Chomsky is often hailed as America’s premier dissident intellectual,
a fearless purveyor of truth fighting against media propaganda, murderous
U.S. foreign policy, and the crimes of profit-hungry transnational corporations.
He enjoys a slavish cult-like following from millions leftist
students, journalists, and activists worldwide who fawn over his dense books
as if they were scripture. To them, Chomsky is the supreme deity, a priestly
master whose logic cannot be questioned.
However as one begins to examine the interviews and writings
of Chomsky, a different picture emerges. His books, so vociferously lauded
in leftist circles, appear to be calculated disinformation designed to distract
and confuse honest activists. Since the 1960's, Chomsky has acted as the
premier Left gatekeeper, using his elevated status to cover up the major
crimes of the global elite.
His formula over the years has stayed consistent: blame "America"
and "corporations" while failing to examine the hidden Globalist
overclass which pulls the strings, using the U.S. as an engine of creation
and destruction. Then after pinning all the worlds ills on American imperialism,
Chomsky offers the solution of world government under the United Nations.
In his book "The
Conspirator’s Hierarchy," Dr. John Coleman named Chomsky
as a deep cover CIA agent working to undermine social protest groups. Certainly
Dr. Coleman’s claims appear validated by an honest review of Chomsky’s
role as a Left gatekeeper.
Since 9-11, he has steadfastly refused to discuss the evidence
of government complicity and prior knowledge. Furthermore he claims that
the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Bilderberg Committee, and Trilateral
Commission are "nothing organizations." When critiquing poverty,
he never mentions the Federal Reserve and their role in manipulating the
Similarly, he claims the CIA was never a rogue organization
and is an innocent scapegoat; that JFK was killed by the lone assassin Lee
Harvey Oswald; that the obvious vote fraud in 2004 did not occur; and that
is real and good for humanity.
Chomsky’s role in propaganda paradigm is much like that
of Karl Marx: to present a false liberation ideology which actually supports
the desired solutions of the elite. Marx pointed out the inequalities and
brutality of capitalism and then advocated a one world bank, army, and government
with the abolition of private property and religion; in other words, the
major goals known of the New World Order.
Tens of millions of activists worldwide still remain trapped
by this scam, failing to recognize the inherent autocratic and elitist structures
of Marxism-Leninism or the newer incarnation under Chomsky.
The Globalist elites and their army of social scientists at
Institute understand that people are going to question the inequities
of the current economic system. For example, why is wealth distributed so
unequally between classes and countries? Why are those living in third world
nations allowed to die from preventable diseases and starvation? Why does
the U.S. government sponsor and direct such murderous foreign policy? Why
was America attacked on 9-11?
In other words, why is the world embroiled in such violence?
Who is behind all this suffering? And most importantly, what solutions would
relieve the poverty and destruction plaguing the worldwide population?
Enter Chomsky, the controlled opposition, to play the role
of re-direct agent. He discusses a mere fraction of the real elite manipulation
and then quickly pushes his followers into dead-end solutions and alienating
rhetoric. Chomsky’s hero status is further amplified by Left gatekeeper
publications like Z Magazine, DemocracyNow!
(Amy Goodman),The Progressive, and The Nation.
Is it a coincidence that all of those magazines receive major
funding from Globalist front-groups like the Rockefeller
Foundation, Ford Foundation, Carnegie Endowment, and MacArthur Foundation?
Chomsky may be the head gatekeeper, but he works alongside a network of
fellow Globalist assets like Amy Goodman who do their best to appear radical
while avoiding all the hardcore issues and deliberately leading the Left
The following analysis will show that Chomsky, a deep cover
agent for the New World Order, a master of black propaganda whose true motives
become clear with a sober and honest examination.
Noam Chomsky has acted as the premier Left gatekeeper in the aftermath
of the 9-11 crimes, lashing out at the 9-11 truth movement and claiming
any suggestions of government complicity are fabrications.
The "radical" Chomsky takes a position so deeply rooted in denial
that it makes the staged 9-11 whitewash commission look like an honest study.
He belligerently refuses to discuss any of the massive evidence proving
government foreknowledge and participation in the crimes, claiming it would
destroy the activist movements worldwide:
"If the left spends its time on this, that's the end
of the left, in my opinion: the mainstream would be utterly delighted.
It is highly likely that nothing significant will be found. And if --
which I very greatly doubt -- something is found that would quickly send
everyone in Washington to the death chamber, the left is unlikely to emerge
triumphant." - Chomsky
In other words, Chomsky is telling his followers to ignore
the evidence because according to him, none exists. However even if there
is massive evidence, responsible activists should ignore it because it would
be "the end of the Left." Chomsky’s role as a 9-11 gatekeeper
goes even further as he denies each piece of evidence individually. The
following examples should suffice:
1) As most honest 9-11 researchers know, 7 of the
accused 19 hijackers are alive, proving the official story is a
fabrication. Many of the remaining 12 were trained as U.S. Air Force bases
and CIA-connected Huffman Aviation. Many of the accused "religious
fanatics" acted more like degenerate contract agents, as they flashed
wads of cash, visited strip clubs, drank profusely, blew cocaine, smoked
weed, cavorted with strippers and had strange meetings in the drug-rich
Men like Mohammed Atta fit the MO of an undercover
CIA drug runner: a man trained at U.S. Air Force bases, fluent
in many languages, able to evade INS regulations, working with drug dealers,
and receiving wired bank funds from CIA-linked Pakistani intelligence. There
remains no photographic evidence of these supposed hijackers ever getting
on the planes (walking through airport security does not count). Furthermore,
the autopsy list of Flight 77 which supposedly hit the Pentagon
listed none of the accused hijackers.
Regarding the evidence of government complicity in training
the hijackers, Chomsky wrote the following:
"Nothing empirical is impossible. Thus, it is conceivable
that everyone in the White House is totally insane. And in my opinion,
that's what they would have had to be to try something that would have
been very likely to turn into an utter fiasco, and if by some miracle
had succeeded, would almost certainly have leaked, so that they would
all be facing the death sentence. Possible, but not likely."
2) What about the unprecedented NORAD stand down on 9-11 which
broke standard operation procedure? Over 67 times in 2001, NORAD had dispatched
jets when they deviated from their flight path. In 1999, when golfer Payne
Stewart’s single engine Lear in depressurized, NORAD planes were flying
around the vessel in 20 minutes.
