry. It also happens that both of them are clean.
Maurice said (April 3, 2015):
It always seemed as though Dylan assumed the persona of the late, great, Woody Guthrie (father of Arlo). As though Woody died (under mysterious circumstances?), and Dylan stepped into his place. I understand that Bob actually sang differently (his voice was different), then it suddenly changed (sounding more like Woody?). He even begins to "look" like Woody Guthrie! Conspiracy? Could one claim to be surprised any more?
Brian in Honolulu said (April 3, 2015):
I see you've been digging Miles Mathis.
I like the purity of his conservative streak.
American Media, and its "History": The plumbing the depths of its deception like Cultural toilet.
False Flags: I think he's right on. Ive read interesting things about Patty Hearst too, over the years.
Hollywood helps Washington, Washington helps Hollywood. Banks run both.
Where would Hollywood get all that money? ...Idea doesn't seem so ridiculous now, does it?
The Spectacular Frauds are Piling Up!
There is a great documentary on Hollywood Mega-Mogul Lew Wasserman on nNetflix. He was Reagan's first agent in Hollywood.
For a while, he was apparently his only client.
Michael C said (April 2, 2015):
I had the privilege of being acquainted with Bob's girl friend at the time (1981-82) when I was at the Bible school I attended. A lively Black gal by the name of Angel, whom he had written a song about.
It was she who played a role in his attraction to Jesus Christ. I had the occasion to meet him because he showed up on campus for several days to visit her. I always thought his Christian testimony and songs like "You Gotta Serve Somebody" were genuine, and his experience, but was disappointed that he later on was less vocal about his faith.
Certainly he was an instrument of change or at the vanguard of changes in our world.
GG said (April 2, 2015):
Thanks for being a 'true' voice calling in the wilderness ! As a middle aged "Luddite", embracing the internet was a struggle. Your website has changed my view. After finishing the Dylan article, I googled 'who pushed the rock up the mountain ?' Up came Sisyphus by Albert Camus. The second sentence explains everything..."the 'gods' felt the ultimate punishment was endless, fruitless labor". I think I "get' them now. Appreciate your work.
Diana said (April 2, 2015):
I saw Dylan in Berlin a few years back and he wasn’t too bad, he was supported by some great musicians.
My husband and I saw him in Toronto recently and the concert was God awful.
All the people sitting around us were really disgusted. You couldn’t make out any of the songs, the acoustic was terrible and to top things off, he looked like he was wearing pajamas.
My husband and I said that’s it for the bucket list..we left very early and so did a lot of the audience.
I think J. Mitchell was right about him.
Looks like we all got deceived.
By the way I was growing up ‘round about the same time as you were…and I don’t believe any of that “bunk” anymore…
Gary said (April 2, 2015):
When Dylan came on the scene practically everyone I knew liked him. The lyrics in his songs were something else. I couldn't fathom how anyone could come up with them. The arrangement in many of them was great, ex. Just Like a Woman. He probably didn't write all his material. How many singers write all their stuff? He was there at the right time and he served a purpose for a lot of people.
I listened to his early music thousands of times, still do sometimes. After the John Westley Harding album his style somewhat changed and I lost interest. Have you checked out the crap that passes for music now days? How about the "talent" of some of the "artists"?
Duane said (April 2, 2015):
We know they could make ANYONE a star in almost any popular music genre..
Maybe no-talent "Dylan" was just another case of jews helping their boy and creating a "jew star"...Why wasn't equally talented (and handsome) "Cohen" remade as "Dylan" if he was writing those horrible songs anyway....
The most sickening thing jew "Dylan" ever did was get the negro killer of 3 Whites "Hurricane Carter" sprung from jail with that "klezmer" song he did....Not only have the jews been weaponizing the negro against Whites worldwide (South Africa, U.S. etc...)...They make sure they get them released for their crimes as well....
I'm skeptical that Cohen was Dylan's ghost. Cohen is a big star in his own right.
Ian said (April 2, 2015):
I adored the songs of the early Bob Dylan. They appealed to my youthful rebelliousness, and the fact that he couldn't sing and didn't care, added to that. He seemed to spring up from nowhere, yet that didn't surprise me then, though thinking of it now it all seems to fit with the facts that the article suggests.
The non suing of the plagiarism accusers, is odd, yet to me at least, no smoking gun. I believe a lot of song writers get the idea or concept for a song from something they hear from others, in fact I listened to a radio interview with a songwriter while driving one day and that was what he claimed, though sorry I can't give a name or link to that. If Dylan was working for the elite/Illuminati/whatever, they would have been able to "persuade" the accuser to change their mind anyway.
It does seem very convincing and obvious now though, that the presumption that is made about Dylan being a puppet, is fact. I certainly admit to being taken in as a gullible rebellious teenager. Oh well, how did that Corgi's song go, "we're not as smart as we like to think we are", hey I could write that into a song.
Tyrone said (April 1, 2015):
The alphabet agencies of the "Crown" whether in the USA or UK use those they promote for social change as this article points out in order to further their agenda against whites/Europeans-Christians and their natural culture toward the "Crowns" JWO plot out of "Israel".
I listened to a long video/movie a while back called "The Last Testament of George Harrison". It was great. I mentioned to others that it's plausible that Paul actually did die and that "Paul" today is a phoney concocted by MI5. I mentioned as well that George's death and even Lennon's death may be all connected to this early event.
If anyone is so inclined I suggest they research George's alleged tapes where he spells out how the boys from Liverpool were forced to live a lie at the threat of death. I firmly believe if the evidence put forth in those tapes was presented to a jury that they would conclude that what is charged therein is true.
Phil said (April 1, 2015):
Great article Henry, after reading Dave McGowan's Laurel Canyon series this article does not surprise me at all. The god of this world can only lie there is not truth in him so his little lackey stooges such as Dylan who I have always thought had no talent have to do their bidding through lies and deceit just like their master!
Erik said (April 1, 2015):
I just read your article about Bob Dylan and it mentioned two points that I feel are really the "Smoking Gun" on why "Conspiracy Theories" are really grounded in truth.
When Dylan was accused twice of plagiarism and neither time did not sue (for defamation of character), that I believe screams volumes...
What most people don't understand is that in a civil court case the court will examine evidence from BOTH SIDES. That's the reason they don't sue because obviously there is damaging evidence that they DO NOT WANT to be presented in a court of law (for the world to see).
A recent example being Chris Kyle's (the American Sniper) claim that he punched Jesse Ventura and knocked him out. Ventura claimed that this was not true and sued Kyle's estate for defamation of character and won!
To put this in context:
If the claims that certain Elitist, celebrities, politicians, etc. are Satanists are really false then why are there no lawsuits?
You see where I'm going with this if people with millions and billions of dollars are really being accused of something that is completely false then why not spend a miniscule amount to hire an attorney to sue the pants off the accuser. At least to scare others into not doing the same thing...
Also if all these false flag crisis actors were really victims then why not sue the people accusing them of being frauds for defamation of character??? As far as I know there are no lawsuits from Sandy Hook or Boston Bombing "Victims" (not that I know of).
And maybe I am wrong maybe there are lawsuits that have come up but I would think that they info would be heavily circulated on the net to at least discourage others from doing the same thing....
I came to that conclusion about a year ago and it really helps me to keep everything in perspective when reading articles that may be labeled as a "Conspiracy Theory". Not to say that everything I read in these articles is absolute truth but I realize that the articles must be at least grounded in truth...
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.