[Editor's Note: I just spent some time reading the web site of John Wilson, the Australian who penned the letter seen below. I re-posted a short note (further below) he wrote in June of 2010 when the police and paramedics unexpectedly came calling at his home with the intention of hauling him off to a psychiatric ward, undoubtedly for 'observation'.
What a tremendous amount of fortitude and courage it takes to face the lions alone. I take my hat off to this man.
The media always tells us about awards and ceremony given to honor policemen for this or that act of heroism, yet the reality is usually far removed from the story presented by the media. We never hear, however, of awards or plaques given to men like John Wilson, whose courage greatly exceeds those who are badged, armed, trained, and "backed-up" to the nth degree.
Corruption and degradation within the judicial system, the law enforcement system and the prosecutorial system will only be curbed and brought under control because men like John Wilson are willing to stand up and face the cowardly lions of fascism, intimidation, and coercion. He deserves our support and assistance. ...Ken Adachi ]
From John Wilson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
May 11, 2011
Subject: Ban ALL Masons from All Public Office!!!!!
Date: Wed, May 11, 2011
To: Ken Adachi
America's courts are filled with Masonic shills called judges, black robed, masonic
priests, who's first allegience is to their satanic brotherhood. They must ALL be
removed from ALL public offices, from dog-catcher to president, for conflict of
interest and "partiality". Most lower degree members have no idea that they are
involved in the worship of Lucifer. All they have to do is read their
bible/handbook, Morals and Dogma (an oxymoron) written by Albert Pike, now dead and
residing in hell!
John Wilson writes to his MP demanding
Judges reveal their affiliations to Freemasonry
David Elliott, MP,
State Member for Baulkham Hills,
Old Northern Road,
I dropped a copy of that DVD, "CHRISTIAN or FREEMASON" (www.elijahschallenge.netdvds.htm) into your Electoral Office yesterday. It's a real eye-opener, isn't it.
Some People have suggested that you are a Freemason.
The exposure, by Brian Shaw, of this insane cult must really have members of this cult thinking "What have I gotten myself into?"
It truly is insanity.
It's such a pathetic facade of "respectability" to pose as an "Honourable" Judge or "distinguished" Member of Parliament while what these persons are doing is purely and simply evil.
That episode with John Bauskis getting stuck into "Justice" John David Hislop in the NSW Supreme Court on Monday was a classic. All through the session, John David Hislop continually had his head down and silent for long pauses. Obviously, he was going through extreme mental distress, thinking "What have I gotten myself into?". John Bauskis was hammering him and saying, "You have no jurisdiction. You cannot judge in your own cause. Jurisdiction is decided by a Special Jury. All you can do is make a date for a Special Jury to determine the Jurisdiction of the Court."
Christ Jesus said to "love our enemies" .... but what fools they are!
Here was one Judge, John David Hislop, committing Perjury to protect another Judge, George Alfred Palmer, from facing Trial by Jury for the Indictment John Bauskis had filed against the latter.
John Bauskis kept repeating, "What you are doing is Treason." .... and John David Hislop did not deny that, at any stage, because he knew it was true.
What fools they are.
"What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his own soul?"
Attached is a List of the Judges of the NSW Supreme Court, incidentally ABN 77 057 165 500, to be used to put on record which ones are Freemasons. A similar List ought to drawn up for Members of the NSW Parliament, ABN 89 288 775 026.
Your secretary said you would be back at Baulkham Hills on Friday. We must talk again and soon.
The banks have corrupted parliaments and courts in order to achieve their seemingly invincible position. Through the parliaments, banks have set in place legislation which form the blue print and provide the means to realize their goal.
However, such legislation can only be enforced through the courts where, if justice were to prevail, bad laws would be vetoed and rejected in fair trials or tribunals. That is why the banks have to have dominance over the courts. They do this by firstly controlling the judges and secondly eliminating juries - thereby removing any possibility that the judges may "do right" or that the people may exercise their will.
But there is a chink in the banks' armour - an Achilles' heel. There is a way to smash the banks by proclaiming a simple truth which the banks have swept aside in the implementation of their practice of issuing loan contracts.