But on 9-11, Ben Sliney, in his first day on the job as hijacking
coordinator for the FAA, delayed calls to NORAD. Meanwhile NORAD ran at
least 7 hijacking drills that morning like Operation Vigilant Guardian where
commercial jets crashed into government buildings in Manhattan, Washington
DC, and Virginia. These "mock" drills, designed to give live on
9-11, helped to distract the honest people within NORAD and the FAA, and
to evade suspicion from patriotic investigators within the CIA, FBI, and
NSA’s Echelon network.
Of the subject of the NORAD stand down, Chomsky wrote the
"Whether NORAD followed SOP, I have no idea, not having
investigated the matter. I think the case is very weak, and diverts people
from the really serious issues."
3) How about the document called "Operation Northwoods"
signed off in 1962 by the Joint Chiefs of Staff
like Generals Lemnitzer and Landsdale? These men, sworn to protect
the Constitution, devised a plan to create false-flag terrorism
in order to engineer a war with Cuba. Their treasonous plans included
-"Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft
could appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the Government
-"Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots,
the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating
Cuban involvement also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible
- "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and
blame Cuba . . . casualty lists in U.S. newspapers cause a helpful wave
This document was discovered in the National Archives and
has been the subject of mainstream articles by ABCNEWS and others. It stands
as clear evidence that the U.S. government has designed plans to engineer
terrorist attacks and blame them on foreign enemies. Yet Noam Chomsky does
not think the Northwoods document matters: Operation Northwoods example
is only one of many reasons for being skeptical about this: it doesn't even
come close, and it was not carried out. Furthermore, there is nothing in
history that even remotely resembles what is being proposed. Of course,
that does not show that the thesis is impossible: nothing could show that,
by definition. And if someone can put together some evidence and refute
the arguments as to why it is extraordinarily unlikely, then the matter
will be worth pursuing.
Chomsky’s role as the chief 9-11 gatekeeper proves he
is distracting his leftist followers from the truth. Instead of facing the
clear facts, he claims that 19 hijackers did it and that al-Qaeda is a real
terrorist enemy. When presented with documented evidence, from living hijacker
patsies to the NORAD stand down, he simply claims it doesn’t exist.
He resorts to emotional "they would never do it" appeals in order
to deny the obvious.
Chomsky is exhibiting far more than logical skepticism, but
instead is actively engaging in disinformation.
9-11 Prior Knowledge:
Chomsky denial of government complicity in the crimes of September
11 is one thing, but he goes further, claiming the government had no prior
knowledge of the attacks. Mind you, this is a position even weaker than
Michael Moore’s tepid Fahrenheit 9-11, which at least tacitly suggested
a degree of prior knowledge.
Chomsky’s position is untenable. For a man who prides
himself on science and logic, his steadfast refusal to acknowledge mainstream
media reports finds him using arguments similar to Holocaust deniers; one
can show them photographs, videos, testimony, and physical evidence but
the burden of proof is impossible. Such is the case with Chomsky who ignores
the many government admissions of prior knowledge widely available even
in the 9-11 whitewash commission report. Here is Noam Chomsky writing on
government prior knowledge:
"That tells us even less. Every intelligence agency
is flooded, daily, with information of very low credibility. In retrospect,
one can sometimes pick out pieces that mean something. At the time, that's
a virtual impossibility. By arguments like this we can prove that someone
blew up the White House yesterday."
If they did not have prior knowledge, why were Cheney and
NORAD running drills that morning where hijacked jets flew into buildings
in New York, Washington DC and Virginia? Also, wouldn’t the NSA’s
Echelon network have picked up the chatter?
Of course, Chomsky does not even admit the Echelon network
exists. This despite the NSA’s openly acknowledged ability to monitor
all phone calls, emails and satellite communication with keyword software
which can identify phrases and immediately begin tracking the communication.
This despite their admitted bases at Fort Meade, with sister sites in the
UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and other unknown locations.
Students of the intelligence world know full well that the
NSA’s Echelon network picked up the chatter for weeks before the attacks.
In fact, the NSA admitted it, saying that on September 10 agents intercepted
calls from hijackers but, *ahem*, did not translate them until after the
attacks. Such admissions are red herrings, clearly designed to excuse massive
prior knowledge at tops levels of the intelligence circles.
What about the Presidential Daily Briefing given to Bush in
late August which discussed the threat of hijacked jets? What about intelligence
groups like Able Danger and FBI agents like Robert Wright who warned of
the flight school trainees? What about FBI agent John O’Neill’s
investigation into Al-Qaeda financing which was quashed by Bush? What about
attorney David Schippers who desperately tried to warn Ashcroft about the
impending attacks? Why was the CIA admittedly tracking the accused hijackers
since 2000? Why was FEMA running drills in Manhattan that morning out of
WTC-7? Why did PNAC documents like "Rebuilding America’s Defenses"
call for helpful Pearl Harbor style attacks?
Those are just a smattering of the mountain of evidence proving
beyond any reasonable doubt that the U.S. government had prior knowledge.
But Chomsky must deny these, because his role is to mislead and distract
while chastising the 9-11 truth movement.
Before and after 9-11, the key role for the Left Gatekeepers
like Chomsky has been denying the existence of the overclass which prints
the money, funds and manages the wars, ships the drugs, controls entire
industries, and creates the scientific propaganda which plagues society.
Instead they critique mid-level minions & front corporations while speaking
in glittering generalities.
In the world of Left gatekeepers, the New World Order does
not exist. There are no elite plan for global government. Instead they paint
the picture of a profit-motivated world in which corporations control the
government. But merely blaming corporations misses the forces which own
their assets, manage their resources, control their board of directors,
and pull their strings.
Chomsky steadfastly denies the role of the Council on Foreign
Relations, Bilderberg Committee, and Trilateral Commission in the creation
and management of the wars and poverty he claims to condemn. When speaking
on such "conspiracies," he said the following:
"It's the same with the Trilateral Commission, the
Council on Foreign Relations, all these other things the people are racing
around searching for conspiracy theories about-they're "nothing"
organizations. Of course they're there, obviously rich people get together
and talk to each other, and play golf with one another, and plan together-that's
not a big surprise. But these conspiracy theories people are putting their
energies into have virtually nothing to do with the way the institutions
actually function". (Understanding Power, 348)
The CFR, funded by Wall Street and the Rockefellers after
WW II, is an organization openly sworn to destroying American national sovereignty
in favor of world government. They have acted as the de-facto "secret
team" in managing U.S. domestic and foreign policy, orchestrating wars
like Vietnam and the first Gulf War.. Almost all executives in the CIA and
State Department have been members of the CFR, whether it was Dean Rusk,
Allen Dulles and Robert McNamara during Vietnam or Richard Armitage and
George Tenet during the crimes of 9-11.
