[Editor's Note: People who are sentimental about the Beatles will find it hard to believe that they were pumped up and used by the Illuminati to introduce soft drugs among middle class American youth. They were also a vehicle for the introduction of mind control "trigger words" into everyday jargon. I recall very well when the Beatles made their debut on the American rock scene. Their sudden and explosive "popularity" in America made no sense to me at the time. I couldn't understand what was so great about the Beatles and why they were portrayed as 'threatening' to the crown of the then King of Rock & Roll, Elvis Presley.
America, after all, was the birthplace of Rock & Roll, Allen Freed, and "do wop, do wop". America alone could boast of the greatest names and groups in Rock & Roll- not Europe or Asia, and certainly not England. American Rock & Roll performers were the envy of world and were emulated and copied down to the smallest mannerism and detail by European and Asian youth. How is it that a bar band from Liverpool doing almost all American rock cover tunes like Chuck Berry songs would suddenly be blitzed across American media as the "greatest sensation to ever hit the shores of America"? Huh? Musically speaking, there was nothing "fabulous" about the "Fab Four". They were a cover band; but that's it!
Yes, they had some decent hits after they took American "by storm" but NOT before. So how is it that they got to the top of Rock & Roll Mountain here in America without really climbing it? Simple, they were helicoptered up there by the Committee of 300 and the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations and no one is in a better position to tell you how it was done than the author of this article, Dr John Coleman...Ken Adachi]
By Dr. John Coleman
March 1, 2007
An outstanding example of social conditioning to accept change, even when it
is recognized as unwelcome change by the large population group in the
sights of Stanford Research Institute, was the "advent" of the BEATLES. The
Beatles were brought to the United States as part of a social experiment
which would subject large population groups to brainwashing of which they
were not even aware.
When Tavistock brought the Beatles to the United States nobody could have
imagined the cultural disaster that was to follow in their wake. The Beatles
were an integral part of "THE AQUARIAN CONSPIRACY," a living organism which
sprang From "THE CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN," URH (489)-2150-Policy Research
Report No. 4/4/74. Policy Report pre-pared by SRI Center for the study of
Social Policy, Director, Professor Willis Harmon.
The phenomenon of the Beatles was not a spontaneous rebellion by youth
against the old social system. Instead it was a carefully crafted plot to
introduce by a conspiratorial body which could not be identified, a highly
destructive and divisive element into a large population group targeted for
change against its will. New words and new phrases--prepared by
Tavistock(1)-- were introduced to America along with the Beatles. Words such
as "rock" in relation to music sounds, "teenager," "cool," "discovered" and "pop music" were a lexicon of disguised code words signifying the acceptance
of drugs and arrived with and accompanied the Beatles wherever they went, to
be "discovered" by "teenagers." Incidentally, the word "teenagers" was never
used until just before the Beatles arrived on the scene, courtesy of the
Tavistock Institute for Human Relations.
As in the case of gang wars, nothing could or would have been accomplished
without the cooperation of the media, especially the electronic media and,
in particular, the scurrilous Ed Sullivan who had been coached by the conspirators as to the role he was to play. Nobody would have paid much
attention to the motley crew from Liverpool and the 12-atonal system of "music" that was to follow had it not been for an overabundance of press
exposure. The 12-atonal system consisted of heavy, repetitive sounds, taken
from the music of the cult of Dionysus and the Baal priesthood by Theo Adorno and
given a "modern" flavor by this special friend of the Queen of England and
hence the Committee of 300.
Tavistock and its Stanford Research Center created trigger words which then
came into general usage around "rock music" and its fans. Trigger words
created a distinct new break-away largely young population group which was
persuaded by social engineering and conditioning to believe that the Beatles
really were their favorite group. All trigger words devised in the context
of "rock music" were designed for mass control of the new targeted group,
the youth of America.
The Beatles did a perfect job, or perhaps it would be more correct to say
that Tavistock and Stanford did a perfect job, the Beatles merely reacting
like trained robots "with a little help from their friends"--code words for
using drugs and making it "cool." The Beatles became a highly visible "new
type"-- more Tavistock jargon--and as such it was not long before the group
made new styles (fads in clothing, hairstyles and language usage) which
upset the older generation, as was intended. This was part of the"fragmentation-maladaptation" process worked out by Willis Harmon and his
team of social scientists and genetic engineering tinkerers and put into
The role of the print and electronic media in our society is crucial to the
success of brainwashing large population groups. Gang wars ended in Los
Angeles in 1966 as the media withdrew its coverage. The same thing will
happen with the current wave of gang wars in Los Angeles. Street gangs will
wither on the vine once media saturation coverage is toned down and then
completely withdrawn. As in 1966, the issue would become "burned out."