The truth is in the meaning of the word, "variable", as found in the Oxford English Dictionary. "Variable" means "uncertain" and "certain" means "not variable". For contracts to be valid under the common law, there must be "certainty of terms" as an essential element. Therefore, all loan contracts in which the banks have incorporated variable interest rates are invalid. Those loans are illegal and the banks are common law criminals.
The judges know this and are concealing this serious offence. This website exposes the incompetence, corruption and treachery in the judiciary.
Magna Carta says, "To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay, Right or Justice.". Unless the banks can be defeated, such noble principles are gone and the people, having no rights, are merely slaves.
Brian Shaw addresses the alligiance issue of freemasons in Christian or Freemason? Part 1
At 5:00PM this evening (Saturday 12th June 2010) I was at home, by myself,
when the door bell rang and I opened the main door to see about five Police
Officers on my verandah. I asked why were they here ... and all they would say
was "Are you John Wilson?". I said "You've got no reason to be here and you
are trespassing. Leave my property." This is because the Police have
trespassed many times, already..... as I have testified to.
They said they had had a report by means of a texted message from me that I
was "suicidal" and "intended to harm myself". I denied sending any such thing
and demanded to know who had. They said they didn't know. I said, "You can't
act on a report without knowing who it is that made the report." They still insisted that it was me and the message had come from my phone. I, again, denied it.
Then a couple of Paramedics came down my driveway. They said they had come
to check out that I was all right and they wanted to take me away for a psychiatric
I phoned a friend to tell him of what was happening and he
confirmed that it was all rubbish. At first, I locked the screen door because of the previous incidents when Castle Hill Police had trespassed and assaulted me and arrested me without even a
Warrant... and saying, as they violently attacked my door with a steel bar, "We
don't need a Warrant.e're the Police" ... all this was brought out in the District Court over the last couple of weeks.
This time, again, they threatened to break the door down, and kept on saying
they just wanted to make sure I was okay. So, I opened the screen door and
went onto the verandah to talk to them. When I told them it was just another
attempt to harrass me and started to explain that I have been fighting the Banks
and the Judges for many years,
The female Police Officer wanted to know the number of my mobile...and I told
her .... perhaps she will investigate the hoax call and see what number had really
sent it.... I suspect whoever it was gave my name.
As they were all leaving and they said they would make a report of being sent to
my home, I said, "I want a copy of that report" .... to which they said I could not
have .... and I said "I'll get it through the Freedom of Information Act."
Dan said (May 11, 2011):
Neutralizing occasional public demand for transparency of government official's memberships in secret societies is old hat for international Masonry. Every generation or so enough of the public become aware of the racket that the Masonic governments make a show of requiring disclosure. Then the requirement is revoked later when the heat's off. See below, England just completed that cycle. Considering the facts that Britain was plunged into wars and became the most intrusive Big Brother society in West despite ten years of required disclosure of public 'servant' Masonic membership, the issue is actually a hoodwink.
The 'blue lodge' organizations memberships aren't where the 'action is' anymore. The real secret societies moved into government 'security' agencies over a century ago. Association with those agencies is "protected under national security".
[Gordon Prentice (Pendle) said there would again be a "cloak of secrecy" following the move by the Justice Secretary.
Mr Straw said last week that a review had shown no evidence of "impropriety or malpractice" as a result of a judge being a Freemason and it would be "disproportionate" to continue with the practice, introduced in 1998.
The United Grand Lodge of England made representations to ministers in May and indicated it might seek judicial review of the policy.
At Commons question time today Mr Prentice asked: "Is it not a disgrace that you have decided to allow judges no longer to have to declare if they are Freemasons?"We know that one in 20 of our judges are Freemasons. Why on earth the cloak of secrecy?"
Mr Straw replied: "There was no secrecy about my announcement, I made the announcement by way of written ministerial statement last week in the light of a European Court of Human Rights judgment against the state of Italy, which was made in 2006, and to which our attention was drawn by the Grand Lodge of Freemasons.
"It suggested that a continuation of a compulsory register...was likely to be unlawful. After legal advice I accepted that. It is open to any judge to declare that they are Freemasons."
He added that there had been "no evidence" of any "unacceptable behavior by Freemason judges.
Ministry of Justice figures indicate there are 3,808 judges in England and Wales and 205 or 5.4 per cent are Freemasons. There are also 29,702 magistrates, of whom 1,900 or 6.4 per cent are Freemasons.]
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.