The CFR has been the dominant roundtable group pushing for
a Panamerican Union by 2010 which would dissolve national borders and unite
Mexico, Canada, and America under a single currency, with biometric ID cards
and GPS-tracked vehicles on camera-strewn superhighways. How can Chomsky
seriously claim the CFR is a "nothing organization" when their
role in crafting policy is so clear? Whom is he trying to protect in denying
the treasonous goals of the CFR?
Chomsky’s stonewalling on the Bilderberg raises even
more suspicions. Since 1954 the Bilderberg has served as the central brain
of the New World Order, the major secret gathering for Globalist agents
from across the globe. Bilderberg chairmen like Prince Bernhard and David
Rockefeller have pushed for total global government, eugenics population
control, engineering wars, and controlling the worldwide economy. Top politicians
from America and Europe also undergo a grooming process at the Bilderberg.
Bill Clinton went in 1991 as Rockefeller’s personal guest, and Tony
Blair attended in 1993 before becoming Prime Minister. John Kerry attended
in 2000, and John Edwards did two weeks before becoming the VP nominee in
Major members of the media, such as editors from the Economist,
NY Times, Newsweek, Washington Post, US News and World Report are regular
attendees. Yet they rarely, if ever, mention the proceedings, sworn to secrecy
by their globalist masters.
Nevertheless in recent years, the truth has emerged. Major
media outlets like the BBC admit the Bilderberg is planning for a one-world
currency, bank, and army. Articles in Reuters and the Financial Times of
London have admitted the existence of the Bilderberg, their grooming of
politicians, and their secret plans for world governance. If these mainstream
media reporters can admit the major role of the Bilderberg in shaping world
affairs, why can’t Chomsky? Why is he holding back?
Simlarly, how can Chomsky seriously ignore the role of the
Trilateral Commission, the brainchild of Globalist masters David Rockefeller
and Zbigniew Brzezinski? This is the same Brzezinski who helped direct the
first CIA funds to bin Laden, and in his book Between Two Ages called for
a technotronic society with a microchipped population.
The Trilateral Commission openly admits they are trying to
control the economy through closer European-Japanese-American cooperation.
They operate much like the CFR, counting the worlds top elites, politicians,
corporate executives, and media barons as members. They have been instrumental
in creating the destructive "free trade" agreements that are destroying
America’s economy and national sovereignty in order to usher in world
Journalist Jim Tucker, a Spotlight reporter with impeccable
credentials, also links the Trilateral Commission to the international narcotics
trade, the $500 billion-plus racket from heroin and cocaine alone which
helps fund the Globalist’s house of cards.
What would motivate Chomsky to call the Trilateral Commission
a "nothing organization?" Is it because they echo his goal of
a world government? Or are there darker forces at work?
When balanced against over 50 years of documented evidence,
Chomsky’s claims are exposed as nothing more than spurious lies and
Similarly, while Chomsky bemoans the widespread poverty in America
and the Third World, he has never spoken publicly on the role of the Federal
Reserve. Therefore most Leftist activists are unaware of the role played
by this privately owned bank cartel which prints worthless fiat currency
out of thin air. Since its secret formation at Jekyll Island in 1910, and
subsequent illegal passage during the Wilson administration, the Federal
Reserve has held the American economy hostage: creating inflation and boom
& bust cycles through managed money supply and interest rates.
Furthermore every dollar printed is merely debt charged to
the federal government. Thus while it only costs 10 cents to print a $100
bill, the U.S. government fits the bill for the full $100 to the private
The creation of the Federal Reserve, owned largely by the
Rockefeller, Morgan, and Rothschild interests has eluded the "radical"
Chomsky. Furthermore he does not discuss the proven role of the Fed in creating
recessions and depressions in order to purchase assets at a fraction of
Chomsky ignores the role of the fiat currency system which
drives down wages, inflates prices, and puts the American economy under
the iron claw of a few elite families. Since the dollar is the base currency
for worldwide trade and the current economic house of cards, shouldn’t
these topics be discussed?
Perhaps Chomsky stays mute because a central bank fits into
his ideology. After all, one of the key planks in the Marxist and Fabian
socialist agenda is a managed central bank in order to control the economy.
Or perhaps Chomsky fears discussion of the Fed would expose the real hidden
hand that runs the world economy. For him it is easier to blast the front
corporations and low-level grocery boys.
If he denies even basic government foreknowledge of 9-11, should
it be any surprise that Chomsky avoids criticism of the CIA? When asked
about the links between the CIA and bin Laden, and the CIA’s overt
support of the Taliban, Chomsky wrote the following:
"CIA support for bin Laden (which is not quite accurate)
or the Taliban (also not quite accurate) doesn't seem to me remotely relevant."
How can Chomsky write this with a straight face? He is simply
ignoring the documented evidence of CIA funding for the "freedom fighters"
known as al-Qaeda, totaling over $6 billion. The cozy CIA/al-Qaeda relationship
continued through the Bosnian conflict via training of the drug-peddling
Kosovo Liberation Army.
What about the meetings between Taliban leaders, oil executives,
and Bush administration officials from January to August 2001 to discuss
building an oil and gas pipeline for Unocal? Chomsky also denies the mainstream
reports from UK and French newspapers about two top CIA agents meeting with
bin Laden for over ten days in July 2001 while he received dialysis at the
American Hospital in Dubai.
But Chomsky goes further than that. While claiming to critique
the CIA, he absolves the agency of any responsibility for its actions, from
Nazi origins via Project Paperclip to heinous mind control experiments like
MK ULTRA. This horrific period in CIA history, a true Rosetta stone in understanding
the New World Order, is scientifically ignored by Chomsky, who sees the
CIA as an innocent victim of White House orders:.
"Or take the CIA, which is considered the source of
a lot of these conspiracies; we have a ton of information about it, and
as I read the information, the C.I.A. is basically just an obedient branch
of the White House. I mean sure, the C.I.A. has done things around the
world- but as far as we know, it hasn't done anything on its own."
"There's very little evidence-in fact, I don't know
of any-that the C.I.A. is some kind of rogue elephant, you know, off on
its own doing things. What the record shows is that the C.I.A. is just
an agency of the White House, which sometimes carries out operations for
which the Executive branch wants what's called "plausible deniability";
in other words, if something goes wrong, we don't want it to look like
we did, those guys in the C.I.A. did it, and we can throw some of them
to the wolves if we need to. That's basically the role of the C.I.A.,
along with mostly just a collection of information". (Chomsky, "Understanding
Like all of Chomsky’s claims, this one is based on
emotion, conjecture, and opinion. He does not cite any specifics, knowing
full well that his fawning minions will accept his word as gospel.