Street gangs will have served their purpose of creating turbulence and
insecurity. Exactly the same pattern will be followed in the case of "rock"
music. Deprived of media attention, it will eventually take its place in
Following the Beatles, who incidentally were put together by the Tavistock
Institute, came other "Made in England" rock groups, who, like the Beatles,
had Theo Adorno write their cult lyrics and compose all the "music." I hate
to use these beautiful words in the context of "Beatlemania"; it reminds me
of how wrongly the word "lover" is used when referring to the filthy
interaction between two homosexuals writhing in pigswill. To call "rock"
music, is an insult, likewise the language used in "rock lyrics."
Tavistock and Stanford Research then embarked on the second phase of the
work commissioned by the Committee of 300. This new phase turned up the heat
for social change in America. As quickly as the Beatles had appeared on the
American scene, so too did the "beat generation," trigger words designed to
separate and fragment society. The media now focused its attention on the"beat generation." Other Tavistock-coined words came seemingly out of
nowhere: "beatniks," "hippies," "flower children" became part of the
vocabulary of America. It became popular to "drop out" and wear dirty jeans,
go about with long unwashed hair. The "beat generation" cut itself off from
main-stream America. They became just as infamous as the cleaner Beatles
The newly-created group and its "lifestyle" swept millions of young
Americans into the cult. American youth underwent a radical revolution
without ever being aware of it, while the older generation stood by
helplessly, unable to identify the source of the crisis, and thus reacting
in a maladaptive manner against its manifestation, which were drugs of all
types, marijuana, and later Lysergic acid, "LSD," so conveniently provided
for them by the Swiss pharmaceutical company, SANDOZ, following the
discovery by one of its chemists, Albert Hoffman, how to make synthetic
ergotamine, a powerful mind-altering drug. The Committee of 300 financed the
project through one of their banks, S. C. Warburg, and the drug was carried
to America by the philosopher, Aldous Huxley.
The new "wonder drug" was promptly distributed in "sample" size packages,
handed out free of charge on college campuses across the United States and
at "rock" concerts, which became the leading vehicle for proliferating the
use of drugs. The question that cries out for an answer is, what was the
Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) doing at the time? There is compelling
circumstantial evidence that would appear to indicate that the DEA knew what
was going on but was ordered not to take any action.
With very substantial numbers of new British "rock" bands arriving in the
U.S., rock concerts began to become a fixture on the social calendar of
American youth. In tandem with these "concerts," the use of drugs among the
youth rose in proportion. The devilish bedlam of discordant heavy beat
sounds numbed the minds of listeners so that they were easily persuaded to
try the new drug on the basis that "everybody is doing it." Peer pressure is
a very strong weapon. The "new culture" received maximum coverage from the
jackal media, which cost the conspirators not one single thin dime.
Great anger was felt by a number of civic leaders and churchmen over the new
cult but their energies were misdirected against the RESULT of what was
going on and not against the CAUSE. Critics of the rock cult made the same
mistakes that had been made in the prohibition era, they criticized law
enforcement agencies, teachers, parents anybody but the conspirators.
Because of the anger and resentment I feel toward the great drug plague, I
make no apology for using language which is not customary for me to use. One
of the worst drug slobs ever to walk the streets of America was Alan
Ginsberg. This Ginsberg pushed the use of LSD through advertising which cost
him nothing, although under normal circumstances it would have cost millions
of dollars in TV advertising revenues. This free advertising for drugs, and
LSD in particular, reached a new high in the late 1960's, thanks to the ever-willing cooperation of the media. The effect of Ginsberg's mass
advertising campaign was devastating; the American public was subjected to
one cultural future shock after another in rapid succession.
We became over-exposed and over stimulated and, again, may I remind you that
this is Tavistock jargon, lifted from the Tavistock training manual,
overwhelmed by its new development and, when we reached that point, our
minds began to lapse into apathy; it was just too much to cope with, that is
to say, "long range penetration had taken hold of us." Ginsberg claimed to
be a poet but no greater rubbish was ever written by anyone who ever aspired
to becoming a poet. Ginsberg's designated task had little to do with poetry;
his main function was to push the new subculture and force acceptance of it
upon the large targeted population group.
