To post this article on Facebook, link to the TinyUrl seen below. Facebook will remove any article identified as coming from educate-yourself.org http://tinyurl.com/ycekuya8
The chart seen below is a consecutive daily background radiation readings chart running from March 1, 2011 to September 20, 2013 showing the minimum, maximum and averaged radiation readings in Tokyo, Japan taken from the aggregate readings of EIGHT different radiation detection stations, overseen by the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health, dispersed around Tokyo. See the graph of Tokyo prefecture below with the names of the eight monitoring stations in English. Anyone can access this chart by going to
You will notice from the chart below that the average daily reading recorded in Tokyo has been hovering around 0.035 micrograys per hour from July 25, 2013 until September 20, 2013, the last date shown on this chart. Now go to the bottom of the chart and notice the background radiation readings in Tokyo from March 1, 2011 until March 11, 2011, eleven days BEFORE the 3/11 attack on Japan, and you will see that the average background reading was hovering close to 0.035 micrograys per hour.
"Tokyo is 124 miles from the Daiichi Nuclear Power station in Fukushima prefecture, while Los Angeles is 5,541 miles from Tokyo. If "tons" (1) of plutonium had been spewed into the air from the Daiichi power station, as some Japan radiation hysteria promoters (E.g. Steven Jones at globalresearch.com.ca, see Footnote 1 at bottom of page) have wildly claimed, then you would have seen a HUGE and unprecedented uptick in Tokyo readings BEFORE such radiation could ever traverse the entire Pacific Ocean and show up on the west coast of America."
The unrelenting torrent of outright fabrications, exaggeration, and hyperbole undertaken by Fukushima radiation hysteria promoters at EneNews (http://enenews.com/), rense.com, etc., , and on every Leftist media outlet across America to pump up the unfounded assertion that Japan and the entire world is now engulfed in the death fog of a Fukushima radiation "catastrophe" that radiation propagandists are now is claiming to exceed (no less!) the radiation contamination caused by the April 26, 1986 Chernobyl disaster is an absurdity on steroids.
I've emphasized in bold type in the chart shown below, the dates of 1) Japan's artificially-created "tsunami" on March 11, 2011, 2) the very first date of an up tick in Tokyo background radiation readings over 0.1 micro grays which occurred on March 15, 2011, and 3) the ten days of elevated Tokyo readings over 0.1 micro grays which occurred from March 22, 2011 through March 31, 2011. These are the ONLY 11 days of slightly elevated Tokyo background radiation readings that have occurred in Tokyo since the 3/11 attack on Japan took place. From a health damaging perspective, background radiation readings of 0.1 micro grays to 0.2 micro grays are insignificant and meaningless; presenting no danger whatsoever. Therefore, the assertion found on many web sites reverberating the Fukushima radiation hysteria party line, that hundreds (and even thousands) of children in Tokyo and Fukushima prefectures have come down with thyroid cancers due to Fukushima is a bogus fabrication based on ZERO evidence. If you click the link below and eheck out this radiation chart, you will see that it contains the daily readings in Tokyo for EVERY SINGLE DAY starting on March 1, 2011 up to the current date on which you viewed the chart. Look at the readings day by day, week by week, month by month, and year by year, going back to March 1, 2011 and you will see the only dates of readings above 0.1 micro grays are the eleven days in March 2011 that I explained above.
Remember, Tokyo is 124 miles from the source of the Fukushima radiation nuclear power station at Daiichi, while the west coast of the United States in 5,500 miles away from the source of the Fukushima raditrion. Do you still believe that Fukushima has - or is - presenting a radiation danger to anybody, anywhere in the world?
All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.