Chomsky sees the CIA as a pathetic collection of scapegoat
bureaucrats, acting as grocery boys for their master President. According
to him, the CIA does not carry out secret projects on their own, and if
accused of such, are innocent.
JFK Assassination/CIA role
Therefore is it any surprise the Chomsky endorses the lone assassin
and magic bullet theory in the assassination of JFK? From his emergence
as a guru of the Left in the late 60's, Chomsky has belittled anyone researching
the anomolies stemming from the official story and Warren Commission cover-up.
According to him, any examination is a complete waste of time:
" The Kennedy assassination cult is probably the most
striking case. I mean, you have all these people doing super-scholarly
intensive research, and trying to find out just who talked to whom, and
what's the exact contours were of this supposed high-level conspiracy-it's
all complete nonsense. As soon as you look into the various theories,
they always collapse, there's just nothing there. But in many places,
the left has just fallen apart on the basis of these sheer cults".
(Chomsky, Understanding Power)
Chomsky’s position puts him in the less than 15% of
Americans who believe Oswald was the lone shooter. For such a self-proclaimed
"anarchist" radical, Chomsky’s trust in Warren Commission’s
official story seems akin to a child’s belief in Santa Claus.
The facts of course, tell a different story. While far from
perfect man, Kennedy ran afoul by opposing the very forces that took over
after his death. He began withdrawing 5,000 CIA "advisers" from
Vietnam; fired CIA chiefs Allen Dulles and Richard Bissel; disbanded the
CIA and handed over covert operations to the State Department; ordered the
creation of a silver-backed government currency to break the Federal Reserve
monopoly; turned down the Operation Northwoods plan to engineer false flag
terrorism and blame it on Cuba; and refused to invade Cuba and launch a
full scale nuclear war during the Missile Crisis, a plan favored by hawks
like General Curtis LeMay.
Chomsky ignores the true history of the Kennedy presidency
because it would expose te shadow government takeover after his assassination.
What about Chomsky’s claims that the CIA never acts
as a rogue elephant? Do they hold up?
MK ULTRA/Project Paperclip
Chomsky has never publicly acknowledged the covert CIA mind control
programs known as MK ULTRA and its many offshoots. This program alone shows
how the CIA was indeed a rogue elephant, as they ran illegal campaign of
propaganda, brainwashing, sex slavery, and poisoning of citizens.
In 1946, Globalist bagman Harry Truman began a covert plan
to smuggle top Nazi SS officers, scientists, and propagandists into America.
Those same war criminals quickly became the front line for the postwar U.S.
intelligence machine. Reinhard Gehlen, one of Hitler’s top intelligence
chiefs, led postwar European intelligence for the CIA, becoming the darling
of head honcho Allen Dulles.
Then, using his same crew of Gestapo and SS, aided by the
Vatican, and sponsored by the CIA, Gehlen set up "rat lines" which
smuggled 5,000 of the worst Nazi criminals into South and Central America.
Butchers like Klaus Barbie, Mortin Bormann and Josef Mengele among others
owed their freedom to this program.
Those same men would later aid CIA coups in Angentina, Chile,
Paraguay, Brazil and other countries. After all, they were veteran experts:
early Gehlen projects had included rigging elections in Italy and France.
By 1955, more than 760 German scientists had been became U.S. citizens,
many specializing in black research projects. This growing cabal of Nazi
doctors found a happy marriage with the control freak elitists infesting
the NSA, CIA, and black operations government.
These men birthed the MK ULTRA program, focusing on mass mind
control, via drugs, hypnosis, subliminals, and pulsed electromagnetic waves.
It was this mad science, spawned in the Nazi labs of Dr. Josef Mengele,
that now obsessed men like Sidney Gottlieb, John Lilly, Jose Delgado and
Their most famous project was the creation of Manchurian candidates,
used for political assassinations, drug transportation, espionage, and sabotage.
Yet this was not limited to Sirhan Sirhan.
In fact, both Gottlieb and Cameron helped train thousands
of pre-adolescent children for use in child prostitution, sex slavery, blackmail,
satanic rituals and murder. Known as the Monarch Project, children were
kidnaped from American streets and foreign nations and then programmed with
trauma based mind control.
Other common victims for experimentation included prisoners,
the homeless, and residents of mental institutions, all cherry-picked because
they were defenseless. Details of this horrific and still operational program
are available in rare and highly suppressed texts of Fritz Springmeier,
which usually fetch over $300 a piece.
Why does Chomsky refuse to discuss MK ULTRA and its sister
projects? Why does he claim the CIA was merely a pawn of the White House,
when the record proves that Eisenhower and Kennedy had little, if any knowledge
of MK ULTRA? Simply put: Why is Noam Chomsky covering for the CIA?
Elite Child Sex Rings
The Monarch Project of prostituting children deserves further mention
(although Chomsky would disagree). In 1988 Vice President Bush was caught
having 15 year-old call boy prostitutes visiting the White House late at
night. The credit cards records to prove it were splashed across the front
page of the Washington Times: "Homosexual Prostitution Inquiry Ensnares
VIP's with Reagan, Bush Sr."
Unfortunately the star witness, Craig Spence, was suicided
in his hotel with piano wire before he could testify. Book like "The
Franklin Coverup" by John DeCamp have further proven the links between
the CIA and Army intelligence to the elite sex slavery rings. Cases of like
the "The Finders" in Washington DC, where customs agents discovered
a CIA warehouse full of child porn and satanic torture, stand as yet further
In the forrmer Yugloslavia, CIA front company Dyncorp has
been convicted of operating in the human slave trade and using their C-130's
to ship many of the 200,000 women and children smuggled out every year.
Furthermore, mainstream news outlets have shown evidence of UN Peacekeepers
assisting the sex trade in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Balkans.
Despite the voluminous amount of grotesque evidence, Chomsky
has never discussed the elite sex trade. This is an issue so shocking, so
paradigm-altering, that his Leftist followers would no longer trust their
loving mother government, and that is the last thing Chomsky wants. After
all, if the Leftists knew that top level politicians are actually pedophiles
practicing satanic ritual abuse, they would no longer trust the savior world
government. The absence of Chomsky and the Left on the suffering of these
children speaks volumes about their true moral character and motives.