To assist him in his task, Ginsberg cooped the services of Norman Mailer, a
writer of sorts who had spent some time in a mental institution. Mailer was
a favorite of the left wing Hollywood crowd and so had no problem with
getting maximum television time for Ginsberg. Naturally Mailer had to have a
pretext-- not even he could blatantly come out with the true nature of
Ginsberg's television appearances. So a charade was adopted: Mailer would
talk "seriously" on camera with Ginsberg about poetry and literature.
This method of getting wide television coverage at no cost to themselves was
followed by every rock group and concert promoter who followed the example
set by Ginsberg. The electronic media moguls had big hearts when it came to
giving free time to these dirty venomous creatures and their even dirtier
products and filthy ideas. Their promotion of horrible garbage spoke volumes
and, without abundant help from the print and electronic media, the drug
trade could not have spread as rapidly as it did in the late 1960's-early
197O's, and probably would have been confined to a few small local areas.
Ginsberg was able to give several nationally televised performances
extolling the virtues of LSD and marijuana, under the guise of "new ideas"
and "new cultures" developing in the art and music world. Not to be outdone
by the electronic media, Ginsberg's admirers wrote glowing articles about"this colorful man" in the art and social columns of all of America's
largest newspapers and magazines. There had never been such an
across-the-media-board free advertising campaign in the history of
newspaper, radio and television and it cost the promoters of the Aquarian
conspiracy, NATO and the Club of Rome not one red cent. It was all
absolutely free advertising for LSD, only thinly disguised as "art" and "culture."
One of Ginsberg's closest friends, Kenny Love, published a Five-page report
in the New York Times. This is in accordance with the methodology used by
Tavistock and Stanford Research: If something is to be promoted which the
public has not yet been fully brainwashed to accept, then have someone write
an article, covering all sides of the subject matter. The other method is to
have live television talk shows in which a panel of experts promotes the
product and or idea under the pretext of "discussing", it. There are point
and counter-point, both pro and con participants airing their support or
opposition. When it is all over, the subject to be promoted has been dinned
into the public mind. While this was new in the early 1970's, today it is
standard practice on which talk shows thrive.
Love's Five-page pro LSD pro Ginsberg article was duly printed by the New
York Times. Had Ginsberg tried to buy the same amount of space in an
advertisement, it would have cost him at least $50,000. But Ginsberg didn't
have to worry; thanks to his Friend Kenny Love, Ginsberg got the massive
advertising all for free. With newspapers like the New York Times and the
Washington Post under the control of the Committee of 300, this kind of free
advertising is given to any subject matter, and more especially to those
promoting decadent life styles--drugs-hedonism-- anything that will confuse
the American people. After the trial run with Ginsberg and LSD, it became
standard Club of Rome practice to call upon major newspapers in America to
give free advertising on demand to people and ideas they were promoting.
Worse yet--or better yet, depending upon the viewpoint-- United Press (UP)
picked up Kenny Love's free advertising for Ginsberg and LSD and telexed it
to HUNDREDS of newspapers- and magazines around the country under the guise
of a "news" story. Even such highly respectable establishment magazines as "Harpers Bazaar" and "TIME" made Mr. Ginsberg respectable. If a nation-wide
campaign of this magnitude were presented to Ginsberg and the promoters of
LSD by an advertising agency, the price tag would have run into at least $1
million in terms of 1970 dollars. Today the price tag would be nothing less
than $15-$16 million dollars. It is no wonder that I refer to the news media
I suggest that we try to find any media outlet to do an expose on the
Federal Reserve Board, which is what I did. I took my article, which was a
good expose of the greatest swindle on earth, to every major newspaper,
radio and television station, magazine house and several talk-show hosts. A
few made promises that sounded good--they would definitely air the article
and have me discuss it--give them about a week and they would get back to
me. Not one of them ever did, nor did my article ever appear in the pages of
their newspapers and journals. It was as if a blanket of silence had been
thrown over me and the subject I was endeavoring to promote, and indeed that
was precisely what had happened.
Without massive media hype, and without almost around the clock coverage,
the hippie-beatnik rock, drug cult would never have gotten off the ground;
it would have remained a localized oddity. The Beatles, with their twanging
guitars, silly expressions, drug language and weird clothes, would not have
amounted to a hill of beans. Instead, because the Beatles were given
saturation coverage by the media, the United States has suffered one
cultural shock after another.
The men buried in the think tanks and research institutions, whose names and
faces are still not known to but a few people, made sure that the press
played its part. Conversely, the media's important role in not exposing the
power behind the future cultural shocks made certain that the source of the
crisis was never identified. Thus was our society driven mad through
psychological shocks and stress. "Driven mad" is taken from Tavistock's
training manual. From its modest beginnings in 1921, Tavistock was ready in
1966 to launch a major irreversible cultural revolution in America, which
has not yet ended. The Aquarian Conspiracy is part of it.
