----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 3:44 PM
Subject: Educate Yourself website
Dear Mr. Adachi,
Your website is really opening me and my family's eyes to the terrors of
this world. If it's not too time consuming for you, I would like to know
a couple things. On the Project Bluebeam page, the author mentions somewhere
toward the end "But to implement the worldwide electronic money system,
everyone in the world who might have money in the future, will have to have
a way to transfer money electronically. Before that time, everyone will
have spent, before the year 2,000, all of their cash, reserves and assets.
Everyone has to be 100% dependent upon the Council for their existence."
The part that sounds fishy to me is "before the year 2000". Because,
obviously, 2000 was 5 years ago. Was this merely the author's educated guess
or is it much along the lines of false prophecy, or evidence that what the
author reports isn't all true? This statement made me a little weary about
the truths of this topic. I also would like to comment on how this article
really makes sense of the UFO sightings.
I would also like to know your standpoint and your views about all the articles
If it's not too bold for me to ask, are you yourself a Bible
believing Christian? How did you first begin to realize all these truths?
If you prefer not to answer these, of course I understand. I thought I'd
take a shot and ask anyway. Once again I thank you for all your hard work.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Adachi
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: Educate Yourself website
Beam Beam article was published in 1995. Both Canadian authors who worked
on the article were covertly murdered within weeks of each other.
The author was working with the best information he had at
the time. Originally, the NWO had planned to go for broke in the year 2000,
but political realities have interfered and their time table has been delayed-significantly
so. The cashless society is coming-have no doubt about it. Everything is
in place. There will be a series of events that will occur in rapid order
and then the government. will say that currency can no longer be used and
give you so much time to convert your cash into plastic credit. The smart
cards will replace cash. It's not really intelligent to dismiss an entire
body of information because one segment of that information does not fit
your present view or preconditioned expectations.
If you read enough of my web site, you will get a good idea
of my views on spirituality.
Since you phrased your question with qualifiers, "Bible
believing" Christian, that tells me that you have linked Bible 'believing'
and Christianity together. I understand that such a view is a basic tenet
of Christian fundamentalism, but I don't agree with that notion. If fact,
that idea is promoted to keep fundamentalist Christians locked down in a
certain belief structure that enables the British Israel propaganda to be
accepted (by fundamentalists) as pre-ordained by "God" as "The
Word of God", etc.
I won't take the time to get into a big discussion about the
Bible, but I will remind you of a few things:
1. There are more than 600 versions of "the" Bible.
When you have more than 600 DIFFERENT edited interpretations of what is
contained within "the" Bible, you are not dealing with a single
'authoritative' source of reference. You are dealing with over 600 DIFFERENT
sources of reference, NONE of which can lay claim to infallibility.
2. The Bible is a COMPILATION of ancient and not so ancient
writings. We call them "sacred" scriptures and all that, but nevertheless,
we are dealing with a compilation of ancient books, tracts, epistles, diaries,
journals, 'epics' (The
Sumerian Epic of Ziusudra and the Story of Noah (Sumerian "Ziusudra")
are one and the same), etc. High officials of the early Catholic Church
had decided at various synods and councils , centuries after Christ had
left the earth, to
eliminate certain books or writings from the Bible which did not concur
with the official church dogma on topics such as reincarnation, for
example (they eliminated the entire Book
of Jubilees). Here you have men, with a vested interest in corralling
spiritual thought into certain corridors of rigid belief, that are deciding
WHICH words and ideas 'written by God' would be seen by the flock and which
would not be seen. Does that sound to you like something that "God"
would approve of?
3. The Bible is NOT the written 'Word of God' . It is the
written 'Word of Men'. Every single word attributed to the "Holy Bible"
was written by a mortal, flesh and blood human being. Furthermore, the 600+
versions of "the" Bible were also EDITED by mortal, flesh and
blood human beings. Their ranks did not even include a single, Cherub Angel
pushing the pen for them-let alone God Himself.
It's one thing to lay CLAIM to the notion that the human writers
of the words in the Bible were INSPIRED by God, but to say that God Himself
authored every single word in the Bible is foolishness and a contemptible
falsity that is repeated over and over again by the TV evangelical brain
washers and from fundamentalist pulpits around the country. Once you buy
into that setup, then you're ripe for the picking, because I can then twist
the words from the Bible to say ANYTHING I want it to say and then tell
you that it's "God's Will", it's "God's prophesy", it's
"Holy Scripture", it's "God's annointed words", it's
"pre-ordained", etc., etc.
4. The TRUE purpose, the righteous purpose of the Bible is
to INSPIRE spiritually advanced thought in its reader. We are born here
on earth to LEARN spiritual lessons in a UPWARD spiritual progression back
towards a reunification with God. Stories and words which get us to contemplate
the desirability of employing love and forgiveness, for example, where we
once held hatred and revenge is the CORRECT application and usage of the
To use the Bible as an 'authoritative' source to incite judgment
against others or justify hurting others or denying others the same fruits
of life which we all wish to enjoy is BLASPHEMY in its worst manifestation.
Such abuse and misuse of the Bible is a DENIAL of God's unlimited love for
all in His creation and an utter denial of the spiritual truths taught by
Jesus Christ. There is NOTHING 'Christian' about those evengelical deceptionists
who promote the British Israel scheme masquerading as the 'End Times', 'Armageddon',
'Great Tribulation', 'Rapture', etc. .