MK ARTICHOKE/ MK NAOMI
Other MK ULTRA side projects included pushing LSD to the youth culture
and attaching electrodes into prisoners heads, the latter perfected by Dr.
Delgado. Adjunct programs like MK NAOMI and MK ARTICHOKE focused on genetically
engineered viruses, biological agents, and radiation effects on American
citizens. Common experiments included testing biological agents and atomic
weapons radiation on soldiers, the mentally handicapped, people in subways,
and even whole towns; putting cancer viruses into polio vaccines; and exposing
pregnant women to radiation to test the effects on the fetus. These experiments
have been documented as continuing into the 1980's and likely still continue
Chomsky does not discuss these horrendous programs, because
it would awaken his readers to the cruelest fact: that the U.S. government
will murder its own citizens and soldiers, killing hundreds of thousands
of unwitting subjects simply for political gain. After all, if they would
feed radiated breakfast cereal to thousands of retarded children, would
these same parasitic elites not also kill more than 2,800 Americans on September
Of course MK ULTRA lives on today in our drinking water. It was
around the time of its inception, in the 1950's, that the U.S. government
began adding sodium fluoride to tap water in massive quantities.. Should
we be shocked? After all, the first people to use the deadly neurotoxin
were the Nazis, who found it pacified the concentration camp prisoners.
Now thanks to imported Nazi doctors helping our friendly neighborhood CIA,
American citizens could enjoy the same privilege as those in Hitler's camps.
Chomsky has never discusses the effects of sodium fluoride,
nor the lead and arsenic used in water as silent weapons of pacification.
As a scientist, he is apparently uninterested in sodium fluoride's proven
link to cancer, leukemia, osteoporosis, Alzheimer disease, and brain damage.
So should we be surprised that he never writes about the deadly
poison aspartame found in thousands of products? Or genetically modified
foods and growth hormones which destroy immune systems while causing blood
disorders and swelling of the organs? Or cell phones which emit deadly microwave
radiation leading to cancer, vision loss, and (according to published BBC
reports) altering human DNA? Or the GWEN towers which pulse deadly ELF radiation
Rockefeller Pharma Cartel
The Nazi doctors who didn’t end up in American intelligence
found cushy jobs in the pharmaceutical cartel firms like Merck and Eli-Lilly.
Chomsky never discusses the history of these firms; nor the Rockefeller
control over the American Medical Association; nor the link between mercury-tainted
vaccines and brain damage; nor the deadly mind control drugs like SSRI’s
(Prozac, Zoloft, etc.) and amphetamine-based Adderall/Ritalin pills pimped
out to helpless children.
These drugs cause bone degeneration, memory loss, suicidal
tendencies and added depression to the poor kids gobbling them like Flintstone’s
chewables, all at the advice of their pill-pusher death merchant doctors.
Meanwhile Chomsky stays true to form, ignoring these matters and instead
calling for socialized, Federally-controlled healthcare which would further
subsidize the pharma cartel. This is just another example of his bait and
switch tactics, a sloppy mess of disinfo and elite sponsored solutions.
Psychiatry/ New Freedom Initiative
Chomsky and his Left Gatekeepers also ignore the assault from psychiatric
community, largely controlled by the Rockefellers and Tavistock Institute,
who seek to define every neurosis as a mental illness in order to push more
drugs. Bush has signed the New Freedom Initiative to forcibly psychologically
test all K-12 students in public schools, screen them for "mental illnesses,"
and force the children to take the recommended drugs.
This brainwashing agenda was pushed by the pharma cartel,
with GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Merck and others investing millions in
buy-offs and lobbying. But news of this extraordinary Stalinist plan never
graced the pages of Chomsky's editorials, nor Z Magazine, The Nation, the
Progressive, and DemocracyNow. Perhaps this is because the New Freedom Initiative
fits into their goal of government-controlled socialized health care.
The New Freedom Initiative, bolder than Stalin’s wildest
dreams, is just a small part of the eugenics agenda; a dominant Globalist
goal which Chomsky and his Left Gatekeeper bagmen aid and abet. Chomsky
has never written about the sinister American Psychiatric Association, nor
the role of it's former chief, Dr. Ewen Cameron, the aforementioned MK ULTRA
villain and CIA child programmer.
Key aspects of the scientific eugenics movement such as population
control, abortion legalization, poisonous vaccinations, and stem cell research
find their most vocal advocates on the far Left of the managed political
debate. Leftist college majors like sociology advocate programs like parental
licensing by the state, state-controlled child care, and Chinese style childbirth
laws with forced sterilization as a penalty.
Leftists call for more vaccinations in the Third World despite
the admittedly tainted vaccines used by the World Health Organization and
UNICEF. All of this is indicative of an infiltrated movement, a Left deeply
penetrated by Globalist agents driving activists into unwittingly championing
the Brave New World.
Population control by any means necessary is a major, some would
say the major goal of the New World Order, perhaps even paramount to their
goal of a cashless society control grid with microchipped slaves. The chief
architects of population control are Bilderberg elitists like David and
Nelson Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Prince Philip, Ted Turner, Alexander
Haig, and Cyrus Vance. Their Malthusian nightmare requires killing 90% of
the "useless eaters" through war, genetically engineered viruses,
and engineered starvation. Declassified documents like NSM 200 and Global
2000 lay the plans out with cold precision.
Chomsky, the self-proclaimed radical, also advocates such
depopulation methods. In Chomsky’s book "Understanding Power,"
a collection of his talks with activists, a crowd member asks about population
control, to which Chomsky responds:
" If we continue to produce energy by combustion, the
human race isn’t going to survive much longer...Yeah, population
control is another issue where it doesn’t matter if you do it, everybody
has to do it. It’s like traffic: I mean you can’t make driving
a car survivable by driving well yourself; there has to be kind of a social
contract involved, otherwise it won’t work". (61)
Chomsky and other gatekeepers claim to maintain the moral
high ground, but then advocate the eugenics agenda pushed by elite roundtable
groups like the Bilderberg and Club of Rome. How can Chomsky claim to be
an advocate for the Third World while simultaneously pushing for the managed
murder agenda favored by Henry Kissinger?
Another one of the great successes of the Left gatekeeper has been
pushing for unconstitutional gun control agenda through their publications
like The Nation, Z Magazine, The Progressive, and their internet kin at
DemocracyNow! & Indymedia. It is a great achievement of propaganda when
the supposed radicals "opposing Bush" call for a completely disarmed
American populace and inflated budget for BATF thugs in ski masks. Chomsky
mock s those who support the Constitutionally endowed right to bear arms.