Thus softened up, our nation was now deemed ripe for the introduction of
drugs which was to rival the prohibition era in scope and the huge amounts
of money to be made. This too was an integral part of the Aquarian
Conspiracy. The proliferation of drug usage was one of the subjects under
study at the Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU) at Tavistock's Sussex
University facility. It was known as the "future shocks" center, a title
given to so-called future oriented psychology designed to manipulate whole
population groups to induce "future shocks." It was the first of several
such institutions set up by Tavistock.
"Future shocks" is described as a series of events which come so fast that
the human brain cannot absorb the information. As I said earlier, science
has shown that there are clearly marked limits to the amount of changes and
the nature of them that the mind can deal with. After continuous shocks, the
large targeted population group discovers that it does not want to make
choices any more. Apathy takes over, often preceded by mindless violence
such as is characteristic of the Los Angeles street gangs, serial killers,
rapists and child kidnapers.
Such a group becomes easy to control and will docilely follow orders without
rebelling, which is the object of the exercise. "Future shocks," says SPRU,"is defined as physical and psychological distress arising from the excess
load on the decision-making mechanism of the human mind." That is Tavistock
jargon lifted straight from Tavistock manuals--which they don't know I have.
Just as an overloaded electrical circuit will activate a trip switch, so do
humans "trip out," which is a syndrome that medical science is only now
beginning to understand, although John Rawlings Reese conducted experiments
in this field as far back as the 1920's. As can be appreciated, such a
targeted group is ready to "trip out" and take to drugs as a means of escape
from the pressures of so many choices having to be made. This is how Drug
usage was spread so rapidly through America's "beat generation." What
started with the Beatles and sample packages of LSD has grown into a
flood-tide of drug usage which is swamping America.
The drug trade is controlled by the Committee of 300 from the Top down. The
drug trade started with the British East India Company and was closely
followed by the Dutch East India Company. Both were controlled by a "Council
of 300." The list of names of members and stockholders of the BEIC read like
something out of Debretts Peerage. BEIC established the "China Inland
Mission," whose job it was to get The Chinese peasants, or coolies, as they
were called, addicted to opium. This created the market for opium which the
BEIC then filled.
In much the same way the Committee of 300 used "The "Beatles" to popularize"social drugs" with the youth of America and The Hollywood "in-crowd." Ed
Sullivan was sent to England To become acquainted with The first Tavistock
Institute "rock group" to hit the shores of the United States. Sullivan then
returned to the United States to draft the strategy for the electronic media
on how to package and sell the group. Without the full cooperation of the
electronic media and Ed Sullivan, in particular, "The Beatles" and their"music" would have died on the vine. Instead, our national life and the
character of the United States was forever changed.
Now that we know, it is all too clear how successful the "Beatles" campaign
to proliferate the use of drugs became. The fact that "The Beatles" had
their music and lyrics written for them by Theo Adorno was concealed from
public view. The prime function to "The Beatles" was to be discovered by
teenagers, who where then subjected to a non-stop barrage of "Beatle music,"
until they became convinced that they liked the sound and adopted it, along
with all that accompanied it. The Liverpool group performed up to
expectations, and with "a little help from their friends," i.e., illegal
substances we call drugs created a whole new class to young Americans in the
precise mold ordained by the Tavistock Institute.
Dr. John Coleman.
(1) An Institute in UK where they research in mind control, run by highly
trained psychiatrists who answer to the Illuminati. From here Ayatollah
Khomeini, Radovan Karadzic and Milosevic among others were all trained for
It's not mentioned here, but the Rolling Stones were created from the same
source and with the same purpose. Beatles were supposed to be the "good
guys" while the Rolling Stones were the "bad guys". Also, Rolling Stones
were experts in creating repeating "riffs", meaning a musical phrase that's
looping over and over again (like in "Satisfaction", "Jumping Jack Flash" etc.). These repeating riffs trigger the mind and make one receptive to
whatever sub-message you want to transfer into the minds of the listener. In
the case of the Rolling Stones we have satanic messages in their lyrics, and
they have repeated that over and over through the years (a more recent
example is the"Bridge To Babylon" album).
Another interesting thing is that The Beatles were knighted by Queen
Elisabeth in the 60's for their "good work". Ringo told the press he'd been
so nervous he had to smoke pot in the bathroom before he met the Queen.
Recently Paul McCartney was knighted again. The question is: is it the same
Forward courtesy of Kanya Vashon McGhee
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.