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005
Subject: Educate Yourself . org
Dear Mr. Adachi,
I have read a good portion of your website and most recently
the "Bible-believing Christian" response you have posted. I am
the younger sister of Marlena, the person who sent you that e-mail, and
have one more question regarding your standpoints, and a request. I understand
your personal views on the Bible, but the question that is still lingering
in my mind (which I also feel was the original question of that email) is
if you are a born-again Christian. And whether you are or are not, I also
wonder if you personally believe whether the prophicies of the Book of Revelation
(i.e. the rapture, the antichrist, etc.) are true or not.
Please understand that I am NOT trying to pick a fight. Much
of what I am trying to say naturally will sound argumentative when written
out in letter form.
Thank you very much for your time and efforts!
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Adachi
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005
Subject: Re: Educate Yourself . org
I know you're not looking for a fight, so don't take my response
to your question as a rebuke. It's a sharing of information to, hopefully,
open your eyes to new vistas of insight and realization. I wouldn't bother
to answer you if I was only interested in one-upsmanship or debate.
You're asking the wrong question when you ask me if I'm a
born-again Christian. A "yes" or "no" answer to your
question leads one into a fixed path of structured thought, an inculcated,
contrived, and calculated mind set (perhaps 'mind wash' is more
accurate) that automatically leads one into certain conclusions
and judgments-which is exactly what it was intended to do- about
the person to whom the question is posed.
Well, I'm not going down that road.
It seems like such a simple question, doesn't it? "What's
the Big Deal?" you might say. You're just looking for a simple 'yes'
or 'no' to a question that "is still lingering" in you mind- right?
OK. For starters, your lingering question is based on pure
curiosity of a personal matter that you really have no right to inquire
about or a justified reason for asking in the first place. You're curious,
but in a prying sort of way. I'm not going to throw rocks at you for a relatively
small impropriety, but you should recognize, at least, that you're
asking an inappropriate question.
However, my reason for not answering you directly goes beyond
It's damaging to you, whether you accept that or
not, to pose such questions to people. It's damaging to your soul's development;
to the spiritual development of your heart; and to your capacity to understand,
love, and forgive. It's damaging to your relationship with Jesus and with
Because the pre-programmed response (mind set) which
you already have there sitting inside your mind and heart is ready
to spring forward the moment you hear the word "yes" or "no"
in response to your question.
If it's "yes", then you'll generally heave a sigh
of relief and tell yourself that someone like me could likely be led back
to the Righteous Fold, as it were, given enough time and quoted enough verses
from the Bible-from a reasonably skilled verse "quoter"; say Jack
Van Impe, for example. If the answer is "no", then that's a horse
of an entirely different color.
If the answer is "no", then you're dealing with
a 'unsaved' person; a person who has not 'accepted' salvation through the
Blood of Christ, and we both know that the only route to eternal salvation
is through a personal commitment and relationship with Jesus Christ.
Isn't that so Mariana? Isn't that exactly what you
believe to be the truth of the matter?
How do I know that?
I know that because you've been on the receiving end of Christian
fundamentalist indoctrination. You wouldn't have asked the questions
you did, if you hadn't been exposed to that indoctrination. Of course, you
never thought of it as indoctrination. You were just sitting there listening
to Pastor so and so on TV or in church, bringing you the "Good News"
and the "Word of God" straight from the Bible (and the Pastor)
into your heart and mind for more than a few years I'm guessing. You listened
in the interest of bettering yourself and having a closer relationship with
Jesus. I understand that and I don't fault you for that.
You listened for the best of reasons and you were there to
help save yourself, your family, and to go beyond that-to help save others
in the world who were yearning for the same peace and comfort that you found
in the company of like-minded Christian brothers and sisters. I got all
I know your intentions were good and they were sincere, but
you've been led into a blind canyon by all those fundamentalist
preaching sessions; listening to and absorbing the words of those
preachers, who pretty much led you to the same place-a blind canyon-
the mind set I mentioned earlier.
A blind canyon only has one way out, and
so does the Christian fundamentalist mind set. You're either in or you're
out when it comes to Christian fundamentalism. You're either aboard the
Glory Train or you're not. You're either a Born-Again follower of Jesus,
who's on his way to Glory & Salvation-in the very near future- or you're
not. There's no in-between.
But if you're not aboard the Glory Train, then you
must be one of them-a non-Christian: a Moslem; a Buddhist; a Taoist,
a Hindu, etc or perhaps you're among one of the 'unsaved' wings of Christianity
like Catholics or Russian Orthodox, or Greek Orthodox Christians, for instance.
Is that a fairly accurate assessment of what you believe Mariana?
Are you beginning to see where I'm going with this?
Adhering to the fundamentalist party line fundamentally
requires its adherents to be judgmental of others. Judgementalism,
by its very nature, leads one to condemnation of others
for not agreeing with the core precepts of the fundamentalist believers
(in our case, born-again Christians, but it could just as equally apply
to Islamic fundamentalists or Zionist
fundamentalists for that matter).
And now we're getting to the crux of the matter.
Condemnation of others eventually leads to conflict
and strife. Conflict eventually leads to war,
and war leads to unspeakable devastation and the death of millions of people,
most of whom are completely innocent and uninvolved as combatants.
Is this what 'Christianity" should be all about? Judgementalism
Did you hear on the news recently that Pat Robertson said
that a Special Forces assassin squad should kill the President of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez,
because it would be "cheaper" than running a war to "take
back" Venezuela from this "dictator"?
How insane do these "Christian" fundamentalist, British
Israel front men for the New World Order have to get before their trusting
and mesmerized followers wake up to the fallacy of their words and the evil
of their intentions?
P. S. The questions on The
Times, etc are already answered on my web site in a number of places.
Use the search engine and put in the keywords to find those articles.
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.