In fact, he says it doesn’t exist:
"It’s pretty clear that, taken literally, the
Second Amendment doesn't permit people to have guns. But laws are never
taken literally, including amendments to the Constitution or constitutional
rights. Laws permit what the tenor of the times interprets them as permitting."
(Secrets, Lies, and Democracy)
Then later in the interview, Chomsky is asked if guns are
a proper way to respond to government tyranny. He responds as follows:
"As for guns being the way to respond to this, that's
outlandish. First of all, this is not a weak Third World country. If people
have pistols, the government has tanks. If people get tanks, the government
has atomic weapons. There's no way to deal with these issues by violent
force, even if you think that that's morally legitimate. Guns in the hands
of American citizens are not going to make the country more benign. They're
going to make it more brutal, ruthless and destructive. So while one can
recognize the motivation that lies behind some of the opposition to gun
control, I think it's sadly misguided". (Secrets, Lies and Democracy)
It would be one thing to hear such rhetoric out of the Fabian
socialists in the Democratic party. But to have the supposed "fringe
radicals" saying there is no second amendment and advocating gun seizures
is remarkable. And because of globalist infiltration of the left, this policy
once favored by Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and other mass murderers has found
a comfortable home. Hence it has become common to hear activists protesting
the Iraq quagmire while simultaneously calling for gun control.
Environmental Front Groups
As masters of propaganda, the Globalists have uses their Left Gatekeepers
to push eugenics and population control as necessary for the environment.
This has been accomplished through the phony environmental movement and
Peak Oil fabrications.
The Club of Rome, a globalist front group created in 1968,
immediately began calling for population reduction under the guise of environmentalism.
Other fronts like the World Wildlife Fund, managed by the aforementioned
Prince Philip, vocally push for population control while seizing large swaths
of land for "Mother Earth." Other pet projects such as the Kyoto
Protocol, which would give the UN total control of energy resources, have
Past WWF board members have included Bilderberg founder Prince
Bernhard, Hollinger media gopher and Bilderberg member Conrad Black, Shell
chairman John Loudon, King Juan Carlos of Spain, Prince Henrik of Denmark,
and accused drug dealer Henry Keswick.
Chomsky is one of the many re-direct agents who use the real
environmental pollution problems to push for a fascist takeover by a world
government. Much like the ideas discussed in the Report From Iron Mountain,
he uses the threat of global warming to justify totalitarian control:
"Suppose it was discovered tomorrow that the greenhouse
effects has been way understimated, and that the catastrophic effects
are actually going to set in 10 years from now, and not 100 years from
now or something. Well, given the state of the popular movements we have
today, we’d probably have a fascist takeover-with everybody agreeing
to it, because that would be the only method for survival that anyone
could think of. I’d even agree to it, because there’s just
no other alternatives right now." (Understanding Power, 388)
Here is Noam Chomsky, openly advocating a fascist takeover
because the ends justify the means. This is classic problem-reaction-solution
programming, as he points to the real threat of pollution and then offers
the solution of tyranny
As previously stated, the environmental movement was funded and
amplified by Globalist oil, banking, and drug cartels, with specific help
from the Rockefeller Foundation. The WWF, along with other phony NGO’s
like the Sierra Club and Greenpeace consistently call for population reduction.
Additionally these groups push the flat earth thesis of "Peak Oil,"
predicting that oil supplies will soon run out and of course...require massive
worldwide population reductions.
Chomsky posted an entry called "Peak Oil" on his
blog in June, 2004, writing the following: "The basic theory is incontrovertible.
The only questions have to do with timing and cost."
Then in a radio interview with Steve Scherr, Chomsky said
the following of Peak Oil:
" There's another side to this, there's a sense in
which it's advantageous if the oil peak is earlier. The reason why is
it will compel the world, primarily the U.S. here, to move toward something
like sustainable energy. If there's unbounded amounts of hydrocarbons,
we're just going to destroy the environment for human life or most biological
life, so the earlier the peak is, in some respects - yes, it could be
catastrophic, it could also be beneficial."
The "beneficial" aspects Chomsky discusses are
likely the resulting population control and starvation that would ensue
from such a shortage.
But in reality oil is abiotic and constantly regenerating.
This, while huge wells go untapped in Russia, Equatorial Guinea, Nigeria,
Sudan, Cuba, Indonesia, Iraq, Alaska, Venezuela, Bolivia, Norway, and the
Gulf of Mexico. Additionally, refinery capacity has been deliberately shut
down by the oil oligopoly in order to create artificial supply shortages.
Market prices are controlled by the Anglo-American cartel and they intend
to use this as a vehicle for engineered crises. At this years Bilderberg
meeting Henry Kissinger reportedly predicted $100 a barrel oil within a
year. The only possible result is a complete worldwide depression.
It is within the "radical" Left that horror stories
of diminishing oil find their home. Even within the 9-11 truth movement,
authors like Mike Ruppert and Nafeez Ahmed have attempted to attach Peak
Oil as the reason for government engineering of 9-11 and the wars in the
Middle East. By polluting the activist movements with Peak Oil lies, the
Globalists have created an army of strong advocates for $5 a gallon gasoline.
Project for the New American Century (PNAC)
Another triumph of Chomsky’s disinfo campaign has been the
active denial of the The Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a
neocon group that published radical statements calling for world war, population
control, and a worldwide police state back in 2000. The signatures on the
documents included Dick Cheney and cabinet members like Paul Wolfowitz,
Richard Armitage, Dov Zakheim, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle, and Eliot
It was Zakheim who previously ran Systems Planning Inc., which
made remote-control software for commercial airliners. Also as comptroller
of the Pentagon, he lost over $3 trillion of taxpayer money without explanation.
Yet his corruption was not singular; after Bush took his figurehead position
in the stolen election of 2000, all of the PNAC radicals became the architects
of 9-11 and purveyors of pre-war lies about Iraq.
Their infamous "Rebuilding America’s Defenses"
document, produced in 2000 before 9-11, reads like prophecy, calling for
theater wars against Iraq, Iran, and North Korea. They also admitted that
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary
change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing
event – like a new Pearl Harbor." September 11, anyone?
They also openly called for killer viruses to wipe out large
sectors of the human population. The document states: "[A]dvanced forms
of biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform
biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool."
How can Chomsky and his kin ignore the statements of the PNAC
cabal, whose mad plans for world domination read like the lost chapters
of Mein Kampf?
If the Left Gatekeepers won’t discuss these published
documents, how can we expect them to research the true history of AIDS and
the potential emerging avian flu? Should we be surprised when they fail
to mention the 60 plus dead microbiologists after 9-11, many of them leading
researchers in emerging viruses? Should we look to Chomsky to find an expose
of the heavy metals and biological agents in chemtrails?
Many authors of the PNAC documents were radical Zionists linked
to the Likud party in Israel, who presented similar plans to Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996 ("Policy for a Clean Break").
Chomsky, the supposed critic of Israel, has been praised by
followers for his books like "The Fateful Triangle" which detail
many Israeli war crimes. Furthermore he often criticizes the Isreali-linked
network dominating U.S. foreign policy. But as always, Chomsky again avoids
the hardcore issues, instead speaking in glittering generalities.
For example, he remains mute on the "Office of Special
Plans," the ad-hoc nerve center of pre-war Iraq propaganda, run of
Cheney’s office. It was here that Zionist moles like Paul Wolfowitz,
Larry Franklin, Douglas Feith, Stephen Cambone, and Richard Perle cooked
up phony WMD threats, links 9-11, and collaboration between secular Iraq
Those same gophers, many of them assets of the Israeli Likud
party and intelligence syndicate Mossad, operated a two-way spy network;
just as manufactured propaganda flowed from Mossad to the OSP moles, U.S.
secrets on Iran secretly floated into Sharon’s war cabinet.
In the middle of all the traitorous espionage was the mafia
don of all lobbying cartels, the Israeli-controlled AIPAC. Top level AIPAC
officers like Steve Rosen often acted as a go–between, then using
that same fake intelligence to strong-arm the Congress where they control
All parties mentioned, from Rosen to Franklin, are now under
investigation from the FBI and Justice Department for the aforementioned
crimes. Major articles in the Washington Post now admit Franklin, working
with Feith and Cambone, was passing secrets to Israel through AIPAC. Chomsky
has never spoken publically about any of these topics, and certainly not
the Mossad involvement in false-flag terror events like the USS Liberty
and connections to 9-11.
When he isn’t busy covering up the facts surrounding 9-11
or the crimes of the CIA, Chomsky spends time actively denying the vote
fraud of 2004, which ushered in another term for the neocon dictatorship.
Chomsky often brags that he does not vote in presidential elections, noting
that both sides are owned by corporations. But he has openly denied the
role of electronic voting fraud in 2000 and the more prominent example of
2004. In 2004, exit polls in Ohio and Florida showed John Kerry winning
by a comfortable margin, but mysteriously numbers showed a Bush victory.
The room for vote fraud was immense. The Secretary of State
in Ohio, Ken Blackwell, managed Bush’s campaign in the state, much
like Katherine Harris did in Florida during 2000. Diebold, the company which
makes most of the electronic voting machines, is crawling with former CIA
and NSA members and used convicted felons to design their software. The
Diebold CEO Walden O’Dell is a Bush Pioneer and wrote in a GOP fundraising
letter that he was "committed to delivering electoral votes to the
The Diebold code is private and has been exposed as being
easily hacked by Bev Harris at BlackBoxVoting.org. In North Carolina and
Georgia, machines were throwing out 5,000 block votes for Bush without explanation.
But none of this seems to interest Chomsky, who finds the accusations of
vote fraud to be without merit:
" I don't find the evidence compelling. An inaccurate
count in itself is a random effect. As for collusion, yes, there are concerns,
but concerns are not evidence. The problem that concerns you may or may
not be real, but in my view, even if we take the worst case scenario,
it is still marginal -- just as the Florida chads were marginal in the
2000 elections. I know of no reason to suppose that electronic voting
will have more than a random effect."
Chomsky and the gatekeepers cannot discuss the fraud of electronic
voting because it would awaken too many people to the total bankruptcy of
the system. It is important that college activists at Berkeley think their
vote for Ralph Nader counted. If they knew the entire game was rigged like
a Don King boxing match, too many illusions would break down.
Chomsky plays the left gatekeeper role perfectly, presenting a false
dialectic of the evil American imperialist as the antagonist aggressor,
contrasted by the savior UN world government as the benevolent deux ex machina.
This false propaganda model, pitting the imperialist U.S.
against the godly UN fits the classic MO of "poisoning the well."
Essentially, Chomsky acts as a re-direct agent: he acknowledges many crimes
of American foreign policy and then offers world government and international
law as the solution.
The Globalists have long been masters of such a paradigm.
In the early part of the 20th century, the same Wall Street bankers crafted
the doctrines of Communism. While posing as a workers’ liberation
theology, it pushed for a central bank, world army, world court, world government,
and the abolition of religion, private property, and the nation state.
Like other "anarchist" agent provacatuers such as
John Zerzan (who helped train violent mobs to ruin the Seattle WTO protests
in 1999), Chomsky has called for the elimination of private property. He
argues, "that some form of council communism is the natural form of
revolutionary socialism in an industrial society."
In fact, Chomsky goes further, pushing for the elimination
of the nation-state and national sovereignty to be replaced by a one world
"Well in my view what would be ultimately necessary
would be a breakdown of the nation-state system- because I think that’s
not a viable system. It’s not necessarily the natural form of human
Chomsky, echoing rhetoric from the phony Marxist doctrines,
is essentially endorsing the major goal of the world elite: the breakdown
of national sovereignty in favor of a one-world government.
Noam Chomsky is a shameless world government pimp, and has
heaped lavish praise on men like Bertrand Russell who helped designed the
New World Order. Lucky for him, Chomsky has been publicly rewarded for his
faithful service to the UN cause. In Febraury 2004 he received the Award
of Excellence at the UN Correspondents Association Club in New York. Previous
winners included Globalist assets like Mikhail Gorbachev.
Since Chomsky is an avowed global government cheerleader, is it
any surprise he supports some of the worst UN programs? U.N.E.S.C.O, the
nightmare UN vehicle posing as an "aid" organization, finds a
strong advocate with Chomsky.
Long a pet project of the Malthusian-obsessed Rockefeller
clan, U.N.E.S.C.O projects include filtering pro-UN propaganda into American
schools and with the goal of eventually merging the curriculum with Mexico
and Canada in the proposed Panamerican Union; and seizing control of huge
swaths of American federal lands through "UN World Heritage" sites.
The first U.N.E.S.C.O chief Julian Huxley said during his tenure in 1948:
"The general philosophy of UNESCO should be a scientific
world humanism, global in extent... It can stress… the transfer of
full sovereignty from separate nations to a world political organization…
Political unification in some sort of world government will be required…to
help the emergence of a single world culture."
But Noam Chomsky, ever the advocate of the UN, endorses the
goals of U.N.E.S.C.O wholeheartedly and lambastes the evil conservatives
who question its motives:
"U.N.E.S.C.O-because it’s working for the Third
World-we practically put them out of business. The United States launched
a huge propaganda campaign against U.N.E.S.C.O. in the 1970's and Eighties-
it was full of outrageous lies, totally fabricated, but nevertheless it
sufficed to eliminate the Third World orientation of U.N.E.S.C.O. and
make it stop doing things it was doing around the Third World, like improving
literacy and health care and so on". (86)
Many credit Chomsky’s "Manufacturing Consent" with
being the premier study of government propaganda. In Leftist circles it
is hailed as a Bible, a rite of passage for any true activist to understand
the system. But again, Chomsky’s work, while appearing radical, is
actually gatekeeper disinfo.
Chomsky spends the entire book attempting to prove that newspapers
diminish American war crimes while exaggerating those of foreign governments.
Such a point is easy to prove, and he does so in his own droll and methodical
Yet he stops there. Chomsky does not discuss the real elephant
in the room: direct CIA collaboration with media outlets and journalists
beginning in the 1950's under Operation Mockingbird.
Chomsky avoids writing about Mockingbird, the CIA program
which covertly put major publishing, newspaper, and media outlets, as well
as thousands of individual reporters under direct agency control. Agents
included Ben Bradlee at Newsweek, Henry Luce of Time and Life, and Arthur
Sulzberger of The New York Times, Alfred Friendly of the Washington Post,
and Joseph Harrison Christian Science Monitor.
Shouldn’t this a significant development for a historian
authoring an honest study of propaganda? After all who is to say that this
program doesn’t still continue? The Bush administration has admitted
spending hundreds of millions on fake newscasts and paying individual reporters
like Armstrong Williams to push talking points in newspapers. What about
the times they haven’t been caught? Exactly how many mainstream commentary
and news outlets work with the CIA and White House?
Perhaps this is the reason why the scripts of the nightly
news on ABC, CBS, and NBC are almost exactly the same, while Newsweek, Time,
and the New York Times push the elitist agenda on cue (as seen most prominently
in the run up to the war in Iraq).
Furthermore Chomsky does not discuss collaboration between
the Bilderberg Committee and the major media outlets. Shouldn’t this
concern the so-called radical anarchist, when media editors attend secret
meetings calling for eugenics, world government, and a cashless society
Owners, editors and writers from Time, Newsweek, Economist,
Washington Post, New York Times, CBS, NBC, ABC and every news outlet in
between have attended the world government meetings.
Furthermore, what about the influence of the CFR, which openly
calls for a Panamerican Union and the end of American national sovereignty?
The CFR counts amongst its members major editors, owners, and journalists
in media outlets from PBS to CBS, CNN to News Corp., New Republic to U.S.
News and World Report.
Aren’t these the reasons that journalists push the propaganda
Chomsky identifies? In "Manufacturing Consent," Chomsky takes
limited aim at an easy target. But he fails to dig deeper and examine the
actual reasons why the propaganda permeates the mainstream media opinion.
Clearly the influence of the CIA, CFR, Bilderberg Committee, and White House
have turned major media outlets into little more than docile commissars.
Furthermore, the interlocking interests of media owners with the military
industrial complex have served to sway content even further.
Chomsky’s "classic" study is little more than
a limited hangout project. He is merely shooting the messengers, blaming
journalistic "bias" while failing to follow the trail of money,
power, corruption, and black propaganda. Instead, he identifies some passive
propaganda and is hailed as a brilliant analyst and purveyor of truth by
the Leftist minions. But his true achievement is ignoring the reasons behind
the lies, as he executes a masterful bait and switch tactic. Is it a coincidence
that Chomsky’s co-author for "Manufacturing Consent," Edward
Herman, has also denied any government complicity in 9-11?
While claiming to expose propaganda, Chomsky has perfected
Chomsky and his gatekeeper contemporaries are perfect devises for the Globalists
because they help define the limits of the false left-right paradigm. Much
like David Horowitz, a former Leftist, currently does for the radical Right.
Is it a surprise that he edited a book called "The Anti-Chomsky Reader?"
It should only be natural since they both serve the same role of gatekeeper.
Puppets like Horowitz, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity, Michele
Malkin, William Kristol, William F. Buckley and their kin serve as Right
Gatekeepers. They criticize the failures of liberals and Democrats and then
call for Bush worshipping, illegal wars, fascist government, and giving
up all of our Constitutional rights for "security." In doing so
they pollute the conservative movement and help marginalize true conservatives
voices like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and groups like Gun Owners of America.
Chomsky and his gatekeepers do the same thing. They write
about the crimes of American imperialism and then call for population control,
gun control, global government under the UN, and a totally socialized Brave
New World society.
The Left gatekeepers must manage the delicate tight rope act
of appearing radical while in actuality calling for worldwide enslavement
and murder. In all likelihood they get a little help from the propaganda
scientists at the venerable Tavistock institute in London and adjuncts of
the CIA’s Mockingbird program; clearly the Left’s denial of
9-11 truths has been too coordinated too have simply been a freak occurrence.
In the mainstream it is the same with the staged battles between
pawns like Democratic operative Al Franken and Republican Ann Coulter.
All of this is designed to create a tight spectrum, a masterfully
crafted false paradigm to enslave the mind and give the people false choices.
Thus at either extreme of the spectrum and all points in between, from Chomsky
to Horowitz, one finds they are endorsing total enslavement and global government.
This is the genius of the New World Order, their complete castration of
free political will through carefully managed propaganda agents. The rest
of the media jackals serve as willing accomplices, mere useful idiots and
power hungry sycophants with massive egos and more concern for their career
than the truth.
Noam Chomsky and his Left Gatekeeper associates must be actively
exposed for their role in the propaganda system. For nearly 40 years since
they infiltrated the activist movement, these Left gatekeepers have made
the activist movements impotent, territorial, confused, and ineffective.
Thus instead of understanding their enslavement, many activists end up calling
for tighter chains by echoing Chomsky’s calls for gun control, population
control, and a world government under the UN. They end up critiquing the
Iraq disaster without seeing government involvement in 9-11 and the CIA/MI-6/Mossad
creation known as Al-Qaeda.
Noam Chomsky and his clique of re-direct agents mercilessly
push real activists into dead-end solutions. Until they are vocally exposed,
the Left will continue to remain a managed asset of the New World Order.
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.